1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Definition
Deals with rights/duties of:
individuals towards one another (private parties), or
companies towards one another (legal persons) or natural persons, or
state acting in private status towards private party
“Private law” is also referred to as “civil law”
Purpouses
provide remedies for individuals harmed by others
manage social conflict & restore harmony
Differences with public law
complaint by private party, plaintiff (and not prosecutor)
injured party is private party, not state
harm done vs. criminal code violated
question is whether defendant is liable (does not refer to “guilt”)
preponderance of evidence standard: more likely than not that the defendant is liable (i.e. > 50%)
remedy is compensation: monetary damages, injunctions, specific performance.
i.e. no probation, no jail, no death penalty.
Fields of private law
Property law: ownership/acquisition of property through conveyances and inheritances
Contract law: enforceability of private agreements between individuals and organizations
Torts: cases involving personal injury to person/property
Family law: involving marriage, child custody, other issues arising in personal relationships
Intellectual property law: protecting rights of creators of a variety of intellectual works
Company law: establishing, managing, functioning and dissolving business entities
Juvenile law: laws regulating behavior of minors
Property law
Property law determines rights and obligations … between persons … in relation to a “thing”
“Thing”
The object of a property right:
aka “object”; “property”
capable of being owned
tangible or intangible
moveable or immoveable
“Thing” of property
tangible property (physical things): moveable = (“personal”), immoveable = (“real property”)
intangible property (non-physical things): intellectual property (patents, trademarks, copyright), legal rights (assignment of credit debt)
Four rights of ownership
possession
use
alienation
exclusion
Right of Possession
power of dominion (physical control) over the thing
possession alone is not ownership
possessor may have “better right” to the thing compared to other non-owners, but not compared to the true owner
Right of Use
power to determine whether and how to enjoy the benefits of the thing
i.e. living in a dwelling, operating a business in an office, farming a field
right to use includes the right to “quiet enjoyment” of a home
Right of Alienation
power to decide whether and how to dispose of the thing
i.e. sell, donate, abandon, destroy
Right of Exclusion
power to prevent other persons from interfering with ownership rights
the essential right to enforce the other three rights of ownership
“Person with full ownership has a set of rights that are enforceable against the whole world.”
“Trespass” is a tort for a violation of the right of exclusion.
Limits on property rights
government regulations
prohibition on the use of property that interferes with another person’s property rights (private nuisance) or with a legal right of the public in general (public nuisance)
owner/possessor cannot prohibit the use of or entry onto property when necessary to protect life or safety (principle of necessity)
Important limit on right of alienation (disposal)
A person can transfer (sell, give away, etc.) only the rights that they have in a thing
The transferee (the person receiving the thing) will receive only the rights that the transferor actually had and actually granted to the transferee
exception: a “good faith purchaser”
Contract law principle
A contract is the voluntary commitment between two or more persons to be legally bound to a set of promises
= a legally enforceable agreement to exchange performances
Assent
Voluntary commitment
refers to intent of the parties to enter into a legally binding agreement
requires contracting parties to have legal capacity
Contract formation
“concluding” a contract
classic model of contract formation requires:
an offer plus acceptance of the offer
but in contract negotiations between merchants, often offer and acceptance cannot be identified, only an agreement on terms of the contract
other formal requirements to conclude a valid contract? contract in writing? signature required? not required except for certain kinds of contracts
“consideration” (common law) / “cause” (French legal tradition)
Contractual obligations
if a term of the contract is ambiguous . . .
interpretation: what are the terms of the contract?
subjective or objective standard of intent
extrinsic evidence allowed (subjective) vs. “four-corners” rule (objective)
breach of contract
non-performance of a promised obligation or defective performance
requires breach of an essential term (essence of the contract) vs. secondary term
implied term of “good faith” in performance of every contract
Effect of breach of contract
non-breaching party can claim a remedy
court-ordered performance of the contractual obligation (“specific performance”)
monetary compensation (“money damages”)
measures for calculation of damages
expectation = value of expected performance of the contract
reliance
restitution
non-breaching party may avoid further performance of the contract.
non-breaching party required to “mitigate” losses; must try to limit losses, if possible.