Federal and State Judiciary System Quiz

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/94

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 4:20 AM on 9/18/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

95 Terms

1
New cards

Why does the professor focus on the US Supreme Court?

It is the one court required to exist at all times and it is the most visible player in the judiciary, whose primary job is to interpret laws.

2
New cards

What is the Marshall Court Era?

The era of the Supreme Court when John Marshall was Chief Justice, from 1801–1835.

3
New cards

How long was John Marshall Chief Justice?

1801–1835, until his death.

4
New cards

What type of government did John Marshall favor?

A strong national government.

5
New cards

What was John Marshall's view of federal power?

He believed in a powerful but not tyrannical central government.

6
New cards

What was Marshall's role in Worcester v. Georgia?

The Marshall Court ruled that Georgia's law restricting people from living on Cherokee land was unconstitutional because the federal government had authority over relations with Native American tribes.

7
New cards

What happened in Worcester v. Georgia?

Samuel Worcester was convicted under a Georgia law for living on Cherokee land without a license. The Supreme Court overturned the Georgia law because the Cherokee were a sovereign nation and only the federal government could regulate relations with Native American tribes.

8
New cards

Why did Worcester v. Georgia conflict with Andrew Jackson?

Jackson supported the forced removal of the Cherokee, while the Court's decision recognized Cherokee sovereignty and federal treaty obligations.

9
New cards

Who was Roger Taney?

Chief Justice from 1836–1864 who was originally a Federalist but later became a Democrat and staunch Jacksonian.

10
New cards

What is the Taney Court Era?

The period when Roger Taney served as Chief Justice, from 1836–1864.

11
New cards

What is Roger Taney best known for?

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), one of the most infamous Supreme Court decisions.

12
New cards

What did the Supreme Court rule in Dred Scott v. Sandford?

The Court ruled that Dred Scott was not a citizen and was considered property, and that Congress could not prohibit slavery in the territories.

13
New cards

Why was Dred Scott v. Sandford so controversial?

The Court denied Scott citizenship while also ruling on the broader issue of Congress's ability to prohibit slavery in territories.

14
New cards

What happened between Taney and Lincoln during the Civil War?

Taney ruled that Lincoln had violated the due process rights of prisoners detained without warrants, and Lincoln ignored the ruling.

15
New cards

What was the New Deal Court?

The Supreme Court era involving FDR's New Deal and the conflict between the Three Musketeers and Four Horsemen.

16
New cards

Who were the Three Musketeers?

The three consistently liberal Supreme Court justices who supported FDR's New Deal.

17
New cards

Who were the Four Horsemen?

The four conservative justices who opposed much of FDR's New Deal economic regulation.

18
New cards

Why did FDR clash with the Supreme Court?

The Court routinely struck down New Deal economic programs, arguing they exceeded federal power under the Commerce Clause and violated states' rights.

19
New cards

What was FDR's Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937?

A proposal that would have allowed the president to appoint a new justice for each justice over age 70 who did not retire.

20
New cards

What was the result of FDR's court reform proposal?

FDR lost the political battle because the bill never passed Congress, but the Court later began upholding New Deal programs.

21
New cards

What does "FDR loses battle but wins war" mean?

FDR's court-packing proposal failed, but the Supreme Court began upholding New Deal programs and allowing greater federal economic power.

22
New cards

What happened to the Supreme Court during the Stone and Vinson eras?

The Court continued siding with government action and began eroding state segregation laws.

23
New cards

What was Korematsu v. United States?

A 1944 decision in which the Supreme Court upheld FDR's ability to send Japanese Americans on the West Coast to internment camps.

24
New cards

Who became Chief Justice in 1953?

Earl Warren, appointed by President Eisenhower.

25
New cards

What is the Warren Revolution?

The period when the Warren Court became a leading policymaker, especially in civil rights, free speech, defendants' rights, and religion.

26
New cards

What was the Warren Court's first major challenge?

Determining whether racial segregation in public schools was completely unconstitutional.

27
New cards

What areas did the Warren Court expand?

Civil rights, free speech, rights of defendants, and religious freedom.

28
New cards

What did the Warren Court establish about symbolic speech?

It established that symbolic or unspoken speech, such as wearing a black armband to protest a war, can be protected by the First Amendment.

29
New cards

What did the Warren Court do for criminal defendants?

