1/128
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
stratigraphy
the study of sequences of layers of rock
only gives us the relative ages of layers of rock
biostratigraphy
dating rocks by the successive types of fossils appearing in layers of rock
only gives us the relative ages of layers of rock
radioactive dating
C14 half life is only 5,730 years, only good for relatively recent dates (prehistoric campfires ex.)
Uranium is most useful for dating the “big picture”, slowly decays to lead (Pb206) with a half life of 4.5 billion years
(uranium is the isotope that’s used to date rocks because C14 doesn’t go back that far)
chronostratigraphy
absolute ages of rocks, as agreed upon by an international team of geologists
Geological time is divided into
eons
Hadean (origin of sun to oldest surviving rocks)
Archean (first life)
Proterozoic (early life)
Phanerozoic (abundant life)
Eras (Phanerozoic = Paleozoic, Mesozoic, Cenozoic)
Periods (Mesozoic = Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous)
Epochs (Cenozoic = Eocene, Oligocene, Pleistocene, etc.)
Boundaries between eons, eras, periods, are usually determined by an unconformity. Define unconformity.
visible break or transition in an orderly sequence of rocks
Precambrian
This is not a single period but a "supereon" that covers the vast majority of Earth's history, from its formation about 4.6 billion years ago until the beginning of the Cambrian period around 538.8 million years ago. The Precambrian is further divided into the Hadean, Archean, and Proterozoic eons
Hadean – beginning of Earth to end of bombardment
Archaean Eon - first life - 3. 9 bya to 2.5 bya
Prebiotic evolution
First prokaryotes (anaerobic)
First photosynthetic bacteria
Proterozoic - early life - 2.5 bya to 600 mya
First aerobic prokaryotes
First eukaryotic cells
Phanerozoic - abundant life - 600 mya - date
First multicellular animals
Directly beneath the Cambrian rocks
a very thick layer with no visible fossils
Ediacaran
This is the last period of the Precambrian's Proterozoic Eon, lasting from about 635 to 538.8 million years ago. It is known for producing some of the earliest evidence of complex, multicellular life.
Cambrian
This is the first period of the Phanerozoic Eon and the Paleozoic Era, beginning approximately 538.8 million years ago. It is defined by the "Cambrian Explosion," a time of significant diversification and proliferation of new animal life.
First bigger organisms
First predators
Most modern phyla
All aquatic
these rocks are filled with an abundance of fossils- swarms of trilobites, mollusks, arthropods…
Suddenly find most major phyla of animals in place - annelids, molluscs, arthropods, ancestors of all modern animals, including chordates
Cambrian Explosion
This spectacular divergence of body plans only took ~ 30-50 million years. Not one major new phylum has evolved since then, though several have gone extinct. This appearance of diverse and complex animal life, in a relatively short period of time.
The Cambrian Explosion is in the ___ Eon
Phanerozoic (abundant life)
What marks the boundary between the Cambrian and the Precambrian?
The farther back in time we go, the fuzzier these boundaries become. The line between no animal life and an abundance of animal life, however, is sharply drawn in the rocks
Burgess Shale
fossil bed exposed in the Canadian Rockies of British Columbia, Canada discovered by Charles Doolittle Walcott that contained
arthropods, mollusks, worms,
contained Soft parts of organisms are incredibly well preserved
contained Many creatures are unlike anything seen on Earth before or since, many seem unrelated to any living creature
how did all those animals pile up there?
Animals lived in mud banks at the foot of a steep primitive reef, formed by thick mats of algae
Mud banks were unstable, mudslides were probably common
Entire community was suddenly swept away by an ancient mudslide (organisms were probably already fossilized then swept away)
Found tumbled into a heap, lying every which way, one atop another
Little or no oxygen or scavengers, fine-grained sediments
Perfect conditions for exquisite preservation, even soft parts
anomalocaris
One of the most unusual critters in the Burgess Shale
the “terror of the trilobites”
Mighty 3 feet long, the world’s first ferocious predator, great white shark of the Cambrian oceans
Were the animals of the Burgess Shale an anomaly and the decimation of those animals a major turning point in the history of life?
That was S.J. Gould’s thesis in his classic book on the Burgess Shale “Wonderful Life” - our ancestors survived by blind luck alone. Since then, we have discovered that the Burgess Shale is not unique. Now have about 30 sites around the world, including Greenland and mainland China with same bizarre fossils. These were the normal organisms of the Cambrian oceans. Similar Chinese and Polish Cambrian fauna are even older- 535 to 540 mya. All these diverse body plans appear to have evolved in a mere 5 -10 million years! Survivors of the Cambrian seas are the ancestors of all life on Earth.
The Cambrian Explosion—What was Earth like? what kind of organisms evolved?
