1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Randomness is inherent to evolution
In a finite population, allele frequency of the next generation is affected by differences in offspring numbers
An animal that has 10 different offspring contributes more than one that has 5
Effect is stronger the smaller the population
Genetic drift
The founder effect - humans in Finland
Migration into Finland
Only inhabited coastal regions
Internal migration = settlement of inland
Each village established by a few settlers
36 mostly autosomal recessive diseases = common in Finland but rare/absent elsewhere
Different pattern of diseases than the rest of the world
Diseases have distinct geographical distributions
Long term small populations in mountain gorillas
2 gorilla species - eastern and western
4 subspecies
Population size threatened by
Habitat loss
Poaching
Ebola virus
Population decreases
Evidence of syndactyly (fused digits) —> suggests inbreeding
Whole eastern species = low genetic diversity
Effective population size
The size of an idealised population that would love genetic diversity via drift at the same rate as the actual population
What factors would reduce effective population size
Not large
No random mating
No equal sex ratio
Non-equal family sizes
Population size fluctuates
Generations overlap
Each individual doesn’t have an equal probability of contributing genes to the next generation
How does genetic drift affect generations
Erases genetic variation within populations
Causes population differentiation
Strength depends on population census size
The behaviour and demographic history of populations affects patterns of genetic variation and effective population size