It established protections including Miranda warnings, mandatory attorneys in criminal defense cases, and restrictions on the use of illegally obtained evidence.

30
New cards

What did the Warren Court do regarding religion?

It established stronger protections for freedom of religion while creating a firm wall between church and state.

31
New cards

Why was the Warren Court so influential?

Its decisions were so powerful that its successor largely failed to overturn them.

32
New cards

When did the Rehnquist Court serve?

1986–2005.

33
New cards

What was William Rehnquist's judicial philosophy?

Judicial restraint.

34
New cards

What happened ideologically during the Rehnquist Court?

The Court shifted firmly conservative.

35
New cards

What did Rehnquist believe about the federal courts?

He believed federal courts were involving themselves too much in policy conflicts that should be left to other branches or the states.

36
New cards

What happened to Roe v. Wade during the Rehnquist Court?

The Court did not overturn Roe but upheld more stringent restrictions on abortion.

37
New cards

What happened in Bush v. Gore?

The Supreme Court stopped a Florida state court-ordered recount of presidential ballots, effectively handing the 2000 election to George W. Bush.

38
New cards

When did the Roberts Court begin?

2005, when George W. Bush appointed John Roberts as Chief Justice.

39
New cards

How is the Roberts Court described in the presentation?

Very conservative.

40
New cards

What concerns does the presentation identify about the Roberts Court?

Concerns about public support, internal legitimacy, hyperpartisanship, contentious decisions, and public disputes among justices.

41
New cards

What major decision did the Roberts Court make regarding Roe v. Wade?

In June 2022, it overturned Roe v. Wade.

42
New cards

What are some other major areas addressed by the Roberts Court?

Religious liberty, campaign spending, birth control access, political gerrymandering, same-sex marriage, and tribal sovereignty.

43
New cards

What is the "shadow docket"?

The Supreme Court's emergency process where it can block a lower court ruling from taking effect without full oral arguments or a written opinion.

44
New cards

Why has the shadow docket been controversial?

Concerns include lack of transparency, frequent use, and accusations that it can be used to block decisions for ideological reasons.

45
New cards

What are proposed Supreme Court reforms?

Term limits, expanding the Court, restricting the shadow docket, restricting jurisdiction, mandatory bipartisan balance, and direct election of judges.

46
New cards

Why are Supreme Court term limits difficult to enact?

Article III specifies that justices serve as long as they want, so term limits would require a constitutional amendment.

47
New cards

What is one argument for expanding the Supreme Court?

It could reduce workload and increase diversity of perspectives and legal expertise.

48
New cards

What is one concern about expanding the Supreme Court?

It could become a tool for political parties to add justices they agree with and could make consensus harder.

49
New cards

What are jurisdiction restrictions?

Changing what types of cases the Supreme Court is allowed to hear.

50
New cards

What is mandatory bipartisan balance?

A requirement that the Supreme Court contain members from both major political parties.

51
New cards

What is one concern with Supreme Court reforms generally?

They could increase the politicization of the Court.