Thin air, hard to breathe
The surface of the Earth was bare rock and dirt, no large plants
A few colonies of algae and bacteria in shallow fresh water habitats
World of green slime…
These are the first land plants!
And then Non-vascular land plants appeared!
Maybe as early as 700 mya!
At least by 500 mya
Mosses
In shallow ocean waters, algae and bacteria may have formed small reefs
Deeper ocean was a dark and murky abyss with only anaerobic bacteria, high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide
Gondwana and Laurentia
At the end of the Precambrian, the Earth was undergoing major changes.
Breakup of the supercontinent Pannotia ~ 600mya and the formation of super continents ____ and ____
oceans covered 85% of planet
Precambrian life (Ediacaran world)
Before ~ 650 mya, there are no definite traces of multicellular life in the fossil record
occurred during the Proterozoic
Small soft-bodied multicellular organisms
No large fossils of any kind
No evidence of passage of organisms through stromatolites - no trails of grazers, no tunnels of burrowers
several episodes of glaciation, at one point reaching almost the equator; decline of stromatolite communities world wide; stromatolites were almost gone, eaten away by armies of small grazing organisms
Ediacaran fauna dates to ~585-550mya (Cambrian border is 543mya) (need to understand some of these animal groups)
The extreme position is that these animals left no descendants
Ediacarans seem to thin out and disappear before the start of the Cambrian Early mass extinction event?? Imperfections in the fossil record??
Dickinsonia (oldest known animal fossil)
At several sites, the fauna fades out well before the start of the Cambrian. This apparent gap between Ediacaran and Cambrian faunas was thought to represent the total extinction of Ediacarans
Some sites (Namibia) the Ediacaran fauna ends much closer to the start of the Cambrian…
Ediacaran fossil beds include numerous surface trails. They are the very first animal footprints on the Earth!
a peaceful, tranquil world filled with slow moving grazers, or immobile filter-feeding animals
The Ediacaran may have seen the rise of the world’s first visible ecosystem, with slow moving grazers, stalked filter -feeders, and a handful of tiny predators
Ediacaran fauna — Precambrian life
dates to ~585-550mya (Cambrian border is 543mya) (need to understand some of these animal groups)
consists of a wide variety of curious creatures
mostly animals
hard to interpret these strange organisms, because they don’t really resemble modern animals
many leaf-shaped, “quilted” forms, appear to be assembled from long tubes
may be early colonial animals, like sea fans
Many disk-shaped forms, may be similar to modern Cnidarians (sea anemones, corals, jellyfish)
Not many worm-like fossils, or vertical burrows - worms were common in the Cambrian We do, however, find long grooves, tracks and traces of worms whose bodies were not preserved
most likely filter feeders, sessile, or sedentary (relatively inactive)
not clear ancestors of Cambrian fauna (controversial topic)
Ediacaran organisms turned out to be common, globally distributed
Dickinsonia
a precursor of modern life
has been interpreted as a primitive type of flatworm, or an early segmented annelid worm
Small Shelly Fauna (SSF)
About 540 mya, in the earliest Cambrian, a new type of fossil appears abruptly, in large numbers: small pieces of shell, mostly smaller than one-half inch
marks the beginning of a new phase of animal life, the acquisition of hard parts
Many of the fossils are complete animals, esp. primitive types of mollusks
Others are parts of larger animals, such as skeletal plates
punctuated equilibrium
a pattern of fossils appearing abruptly and disappearing abruptly; New types of fossils often appear abruptly, and last through long periods of relative stability until they abruptly disappear
SSF serves to demonstrate the pattern of how fossils appear as we trace the rocks through time
Sudden appearance may be an illusion, an artifact of the way the fossil record is formed
Species would be most likely to evolve in small, isolated populations (need to know the background of these things)
Because of the small size of these “founder” populations, extremely few of these early individuals would end up preserved as fossils
Over time, as the population grew large enough, a few individuals would be preserved as fossils
It would appear as though they had instantaneously emerged into the world
Once they began to spread, they might drive less competitive species into extinction
One species seems to abruptly disappear (old), replaced by a very similar species (new)
So the fossil record shows a pattern of long periods of relative equilibrium (slow or no change), interrupted by bursts of speciation
What is punctuated equilibrium and what does it mean about evolution? Does it mean Darwin was wrong about slow, gradual change?
it is the abrupt appearance of organisms/fossils and abrupt disappearance of organisms/fossils. maybe evolution is not linear but it’s a slow, gradual process. Darwin was not wrong about slow, gradual change.
eggs and embryos
discovery made by Shuhai Xiao
Small balls discovered in fossil beds in Doushantuo, China, were thought to be colonial green algae
Xiao determined that they were the eggs and embryos of animals
Animals must have existed 570 mya, though we can’t determine the types of animals from these embryos. Suggests that complex animal life had a very ancient history
trilobites
one of the earliest arthropod groups
First appeared 521 mya and flourished for over 270 my!
