STAT 230 MIDTERM 2

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/67

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

EAT DOWN OK AMELIA AND DONT CRY OR KILL YOURSELF LIFE IS ROBLOX

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

68 Terms

1
New cards

Observed

Xijk

2
New cards

What is xijk?

observed value for the kth observation under the ith level of factor A and jth level of factor B

3
New cards

ai

effect of the ith level of factor A

4
New cards

μ

grand mean

5
New cards

Bj

effect of the jth level of factor B

6
New cards

(aB)ij

the interaction effect between level i of factor A and level j of Factor B

7
New cards

eijk

error/residual

8
New cards

C

Unknown true values are constant

9
New cards

A

components go together to make xijk by adding them

10
New cards

Z

The errors have a mean of zero. eg. E{εijk} = 0

11
New cards

S

errors (εijk) come from the same distribution, with

common standard deviation

12
New cards

I

errors are independent (eg. there is no relationship

between ε111 and ε112)

13
New cards
14
New cards

N

the distribution of εijk is Normal

15
New cards

Two assumptions about unknown true values

C and A

16
New cards

Four assumptions about errors:

Z, S, I, and N

17
New cards

SSCorrected Total =

 SSTotal − SSMean

18
New cards

√MSE =

whatever is the SD for this analysis. This is the estimate

of σε, the standard deviation of the ε’s

19
New cards

Hypotheses to test in a BF[1] design

H0 : α1 = α2 = · · · = αg = 0

vs.

Ha: At least one αi is different from the others

20
New cards

Test H0 for BF[1]

F-ratio

F-ratio = MSgroup/MSError = Variability due to group/Variability due to error = (One estimate of

chance error variability + Estimate of variability due to groups)/Another estimate

of chance error

21
New cards

MSError

quantifies variability due to error

22
New cards

η2

 interpreted as the percent of the

variability in the response that can be explained..

23
New cards

η2model =

SSexplained/ SSCorrectedTotal

24
New cards

η2FactorA=

 SSFactorA/SSCorrectedTotal

25
New cards

η2p

calculated to quantify the percent of the

variability explained by a single effect AFTER controlling for the variability explained by other factors:

26
New cards

η2p,FactorA =

SSFactorA/(SSFactorA + SSE)

where SSE is the SS for the error used to test Factor A

27
New cards

For BF[1] models, η2 =

η2p

28
New cards

Why randomize:

Protect against bias and confounding

2 Allows us to use probability and sampling distributions when

analyzing the data.

29
New cards

Balance refers to

the presence of equal treatment group size

30
New cards

Partition

 a way of sorting them into groups.

31
New cards

Factor

a meaningful partition of the observations

32
New cards

To find power, we need:

1 α (significance level)

2 n (observations per group)

3 I (number of groups)

4 values for α1, α2, . . . , αI

5 estimate of σ2

33
New cards

F-test does NOT

help you see which means are different or best.

34
New cards

comparison is

a measure of distance between means for two

groups of observed values.

35
New cards

What do we use if we want to check if the true difference equal to zero?

hypothesis test

36
New cards

What do we use if we want to check if the range of plausible values for true difference

CI

37
New cards

 two groups for comparison

µ1. − µ2.

38
New cards

3 groups for comparison

µ1. − µ2.

µ1. − µ3.

µ2. − µ3.

39
New cards

5 groups for comparison

µ1. − µ2.

µ1. − µ3.

µ2. − µ3.

µ1. − µ4.

µ2. − µ4.

µ3. − µ4.

µ1. − µ5.

µ2. − µ5.

µ3. − µ5.

µ4. − µ5.

40
New cards

Family-wise (Type I) error rate

The chance of at least one ___error among a ____

of tests, assuming there are no differences in the group means.

41
New cards

“contrasts” of the form c1µ1. + c2µ2. + ... + cIµI.

µ1. − (µ2. + µ3. + µ4. + µ5/4) ⇒ 1 -.25 -.25 -.25 -.25

42
New cards

orthogonal)

perpendicular/non-overlapping information. Totally distinct comparisons

43
New cards

can use a set of orthogonal contrasts to

split the SS for a factor into pieces, one piece for each contrast

44
New cards

Looking at multiple factors simultaneously allows us to:

1 Study the factors in one experiment instead of multiple experiments

2 Study how conditions interact

45
New cards

Two factors are crossed if

all possible combinations of the factors’ levels occur in the design.

46
New cards

Interaction

the effect of factor A on the response changes for different values of factor B.

47
New cards

BF[2]


yijk = µ + αi + βj + (αβ)ij + εijk

48
New cards

Three Null Hypotheses

H0: The mean wear for the 2 filler types is the same ← check main

effect for filler

–OR–

H0: α1 = α2 = 0

H0: The mean wear for the 3 proportions is the same ← check main

effect for filler

–OR–

H0: β1 = β2 = β3 = 0

H0: Proportion and Filler do NOT interact ← check interaction effect

H0: (αβ)11 = (αβ)12 = (αβ)13 = (αβ)21 = (αβ)22 = (αβ)23 = 0

49
New cards

Assessing the interaction requires

a response and two crossed factors Use an interaction plot

50
New cards

BF[2] Decomposition: Observed values

= Cell means + Residuals

51
New cards

BF[2] Decomposition: Cell means

estimated mean effect = factor level mean - grand mean

52
New cards

BF[2] Decomposition: Interaction effect

= cell mean - (grand mean + factor A effect + factor B effect)

53
New cards

The meaning of a main effect changes

if there is a significant interaction.

54
New cards

If interaction IS significant

Compare treatment means (are main effects meaningful)

55
New cards

If interaction is NOT significant

Evaluate and interpret main effects

56
New cards
term image

p value for interaction is 0.01

p value for factor B is 0.90

57
New cards
term image

pvalue for interaction is 0.01

p value for factor B is 0.01

58
New cards
term image

p value for interaction is 0.90

pvalue for factor B is 0.20

59
New cards

Replication is important because

1 gives more precision to our estimates of model parameters

2 gives us information about the errors εij, which then allows us to make inference about model parameters.

60
New cards

what if there there is not replication?

Hope that the prop×filler interaction is non-existant/non-significant

61
New cards

if there is no interaction effect

MSinterax is just an estimate of σ2 (i.e., MSinterax ∼= σ2) . . . just run the model with no interaction term

62
New cards

UNBALANCED DATA:

Standard formula for estimating model parameters are often invalid

Order of the factors in the model affects SS, MS, and F-tests

63
New cards

Type I SS

gives first term in the model the chance to “explain” as much of the variability as possible, with 2nd, 3rd, and later terms a chance to explain what is leftover (Type I SS aka “Sequential SS")

64
New cards

Type III SS

which treats each term as if it were last in the model. That is, what is unique about this term after explaining all others (aka “SS Last”)

65
New cards

Type II SS

which gives the effect of each main effect in the presence of all other main effects, but before the two-way interaction(s); then it gives the effect of the interactions in the presence of the main effects and any other interactions of the same order.

66
New cards

For Type III and Type II SSModel /=

SSGender + SSType + SSInteraction

67
New cards
68
New cards