1/46
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Polygenic traits
traits controlled by more than 1 genes, assort independently
Multifactorial (polygenic) traits
multiple factors, contribute genetic architecture of complex traits
Quantitative traits
continous phenotypic variation, described in units of measure, show continuum, homozygous are extremes, some have discrete values (meristic), genetic potential, complex inheritance
Qualitative traits (categorical)
discrete categories, discontinuous phenotypic range, simple inheritance, predictable phenotypic ratio
Qualitative traits that don’t have simple inheritance
gentic and enviromental factors, risk factors, threshold traits (have disease when threshold exceeded)
Meristic traits
quantitative traits with discrete values, falls into categories/can’t have half numbers
Genetic potential
genotype give maximum phenotypic expression, enviromental/developmental factors infulence phenotypes
Major genes
polygenic traits, contribute more to trait then others
Modifier genes
polygenic traits, contribute small effect to phenotype
Predict polygenic traits
predict if number alles/genes known, assuming 2 alles per gene and diploid use binomial expansion/Pascal triangle, p = contributing allele, q = alternative, n= number of alleles, n + 1 = # phenotypes
Condition for using binomonal expansion/Pascal triangle for predicting polygenic traits
Diploid, 2 alles per gene, even allel frequences (5050), random mating (no selection), contributing alleles additive, no linkage, no interaction, no enviromental effects, discrete categories
additive genes
incremental contributions from multiple genes, no enviromental influence, each allele own quantitative value
multi gene hypothesis
Hermann Nilsson-Ehle propsed, segregation of alleles from multiple genes, contributes to phenotypes
Gene environment interaction (GxE)
no interaction - discontinuous phenotypes, Some interaction - overlap in phenotypes, Lots of interaction - lots of phenotype overlap
frequency distribution
values on quantitative scale (graph), represent proportion of variation in sample to estimate of variation in population
Mean
average, sum of all/ population number
Mode
most common value in distribution
Median
middle value om distribution
Varaince
spread in distribution around mean
Standard Deviation
deviation from mean, in same unit as scale but squared
Vp
phenotypic variance of quantitative trait, = Vg+Ve
Vg (genes)
proportion of variation due to genotypes
Ve (environment)
proportion of variation due to enviromental factors, can control in lab/hard in nature, all variations in F1 from
Correlation
tendency of one variable to vary in proportion to another, positive (same direction) or negative (opposite direction)
Correlation coefficient - r
statistical measure of correlation, -1 to 1, 0 no connection to 1 strong connection
Familial traits
shared by family, any reason
Heritable traitss
similar in family, due to shared genes
Heritability
proportion of phenotypic variation due to genetic factors, specific to trait and environmental context, High - most variation due to genes (Vg>Ve) and strongly influenced by natural seletion, Low - most variation not inherited (Vg<Ve) and influenced by envionment, measure degree but not how, change if enviro changes (natural selection)
Broad sense heritability (H²)
estimate proportion variation due to total genetic variation (Vg/Vp), measure magnitude, don’t partition genetic variation (Vg = Va+ Vd+ Vi)
Narrow sense heritability (h²)
estimate proportion variation due to additive genetic variation (Va/Vp),estimate regression to show correlation, resemblance between parent and offspring, higher values = greater response to selection
Twin studies
broad sense heritability, compare MZ to same sex DZ to estimate heritability, prone to error, stronger maternal effect in identical (more similar enviroments), MZ have higher concordance than DZ if strong genetic influence
Identical (monozygotic) twins
single fertilisation, splitting of embryo, share all alleles, assume broad sene heritability (H²) solely enviromental (Vp = Ve)
Fraternal (dizygotic) twins
independent fertilisation, 2 zygotes, genetically same as siblings, smae ~50% of alleles(Vp = Ve + ½ Vg)
Concordance
% of twin pairs in which both have same phenotypes, MZ concordnat if 100% genetic, DZ twins ~50% concordant, equal between MZ and DZ if not solely gentic
Discordance
% of twin pairs in which both have different phenotypes
Behavioural conditions (mental health)
some genetic influence, traditional diagnosed based familiar patterns, starting to look at symptoms over familial patterns
Additive variance (Va)
additive effects, contributing alleles, produce heterozygotes with intermediate phenotypes
Dominant variance (Vd)
dominant relationship, non contributing alleles, heterozygote produce phenotype not inbetween
Interactive variance (Vi)
epistatic effects between alleles on different genes
Selection differential (S)
difference between population mean and mean of mating portion, = mean mating - mean population
Selection response (R)
extent difference between mating mean and progeny mean, + S(h²), under stable growth conditions mean progeny = population mean + R
Breeder equation
S = mean mating - mean original population, R = mean offspring - mean original population
Genetic correlation
influence response to selection, indirect response or restrict trait combination, important in evolution, important in breeding
Response to selection
M = mean phenotype of parental, Ms = Mean phenotype selected for mating, M’= mean phenotype of offspring after selection, higher heritability = higher selection response
Directional selection
mean shifted one direction, one extreme favoured
Stabilising selection
favours intermediate, reduce variation, mean maintained
Disruptive selection
both extreme favoured, increase phenotypic variation, mean maintained, potential phenotypic split