Psychiatric Injury and Duty of Care in Negligence Law

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

21 Terms

1
New cards

What is a recognized psychiatric condition mentioned in the notes?

Conditions such as anxiety, depression, and PTSD.

2
New cards

What distinguishes psychiatric conditions from mere emotions?

Psychiatric conditions are recognized as conditions requiring duty, breach, and damage, unlike emotions such as grief or hysteria.

3
New cards

What are the two types of victims in negligence cases involving psychiatric injury?

Primary victims and secondary victims.

4
New cards

Who are considered primary victims?

People directly affected by the negligent act or those in the zone of danger.

5
New cards

What case established that primary victims do not need to show that psychiatric injury was reasonably foreseeable?

Page v Smith.

6
New cards

What defines secondary victims in negligence cases?

Those who suffer psychiatric injury due to witnessing an event or its immediate aftermath.

7
New cards

What are the Alcock control mechanisms for secondary victims?

1. Close tie of love and affection with the victim. 2. Proximity to the event or its immediate aftermath. 3. The event must be shocking and sudden.

8
New cards

What is presumed for spouses in terms of the close tie of love and affection?

It is presumed; for others, it must be proved.

9
New cards

What is required for proximity in secondary victim claims?

The claimant must be physically near the location of the traumatic event or witness its consequences within a certain timeframe.

10
New cards

What timeframe is relevant for witnessing the consequences of a traumatic event?

Witnessing within 2 hours, as established in McLoughlin.

11
New cards

What characteristics must the event have to qualify as shocking and sudden?

It must be traumatic and unexpected, not resulting from medical negligence.

12
New cards

What does it mean for a person of reasonable fortitude in the context of psychiatric injury?

It refers to a person with reasonable mental resilience who would suffer psychiatric injury from the event.

13
New cards

Can the development of psychiatric injury occur over time?

Yes, it need not be sudden.

14
New cards

What senses must a claimant use to witness the event or its aftermath?

They must witness it with their own unaided senses, such as sight or hearing.

15
New cards

How are rescuers treated in terms of primary and secondary victims?

If they put themselves in the zone of danger, they are treated as primary victims; otherwise, they are secondary victims.

16
New cards

What case illustrates that rescuers in the zone of danger are treated as primary victims?

Chadwick v British Transport.

17
New cards

What happens if bystanders witness an event but do nothing to help?

They are treated as secondary victims and cannot claim for psychiatric injury unless they satisfy the Alcock criteria.

18
New cards

What case established that defendants are not responsible to the 'world at large'?

McFarlane.

19
New cards

What additional elements must be considered if there is a duty of care?

Breach and damage.

20
New cards

What are some defenses available in negligence cases?

Consent and contributory negligence.

21
New cards

What types of damages are mentioned in the notes?

Special and general damages.