1/62
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Hindsight bias
thinking you knew it all along or would have foreseen it
Overconfidence
being more confident than correct
thinking that does not blindly accept arguments and conclusions
getting self-reported attitudes or behaviors of a group, usually by questioning
observation technique in which one person is studied in depth
getting as much research data together as possible
Scientific method
Theory, Hyp, Op Def, Results, Summary
Theory
explanation that predicts behavior or events (1)
Hypothesis
testable prediction (2)
Operational definition
statement of procedures in experiment (or defining a term) (3)
the results / scores / numbers / graphed data (4)
Conclusion
a summary explanation of the results (5)
repeating a research study
if a hypothesis can be logically contradicted (proven false) by an empirical test
all the cases in a group being studied, from which samples may be drawn
sample that fairly represents a population (Representative sampling)
Random assignment
randomly dividing the sample into groups (e.g. A & B)
non-probability sampling drawn from population that is close at hand
Naturalistic observation
observing and recording behavior naturally; no manipulation
a survey scale on how much you like something (e.g. 1-10)
measure of the extent to which two factors vary together; not cause
statistical index of the relationship between two things (from -1 to +1).
when one thing makes something else happen
how far apart things are
a graph (x & y axis)
/ or Negative skew
\ or Positive skew
perception of a relationship where none exists
Experiment
research method in which an investigator manipulates one or more factors (IV)
what is manipulated in an experiment (IV)
what happens in an experiment (DV)
only the experimenter knows the purpose of the experiment
neither the experimenter or the subjects know the purpose of the experiment
results caused by expectation alone (fake medicine)
the group being manipulated with the IV
the group that gets nothing or the placebo
3 rd variable other than independent variable may produce an effect
(hot)
mean, median, & mode stats
*Mean
average
middle number (1,2,3,4,5 = 3, 1,1,1,1,2,3,4 = 1, 1,2,3,4 = 2.5)
most occurring number
difference between the highest and lowest score
two modes
computed measure of how much scores vary around the mean
symmetrical, bell-shaped curve
the percent you scored better than (90 th percentile = better than 90%)
tendency of researchers to introduce bias into an experiment (cheat?)
to answer questions in a way you think will be viewed favorably
only search for information in a way that confirms prior beliefs or values.
how likely it is that an obtained result occurred by chance
% showing Statistical significance
Regression towards the mean
for outlier scores to go back to being average (1 good game)
reasoning that involves drawing very broad inferences (e.g. stereotypes)
proper fair treatment of others in research (4 parts)
Informed consent
tell subjects enough for them to decide to be in experiment
Debriefing
post-experimental explanation
relies on data / numbers (quantity)
relies on opinions and interpretations (quality)
Peer reviews
evaluation of work by one or more people with similar expertise
a board applies research ethics by reviewing your methods
strength (effect) or relation between 2 means