1/105
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
what are the lumbar spine impairment-based classification system categories?
low back pain with mobility deficit (acute/subacute)
low back pain with movement coordination impairments (acute/subacute/chronic)
low back pain with LE referral (acute)
low back pain with radiating pain (acute/subacute/chronic)
low back pain with cognitive or affective tendencies (acute/subacute)
low back pain with generalized pain (chronic)
what are the major differences between the CPG for neck pain and back pain?
the low back pain CPG has more categories and larger discriminations of acute, subacute, and chronic which can possibly be complicating / confusing
what are symptoms of LBP with mobility deficits?
acute low back, buttock, or thigh pain
unilateral pain
onset of sx often linked to a recent unguarded/awkward movement or position
may report sensation of stiffness
if a patient says “I have no idea how this started” or “I don’t know what I did to bring this on” that is more associated with which category? is this category associated with activity?
LBP with mobility deficits; it can be but it is often not
what are impairments of LBP with mobility deficits?
lumbar ROM limitations
restricted lower thoracic and lumbar segmental mobility
low back and low back-related LE sx are reproduced with provocation of involved lower thoracic, lumbar, or SI segments
sx reproduced with end-range spinal motions
restricted motion w/ associated segmental motion
Your patient reports unilateral acute low back, buttock, and thigh pain. Their onset of symptoms are usually linked to unguarded/awkward movements and positions of their back. They also report a sensation of stiffness. Upon gross ROM assessment, you notice limitations in lumbar ROM, with their symptoms reproduced at end range of spinal motions. Upon segmental examination, you notice restricted lower thoracic and lumbar segmental mobility and restricted motion with the associated segmental motion. The patient also reports reproduction of their low back and lower extremity symptoms with provocation of certain lower thoracic, lumbar, and SI segments.
low back pain with mobility deficits
what are symptoms of LBP with movement coordination impairments
recurring low back pain that is commonly associated with referred LE pain
sx often include numerous episodes of low back and/or low back-related LE pain in recent years
is referred pain definitive of one specific category?
no it can occur in any of the LBP categories
what are impairments of LBP with movement coordination impairments?
pain provoked with mid-range movements and may worsen w/ end-range movements or sustained end-range movements
pain provoked w/ provocation of involved segments
hypermobility may be present w/ segmental assessment
movement coordination impairments
decreased regional muscle strength and endurance
neighboring mobility deficits
Your patient reports recurring episodes of low back pain and referred LE pain. They have had numerous episodes of LBP and low back-related LE pain in the recent years. Upon gross ROM assessment, you notice the pain is provoked with mid-range movements and worsens at end range and sustained end range movements. Upon segmental examination, you notice potential hypermobile segments with pain provocation, and neighboring mobility deficits in the adjacent segments. You also note decreased regional muscle strength and endurance.
LBP with movement coordination impairments
symptoms of LBP with related referred LE pain
acute LBP w/ referral into buttock, thigh , or leg
worse with flexion and sitting
impairments of LBP with related referred LE pain
centralization or symptom reduction possible with specific postures
reduced lordosis
limited extension
lateral shift may be present
findings consistent with movement coordination impairments
Your patient presents with acute LBP and referred pain into the buttock, thigh, and leg. The pain is worse with flexion and sitting. Upon posture assessment, you notice reduced lumbar lordosis and a lateral shift. Upon gross ROM assessment, you notice limited extension. When putting the patient in different postures, you notice centralization of their symptoms. Your findings are consistent with movement coordination impairments.
LBP with related referred LE pain
symptoms of LBP with radiating pain
LBP with associated radiating (vs broadly referred) pain
LE paresthesias, numbness, and weakness may be reported
impairments of LBP with radiating pain
radicular sx at rest or produced with initial to mid range spinal mobility, limb tension tests/SLR/slump tests
chronic radiating pain more likely to produce with end-range
nerve root signs MAY be present
MAY have sensory, strength, or reflex deficits
similarities to LBP w/ related referred pain
Your patient reports low back pain that radiates down into the lower extremity. They also report lower leg paresthesia, numbness, and weakness. They have radicular symptoms at rest, but when assessing gross ROM their symptoms are produced with initial to mid-range spinal movements. They have a positive SLR, slump, and limb tension tests such as Ely’s test. They have sensory and strength deficits consistent with a nerve root pattern and they have diminished reflexes.