Lived from Cambrian until Permian extinction
One of the most successful groups of all early animals
Highly diversified and geographically dispersed.
Predators, scavengers, filter feeders (many different species)
came in all shapes and sizes and had many different species throughout the 270 million years that they existed.
They also exhibited interesting behavior
Why so successful?
One of the first organisms to develop eyes, and really good eyes at that – independent from vertebrate eyes
Constructed of calcite, unlike modern arthropod eyes
Great color vision underwater
eyes
evolution of the nervous system
neurons developed as specialized electrical signaling cells in colonial and multicellular animals
eventually simple nerve nets evolved in organisms like Cnidaria
followed by nerve chords in bilaterally symmetrical animals
cephalization
evolution of head-like regions
organisms evolved a control center for the nervous system— THE BRAIN
allowed for more complex animals
list the theories of the Cambrian Explosion (have to be able to describe some— “was this idea a driving force for the Cambrian Explosion?”)
Artifact of preservation - no real explosion
Evolution of skeletons/hard parts (shells etc.)
Critical oxygen threshold reached
Evolution of better organs and systems
Evolution of developmental (Hox) genes
Evolution of sex
Nutrient availability from deep sea upwelling
Nutrient availability from continental shelves
Snowball Earth
Evolution of food webs, ecosystems
Evolution of predators
Light Switch hypothesis
Evolution of Hard Parts/shells (theory of Cambrian Explosion)
certainly a major force driving the diversification of early animal life
Shells fill many important functions
Protect soft bodied organisms from predators
Provide support for larger body sizes, more diverse functions
Shells in the form of tubes buried in ocean sediments were also an important new niche
Vertical tubes suddenly appear in large numbers in Cambrian rocks
Shell material also used for spines, rudimentary jaws (sea urchins ex.)
Oxygen Threshold Reached (theory of Cambrian Explosion)
Increasing levels of atmospheric oxygen may have spurred the Cambrian Explosion
Once hard parts were invented, many new evolutionary pathways opened up - skeletal systems, jaws, legs etc…
The evolution of shells could not have occurred without an ample supply of oxygen
Shelled organisms would have also required higher levels of oxygen to survive simply because of their shells
Early animal bodies had to absorb oxygen through their skin (no respiratory organs)
Shells would have covered large parts of the skin, reducing the diffusion of oxygen
Trade off between reducing naked skin in favor of a protective shell would only make sense in high oxygen environments
the rise in atmospheric oxygen is most widely accepted
Many of the other hypotheses proposed may have contributed to the incredible explosion of animal life in the early Cambrian
Evolution of organs and organ systems (theory of Cambrian Explosion)
Perhaps it was the evolution of multicellularity itself . More efficient communication, integration of cells into organs and organ systems would certainly have been a critical stage in early animal evolution
Evolution of Hox genes (theory of Cambrian Explosion)
maybe it was a change in how many cells are organized into a developing organism
Large-scale patterns of development are controlled by many interacting genes
Most important are these genes
they determine how each section of the body develops, front to back
are a group of genes that control the body plan of an embryo, and after the embryo forms, they determine the formation of appendages.