52
New cards
Why has judicial selection become increasingly important in the states?
State supreme courts have become more powerful because of judicial federalism and because more contentious issues are being decided by state courts.
53
New cards
What happened with the North Carolina Supreme Court's gerrymandering decision?
In 2022, the Democrat-controlled court ruled partisan gerrymandering unconstitutional. After Republicans gained control in 2023, the new court reheard and overturned the decision.
54
New cards
What happened in the 2025 Wisconsin Supreme Court election?
It became the most expensive judicial election in US history, with almost $100 million spent.
55
New cards
What is a major concern about judicial elections?
That money and donors may have too much influence over judges and that elections may undermine the idea of a fair judiciary.
56
New cards
What percentage of state supreme court justices are women?
Almost 40%.
57
New cards
What percentage of state supreme court justices are non-white Anglos?
17%.
58
New cards
Why does diversity on state courts matter?
It can bring new perspectives, increase judicial legitimacy, and potentially increase public participation.
59
New cards
What is informational theory regarding judicial diversity?
The idea that women and minority judges can bring unique experiences and perspectives to judicial decision-making.
60
New cards
What is one benefit of having a representative judiciary?
Public support for the judiciary is greater when its membership looks more like the state's population.
61
New cards
What is gubernatorial/legislative appointment?
A system where judges are appointed, usually by the governor, sometimes with legislative involvement.
62
New cards
What are common characteristics of gubernatorial/legislative appointments?
Judges have limits on office and are often political allies of the appointing officials.
63
New cards
What is one benefit of gubernatorial/legislative appointments?
They insulate judges from public pressure.
64
New cards
What is another potential benefit of appointments?
They can increase gender and racial/ethnic diversity.
65
New cards
What is a drawback of gubernatorial/legislative appointments?
Lack of public accountability and risk of greater judicial partisanship.
66
New cards
What is a concern with appointed judges being political allies?
Their ideological attitudes may get in the way of fair judging.
67
New cards
What are popular judicial elections?
Elections where voters directly choose judges.
68
New cards
What are the two types of popular judicial elections?
Partisan and nonpartisan elections.
69
New cards
What is a partisan judicial election?
An election where party affiliation is part of the election process and appears on the ballot.
70
New cards
What is a nonpartisan judicial election?
An election where candidates do not officially run with party affiliations or party primaries.
71
New cards
Which state has partisan judicial races according to the presentation?
Ohio.
72
New cards
What is one problem with nonpartisan judicial elections?
Party affiliations can still be inferred or communicated indirectly.
73
New cards
What is the most common use of popular judicial elections?
Lower courts, including general jurisdiction trial courts and limited jurisdiction courts.
74
New cards
What are benefits of popular judicial elections?
Greater accountability, democratic participation, and potential diversification of courts.
75
New cards
What are drawbacks of popular judicial elections?
Influence of money, lack of competition, low voter information, manipulation of the public, and possible effects on judicial decisions.
76
New cards
How can money influence judicial elections?
Lawyers, interest groups, and other donors can contribute money, potentially creating conflicts of interest or influencing judges.
77
New cards
Why are many lower-court judicial elections less competitive?
Judges often run unopposed.
78
New cards
Why can low voter information be a problem?
Interest groups and candidates can oversimplify or distort opponents' decisions and positions.
79
New cards
How can elections affect judicial decisions?
The presentation states that criminals are likely to receive harsher sentences during election years, particularly following increases in crime.
80
New cards
What is Republican Party of Minnesota v. White (2002)?
A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that restrictions preventing judicial candidates from expressing opinions on disputed legal or political issues violated the First Amendment.
81
New cards
What was the significance of Republican Party of Minnesota v. White?
Judicial candidates can publicly take positions on disputed legal or political issues, subject to constitutional limits.
82
New cards
What is Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015)?
A case where the Supreme Court upheld Florida's restriction on judicial candidates personally soliciting campaign funds.
83
New cards
Why did the Supreme Court uphold the Florida fundraising restriction in Williams-Yulee?
The Court found the restriction narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest in maintaining public confidence in judicial integrity.
84
New cards
What did Williams-Yulee NOT prohibit?
It did not generally prohibit financial contributions to judicial elections; such restrictions still must satisfy strict scrutiny.
85
New cards
What is merit selection?
A judicial commission recommends candidates and the governor selects one, after which the judge faces periodic retention elections.
86
New cards
What is the theoretical benefit of merit selection?
Avoiding the negative politics and other problems associated with popular elections.
87
New cards
What is a retention election?
An election where voters decide whether an appointed judge should remain on the court.
88
New cards
How long can judges selected through merit systems serve after winning retention?
Typically between 6–12 years, depending on the state.
89
New cards
What is a drawback of merit selection?
It can still have problems associated with popular elections, especially retention elections.
90
New cards
Does merit selection eliminate judicial partisanship?
The presentation says there is no evidence that merit selection produces less partisanship.
91
New cards
What happened in Iowa's 2010 Supreme Court retention election?
Three justices lost their positions after public outrage over the court's legalization of same-sex marriage.
92
New cards
What is a major problem with retention elections?
Voters may judge a justice based on individual controversial decisions rather than their overall record or qualifications.
93
New cards
According to the presentation, are merit-selected judges more qualified than popularly elected judges?
The empirical evidence presented says they are not more likely to be well-qualified.
94
New cards
According to the presentation, are merit-selected judges less partisan?
The empirical evidence presented says they are no less likely to be partisan than popularly elected judges.
95
New cards
What are the three major state judicial selection methods covered?
Gubernatorial/legislative appointments, popular elections, and merit selection.