LBP with radiating pain (but they don’t always have sensory, strength, and reflex deficits!!)
symptoms of LBP with cognitive/affective tendencies? what about impairments?
symptoms:
acute or subacute LBP and/or low back-related LE pain
impairments:
behavioral scale indicators (fear avoidance belief questionnaire FABQ, pain catastrophizing, depression)
True/false: LBP with cognitive/affective tendencies cannot have another category of LBP present
false: another category of LBP CAN be present, but the cognitive/affective predominance is likely to affect the responses/outcomes and cause a disproportionate behavioral response and may have kinesiophobia
LBP with generalized pain syndrome symptoms
low back and/or low back-related LE pain with symptom duration for longer than 3 months
generalized pain not consistent with other impairment-based classification criteria presented in these clinical guidelines
LBP with generalized pain syndrome impairments?
low back and/or low back related LE pain with symptom duration for longer than 3 months
generalized pain not consistent with other impairment-based classification criteria presented in these clinical guidelines
behavioral scale indicators: FABQ, pain catastrophizing, depression
may have underlying problem of other category (maybe multiple) but difficult to discern and assess response of any intervention
the primary problem with patients in the LBP with generalized pain category is ?
that they may have had a mechanical issue previously or currently but now that it has been so chronic, the CNS is now the primary problem because it is misinterpreting the pain and causing central sensitization or nociplastic pain
is there a hard timeline between what is acute vs chronic LBP?
no, 6 weeks is a general timeline but there is variability
LBP with leg pain means the pain is ?
distal to the knee
80-90% of lumbar load bearing goes through ___ and 10-20% goes through ___
disc-body-disc; facet joints
facet loading increases with aging because of what? what motion increases the compressive loading through the z joint surfaces?
loss of disc height and increasing irregularity of facet joint surfaces; extension
characteristics of lumbar IV discs?
greatest proportion of water content loss during 2nd decade, but continuous and progressive
HNPs most common in the 40s when the NP is still hydrated but changes affected load distribution, plus fissure/openings in the annulus may develop
by age 60, HNP are not as common because the NP and AF become more alike and more likely to be upper lumbar
pain studies indicate that ___ can refer pain into the buttock and thigh
any structure in the lumbar spine
pain that is ___ is most consistent with nerve root origin, but other structures may refer distally, including z joints
distal to the knee
does location of pain have diagnostic value?
no
facet joint pain patterns
lumbar region: L1-L5
low lumbar/gluteal region: L2-S1
posterior thigh: L3-S1
lateral thigh: L2-S1
anterior thigh: L3-S1
groin: L3-S1
what are the most common lumbar nerve root pain descriptors based on the McGill Pain Questionnaire?
aching
tiring-exhausting
sharp
stabbing
numbness
shooting
difference between somatic referred pain and radiating pain
somatic referred pain:
perceived remote from the site of pathology
no neuro loss
often, not always predictable (not basis of diagnosis)
radiating pain:
in distribution of single nerve root
MAY have neuro loss
deep lancinating severity
differences between nerve roots and peripheral nerves?
nerve roots are not built for mechanical stress like peripheral nerves are
nerve roots have incomplete perineurium and no epineurium
nerve roots have tightly arranged parallel fibers vs loosely arranged fibers with abundant fat and connective tissue of peripheral nerves
what are general thoughts on lumbar spine pain patterns?
there is a tendency for pain patterns but variances occur
can support clinical impressions but not the basis for diagnosis or specific anatomical attribution
what is discography and what is it best used for?
an imaging and pain provocation procedure not commonly used anymore where the patient is partially sedated, they have a large needle inserted into the disc across multiple levels that injects a contrast agent into the disc to pressurize it with the intent to get a comparable sign and look at the distribution of contrast in the disc; it is best used to see internal disc derangement
what is internal disc derangement? is there nerve root compression with this? is it more common in younger or older individuals?
when the internal architecture of the disc has been changed and there is derangement of the NP surrounded by lamellae where you see fissures in the lamellae but no damage to the outer disc ; there is no nerve root compression with internal disc disruption; younger individuals
what things are included in a lower quadrant scan exam?
movement and neurological screens
peripheral joint screens with particular interest in the hip
neurotension with SLR
pain provocation battery for SI
changes of position and patient movement
patients presenting with ___ are potentially those with the greatest risk of having an underlying problem so have reasonable suspicion
LBP
what are difference etiologies for low back pain?
