1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Approaches for Compensating Auto Accident Victims
How drivers can show they can pay for accidents (financial responsibility):
Have an auto liability insurance policy with at least the minimum required coverage
Example: If your state requires $25,000 for injury per person, your policy must cover at least that.
Post a bond
Example: A court-approved payment guarantee instead of insurance.
Deposit the required amount of money with the state
Example: Putting $50,000 in a state account to cover potential accidents.
Be a qualified self-insurer
Example: Some large companies or government entities can prove they can pay for accidents themselves.
Limitations of financial responsibility laws:
They don’t guarantee full protection against irresponsible drivers.
Accident victims may not get paid if:
Driver is uninsured
Driver commits a hit-and-run
Driver was driving a stolen car
State laws usually require only minimum liability limits, which are often low compared to real accident costs
Compulsory Auto Insurance Laws
Compulsory insurance law:
Requires drivers to carry at least minimum liability insurance before their vehicle can be licensed or registered.
Example: You cannot legally register your car without proof of $25,000 bodily injury coverage per person if that’s the state minimum.
Advantages:
Provides greater protection against uninsured drivers because proof of insurance is required before an accident happens.
Criticisms / Limitations:
Mandatory insurance does not necessarily reduce uninsured drivers.
Example: Some people may still drive without insurance despite the law.
No correlation between compulsory insurance laws and the number of uninsured vehicles on the road.
Computer reporting systems meant to track uninsured drivers have not been very effective.
Compulsory Insurance Law
A law that requires drivers
Unsatisfied Judgement Funds
A state fund that pays accident victims when they have a court judgement against a negligent driver, but cannot collect from that driver
What they are:
Special state funds in 5 states (MD, MI, NJ, NY, ND) that pay accident victims when all other recovery options fail.
Example: If you win a court judgment but the at-fault driver can’t pay, this fund can step in.
Requirements to access the fund:
Victim must have a judgment against the negligent driver.
Must prove the judgment cannot be collected from the driver.
Limitations:
The amount paid is limited by state law.
Payments may be reduced by other collateral sources (like insurance or settlements).
Obligations and financing:
The negligent driver must repay the fund if possible.
States fund the program in different ways, such as assessments on insurers.
Uninsured Motorists Coverage
Insurance that pays for your injuries (and sometimes property damage) if you’re in an accident caused by an uninsured, hit-and-run, or insolvent driver
What it is:
Many states require uninsured motorist (UM) coverage as part of auto insurance.
Example: If someone without insurance hits you, your own insurer can pay for your injuries.
What it covers:
Bodily injury caused by:
An uninsured driver
A hit-and-run driver
A negligent driver whose insurance is insolvent
Some states also cover property damage.
Advantages:
Faster claim settlement than filing a tort liability lawsuit.
Limitations:
The injured person must prove the uninsured motorist is legally liable.
Minimum coverage limits are low, so victims may not be fully compensated.
Low-Cost Auto Insurance
Affordable auto insurance that provides the minimum required liability coverage for drivers who cannot pay for regular insurance
What it is:
Provides minimum liability insurance at reduced rates for drivers who cannot afford regular insurance.
Example: A low-income driver may pay $200/year instead of $800/year for basic coverage.
Goal:
Reduce the number of uninsured drivers on the road.
Effectiveness:
A pilot program in California hasn’t been very effective.
Many drivers still find insurance too expensive.
Related laws:
Some states have “no pay, no play” laws, which prevent uninsured drivers from suing negligent drivers for noneconomic damages (like pain and suffering).
“No Pay, No Play” Laws
Laws that prevent uninsured drivers from suing negligent drivers for noneconomic damages like pain and suffering
No-Fault Auto Insurance
A system where each driver collects compensation from their own insurance company for their injuries after an accident, regardless of who caused it
What it is:
A system where each driver collects from their own insurer after an accident, regardless of who caused it.
Example: If you’re hit by another car, your own insurance pays for your injuries without waiting to prove the other driver was at fault.
Prevalence:
About half of the U.S. states have no-fault auto insurance laws.
Reason it exists:
Created due to dissatisfaction with the traditional tort liability system (lawsuits were slow, costly, and complicated).
Encourages trusting your own insurance company rather than the other driver’s insurer.
No-Fault Auto Insurance Laws
State laws that require drivers to carry no-fault insurance, allowing them to receive compensation from their own insurer without proving the other driver was at fault
Variations of No-Fault Auto Insurance
No-fault plans differ by state:
Pure no-fault plan:
Accident victims cannot sue at all, no matter how large the claim.
Note: No states have a pure no-fault plan.
Modified no-fault plan:
Victims have a limited right to sue.
Can sue if:
Monetary threshold is exceeded (injury claim is above a certain dollar amount).
Verbal/serious injury threshold is met (e.g., death, dismemberment, disfigurement, or permanent loss of bodily function).
Example: In a modified plan state, you might only be able to sue if your medical bills exceed $50,000 or if you suffer permanent disability.
Pure No-Fault Plan
A no-fault auto insurance system where accident victims cannot sue the at-fault driver under any circumstances
Modified No-Fault Plan
A no-fault auto insurance system where accident victims can sue the at-fault driver only if certain monetary or serious injury thresholds are exceeded
Monetary Threshold
A specific dollar amount of bodily injury costs that must be exceeded before a victim can sue under a modified no-fault plan
Verbal Threshold
A type of injury requirement (like death, dismemberment, disfigurement, or permanent loss of function) that must be met before a victim can sue under a modified no-fault plan
Add-On and Choice No-Fault Plans
Add-On Plan:
Pays benefits to an accident victim regardless of fault.
Victim still has the right to sue the negligent driver.
Note: Not a true no-fault plan.
Example: If someone hits you, your insurance pays, and you can also sue the other driver for additional damages.
