1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Trespassers Act
OLA 1984
Can’t claim damage to property
s.1(8) OLA 1984
Injury due to C’s own actions not the state of the premises
Siddorn v Patel
When duty will arise act
s.1(3)OLA 1984
s.1(3)(a) OLA 1984
Occupier’s aware of danger / has reasonable grounds to believe it exists
Occupier wasn’t aware of danger
Rhind v Astbury
Rhind v Astbury
Occupier didn’t know of fibreglass container at bottom of lake
s.1(3)(b) OLA 1984
Occupier knows trespassers is/may come into vicinity of danger
Occupier had no reason to believe trespasser would come in vicinity of danger
Higgs v Foster
Time of day/ year relevant whether occupier expects trespasser
Donoghue v Folkestone Properties
Donoghue v Folkestone Properties
C dived into harbour in middle of night in winter
s.1(3)(c] OLA 1984
Risk is one occupier is reasonably expected to offer some protection
Wouldn’t be reasonable to offer protection against natural feature of lake
Tomlinson v Congleton BC
Standard of care for trespassers act
s.1(4) OLA 1984
Occupier doesn’t need to spend lots of money making premises safe
Tomlinson v Congleton
No duty to guard against obvious danger
Ratcliff v McConnell
Standard Of care doesn’t alter significantly with minors
Keown v Coventry NHS Trust
Warning notice
Westwood v Post Office