mechanical LBP: 97% of cases
nonmechanical spinal disease: 1%
visceral disorder: 2%
red flags for cancer/infection
history of cancer
unexplained weight loss
immunosuppression
urinary infection
IV drug use
prolonged history of corticosteroids
not improved w/ conservative care
red flags for spinal fracture
history of trauma
prolonged history of corticosteroids
minor fall/heavy lift in person with OP or older person
red flags for cauda equina syndrome or other neurological compromise
acute urinary retention or overflow incontinence
loss of anal sphincter tone or fecal incontinence
saddle anesthesia
bilateral/progressive motor weakness in LEs
true/false: majority of LBP cases have antatomically identifiable causes
false! majority have unidentified LBP with a mechanical behavior/pattern to the symptoms
characteristics of spondylolysis/spondylolisthesis?
most asymptomatic
most stable
no exam procedures w/ high psychometric values
when identified by imaging, presumption is that it is the origin of sx
what are treatments for spondylolysis/spondylolisthesis?
relative rest
stabilization motor control exercises
address any other imbalances
characteristics of stenosis
generally worse with walking, standing, and extension
walking distance tolerance often predictable and may be enhanced by flexed posture (like leaning over a shopping cart or uphill)
better w/ rest and flexion
often adopt a resting flexed posture
initially no neuro findings but may progress w/ decreased reflexes, strength, and sensation
decreased balance and wider base of support
a dynamic disorder meaning you may not see symptoms until they are moving around
often will have a wide BOS due to loss of proprioception
distal to proximal progression
what do people usually say or complain about when they have a central stenosis?
my legs feel heavy
I can walk a distance, legs get really heavy or feel like concrete, and then I have to sit down
when I sit down and rest, I feel better but if I get up and walk the same thing happens
sometimes relief with a flexed posture
they do not like extension
will likely lose hip extension eventually
off balance so they have to walk with a wide BOS
symptoms of stenosis that manifest in the LEs are typically ___ vs the ___ that is characteristic of acute radiculopathy
fatigue, heaviness, and achiness vs deep lancinating pain
a ___ stenosis is more likely to present as LBP with radiating pain whereas a ___ stenosis is more likely to have bilateral symptoms
lateral; central
is stenosis an imaging only diagnosis?
no, it is diagnosed by subjective history, clinical exam procedures, and correlates with imaging findings but not diagnosed only by imaging as many people will appear to have central stenosis on imaging but are asymptomatic
disc bulges are herniations are common after what age? what are characteristics of these herniations?
age 40;
most are asymptomatic
routinely found on MRI
only if overt nerve root compression is found then pain is more likely to be present
do internal disc disruptions always have symptoms?
no they can also occur with or without symptoms and there may be no specific clinical indicators, only back pain
characteristics of the spinal mechanical lesion?
aberrant segmental motion influencing afferent input and efferent output
difficult to be precise or definitive
may be related to too much or too little movement at a segment
not uniquely descriptive (segments that move too much or too little may be asymptomatic)
what are the theoretical effects of the spinal mechanical lesion?
abnormal afferent input from dysfunctional spinal segment
information relayed to higher centers may or may not be perceived as pain
altered motor recruitment pattern
may be inhibitory or excitatory
may precipitate cascade of dysfunction
___ and ___ are more valuable than MRI findings
diligent patient history and physical exam
correlation of nerve root compression on MRI and a positive SLR is ?
modest (low correlation of objective neuro deficits on exam and nerve root compression on MRI
components of a scan exam
observation
motion
neurological testing:
sensation
MMT
reflexes
dural/neurotension tests
segmental stress and pain provocation/reduction tests
lumbopelvic distraction
SI joint pain provocation tests
lumbar PA pressures
peripheral joint active/passive/resisted ROM (proximal to distal)
characteristics of sacral insufficiency fractures
“silent epidemic”
older females w/ LBP, inguinal, or pubic pain
increased pain with weight bearing and decreased pain with rest
low energy or no trauma
sacral tenderness and + SI pain provocation tests
can be radiographically occult
what is the value of a hip exam with low back pain?
postural assessment may reveal short hip flexors/hyperlordotic posture or generally flexed posture consistent with hip motion loss
hip relationship to LBP is much more prevalent in older adults
loss of hip motion affects lumbosacral junction/lumbar spine
detailed biomechanical exam components
special tests
may include assessment for directional preference
passive accessory movements
lumbar PIVMs
passive innominate motion
hip PAMs
characteristics of the lateral shift assessment
may fit into either scan or detailed exam
if large, persistent, or part of severe limiting pain, may require being addressed early/immediately
visual appearance
determine if pathomechanical barrier is present (side glide limitations and pain response)
lumbar radiculopathies have historically been detected with what?