when these genes are reordered or duplicated, you get things like new body plans
Studies on arthropods have demonstrated that mutations in these genes are behind the incredible diversity of arthropod bodies
Evolution of Sex (theory of Cambrian Explosion)
The evolution of sexual reproduction would have provided a tremendous boost to the overall rate of evolution
Cell division that forms sperm and eggs is a special type of cell division called meiosis
Meiosis shuffles the parental chromosomes in several ways
Dramatically increases the amount of variation that can arise from a single mating
More variation, more raw material for natural selection to work on
Can’t really say when eukaryotic cells evolved the ability to reproduce sexually…
The first step to sex was evolving diploidy – having two sets of chromosomes
the evolution of sex (a theory of that caused the Cambrian explosion) would have involved…
Diploidy
Then evolution of meiosis
Evolution of sperm and egg
Evolution of reproductive structures/system
Evolution of mating types and eventually separate sexes – not necessary for sexual reproduction
Hermaphrodites can still have sexual reproduction
Nutrient availability from deep sea upwelling (theory of Cambrian Explosion)
Some theories rely on changes in environmental nutrients to explain the Cambrian Explosion
Nutrients like phosphorous and calcium often limit the growth of organisms
Evolution of shelled organisms would have drained the available supply
We think this period was marked by intense tectonic activity (movement of the vast plates on which the continents sit) which caused ocean upwelling, releasing vast amounts of nutrients that had been buried in deep ocean sediments
Nutrient availability from continental shelves (theory of Cambrian Explosion)
Some theories rely on changes in environmental nutrients to explain the Cambrian Explosion
Nutrients like phosphorous and calcium often limit the growth of organisms
Evolution of shelled organisms would have drained the available supply
Another possibility is that changing sea levels flooded low-lying areas which created vast new continental shelves over “new” soils that had not yet been depleted of nutrients
climate cycles (in relation to snowball earth hypothesis)
Several long-term planetary cycles contribute to a periodic cooling that leads to an Ice Age
consider shining a beam of light on a surface
As you change the angle of the flashlight, you don’t change the total amount of energy that hits the top of the table
But you reduce the amount of energy that hits any one part of the table top - the beam becomes “smeared out” over a wider area
if more at an angle, light covers more area than wen straight on
Now think about the tilt of our planet’s axis
The angle at which the suns rays strike part of the earth determines how much solar energy that part of the earth receives…
the tilt of earth’s axis is not constant. it changes over a range of degrees
the spin of the Earth’s axis is not perfectly circular
axis wobbles back and forth
Superimposed on these two long-term cycles (axial tilt and precession) is a third cycle - changes in the shape of the Earth’s orbit around the sun
Sometimes the orbit is nearly circular, sometimes elliptical - eccentricity of orbit
Changes in orbital shape also affect the amplitude of the effects of precession (reduce or enhance)
basically: earth tilts at an angle but tilt changes; the way it’s spinning also wobbles and doesn’t stay the same either
tilt, spin/wobble (precession), and shape of orbit (eccentricity) all effect the climate on earth and effects how much sun a portion of the earth is getting
So the Milankovitch cycles explain the long-term climate pattern of our planet, and the timing of the glacial periods
Ice Ages are a normal part of Earth’s history
But in the Precambrian, we almost froze solid forever
Milankovitch Cycles (rebound from snowball earth)
The three cycles that affect Earth’s climate.
earth’s tilt, wobble (precession), and shape of orbit (eccentricity—round or oval)
effect the climate on earth and how much sun a portion of the earth is getting
Predicted that these cycles could cause variation in sunlight in the Northern Hemisphere by up to 20% - couldn’t prove it, no precision data
Snowball Earth Hypothesis (theory of Cambrian Explosion)
the idea that the Cambrian Explosion was a rebound effect from a catastrophe which nearly ended life on Earth before it had a chance to begin -not once, but twice
Milankovitch cycles (the three cycles that affect Earth’s climate and how much sunlight a portion of the earth is getting)
proposes that Earth's history included periods when the entire planet was covered in ice. This was caused by a significant drop in greenhouse gases, leading to runaway glaciation. The theory suggests that volcanic activity eventually released enough carbon dioxide (CO2) to break the ice, leading to a rapid warming period that may have spurred the evolution of complex life
Rebound from Snowball Earth
There is extensive evidence for glaciation in the Cambrian and later periods
This is completely normal…
Our recent “Ice Age” was only the latest in a long series of similar ice ages, stretching back to the beginning of the planet
the Milankovitch cycles
what saved the planet?
greenhouse effect saved the planet from an untimely end
glass lets the heat and light through, but some of the heat (infrared) is reflected back inside by the glass
Our atmosphere acts like a gigantic pane of greenhouse glass
Some atmospheric gases like carbon dioxide (CO2 ) and methane (CH4 ) absorb and emit some of the infrared radiation released from the heated surface of the Earth
Gases like carbon dioxide and methane are called greenhouse gases
Increasing the atmospheric content of these gases raises the average global temperature
FIRST SNOWBALL EARTH
CO2 buildup would have eventually leaked out, warming the atmosphere from the greenhouse effect
Rapid increase in temperature, CO2 would have been a banquet for photosynthetic organisms
Rapid increase in photosynthesis would have sharply increased the level of oxygen
Hence the banded iron deposits!
The second glaciation (~ 600-800 mya) was equally severe
This time, the rebound effect was the rapid evolution of multicellular animals
what tamed the Ice Ages
The evolution of the lowly worm… tamed the 2nd snowball earth
Marine worms tunnel through ocean sediments, causing CO2 to escape from organic matter buried in the sediment
This liberated CO2 warms the atmosphere just enough to take the edge off the severity of the Ice Ages!
What caused the snowball earth?
When glaciers advance and retreat, they leave several tell-tale traces:
Large parallel grooves and scratches in the rock
Stray boulders (erratics)
Terminal moraines
Sedimentary deposits called tillites
Tillite deposits are made up of small pieces of sharply angled rock, resemble a rock version of particleboard
Tillite deposits are found across the globe at 2.4 bya and 600-800 mya
In both cases, the deposits extend almost to the equator
Typical Ice Age, glaciers don’t extend past the temperate zones
Glaciers are generally confined to land, oceans remain open
In these “Snowball Earth” events, the planet almost froze completely
Oceans may have been covered in pack ice 500-1500 meters thick!!
