Fundamental Rights and Judicial Power Review

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/15

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering key legal concepts, judicial philosophies, proportionality analysis, and classification of rights from the lecture notes.

Last updated 4:59 PM on 9/14/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

16 Terms

1
New cards

Judicial Review

A mechanism allowing courts to assess the constitutionality of legislation and executive action to keep government power in check and protect fundamental rights.

2
New cards

Judicial Restraint

A judicial philosophy asserting that unelected judges should not actively alter or heavily interpret laws, leaving major decision-making and policy changes strictly to the elected legislature.

3
New cards

Judicial Activism

A judicial philosophy asserting that judges should take a proactive role in interpreting and shaping laws to ensure outdated constitutional documents meet the modern standards and needs of society.

4
New cards

Defense of Marriage Act (1996)

A United States federal law that defined marriage for federal purposes as the union between a man and a woman, which was subsequently struck down through judicial intervention.

5
New cards

Suitability Test

The first step in proportionality analysis, which assesses whether a measure adopted by the legislature is suitable to achieve its intended objective.

6
New cards

Necessity Test

The step in proportionality analysis evaluating whether a restrictive measure is necessary because no alternative, less restrictive measure exists to achieve the same objective.

7
New cards

Proportionality in a Stringent Sense

The final stage of proportionality analysis where judges conduct a balancing test to decide whether the benefits of a state objective outweigh the harm done to an affected fundamental right.

8
New cards

Necessity Theory

Robert Alexy's theory holding that balancing and proportionality are an inherent and necessary part of fundamental rights adjudication whenever judges interpret the law in court.

9
New cards

Contingency Theory

A theory arguing that rights balancing and proportionality exercises are not inherent to all judicial processes, occurring only when explicitly intended by the constitutional framers.

10
New cards

Rule

A definitive legal norm that is either completely satisfied or not satisfied, such as a law requiring a person to be 18 years old to vote.

11
New cards

Principle

An abstract legal norm—such as freedom of speech or self-determination—that cannot enforce itself directly and requires judges to interpret and balance it against other rights.

12
New cards

Weight Formula

A formula created by Robert Alexy to standardize and introduce a quasi-scientific, objective structure into the judicial argumentation process during rights balancing.

13
New cards

Positive Law

Written law enacted by a legislature and recorded on paper, representing the real or factual side of constitutional rights.

14
New cards

Natural Law

Inherent rights possessed by human beings simply by virtue of being born, representing the ideal dimension of rights that pre-exists written constitutions and positive law.

15
New cards

Positive Right

A category of fundamental right that requires the state to take affirmative action or organize society to provide something for the citizen, such as the right to education.

16
New cards

Negative Right

A category of fundamental right that negates or restricts the ability of the state to interfere with individual liberties, such as freedom of movement or freedom of speech.