1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
CSR
Cognitive Science of Religion
Goals of CSR
Answering questions:
- how did religion arise?
- why is it a societal human universal?
- why do religious ideas and practices spread?
What are the effects of its practices on participants?
Disciplines integrated into CSR
- religious studies
- cognitive, cultural, evolutionary anthropology
- archeology
- cognitive & social psychology
- sociology
- philosophy
- neuroscience
- biology
- behavioral ecology
- history
Limitations of CSR
- focus on mechanisms not meaning
- reductionism causing oversimplification and biased approaches
- bias against religious beliefs
- separation of cognition & culture
Approach of CSR
Fractionation - finding aspects religion that reoccur cross-culturally to have ideas form and be consistent
Reductionism causes this to be oversimplified, but breaking down of concepts can create focus areas
Does CSR think there is such a thing as religious cognition?
Yes, central topic in CSR
- is a technical term to refer to people's thoughts and feelings about religion
-
Dual process model of mental functioning - general
system 1 & system 2, differentiated by complexity and sophistication of the system
1 is quick, automatic
2 is slow, deliberate
System 1
quick, automatic, implicit
little to no reflection time given
showcases how humans often think
how the human mind shapes religious ideas and behaviors
System 2
slow, deliberate, explicit
belief proper according to CSR
reveals how the human mind interacts with culture to shape religious beliefs and behaviors
Theological correctness
layperson understanding of religion, despite the layperson still using practiced natural ideas without training or instruction
Theological incorrectness
ideas that go against religion - either in time constraints or strong emotional states
ideas that are considered "rebellious"
Teleology
everything happens for a reason - a phenomena will happen to serve a purpose, not because it is a phenomenon
Anthropomorphism
giving non-human things human-like characteristics
Folk Dualism
The concept that mind and body are two separate entities and act distinctly from each other
Proportionality bias
punishment befits the crime mentality - an eye for an eye
tendency to believe that big causes require big events
Proximate vs. Ultimate questions
Proximate: a mechanism (what is the structure of the trait) or Ontogeny (how does the trait develop in individuals)
Ultimate: phylogeny (what is the traits evolutionary history) or Adaptive significance (How have trait variations influenced fitness)
Tinbergen's 4 questions
What is the function? FUNCTION (Proximate & Contemporary)
How does it develop? ONTOGENY (Proximate & Chronological)
What is the function? ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE (Ultimate & Contemporary)
What is the genetic history? PHYLOGENY (Ultimate & Chronological)