Poor law: why was reform thought necessary by 1834?

studied byStudied by 1 person
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 7

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

add comments from podcast

8 Terms

1

Features of the existing poor law

  • 1601

  • organised around the parish

  • rich paying poor rates for impotent, able bodied and idle poor

  • worked well in rural society around system of deference

New cards
2

What were the general problems with the Old poor law? (5)

worked in a rural society not an industrial one as (industrial and agricultural revolution)

  1. population growth in cities- too many unemployed people =strain on system (when economic recession - hundreds made redundant and poor relief sky rocketed

  2. only receive poor law in place of birth- migration to cities means transport cost- high (287,000 year)

  3. Speenhamland system 1795- topped up low wages through the poor releif- but encourage employers to reduce wages as knew it would be compensated

  4. sense of community breaking down- emergence of capitalist agriculture as farmers got richer

  5. system not uniform - some outdoor relief some indoor

New cards
3

What was the intellectual case for change?

  1. 1820: dominant view was the old poor law encouraged idleness, didn’t have the incentive to work

    • Speenhamland system

    • Thomas Malthus 'An essay on the principle of population' 1798- population expanding too fast/food running out and poor law making situation worse

  2. Immoral: rewarding the underserving poor whilst hardworking landowners/farmers paid poor rates

  3. Utilitarians - followers of Jeremy Bentham ‘less eligibility’ concept - make conditions so unpleasant only needy would claim PL - prevent idleness

    • J.R Mulloch in 1830 ‘Principles of Political Economy’ and Edwin Chadwick - support view

  4. Worrying pop growth.- poor had more children knowing poor law would provide (Malthus)

New cards
4

What were the economic reasons for change/who disliked it?

  • Cost= too high

  • 1795- total cost for all parishes= 2m

  • 1830- almost 8m

  • Dislike by upper/middle classes paying rate

New cards
5

When was the poor law commission set up, who led it and what did they do?

  • 1832- led by Erwin Chadwick main aim- saving money and making system uniform across England and Wales

  • condemned outdoor relief

  • heard evidence but already made its mind- commissioner Nassau Senior wrote report before evidence collected

New cards
6

What did the 1834 Poor law report conclude (commission)

  • Old poor law primary cause of of poverty

  • Scaving of outdoor relief - it was early abused and able bodied poor taking advantage of work

New cards
7

What recommendations did the committee make?

  • Outdoor relief phased out for able bodied poor (some cases to sick and old)

  • Relief in workhouses - impotent/able bodied poor

    • conditions unattractive as possible - more miserable than life of the poorest labourer outside (encourage self help/reduce idleness)

  • Parishes grouped into unions: over 600 poor law unions with locally elected board of guardians set up to have own workhouses

New cards
8

What happened to recommendations of the Committee?

  • Recommendations of report: became provisions of PLAA 1834

New cards
robot