1/387
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Blackstone
having ownership means having sole and despotic control over something, this is the strongest property ownership
Locke
our property rights come from the fruits of our labor
if the earth produces something naturally, it belongs to everyone, but if men through their labor, apply it to the property, then the property becomes theirs
Doctrine of Accession
if A adds labor or labor + materials to some object that B owners, then B is awarded the object unless:
1) A transforms the item into a fundamentally different article
2) greatly increases the value of B’s original item
Hardin
applies law and economics to property –> control over goods necessary to achieve efficiency, internalize externalities
private ownership and some time of regulatory agency to govern ownership is necessary
private ownership is necessary to avoid the tragedy of the commons
Externalities
the impact of an action the results of which fall on someone else
property law is meant to minimize these externalities
there can be positive and negative externalities
Bundle of Sticks
ownership is a bundle (collection) of rights (legally protected interests) which can be separated out from each other to allow certain rights to be taken away without removing the rest (thus preserving most of the ownership)
rights to include, transfer, exclude, destroy, etc.
Numerous Clauses Principles
you cannot have too many property rights bouncing around because we want people to know you have a right in that property
Progressive Property Movement
property is more than just things, it is more about the human condition
progressive property –> human flourishing
property is about power and property is a scarce thing so moral and ethical decisions
Natural Law Theory
law = govt’ recognition
property rights only exist because the law recognizes them and governments create them
Formalism
looking to established sources and try to determine what is required as an articulation of the rule from the sources
Instrumentalist
what is the best option for this time, view, etc. and then make the rule that matches with this
Tangible Real Property
land, building, timber, crops
personal tangible property
laptop, car, suit, books
intangible real property
fee simple absolute (ownership), easement, lease interest
A car is real/tangible property BUT if you are leasing a car, your interests in the car are intangible/real
intangible personal property
stocks, intellectual property, digital assets
Protection of Persona
courts have found that your image and likeness is property but its not the same as your house for example
a person does not have to commercialize their persona prior to their death
example a law and economics in action
trying to create a rule with market efficiencies
Policy implications of Protection of Persona
nothing is purely coming from the mind of the creator, every idea we have comes from something/someone else so if we protect everything, creativity will be stifled
Protection of Persona Exceptions
1) First Amendment – right to freedom of expression
the use of someone’s name or likeness in media reporting
2) Matter of legitimate public interest
idea that we are not going to protect someone’s persona to the extent that the activity of another person relates to a matter of legitimate public interest
ex: writing an article about a politician
Involuntary transfer of property rights
situations where one part acquires property rights from someone else and the person from whom those rights are transferred are not intentionally or voluntarily giving them up
Rule of Capture
The first person to take possession of an unowned thing owns it first
only applies to things that are owned by no one and limited to tangible personal property
Res nullius
things that are owned by no one (wild animals and abandoned things)
feræ naturæ
latin term for wild animals
considered unowned until they are captured this comes from the idea that by adding your labor into the capture of the animal, it now becomes yours (Lockean labor theory)
Rule of Capture General Rule
you must commit a physical act that constitutes physical control or dominion over the thing. Mere pursuit does not give you a property right. BUT ALSO pursuit + mortally wounding the animal would work
entrapment also works because you have deprived the animal of its liberty of freedom
Occupancy
roman law idea that ownership via occupancy is not met until possession happens
(physical possession, corporeal possession)
someone becomes the owner of that thing that is owned by no one through occupancy
Exceptions to General Rule of Capture
1) pre-possessory interest
2) Inevitability
3) Custom
Pre-possessory Interest
an actor has a pre-possessory interest in the property if they undertake significant steps to achieve possession of the abandoned property, but the possession is incomplete by the interference of others (or unlawful acts)
courts honor this rule because they do not want to encourage people asserting violence to get property from someone
sometimes courts will have the possessor give the property back to the person with PPI OR have the value of the property be split
Inevitability
property in wild animals is acquired when the pursuer is within reach or has a reasonable prospect of taking physical possession
make arguments about how inevitable it really is
Custom
look at what is custom in the scenario to see what usually constitutes possession
Fugacious materials
materials/things that are dispersed (oil, gas, water, etc).