Average temperatures were -20 to -50oC (-4 to -58oF)
Life would have been restricted to a narrow belt along the equator, perhaps deep sea vent communities
High Obliquity Hypothesis
Zipper-Rift Hypothesis
Proposes two pulses of continental "unzipping“
Breakup of Rodinia
Splitting of Baltica from Laurentia
The associated tectonic uplift would form high plateaus, just as the East African Rift is responsible for high topography; this high ground could then host glaciers.
Created lots of basalt which soaked up all the CO2, dropping temperatures
Extreme amount of ice and snow could have triggered a potentially catastrophic feedback
Would have reflected more and more light/heat back to space, making even more ice and snow…
High Obliquity Hypothesis
A competing hypothesis to explain the presence of ice on the equatorial continents was that Earth's axial tilt was quite high, in the vicinity of 60°, which would place Earth's land in high "latitudes", although supporting evidence is scarce. (might have caused snowball earth)
Zipper-Rift Hypothesis
(might have caused snowball earth)
Proposes two pulses of continental "unzipping“
Breakup of Rodinia
Splitting of Baltica from Laurentia
The associated tectonic uplift would form high plateaus, just as the East African Rift is responsible for high topography; this high ground could then host glaciers.
Created lots of basalt which soaked up all the CO2, dropping temperatures
Snowball Earth summary
Caused by:
Milankovitch cycles
Reduction in greenhouse gases – buildup of photosynthetic organisms releasing O2?
Breakup of Rodinia and basalt absorbing CO2.
The more ice there is, the more heat gets reflected back
end:
Greenhouse gases slowly get released from deep down
Worms, tectonic plates
Evolution of Ecosystems (theory of Cambrian Explosion)
trophic structure and the flow of energy through ecosystems
Maybe the evolution of herbivores and carnivores created an entirely new level of biodiversity, the first true ecosystems
Ecosystems consist of producers (like cyanobacteria, plants etc.) and consumers (herbivores, carnivores)
The evolution of Cambrian ecosystems was driven by an ecological cascade, primarily the rise of predation, which interacted with environmental and genetic factors. The emergence of predators led to an evolutionary arms race, forcing prey to develop defenses like shells and improved mobility, which in turn spurred predators to evolve more sophisticated hunting methods like complex vision and speed. This co-evolutionary feedback loop, supported by increasing oxygen levels and new genetic tools, created a complex, highly competitive ecosystem that accelerated the diversification of life
Light Switch Hypothesis (theory of Cambrian Explosion)
related to Predation Hypothesis
The Cambrian Explosion might have been caused by the evolution of the eye
Early Cambrian fossils mark the appearance of the first true eyes, eyes with lenses to focus the image on light-sensitive cells
This was a very big event in a world formerly dominated by chemical, tactile, mechanical senses
Evolution of the compound eye forever changed the way animals interacted with one another
No longer easy for prey to stay hidden
Both predator and prey could see who was out there, how far away, how fast and in which direction they were moving
How did the eye evolve?
Common ancestor with photoreceptors
Eyespots – protists, flatworms
Eyes then developed independently in the different groups – mollusks, arthropods, chordates
Increased in complexity as part of evolutionary arms race – few million years
Fast forward to the Burgess Shale and all the ferocious arthropod predators have well developed eyes
Trilobite eyes have lenses of calcite, transparent mineral crystal
Preserves extremely well
Evolution of Predators (theory of Cambrian Explosion)
Both predators and their prey also had abundant spines. Suggests that even predators themselves needed protection from larger or fiercer predators
predation could have been a big step that led to Cambrian Explosion
Predation created new, intense selective pressures, created new niches
Favored organisms that could make shells, burrow deeply, quickly, swim away rapidly
Evidence of predation is common in Cambrian fossils, including bite marks etc.
Sudden presence of vertical burrows suggests a need to hide from predators
Sudden, widespread evolution of shells also circumstantial evidence of increased predation
chordate (cambrian explosion)
possesses a notochord, the precursor to a backbone
Pikaia
World’s first chordate
found in the Burgess Shale
is a close relative of vertebrate ancestors, but is not an ancestor.
Haikouella
one of the earliest members of the vertebrate family tree
one of the earliest chordate ancestors
found in the Maotianshan shale
seems to be the same species as Pikaia (has teeth but no jaw or bones)
Haikouichthys
the first fish
Very primitive, but had a notochord and cartilaginous vertebrae –Maybe first vertebrate!
