ATAR, DATA TEST, Inferential statistics
The Scientific Method
a logical process of problem-solving applied in all sciences
IV (independent Variable)
the variable that is manipulated by the experimenter resulting in changes in the dependent variable (DV)
DV (dependent variable)
the property that is measured in psychological research, to look for effects of the independent variable (IV)
operationalization
quantification of a variable (put into numbers)
extraneous variable
a variable other than the IV that could cause changes in the value of the dependent variable
confounding variable
a variable other than the IV that has a systematic effect on the valyd of the dependent variable; if a confounding variable exists, no valid conclusions are drawn from the data
hypothesis
a prediction of the outcome of research stated in terms of the influence of changes int he value of the IV on the value of the DV
null hypothesis
there will be no significant difference between groups; any difference observed is caused by error
alternate hypothesis
there will be a R’ship between the IV and DV
population
the group of people about which we wish to draw conclusions
sample
the members of the pop. who have been chosen to take part in the research
convenience sampling
using whoever is available at the time of research
random sampling
a sampling procedure in which every member of the pop. has an equal change of being selected
stratified sampling
sampling process by which the effects of a certain variable can be eliminated as a possible confound in an experiment
E-group
the group of research participants exposed to the IV; the results are compared with the C group so that the effects of the IV can be determined
C-group
the group of research participants not exposed to variations in the IV; the results are compared with the E-group to see/determine the effects of the IV
random allocation
subject-selection procedure where all participants who have been selected for an experiment have an equal chance of being in the E or C group
repeated measures design
subject-selection procedure where each participant is part of both the E and C group
counterbalancing
a method for controlling order effects in a repeated measures design
matched participants design
subject-selection procedure that attempts to eliminate confounding variables by ‘matching’ on key characteristics, each individual in the E group with an individual in the C group
placebo effect
participants behavior that is influenced by their expectations of how they should behave, caused by the belief that they have received some treatment.
single blind procedure
allocating participants to groups in such a way that they do not know whether they are in the E or C group
Experimenter effect
outcome of an experiment being influenced by the person conducting the experiment
double blind procedure
method of allocating participants to groups so that the experimenter and participants don’t know which group is which
naturalistic observation
observation of voluntary behaviors within a structured environment such as a lab
controlled observation
observation of voluntary behaviors within a structured environment such as a lab
interview
structured (asked a set of pre-determined questions with fixed choice of responses) or clinical (structured guidelines, but further questioning is used for clarification)
surveys (form of questioner)
question-and -answer response (rating scales). easy to replicate and score, provide a way of quantifying data. weakness - open to bias if participants are trying to appear in a particular way
psychological test (type of questionare)
multiple choice IQ tests and personality tests. strengths - standardized, easy to replicate, and score. weakness - difficult to contrast and validate
Generlisation
for it to occur: results must show statistical significance, all sampling procedures were appropriate, all experimental procedures were appropriate, all measures were valid, all possible confounding variables were controlled.
line graph/table
variable is continuous (can have any value within a certain range)
normal curve
bell curve. statistical procedures can be applied to the bell curve without further manipulation of data
measures of central tendency
mean, median mode - for a normal bell curve. how the data is clustered near the central point of the data set
measures of variability (dispersion)
range, variance, SD
range
difference between highest and lowest score on data set
variance
how much, on average, the scores differ from the mean
standard deviation (SD)
measure that tells you how far on average the scores differ from the mean
p value
probability value that the scores were caused by chance
p value of less than 0.05
statistically significant. less chance that the data was caused due to chance
p value of more than 0.05
not statically significant. caused by chance most likely
students t-test
a statistical test used to test whether the difference between the response of two groups is statistically significant or not. It is appropriate when the data sets follow a normal distribution, the population variance is unknown, and the sample size is relatively small (usually n ≤ 30).
Mann-Whitney U test
test of null hypothesis. does not require normal distributions. compare the differences between 2 groups when the DV is either ordinal or continuous
Wilcoxen Signed Rank Test
used as an alternative for t-test when the pop cannot be assumed to be normally distributed. compares 2 sets of scores from the same population
persons product moment correlation
measure of the strength of the linear r’ship between to continuous variables
spearman correlation
measure of 2 ordinal variables that use the ranked values for each variable to examine how they change together, but not necessarily at a constant rate
correlation
statistical measure of the strength of the r’ship between two variables, does not show a cause-and-effect r’ship, but describes the way in which variables vary in relation to each other
reliability
the extent to which a measure could be expected to produce the same result with the same subject(s) under the same conditions on other occasions
validity
the extent to which an instrument measures what it is supposed to measure
internal reliability
extent to which all items in a research instrument contribute = to the final score. High if the correlation between scores on the odd-numbered items and even-numbered items were high
inter-rater reliability
the same result should be obtained by anyone administering the test. procedures must be standardized
parallel form reliability
some tests have more than one form that measures the same property. these can be very useful if the research is investigating change in the property measured. measured before (pretest) and with a parallel form after (post-test)
test-retest reliability
checked to ensure that it would produce the same result if re-administered to the same person under the same conditions at a different time
internal validity
examines whether the results gained from a measure are truly due to the variable that it is thought to be measuring
content validity
face validity. form of internal validity that involves examining the instrument to decide if it measures what its supposed to
construct validity
form of internal validity. deciding whether the test can be used to support the theory that is being tested
external validity
criterion-related validity that refers to the extent that results from this measure are comparable with other, established measures of the variable
ordinal scale
data that has definite sequence but the gap between one level and the next is not consistent e.g. age of people in the classroom
nominal scale
data that has a QUALITATIVE value rather than quantitative value where there is no ranking or ordering of values implied e.g. hair colour
Interval scale
Data is measured on a scale, where each step is the same value but 0 does not mean the property does not exist (e.g. Celsius and Fahrenheit).
Ratio scale
measurements that represent quantities is terms of = intervals and an absolute 0 point of origin