Metaphysics- what is real?
Epistemology- How do we gain knowledge? - plat believes it is through the mind, not senses
Politics-Who should rule? Democracy puts power in the hands of the majority who lack knowledge.
Ethics. What is good?- Only the philosopher understands what is good.
The information we gain through are senses are still essential and we need them to survive
No proof of another realms and he is unclear on how the two worlds relate with each other
Guilty of elitism- differences in a degree of Knowledge
Why should philosophers rule if this is only a shadow world?
difference between our changing world and the mathematical world- mathematical truths do not change .
Plato believes in the same way that there is a similar unchanging truth about every type of object/quality.
each form is one single thing ( one idea of perfect beauty)
They are known by the intellect or reason
They are eternal
They are immutable
They are non-physical
They are perfect
There are many particulars ( many beautiful things
Known through empirical sense
They pass in and out of existence
They are constantly changing
They are physical
They are imperfect
the form of the good illuminates the other forms
It is the reason why the forms are good
It enables us to “see” the forms
IT is the ultimate end in itself.
When we observe different particulars, eg chairs, cats and beautiful things we are able to recognise that they have similar qualities. Eg a child can identify a cat when they have never seen one like it before.
We can acknowledge similarities between objects
We have an innate ability to recognise the forms tat our souls know before we were born. Our souls were in the world of the forms before they were tied down to earth.
Without the forms it is not possible to explain “sameness”
idea of forms can be used to support a belief in absolute unchanging moral rules.
Higher form such as goodness and justice seem to important to be a matter o opinion. The form of the good gives us an absolute idea of what goodness really is, it’s not a matter of opinion.
The one over many argument
The ideal standard.
His family resemblance theory
there is “no one over many” but simply overlapping characteristics- just like a family, resemble each other but there is no specific one thing to that family
Responds to the theory’s claim to explain reality
If we need the forms to explain why things have qualities in common, what’s to stop us from asking what the forms have in common and therefore require a “third man” it explain this
Indefinite process
Plato’s claim of the forms can be carried to absurdity
he says “the form of the bogey”
no- don’t have practical value, study of them takes us away from useful scientific study of the world.
If there are forms of every possible number, as Plato claimed there are an infinite number of forms.
seems illogical - ideal standards
not practical
infinite regress
explains imperfections in the world
explains recognition
Encourages us to question everything