1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
ethics
A set of general principles of how people should be educated, treated, and respected when participating in any study
Historical examples of unethical studies
Tuskegee syphilis study
Milgram obedience study
Stanford prison experiment
Little albert experiment
Bobo doll experiment
Robbers cave experiment
Tuskegee syphilis study
Treatment experimentation for syphilis - experimentation targeted specific marginalized groups
Participants were lied to, denied treatment, told empty promises, and told there was no treatment when there was treatment
Unethical choices:
Participants were not treated respectfully
Participants were harmed
Participants were a targeted, disadvantaged social group
Milgram obedience studies
participants were partnered with someone (actor) → asked questions → each questions answered wrong led to shocks delivered to the actor
Participants obeyed authority figures when told to give shocks
Participants saw/heard actors being “shocked”
Unethical choices:
Participants were not followed up with after being debriefed
Also debate on content of debriefing
Stanford prison experiment
Looking at people taking social roles in groups
Participants given roles of guards and prisoners
Led to dehumanizing from participants
Intense violence and danger risks
Questionable debriefing
Unethical experiment
The belmont report
1976 - created to define the ethical guidelines that should be followed by researchers in a variety of disciplines
3 core principles:
Respect for persons
Research should show respect for persons and their right to make decisions without undue influence or coercion
2 major concerns:
Informed consent - need all the information to make educated decision
Protections for less autonomous groups
Beneficence
Researchers must take precautions to protect participants from harm and ensure well being
Consider potential risks
Identity info shared?
Anonymous study
confidential study
Consider potential benefits - for oneself and the community
Justice
Must be a fiar balance between those who participate in research and those who benefit from it
Researchers need to ensure that participants are representative of the group that will benefit
APA ethical principles
5 general principles and specific ethical standards adding to the belmont report
Many principles similar to the belmont report
Changes as research changes
Beneficence and nonmaleficence
Treat people in ways that will benefit them. Do not cause suffering, conduct research that will benefit society
Fidelity and responsibility
Establish relationships of trust. Accept responsibility for profession behaviour
Integrity
Strive to be accurate, truthful and honest in ones role as researcher, teacher, or practitioner
Justice
Strive to treat all groups of people fairly, sample research participants from the same populations that will benefit from the research
Respect for people's rights and dignity
Recognize that people are autonomous agents. Protect people's rights, including the right to privacy, the right to give consent for treatment or research, and the right to have participation treated confidentially. Understand that some populations may be less able to give autonomous consent, and take precautions against coercing such people.
Ethical standards for research
Standard 8: specific to research
Institutional review boards (Standard 8.01)
Informed consent (Standard 8.02)
Deception (Standard 8.07)
Withhold information only when it is absolutely necessary and the ethics committee approves
Debriefing (Standard 8.08)
Necessary when there is information withheld
Research misconduct
Data fabrication (Standard 8.10) and data falsification
Plagiarism (Standard 8.11)
Animal research (Standard 8.09)
Animal research (standard 8.09)
Legal protection for laboratory animals
Animal care guidelines and the three R’s
Replacement, refinement, reduction
Ethically balancing animal welfare, animal rights, and animal research
Ethical decision making
Requires balance of priorities
We need to weigh the potential harm to human or animal participants against what the knowledge gained from the research will contribute to society