Choice No-Fault Plan:
Motorists can choose between two options:
Be covered under the state’s no-fault law and pay lower premiums.
Retain the right to sue under tort liability and pay higher premiums.
Example: A driver might opt for lower premiums and no lawsuits, or higher premiums to keep full legal rights.
Add-On Plan
An insurance plan that pays benefits regardless of fault while still allowing the victim to sue the negligent driver
Choice No-Fault Plan
A plan that lets drivers choose between no-fault coverage with lower premiums or retaining the right to sue under tort liability with higher premiums
What No-Fault Insurance Covers
No-fault benefits are added to your policy through a special endorsement.
These benefits only cover economic losses (financial losses), not pain and suffering.
Economic losses covered include:
Medical bills
Lost wages
Essential services (help with housework or daily tasks you can’t do)
Funeral costs
Survivors’ benefits (regular payments to a spouse or dependent children if the insured dies)
Some states require insurers to offer optional extra no-fault benefits above the minimum required amounts.
Optional No-Fault Benefits
Extra no-fault coverage you can buy above the minimum required
Right to Sue and Property Damage in No-Fault Plans
Right to sue:
Varies by state and type of plan (no-fault or add-on).
All states allow a lawsuit if the injury is serious.
Property damage:
No-fault laws usually cover only bodily injury, not property damage.
Exception: Michigan covers property damage under no-fault.
Motorists can sue the negligent driver for property damage.
These cases are generally small and resolved quickly.
Arguments in Support of No-Fault Auto Insurance
Reasons supporting no-fault laws:
Difficulty in determining fault
It can be hard to decide which driver caused the accident.
Inequity in claim payments
Serious claims may be underpaid under traditional tort systems.
High transaction costs and attorney fees
Less than half of tort dollars actually reach injured victims.
Fraudulent and inflated claims
Pain and suffering awards are sometimes based on medical expenses and wage loss, giving claimants incentives to inflate claims.
Delay in payments
Claims take a long time due to investigation, negotiation, and court delays.
Arguments Against No-Fault Auto Insurance
Reasons against no-fault laws:
Defects of the current system are exaggerated
Problems in the tort system may not be as widespread as claimed.
Savings from no-fault are exaggerated
No-fault may not actually save as much money as proponents suggest.
Court delays are localized
Long delays mainly occur in a few large cities, not everywhere.
Safe drivers may be penalized
Rating systems can raise premiums for drivers who were not at fault.
No payment for pain and suffering
Victims may not be compensated for emotional or non-economic losses.
Tort system improvement preferred
The existing tort liability system could be reformed rather than replaced.
Effects and Repeal of No-Fault Laws
Repeal of no-fault laws:
Some states repealed their no-fault laws because low monetary thresholds increased lawsuits.
Findings from the Institute for Civil Justice:
Reduce attorney fees and claim processing costs.
Match compensation more closely with actual economic loss.
Generally pay benefits more quickly.
Conclusion:
Savings from no-fault plans depend on the specific provisions included in the plan.
Auto Insurance for High-Risk Drivers
High-risk drivers:
Drivers who have trouble getting insurance in the voluntary market.
Typically include:
Younger drivers
Drivers with poor driving records
Drivers convicted of drunk driving
Shared (residual) market / Assigned risk plan:
Most states have a plan that makes insurance available to high-risk drivers.
All insurers in the state take a share of high-risk drivers based on their total premiums written.
Premiums:
Substantially higher than those in the voluntary insurance market.
Shared (Residual) Market
A system that provides auto insurance to high-risk drivers who cannot get coverage in the regular market
Auto Insurance Plan (Assigned Risk Plan)
A state program that assigns high-risk drivers to insurers so they can obtain required auto insurance, usually at higher premiums
Joint Underwriting Association (JUA) for High-Risk Drivers
Joint Underwriting Association (JUA):
Some states have a common pool where all insurers participate to provide coverage to high-risk drivers.
Each insurer pays a proportionate share of pool losses and expenses.
The JUA designs policies and sets rates for the pool.
Underwriting losses are shared by insurers based on the premiums they write in the state.
Only a limited number of insurers act as servicing insurers, but all insurers participate in the pool.
Joint Underwriting Association (JUA)
A state-established program in which all auto insurers in the state share responsibility for providing coverage to high-risk drivers through a common pool
Reinsurance Facilities and Specialty Insurers for High-Risk Drivers
Reinsurance facility / pool:
Some states have a pool for high-risk drivers.
Insurers must accept all applicants.
If a driver is high-risk, the insurer can place them in the reinsurance pool.
Underwriting losses are shared by all auto insurers in the state.
State example:
Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund provides coverage to high-risk drivers canceled or refused by private insurers.
Specialty insurers:
Companies that focus on insuring drivers with poor driving records.
Reinsurance Facility (or Pool)
A state-established program where all insurers share the responsibility for providing coverage to high-risk drivers
Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund
A state fund that provides auto insurance to high-risk drivers who have been canceled or refused by private insurers
Specialty Insurers
Insurance companies that focus on providing coverage to drivers with poor driving records
Factors Affecting Auto Insurance Costs
Reasons auto insurance rates have increased:
Rising medical costs and higher vehicle repair costs
Soaring jury awards in liability cases
Insurance fraud and abuse
Factors insurers use to set premiums:
Territory / location
Age, gender, marital status
Use of the auto (personal vs. business)
Driver education
Number and types of cars
Discounts and reductions:
Multicar discount for owning 2+ cars
Good student discount
Safe driver plans for clean driving records
Insurance score based on credit record
Multicar Discount
A premium reduction offered when a policyholder insures two or more vehicles with the same insurer
Insurance Score
A number derived from an applicant’s credit record used by insurers to help determine auto insurance premiums