1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
consequentialism is a
way to think about morality in response to consequences
consequentialism includes
utilitarianism
group consequentialism
game theory
deontology
utilitarianism: right =
good consequences
utilitarianism: right = good consequences: ask what question
what does good mean?
utilitarianism: right = good consequences
Timeliness (how much suffering to get to the happiness)
utilitarianism: right = good consequences
Demanding (just general happiness)
group consequentialism: right =
good but within specific group parameters
group consequentialism: right = good but within specific group parameters: group parameters =
what specific you're in, thinking about what's in front of you
game theory: right =
good
game theory: right = good: good is made possible
by the game, so we need to protect the game
game theory: right = good: protect game =
 protect equilibrium, less individual view
game theory: right = good: can justify a lot by
 saying you're trying to protect the game
deontology: denot =
duty
deontology: ology =
study of
deontology: kant: inherent dignity of
duty
deontology: kant: somethings
negate dignity
deontology: kant: dignity =
human exceptionalism
deontology: kant: dignity = human exceptionalism =
Also deals with autonomy
Not a scalable thing
deontology: kant: categorical
imperative
deontology: kant: categorical imperative: something is
right if it’s right in all places at all times