Cartilage evolved to allow it to swim more efficiently
Did very well in Ord. – precursor to other fish and vertebrates (maybe first vertebrate)
Maotianshan Shale
10 million years older than the Burgess Shales
chinese version of the british shales; has everything just way older
the world's most important for understanding the evolution of early multi-cellular life, particularly phylum Chordata, which includes all vertebrates.
How did the Asteroid that killed the Dinosaurs affect the earth?
The impact and explosion would dwarf the energy of the worlds’ entire nuclear arsenal
Through the winds of the upper atmosphere the dust shroud spreads
Dust quickly envelops the Northern Hemisphere, obscuring the sun
Many animals are killed outright, pulverized by the explosion or swept away by a monstrous tidal wave over 100 feet tall
Tsunami deposits have been found all over the Caribbean, including evidence in Cuba of a 100 foot tidal wave
Darkness settles over the Earth at high noon
Photosynthesis stops, and plankton and terrestrial plants die of starvation
Foraging in the dark for ever fewer scraps of living vegetation, the herbivores gradually succumb.
Herbivores are followed shortly by the carnivores that preyed on them
For a brief period, detritivores and scavengers rule the world
In the sea, a major long-term ecological disruption is underway
The increasingly acid ocean waters kill the calcareous plankton, and dissolves calcareous sediments on the ocean floor
Calcareous – composed of calcium carbonate
This releases immense amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, adding to the outgassing of numerous volcanoes and combustion gases from the raging forest fires
Adding to the carnage and chaos, the Deccan Traps pour a river of lava over much of what is now India
Additional dust, carbon dioxide, add another knockout punch
A feedback loop between ocean and atmosphere creates a greenhouse effect, further stressing the organisms that have managed to survive the initial blow
Massive pulse of organic carbon from dead terrestrial organisms floods into the sea, causing anoxia, stagnation
The Cretaceous skies were full of diverse species of winged pterosaurs
The oceans teaming with plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs, elasmosaurs…
Along with them went 50% of the large invertebrates, most of the biomass of land plants, and most of the marine plankton
The dinosaurs have vanished, and the wealth of ecological niches they formerly occupied are opened up for the rapidly radiating mammals
Finally, when the dust settles, the planet is transformed • Tropical conditions have given way to a temperate climate
For a while, ferns dominate the land, “fern spike” at KT boundary reminiscent of spike seen after Mt. St. Helen’s eruption
Ferns slowly give way to pines and other gymnosperms and finally to the recovering flowering plants.
The rules, however, have changed forever…
extinction
the death of species
a normal and ongoing process, an inevitable consequence of natural selection and environmental change
Why do species go extinct?
there’s an upper limit to adaptation
If new species are adaptively superior, then new species should outlast ancestral species, but new species have the same extinction rate as ancestral species
environments constantly change, organisms must constantly adapt to these changes
But if the environment changes too rapidly species can go extinct
Sooner or later every species fails to keep pace with local or global changes
Environment never stops changing, species never stop evolving. Eventually even the most varied gene pool will be exhausted, species goes extinct
Only a handful of species and genera show long life in the fossil record
Most disappear in a relatively short period of time
Reflects the basic pattern of biodiversity
Most genera have relatively few species
Most species have relatively few populations
Most species live in narrow geographic areas
Makes for a “low stake”, a perilous existence for most species…
Modes of Extinction (list the 4 ways in which smaller populations are vulnerable to extinction
Demographic randomness
Genetic deterioration
Social dysfunction
External limiting factors
May be a minimum viable population, below which the population cannot sustain itself
Concept comes from conservation biology
Much of the research on why modern species go extinct applies to past species
Important principle of conservation biology is the relationship between biodiversity and geographic area
Mass extinction events reduce the amount of habitable areas
Greatly reduces the overall number of species
Easy to see the effects of loss of habitat on modern animals – main cause of ongoing extinctions
Species tend to become very specialized
When things change, specialization can become deadly
If the diet or habitat you rely upon is gone, so are you (ex. plant / pollinator)
When everything changes at once, specialized species die in large numbers
Demographic randomness (mode of extinction)
random accidents can have a much greater effect on small populations.
