1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
design that tests if a new intervention works
experimental study
design that tests if an exposure and outcome are associated with each other
analytical observational studies
design that tests the pattern of disease in the population
descriptive observational studies
list the hierarchy of evidence from bottom up
editorials/expert opinion → case reports → case series → cross sectional studies → case control studies → cohort studies → non-randomised controlled trials → systematic reviews/meta analyses
4 reasons for a study result
true association
chance
bias
confounding factor
define bias
systematic error in design or conduct of study giving a result that is different from the truth
2 sources of bias
selection bias
information bias
4 types of selection bias
self-selection bias
non-response bias
healthy worker effect
survival bias
types of information bias
recall bias
interviewer bias
social desirability bias
attrition (loss to follow up) bias
define a confounder
a factor associated with both the exposure and outcome that influences the apparent association
3 bradford hill criteria for causal inference - association features
strength of association (large effect size)
specificity (outcome has one cause)
consistence (replicable)
3 bradford hill criteria for causal inference - exposure/outcome features
temporal relationship (exposure before outcome)
dose-response relationship
reversibility (removing exposure reduces outcome)
3 bradford hill criteria for causal inference - other features
biological plausibility
analogy (similar known associations)
coherence