1. INTESTATE DEVOLUTION WITH SURVIVING SPOUSE(S), DESCENDANTS, IN COMMUNITY OF PROPERTY MATRIMONIAL REGIME, AND CHILD'S SHARE CALCULATIONS

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:19 PM on 9/22/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

10 Terms

1
New cards

Map of Problem-Solving Steps for Succession Law, Intestate Devolution with Surviving Spouse and Descendants (ICOP)



  • Factual Trigger: 

  • Step 1: Identification of the Legal Issue

  • Step 2: Scope, Applicable Law, and Factual Context

  • Step 3: Matrimonial Property Regime Adjustment (In Community of Property)

  • Step 4: Statutory Framework of Section 1(1)(c)

  • Step 5: The Child's Share Calculation Formula under Section 1(4)(f)

  • Step 6: Constitutional Protection of Spousal Shares (Bhe v Magistrate, Khayelitsha 2005)

  • Step 7: Extension to Polygynous Marriages (Hassam v Jacobs 2009)

  • Step 8: Step-by-Step Mathematical Calculation and Final Estate Distribution


2
New cards

Factual Trigger for Intestate Devolution with Surviving Spouse and Descendants (ICOP) Question



A deceased spouse who was married in community of property passes away without leaving a valid will, leaving behind a surviving spouse and multiple living children, requiring a calculation of the net estate and child's share.



3
New cards

Step 1: Identification of the Legal Issue



The legal issue here is whether a surviving spouse married in community of property is entitled to both their matrimonial half-share and a statutory child's share from the deceased spouse's estate, and how the net estate is distributed among the spouse and descendants under Section 1(1)(c) of the Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987.


4
New cards

Step 2: Scope, Applicable Law, and Factual Context



As such, This matter concerns/ requires the application of matrimonial property law adjustments alongside the statutory rules of intestate succession because a deceased spouse who was married in community of property died without leaving a valid will, leaving behind a surviving spouse and three living children.


5
New cards

Step 3: Matrimonial Property Regime Adjustment (In Community of Property)



Where a deceased was married in community of property, marriage creates a single joint estate owned in equal half-shares by both spouses. Upon death, the joint estate dissolves ex lege.

One half (50%) belongs automatically to the surviving spouse under matrimonial property law. Only the remaining 50% forms the deceased's net intestate estate.


6
New cards

Step 4: Statutory Framework of Section 1(1)(c)

Under Section 1(1)(c) of the Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987, where a deceased is survived by a spouse and descendants, the surviving spouse inherits either a child's share or a statutorily guaranteed minimum threshold (R250,000), whichever is greater.



7
New cards

Step 5: The Child's Share Calculation Formula under Section 1(4)(f)



Under Section 1(4)(f) of the Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987, a child's share is calculated by dividing the value of the net intestate estate by the total number of surviving children, plus predeceased children who left living descendants, plus the number of surviving spouses.

If this amount is less than R250,000, the spouse receives R250,000, and descendants divide the remaining residue equally per stirpes.


8
New cards

Step 6: Constitutional Protection of Spousal Shares (Bhe v Magistrate, Khayelitsha 2005)



In Bhe v Magistrate, Khayelitsha 2005, the Constitutional Court struck down male primogeniture and Section 23 of the Black Administration Act 38 of 1927 for violating Section 9 (Equality) and Section 10 (Human Dignity) of the Constitution, ordering all intestate estates to devolve under the Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987.


9
New cards

Step 7: Extension to Polygynous Marriages (Hassam v Jacobs 2009)



In Hassam v Jacobs 2009, the Constitutional Court extended Section 1(1)(c) of the Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987 to polygynous Muslim marriages, holding that each surviving spouse is entitled to inherit a child's share or the statutory minimum of R250,000, whichever is greater.



10
New cards

Step 8: Step-by-Step Mathematical Calculation and Final Estate Distribution



In a joint estate valued at R1,000,000 with a spouse and 3 children:

  1. Surviving spouse takes R500,000 (50%) under matrimonial property law.

  2. Net deceased estate is R500,000.

  3. Under Section 1(4)(f), child's share denominator is 4 (3 children + 1 spouse), giving R125,000.

  4. Since R125,000 is less than R250,000, the spouse gets R250,000 from the deceased estate under Section 1(1)(c).

  5. The remaining R250,000 residue is split among 3 children (R83,333.33 each).