Genetic deterioration (mode of extinction)
less variability, highly inbred, can’t always adjust to rapid environmental change
social dysfunction (mode of extinction)
Harder for males to find females in small populations
Social facilitation in colonial breeders
External limiting factors (mode of extinction)
fires, floods, etc. are density-independent
Whether they occur is not affected by population size
But have greater effect on small populations
What makes some organisms more vulnerable than others? (modes of extinction)
small population
restricted range, habitat
specialized niche
Divergent evolution
divergence of new species from a common ancestor
background extinction
The ongoing normal rate of natural extinction
example: 1 species of an animal would be expected to go extinct every 400 years; long-term, gradual disappearance of a species due to natural processes like habitat change, competition, or climate shifts, as opposed to a sudden, cataclysmic event.
opposite of mass extinction
mass extinction
a rapid turnover of fossil organisms, entire communities, abrupt changes in the nature of the very rocks themselves. everything changing suddenly is indicative of this event
specialists are even more vulnerable than usual
Adaptation has very little to do with survival during mass extinctions
Chance plays an even greater role in survival than usual
Burrowing animals, deep sea fish would survive, but only because they were hidden
Species whose habitat was at or near an impact event would be wiped out regardless of their adaptive superiority
Natural selection is not a factor
Precambrian extinction may have wiped out the Ediacaran fauna, paved the way for the Cambrian explosion
At least one or two minor extinctions in the Cambrian
Second Cambrian extinction took out early trilobites (Agnostus), first reef formers
Widespread environmental stress might not be sufficient to cause mass extinction
Most organisms could escape to refugia, migrate to a new habitat
Most can migrate faster than climate can change, or shorelines rise or fall
list the 2 major causes of mass extinction
cosmic causes & geologically normal causes
cosmic causes of mass extinction
Cosmic collisions – asteroids, comets, meteors
Cosmic radiation – nearby supernovae
geologically normal causes of mass extinction
Climate change
Sea level change (regression)
Extensive volcanism
predation, diseases, parasites
Competition
Kill Curve (mass extinctions)
plots the probability of percentage of species killed in a mass extinction event over time
We can use it to predict:
Likelihood of major extinction events occurring
Average waiting time between mass extinctions
common features of a mass extinction event
Many species go extinct in a short period of time (30% or more)
Vanished species span all habitat types, sizes - marine and terrestrial, large and microscopic
fossil records
Evidence of Mass extinctions: what is the evidence for large impacts?
Big craters (duh)
Anomalous levels of iridium and other elements
Shocked quartz or other minerals
Tektites in sediment
Soot particle
Anomalous levels of iridium and other elements (evidence for large impacts)
Some elements, like iridium, are rare on Earth’s surface, but common in outer space
Walter Alvarez and his team measured the iridium in exposed rocks spanning the boundary between the Cretaceous and the Paleogene
discovered a significant spike in iridium levels right at the KT boundary
a massive increase in cosmic iridium in an area comes from an asteroid impact
KT, Permian and late Devonian extinctions (3/5) clearly show an iridium spike
Shocked quartz or other minerals (evidence for large impacts)
Atoms in crystals are arranged in neat, ordered rows. In the stress of collision, these rows of atoms can become dislocated. Shocked minerals show characteristic pattern of displaced atoms. Multiple intersecting shock planes are characteristic of meteoroid impacts
shocked minerals have been discovered at the KT boundary layer
tektites (evidence for large impacts)
Small glassy spheres of rock, liquefied by the heat and pressure
Thrown off as liquid splashes, harden into tektites
soot particles (evidence of large impacts)
thin layer of soot at the KT boundary suggests global wildfires started by the impact
big 5
Ordovician
death rate: 85%
time: 445 mya
likely causes: rapid global cooling and falling sea levels
results: costal areas destroyed, chemical reactions affected by cold
Devonian
death rate: 70%
time: 340mya
likely cause: asteroid impact(s), rapid global cooling
results: local destruction from debris, ocean life affected by temperature
Permian
death rate: 95%
time: 250mya
likely cause: volcanic activity, increase in methane and CO2, rapid global warming
results: oxygen removed from oceans, desertification of land
Triassic
death rate: 76%
time: 200 mya
likely cause: increase in methane and CO2, rapid global warming
results: desertification of land, frequent heat waves
Cretaceous (KT):
death rate: 80%
time: 65 mya
likely cause: asteroid impact, volcanic activity, falling sea levels
results: widespread fires, plants disrupted by global ash cloud (can’t photosynthesize), “nuclear winter”
name the 6 mass extinctions in order (on the test, will need to put them in order and probably name the causes and big evolutionary changes that happen in each)
The Odovician/Silurian
Late Devonian
Permian
Triassic/Jurassic
Cretaceous/Tertiary (KT)
current extinction rates for humans, mammals, amphibians, birds, and reptiles
The Ordovician/Silurian Extinction (name causes and big evolutionary changes)
caused by changes in ocean chemistry - heavy metals
rapid global cooling and falling sea levels
The Devonian Extinction (name causes and big evolutionary changes)
Caused by asteroid impact (maybe multiple), with climatic changes and major changes in sea level and ocean chemistry — Woodleigh Crater - Australia
***Permian Extinction (name causes and big evolutionary changes)
the biggest mass extinction (96%)
much ocean life lost, including trilobites
evidence of shocked quarts and several possible impact sites (all large)
this extinction was caused by asteroid impact
Plume Tectonics – a giant pulse of heat between Earth’s mantle and core rises toward the surface as a plume
Generates volcanic eruptions that generate hundreds of thousands of Kg of Basalt – Flood Basalt
Triassic/Jurassic Extinction (name causes and big evolutionary changes)
Most archosaurs and therapsids and all large amphibians went extinct, allowing dinosaurs to take over
cause is unclear — impact event and volcanic activity?