oil and gas develop under land in pools, so it is not enough to own the land, you have to capture to fugacious minerals by drilling for the oil which incentivizes people to be the first person to drill but this leads to a greater loss of oil from pumping
Unitization
to avoid loss of oil by everyone pumping, some states have developed unitization programs – the portion that you get needs to be divided evenly based on the amount of oil that was on your property
surface water
streams, rivers, and lakes
2 methods: riparianism and prior appropriation
Riparian regime
you can draw and become the owner of water from a body of water that abuts your property, subject to a rule of reasonableness
most prevalent in state to the east of the Mississippi river
animating principle of the riparian regime
there is an unlimited amount of water
Resonableness in Ripirianism
based on custom, social norms, and pre-exisiting uses
Prior appropriation
premised on the idea that water is a scarce resource, but still dealing with land owners who have property that abuts a body of water
whoever makes the first beneficial use of the water upstream surpasses the right of those downstream
consequence of prior appropriation
the person upstream starts drawing water and that results in there being less water downstream, but this does not matter because the person downstream still has the weaker right to the water; UNLESS the person downstream makes the first beneficial use of the water, then they will win
Ground water
water that is placed under the ground
Rule 1 of Ground Water: The american approach to groundwater
the tempered rule of capture but it prohibits wasteful uses of the water
Rule 2 of Ground Water: The english approach to groundwater
the first person to capture the water from the ground has it
Possession
9/10th of the law
intent to possess + some act of control/dominion = possession
a person who has possession has a major advantage over everyone else in the world except the owner
2 elements of possession
Corpus & Animus
Corpus
you have to be exercising physical dominion over the thing (physical)
Animus
you have to intend to possess this thing on your own behalf (mental)
constructive possession
legal fiction that gives you possession even if you do not have physical possession; your physical acts accompanies by the intent of a portion of property where the property has boundaries imparts your possession against everything within the boundaries
Civil possession
you start with both elements of possession but then give up the physical aspect for a period of time but you do not give up the mental element
Rule of Finders
A person who finds lost property has ownership interest in the property that is superior to the interest of anyone except the property’s rightful owner
only applies to lost or mislaid things*
relativity of title
property rights can be different as to a thing depending on how you are asserting your rights
courts usually rule in favor of the prior possessor
Lost Property
owner is not likely to ever find the property again
Finder win, but not against the true owner or prior possessor
Mislaid property
property that is placed where it is likely that the owner will return to it
the longer the property is separated from its owner, the more it shifts from mislaid to lost
the landowner wins more often in places that are open to the public
finder wins, but not against owner or prior possessor
Abandoned Property
the true owner gives up possession voluntarily
Considerable Factors in Law of Finders
public/private property
placement of the item
employee/employer relationship
time of placement
owner’s knowledge
Public/private
the more public the place, the less the expectation that everything there belongs to the owner (more likely to go to the finder)
Placement of the Item
if the item is embedded in the soil, or attached to it, it generally goes to the owner of the land
employee/employer relationship
if a finder finds property as an employee of the property owner then the found property usually goes to the owner of the land
time of placement
does the found property seem like it has been there for a while or just recently placed there? If it has been there for a while, more likely to go to the finder
Owner’s knowledge
if the owner did not know the found item was there or context clues leads to this inference, it is more likely to go to the finder
Adverse possession
if you occupy or possess someone else’s property for long enough, you the possessor become the owner
AP big picture
the elements change from state to state
gives legal recognition to what is actually happening on the ground
gives real world effect to what we perceive to be the property rights
5 elements of adverse possession
actual possession
exclusive possession
open & notorious possession
hostile /adverse possession
continuous & uninterrupted possession
Taints to adverse possession
taint of violence
taint of minority
taint of disability
actual possession
requires some sort of physical use of the thing; you have to possess the property physically as would the actual owner of the property, this is determined by courts based on the type of land that is at issue and viewed through the lense of how it has been historically been used (ex: constructing, grazing, cattle, farming)
extent of possession
the adverse possessor actually possess the amount of property that they are actually possessing
courts want to calibrate the level of physical property as to what you are doing on the property
Constructive Possession
physical activities sufficient for actual possession for a portion of a much larger piece of property, when the entirety of the property is enclosed in some way (2 ways to satisfy)
mean to convey to the true owner that someone is possessing their property and if they want to keep it, they should do something about it
boundaries
can be constructed (fence) or pre-exisiting or natural boundaries
Color of Title
