1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
P1: Popularity of the PM
Popularity of a Prime Minister with the public is a highly important factor in influencing whether they are able to exercise control over their cabinet and party
if the Prime Minister is unpopular they will be seen as an electoral liability and their party and cabinet will often turn on them and seek to remove them
Thatcher was very popular mid-way through being PM however became very unpopular with the public after trying to push through with the poll tax despite its unpopularity and the cabinet opposing it
Â
2019- Johnson was an electoral asset- eventually became an electoral liability following the partygate scandal, cabinet gained power and he was eventually forced out by key members of the cabinet resigning
HOWEVER
Party unity
Divisions over policy within a governing party can cause problems for a Prime Minister who may struggle to keep the support of opposing factions within the party
The tories effectively removed Thatcher when she faced the leadership contents they were fed up with her domineering effect
Â
Major faced a leadership contest from John Redwood and Eurosceptic in the tory party almost defeated the Maastricht treaty that he negotiated with Brussels
Â
Blair became unpopular within his party especially after Iraq
Â
Brown may have had few MPs willing to openly challenge him but very few actually were willing to actually openly challenge him
Â
Cameron's call for a referendum stemmed in part from the Eurosceptic right wing of the party
Â
May accepted defeat after the brexit process was completed- her resignation was brought forward- struggled to keep support from ERG european research group
Â
Divisions over NHS
Â
Divisions over gov. Spending
P2: Popularity of the PM
Popularity of the PM is paticularly important in an era of personality politics- the media focuses on individual personalities and leadership quality is often determined by this
Truss' mini budget- seen as a failure, compared to a lettuce to see how long she would stay in
Â
Blair's image was used by the Labour Party in 1997 in 2001 to promote its manifestos
Â
Cameron in 2010 used his personal popularity to win boats and some by elections even renamed the party David Cameron's conservatives
Â
Boris Johnson seemed at home taking part in publicity stunts driving a JCP through gridlock parliament sign in 2019 general action to signify that he was going to get Brexit done
HOWEVER
Success at bypassing cabinet
Prime ministers have more control in smaller forums and it is easier to reach a compromise with one or two key ministers in the whole cabinet as a consequence they often use smaller cabinet committees bilateral meetings with ministers and informal groups to make decisions shunning the cabinet
SPADs in recent years have occupied an important role in Downing St and in decision making these are unlocked in a hired directly by the PM working with them to develop government strategy
PMs office and cabinet office- grown in recent years
black and brown negotiated with each other to determine economic policy black often used bilateral meetings his style of governing was dubbed sofa government as a result he largely shunned the cabinet
Â
in the coalition the quad was used to make a number of key decisions and resolve issues between the conservatives and the Lib Dems
Â
may and Johnson used cabinet committees to make decisions on important issues
Â
major heart just 8 special advisers but by 2005 Tony Blair had 30
Â
may relied on special advisers nick Timothy and Fiona hill to help her develop policy and manage government
Â
Cameron create a policy and implementation unit 2011
Â
Johnson COVID press briefings
P3: Popularity of the PM
A popular PM who commands a large majority is arguably the most important factor in determining the balance of power
When a PM is riding high in opinion polls and seen as an electoral asset they can more effectively command the loyalty and respect of their colleagues who owe their positions to the PMs continued premiership
This is often referred to as having prime ministerial coattails a lot of MP's owe their seats the PM and so are more likely to be loyal and vocal supporters appea
in the 1983 election and the 1997 election flattering Blair won a lot of seats in areas not traditionally seen as being supporters of their parties
Â
while they remain popular for a time when their reputations became more of a hindrance likely to cost them seats split started to emerge and there was declining support for them leading to their eventual removal
HOWEVER
The ability of the PM to manage their cabinet
An effective Prime Minister can use their powers of patronage to shape the top team in a way that enhances their power and enables them to promote their policy priorities and agenda removing poor performers bringing in fresh talent and promoting ideological allies
this can allow prime ministers to maintain their authority and marginalised the power of factions in their party who may want to challenge them for their leadership
The PM chairs all cabinet meetings and sums up the discussion at the end, giving them scope to lead people toward their desired position
May failed to effectively manage her cabinet and was constantly undermined by leaking and briefing against the government by Johnson in paticular
Â
May prevented a vote within cabinet on whether no deal brexit was an option despite other cabinet ministers supporting one
Â
Cameron made austerity key to the coalition's policies and the responsibility of every department