a neurological screening:
manual muscle tests “myotomes”
muscle stretch reflexes (“DTRs"“)
sensory testing (“dermatomes”)
SLR
what are the problems with MMT?
inconsistencies in techniques
lack of knowledge of exact muscle action
classic neurological exam procedures have ___ accuracy when detecting radiculopathies
limited accuracy (no single test is highly accurate)
what is the general consensus on clinical neurological exam findings?
they have higher specificity, meaning it is useful when there are positives, but if there are negatives you can’t rule out a serious pathology
clinical neuro exam deficits typically correspond with MRI findings in radiculopathies of L4/5 and L5/S1
clinical neuro exam does not predict normal/abnormal NCV
if MRI findings do not match clinical neuro exam, addition of NCV can clarify
what is the general consensus of the SLR exam procedure?
a positive SLR was associated with lumbar nerve root impingement on MRI, but results are variable and it must be used with other findings
compared to electrophysiologic studies, SLR was highly sensitive and not very specific
overall, the research on its psychometric values, testing positions, and interpretations of positives were highly variable
movement of nerve roots starts at 30 degrees of hip flexion
greatest value is provoking distal symptoms at lower ranges of hip flexion for greatest specificity and diagnostic value
it is the first thing you do when the patient is supine because it determines other exam procedures if you get a positive
the SLR is less discriminative and diagnostically accurate in what population?
older individuals (over 60 years old)
the primary interest of doing the SLR test is? it is only a true positive neurotension test if what 3 things occur?
the angle of hip at which symptoms occur/worsen, and the location of pain provocation;
symptoms provoked distal to the knee
lower angles of hip flexion
specificity lost when hamstrings tensioned
can a SLR be used as an SI test or mechanosensitivty test?
it cannot be used as an SI test, but may be used to assess mechanosensitivity apart from its original diagnostic purpose
the SLR is only applicable to ___ radiculopathies because?
lower lumbar radiculopathies; because it tensions L4-S3 (sciatic nerve) so it does not apply to upper lumbar radiculopathies
characteristics of femoral nerve tension test
tensions L2-4
potentially affected by rectus femoris length
caution with interpretation subjectivity (stretch sensation vs pain and compare sides)
tests more for upper lumbar radiculopathies which are not as common
older individuals tend to have ___ lumbar radiculopathies whereas younger individuals tend to have ___ lumbar radiculopathies
upper; lower
what is a crossed “well” SLR? what is it used to help diagnose? what are the psychometrics?
when you do a SLR and the other side has symptoms; radiculopathy; more specific than sensitive, meaning that if it is present, a radiculopathy is likely (doesn’t happen very often though)
what is the hypothesis of a crossed well SLR?
the contralateral SLR is caused by traction effect on the nerve root, and the direction of herniated fragment tensions nerve root on the opposite side, producing contralateral symptoms
what is the compression overload test? what are the psychometrics and should you trust them?
a new exam procedure for a HNP; high sensitivity and specificity; you should be cautious with these results because its a new study
what is the general consensus of PIVMs in the lumbar spine?
reliability values are modest overall with mobility assessment only
mobility assessment + sx provocation likely more accurate
most experienced practicitioners find high value but interpret with caution
palpation of lumbar spinous processes are notably inaccurate but with experienced manual therapists it is moderately better
when should you do PIVMs in your exam?
they are most confirmatory at the end of the exam because they have limited value when done in isolation with no working hypotheses yet
what are signs of symptoms of lumbar instability? are these signs more specific or sensitive?
instability catch: painful arc on return to upright from flexion or needing to climb back up the thighs
painful catch sign: supine SLR and lowering with sudden lumbar pain
lack of hypomobility in PIVMS/PAIVMS assessment
hypermobilty present in PIVMs/PAIVMs assessment
rotary and translational instability in PIVMs/PAIVMs assessment
aberrant movement pattern (Gowers/reveral of lumbopelvic rhythm)
all have moderate to high specificity and low sensitivity
which is more specific as a sign of lumbar instability: lack of hypomobility or presence of hypermobility in PIVMs/PAIVMs? what would strengthen the positive likelihood ratio?
lack of hypomobility is more specific; if there was lack of hypomobility AND lumbar flexion over 53 degrees although that is usually just someone who is hypermobile overall
what is the prone instability test and what are its psychometrics?