having the deed or some other conveyance instrument that has a property description that is within the boundaries of that property and has been recorded in the land records
exclusive possession
possession cannot be shared with the true owner, you as the possessor have to act as the land is your own
you do not have to believe that the land is yours
cannot possess land with or on behalf of others
people acting independently cannot adversely possess the same property
Open & Notorious Possession
has to be obvious so that the true owner is at least on constructive/actual notice that you are possessing their property
actual notice – you tell someone or they actually know
constructive notice – what you should know if you are paying attention/acting diligently; designed to shift ownership to a new person when a reasonable person fails to notice the occupation
Earning theory of AP
rewarding the possessor with ownership; wants to reward those who cultivate and maintain the land
Sleeping theory of AP
punishing the owner for not doing things; if you are not the true owner but are neglecting the law and doing nothing with it then you are sleeping on your rights and should lose your ownership
Hostile / Adverse Possession
state of mind behind possession, you cannot be in actual possession with permission
the mindset you start your possession with is the mindset you finish with
Neutral State of Mind
general rule; most popular among the state
the state of mind of the possessor does not matter
Good Faith State of Mind
second most popular; possessor believes that they own the property they are possessing
discourages stealing other people’s property
states want to reward innocent possessors
you have to have a belief that you own the property that you are possessing – proven through the facts and circumstances of the case
Objective Test
if someone were standing across the street would it be reasonable for them to think that the possessor is actually the owner
Subjective Test
do you in your heart and mind really believe that you are the owner
Bad Faith State of Mind
you can only make out the hostile adverse requirement if you possess property that you know you do not own, but you want to own it anyways
the period of time that you have to wait to adversely possess in these cases are typically much longer than if it was in good faith
hits on sleeping principle
Continuous & Uninterrupted
you need to possess for the requisite amount of time
tacking
you add your time to someone else that also meets all the adverse possession requirements to meet the requisite amount of time but you need privity to do so
privity
successive legal relationships between people to the same property. Serves as a nexus/connection between the successors (deed, will, inheritance)
Taint of Violence
even if you meet all of the elements of adverse possession, your possession is ineffective because it was gained through violence; courts want to discourage people from taking the law into their own hands
Taint of Minority
you cannot adversely possess against a minor until they reach the age of majority
Taint of Disability “Disability Doctrine”
persons who are deprived of reason; courts do not want people to lose their property to adverse possessors if they are not in the frame of mind to get rid of them
this can include minority or not yet emancipated persons
an individual who has a cognitive impairment (can be episodic)
some states include imprisonment, military service that takes you out of the country, absence from the jurisdiction for a long period of time
different approaches to timing
original minority approach – if the disability does not exist at the time the adverse possessor begins, then this does not affect adverse possession
some states will just pause the time considered for adverse possession until the disability is over
some states just do not allow the statutory period to begin running there is a statutory period at all (it starts at day one once the disability is lifted)
to allow time to accrue, but once the disability ends, placing some sort of grace period to bring an action to get rid of the possessor
Replevin
the procedural vehicle to get the property back that was wrongfully taken
AP of personal property
you have to wait until the TO can no longer bring a case under replevin
Discovery Rule
the statute of limitation begins to run when:
you know you no longer have possession of the thing
you know who the person took the possession is
Demand Rule
the time period does not begin running until the true owner makes the demand of the return and then the adverse possessor does not give it back
Conversion Rule
the statute of limitations begins to run as soon as the true owner has discovered their property has been taken
History of Possessory Estates
The King → the senior nobility → the junior nobility → the peasantry/commoners
Each group is getting a possessory interest and then they are carving their possessory interests down, not all possessory interests are equal
Heritable
can be transferred to heirs
heirs
the people who are entitled by law to succeed to your stuff after you die
Intestate Statute
each state has a statute that tells you who your heirs are if the decedent dies intestate
Decedent
someone who has died
Intestate
involving a person (or their property) who has died without a valid will
Testate
involving a person (or their property) who has died with a valid will
Separate Property
everything you owned before the marriage , and whatever you inherited during the marriage
Community property
all of your gains and acquisitions during the marriage
Alienable
being able to transfer the property right during your life as you please
Issue/descendants
those vertically below someone on a family tree (children/grandchildren)
Ancestors
those above someone on a family tree (parents/grandparents)
Collaterals
those horizontally next to or someone in a family tree (siblings, counsins, uncles, etc).