1/103
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Complex disease
Disease caused by the combined effects of multiple genes and environmental factors
Polygenic disease
Disease influenced by many genes each contributing a small effect
Multifactorial disease
Disease resulting from both genetic and environmental influences
Single-gene disorder
Disease caused by mutation in one gene with a large effect
Mendelian inheritance
Predictable inheritance pattern following dominant, recessive, X-linked or Y-linked transmission
Autosomal dominant
One mutant allele is sufficient to cause disease
Autosomal recessive
Two mutant alleles are required to cause disease
X-linked disorder
Disorder caused by mutations on the X chromosome
Y-linked disorder
Disorder caused by mutations on the Y chromosome
Major difference between single-gene and complex diseases
Single-gene diseases are caused by one major mutation whereas complex diseases involve many genes and environmental factors
Frequency of single-gene disorders
Generally rare in the population
Frequency of polygenic disorders
Generally common in the population
Effect size in single-gene disorders
Large effect from one gene mutation
Effect size in polygenic disorders
Small contribution from many genes
Environmental influence in complex disease
Often a major determinant of disease risk and progression
Inheritance pattern in complex disease
No clear Mendelian inheritance pattern
Example of a single-gene disorder
Cystic fibrosis
Example of a complex disease
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Genetic characteristic of complex diseases
Multiple susceptibility genes contribute to disease risk
Why are polygenic diseases common?
Risk alleles have small effects and may persist due to selective advantages or late onset of disease
Homeostasis in complex disease
Gradually disturbed by accumulation of genetic and environmental risk factors
Gradual disturbance of homeostasis
Progressive movement toward disease rather than sudden onset from one mutation
Polygenic trait
Trait influenced by multiple genes
Continuous trait
Trait showing a range of values with a normal distribution
Examples of continuous traits
Height, weight and blood pressure
Discontinuous trait
Trait expressed as affected or unaffected
Examples of discontinuous traits
Type 1 diabetes and cleft lip
Quantitative trait
Another term for continuous trait
Qualitative trait
Another term for discontinuous trait
Why do continuous traits show a normal distribution?
Many genes contribute additively to the phenotype
Additive genetic effect
Each gene contributes a small amount to the final trait value
Threshold model of susceptibility
Disease occurs only when liability exceeds a critical threshold
Liability
Overall genetic and environmental susceptibility to disease
Components of liability
Genetic factors plus environmental factors
Threshold
Point at which disease manifests
Crossing the threshold
Accumulating sufficient genetic and environmental risk to develop disease
Individuals below the threshold
Unaffected
Individuals above the threshold
Affected
Average liability in affected families
Higher than in the general population
Why do siblings of affected individuals have higher risk?
They share more susceptibility genes and environmental exposures
Recurrence risk
Probability that a disease will occur again in a family
Factors increasing recurrence risk
More affected relatives and greater disease severity
Prediction 1 of multifactorial threshold model
Recurrence risks vary among families
Prediction 2 of multifactorial threshold model
Risk increases with the number of affected relatives
Prediction 3 of multifactorial threshold model
Risk increases with severity of disease
Prediction 4 of multifactorial threshold model
Relative risk increases as disease prevalence decreases
Prediction 5 of multifactorial threshold model
Offspring of the less commonly affected sex have higher risk
Twin study
Method used to assess genetic contribution to disease
Concordance
Probability that both individuals in a pair exhibit the same trait
Monozygotic twins
Twins derived from a single fertilized egg and genetically identical
Dizygotic twins
Twins derived from two fertilized eggs and share about 50% of genes
Interpretation of MZ concordance greater than DZ concordance
Evidence for a genetic contribution to disease
Interpretation of MZ concordance less than 100%
Environmental factors also contribute to disease
Heritability
Proportion of trait variation attributable to genetic factors
High heritability
Strong genetic influence but not necessarily complete genetic determination
Heritability of schizophrenia
Approximately 85%
Heritability of asthma
Approximately 80%
Heritability of ankylosing spondylitis
Approximately 70%
Heritability of hypertension
Approximately 62%
Heritability of osteoarthritis
Approximately 55%
Heritability of type 2 diabetes
Approximately 26%
Limitation of twin studies
MZ twins often share more similar environments than DZ twins
Bias in twin studies
MZ twins may be treated more similarly than DZ twins
Why study twins separated at birth?
To better distinguish genetic effects from environmental effects
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Polygenic disorder characterized by insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia
Major environmental risk factors for type 2 diabetes
Obesity, high-calorie diet and physical inactivity
Insulin resistance
Reduced cellular response to insulin despite its presence
Thrifty gene hypothesis
Genes that promoted survival during famine may predispose to obesity and diabetes today
Metabolically thrifty genes
Genes that favor efficient energy storage and fat deposition
Advantage of thrifty genes in ancient environments
Improved survival during famine
Disadvantage of thrifty genes in modern environments
Increased risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes
Genetic variation
Differences in DNA sequence among individuals
Percentage of DNA shared among humans
Approximately 99.9%
Percentage of DNA contributing to individual variation
Approximately 0.1%
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)
Single base pair variation present in more than 1% of the population
Mutation
Single base pair variation present in less than 1% of the population
Difference between SNP and mutation
SNPs are common whereas mutations are rare
Pronunciation of SNP
Snip
Location of SNPs
Found in both coding and noncoding regions of DNA
Most SNPs occur in
Noncoding regions
Frequency of SNPs in the genome
Approximately one every 100–1000 base pairs
Coding region SNP
May alter amino acid sequence and protein structure
Noncoding SNP
May affect gene regulation or serve as a genetic marker
Significance of SNPs
Modify disease susceptibility and contribute to phenotypic variation
Disease risk SNP
Genetic variant that increases or decreases likelihood of disease
Harmless SNP
Variation with no significant biological effect
Harmful SNP
Variation associated with disease development
Latent SNP
Variation that becomes important only under certain conditions
Why are SNPs useful in genetics?
They are abundant and easy to measure
SNP marker
A SNP located near a gene and used to track inheritance of that gene
SNP profile
Unique pattern of SNPs within an individual’s genome
Importance of SNP profiles
Can predict disease risk and drug responses
Pharmacogenomics
Study of how genetic variation influences drug response
Role of SNPs in pharmacogenomics
Help predict efficacy and toxicity of medications
Genome-wide association study (GWAS)
Method that identifies SNPs associated with disease risk
Most SNPs directly cause disease
False, most only modify susceptibility
Common diseases associated with SNPs
Diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease
Exam clue for genetic contribution
MZ concordance significantly exceeds DZ concordance
Exam clue for environmental contribution
MZ concordance is less than 100%
Affected individual with unaffected parents in complex disease
Common finding due to multifactorial inheritance