a test for lumbar instability where the patient lifts legs up into extension and pain is provoked, then the LEs are raised from the floor with a PA applied to the spinous process (positive test is if the pain is reduced in the second step); moderate sensitivity AND specificity
what is the passive lumbar extension test? what are the psychometrics?
a test for lumbar instability where the patient is prone with LEs raised from the table 30 cm (positive test is strong LBP or a heavy feeling “my back feels like its coming off”); 84.2% sensitive and 90.3% specific but more investigation of the test is warranted
what is the lumbar rocking test? what are the psychometrics?
a (not good) test for lumbar instability where you are inducing a gentle jerk to the lumbar spine after locking hip and pelvis in hyper-flexed position by gently pushing the knees onto the abdomen (positive test is if the subject complains of severe pain in lumbar region while pushing knee onto the abdomen); highly sensitive and not very specific but caution with use and interpretation
what are bridging tests?
used by some for testing “stability”
prone, supine, side bridging are more pain tolerance and endurance dictated motor control tests rather than true instability tests
what is the general consensus on diagnosing lumbar instability with clinical tests
there is no consensus in diagnosing lumbar instability with clinical tests
what is the general consensus on the instability questionnaire?
considered positive 6 or more “yes items” (highly sensitive, not very specific)
if 10 or more, then more sensitive and specific
modest value, more research needed
what are the 2 subtypes of instability
mechanical instability
functional instability
mechanical instability characteristics
excessive translatoric / angular motion
malailignment
demonstrated by imaging
may be accompanied by neurological signs/sx
may include intractable pain
more readily attributable patho-anatomical origin of excessive movement
typically imaging correlation to sx
functional instability characteristics
more subtle
not consistently identified by imaging
loss of control during active movement
suggested by clinical tests/history
inconsistency of persistent sx
lack of corresponding hypomobility or other alternate explanation
poor motor control
often lack of response to initial interventions
occassinally, subjective descriptions of movement
categorization is more subjective and possibly less accurate
summary findings of lumbar instability
clinical exam procedures of modest value at best
likely detect more obvious cases
more subtle and more common instabilities (those more likely responsive to PT) less likely to be detected by clinical tests
less likely to have confirmatory findings with more subtle presentations
general impressions based on totality of clinical features
abundant subjectivity
what is the general consensus of directional preference?
overall maybe as much as 70% of patients with LBP will have directional preference
derivation of McKenzie approach
exam bridging to treatment with significant prognostic value
what is centralization/peripheralization
related to directional preference but not synonymous
tendency of symptoms to intensify or be distributed more distally or proximally based on spinal movements or positions
also derivation of McKenzie methodology
evidence to suggest correlation to the disc, but not consistent with original McKenzie model of derangement
centralization has high specificity with it being discogenic in nature
if patient has stress or psychological issues, they are more likely not to respond well to centralization/peripheralization
what conditions can mimic L1 radiating/referred pain ?
hip joint conditions and athletic pubalgia
what conditions can mimic L2 radiating/referred pain ?
occult femoral neck fx, iliopsoas bursitis/tendinopathy
what conditions can mimic L3 radiating/referred pain ?
greater trochanteric pain syndrome, ITB pain syndrome, external snapping hip syndrome
what conditions can mimic L4 radiating/referred pain ?
knee conditions
what conditions can mimic L5 radiating/referred pain ?
piriformis syndrome, tibial/fibular stress syndromes, exertional compartment syndrome
what conditions can mimic S1 radiating/referred pain ?
hamstring conditions, ischiofemoral impingement, ischiogluteal bursitis, SI joint, plantar fascitis
what clinical tools/questionnaires may assist in pain phenotyping? why is it important to phenotype pain?
painDETECT
DN4
central sensitization inventory (CSI)
neuropathic pain and nociplastic pain is associated with greater functional impairment and higher psychological distress
what are the 3 pain phenotypes
nociceptive pain: localized pain proportional to mechanical triggers with no neurological features
neuropathic pain: burning pain, dyesthesia, positive neurodynamic tests, higher disability scores
central sensitization: widespread pain, hyperalgesia, disproportionate symptom patterns, and atypical pain distribution
does osteoporosis have a major impact on LBP or the ODI? why is this important?
no but osteoporotic fractures are more strongly associated with reduced performance (single leg standing, sit to stand 5x, max walking speed and step length); there is possible value of including physical function tests as part of assessment especially in older adults or those with a history of OP (not just relying on self-report questionnaires)