1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Trespassers Act
OLA 1984
Can’t claim damage to property
s.1(8) OLA 1984
Injury due to C’s own actions not the state of the premises
Siddorn v Patel
When duty will arise act
s.1(3)OLA 1984
s.1(3)(a) OLA 1984
Occupier’s aware of danger / has reasonable grounds to believe it exists
Occupier wasn’t aware of danger
Rhind v Astbury
Rhind v Astbury
Occupier didn’t know of fibreglass container at bottom of lake
s.1(3)(b) OLA 1984
Occupier knows trespassers is/may come into vicinity of danger
Occupier had no reason to believe trespasser would come in vicinity of danger
Higgs v Foster
Time of day/ year relevant whether occupier expects trespasser
Donoghue v Folkestone Properties
Donoghue v Folkestone Properties
C dived into harbour in middle of night in winter
s.1(3)(c] OLA 1984
Risk is one occupier is reasonably expected to offer some protection
Wouldn’t be reasonable to offer protection against natural feature of lake
Tomlinson v Congleton BC
Standard of care for trespassers act
s.1(4) OLA 1984
Occupier doesn’t need to spend lots of money making premises safe
Tomlinson v Congleton
No duty to guard against obvious danger
Ratcliff v McConnell
Standard Of care doesn’t alter significantly with minors
Keown v Coventry NHS Trust
Warning notice
Westwood v Post Office