1/48
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Bite
first level of interaction
Bite mass
bite depth + bite volume
Feeding Station
area in which aimal has acces to without moving front legs
Patch
cluster of feeding stations within one grazing period
Feeding site
cellection of patches in a contiguous area (pasture)
Daily Range
area animals drink rest, and graze
True
We must identify management strategies that alter the forage canopy such that bite mass + grazing time are maximized.
True
Bite mass +daily intake increase with both forage mass and canopy height
Manipulation of grazing in pursuit of a specific objective
-forage production
-forage use efficiency
-plant persistance
-animal production
-grazing pressure
-economic concerns
Grazing
-exerts pulling force on plant
-possible root damage
-uproot immature plants
-selective grazing
-trampling
Grazing intensity
the severity of grazing pressure. Understandin the relationship between grazing intensity toa pasture and animal performance is crucial to a successful enterprise
True
Selecting the correct stocking rate is the most important of all grazing management decisions from the standpoint of veg. livestock, wildlife, and economic return.
Stocking density
number of animals allocated per acre of land at any point in time
Stocking rate
the amount of land allocated to each animal unit for a grazable period of time
Carrying capacity
-max stocking rate possible year after year without inducing damage to the veg of related resources.
-average number of animals that a particular range will sustain over time
True
Grazing intensity as more influence on forage production than any other grazing factor
Heavy stocking rate
removal of >50% of veg growth
Moderate Stocking rate
removal of 35-50% of veg growth
Light stocking rate
removal of 20-35% of veg growth
As grazing intensity increases
animal productivity decreases
Productivity per unit area increases
Max gains per animal and per unit area are not possible concurently
During drought periods heavy stocking rates can become economically disastrous
Moderate stocking rates permits less adjustments in animal numbers
Moderate stocking permits higher levels of forage standing crop throughout the year and more hardy plants
True
High residence time results in less time searching for food
Change in feeding site influence by
forage quantity and quality
topography
distance to water
Components of intake influence by
greater bite mass, less grazing time
rumination
socialize
rest
Canopy
aboveground portion of the plant and incorporates the distribution and arrangement of the plants
Plant part proportion
leaf vs stem
desired: high percentage of leaf and a low percentage of stem
Canopy height
shorter canopies-bite mass limiting factor
taller canopies-leaf bulk density limiting factor
Grazers
livestock who’s main diet selection is grasses
Cattle and Sheep
longer rumen retention time
max microbe digestion
Cattle
short lips braod muzzles and a callused tongue for protection during tearing of abrasive plant tissue
Sheep
narrower mouths and better suited for diet selection
Browsers
livestock who’s main diet selection is browse
True
large animals are at a disadvantage when grazing shortveg because each bite represents a smaller portion of daily requirements
grazing reduces the competitive stregth of a plant
True
Hoof action /treading affects pasture plants directly through…
damaging
serving
burying
Indirect effects of treading
soil compaction
reduced water infiltration
Grazing is not always a bad thing
True
Sprigging
a term for vegetative propagation
The type of herbivore and its grazing pattern can alter the species composition of a grassland
True
As forage diversity increases
diet selection increases
nutrition value increases
less dense canopies, limited intake, poort quality forages
Excretion
non retained nutrients are returned to the soil and plant in concentrated form
Effects of excretion
nutrient cycling
pasture growth
grazing patterns