Cretaceous Tertiary (K-T) (name causes and big evolutionary changes)
caused by impact event (Chicxulub) and volcanoes
Ammonites, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dinosaurs, and pterosaurs went extinct.
Allowed mammals and birds to diversify
characteristics of survival of a mass extinction
Being very widespread - greater chance that someone will be spared
High population densities - more numerous you are, higher chance some will make it through
Being lucky…blind chance
The 6th Mass Extinction
humans are the single greatest threat to global diversity in the history of life
modern rates of extinction are extremely high
Climate change, habitat loss, pollution, introduction of invasive species, hunting, disease
since 1600, about a thousand organisms have gone extinct due to human action and the rate of extinction is increasing
Current extinction rates for mammals, amphibians, birds, and reptiles are faster than or as fast as all rates that would have produced the Big Five extinctions over hundreds of thousands or millions of years
How do we know we’re in a mass extinction? (Sonn said could be asked on exam)
We are well above the mass extinction rate.
fossil
any evidence of life that is at least 10,000 years old
how do fossils form?
Death – the organism dies.
Decay – soft tissues rot, leaving hard parts.
Burial – rapid burial in sediment protects remains from scavengers and oxygen.
Diagenesis – pressure and chemical changes turn sediments to rock and remains to fossils (via mineralization, replacement, or molds/casts).
Preservation – sometimes whole organisms are preserved in amber, ice, or tar.
what factors work against the preservation of fossils?
Behavioral – scavengers, detritivores
Physical – transport, burial of remains
Chemical – geochemistry of environment (aerobic ex.)
scavengers
animals that eat dead animals
break bones and other hard parts into smaller pieces, and scatter the remains – disarticulation
bioerosion
Wearing away of hard parts by other organisms burrowing or boring through them – barnacles, worms, mollusks
Scavengers break bones and other hard parts into smaller pieces, and scatter the remains – disarticulation
detritivores
animals that eat particulate organic matter and help break down decomposing organisms
factors that affect rate of decay
Available oxygen: – bacteria require oxygen for respiration, breaking down organic molecules for “fuel”
Temperature: – higher the temperature, the higher the rate of decay
Acidity: – the higher the acidity, the slower the rate of decay
Type of organic carbon: Types of organic compounds in the tissues affect decay. Some organic molecules break down very quickly, others are more stable
physical factors that work against preservation
once scavengers move on, the remains begin to decay; exposed remains now subject to physical processes — wind, water, sun, etc
Disarticulation (Scavengers break bones and other hard parts into smaller pieces, and scatter the remains)
Transport (remains become scattered by wind, water, animals)
Fragmentation (remains can become fragmented, broken into smaller pieces)
Abrasion (friction from contact with the sediment or other fragments of remains, grinds away outer edges, removes surface, find details)
chemical factors working against becoming a fossil
corrosion ex: dissolves unstable minerals
water s often slightly acidic
water absorbs carbon dioxide, makes carbon acid (weak acid)
How fossils form
once scavengers move on, the remains begin to decay
the remains begin to decay; exposed remains now subject to physical processes — wind, water, sun, etc
any surviving remains are now buried, either rapidly or slowly
burial itself further alters the remains
diagenesis
sum total of physical and chemical changes undergone by fossils and the rocks that contain them
carbonization
compression between fine layers of sediment
(soft parts can be preserved under ideal condition — volatile chemicals disappear, leaving a thin film of carbon(ex is species in Burgess Shales))
replacement (definitely on the exam)
gradual replacement of original tissues (shells etc.) by minerals during fossilization (= mineralization - petrified wood ex.)
recrystallization
Some fossils, especially shelled organisms, are preserved by _______, when the original material in the shell is unstable and recrystallizes into a more stable atomic structure. Process doesn’t usually alter the surface of the shell and sometimes even preserves some internal features.
mold (definitely on the exam)
The entire organism may decay after burial, leaving a detailed impression of itself in the surrounding sediment
can be internal or external (made by the inside of the shell or by the outside – ex. a clam filled with mud)
cast
molds that are filled with minerals (space between the internal and external mold becomes filled with minerals)