1/13
SCOTUS cases to know for AP government
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Marbury v Madison (1803)
Holding- The Supreme Court agreed that Marbury was entitled to his commission but they were not allowed to give it to him
Impact- established judicial review— the court interprets the Constitution
Constitutional Basis- Article 3- the judiciary and the Judiciary Act of 1789
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
Holding- Congress did have the ability to start a national bank due to the necessary and proper clause
Impact- example of federalism and the balance of power shifting towards the federal government
Constitutional Basis- Necessary and Proper Clause (Article 1 Section 8)
Schenck v US (1919)
Holding- The Espionage Act did not violate the 1st amendment and some speech was not considered protected by the 1st amendment
Impact- “clear and present danger” test— free speech is not unlimited
Constitutional Basis- 1st amendment freedom of speech clause
Brown v Board of Education (1954)
Holding- “Separate but equal is inherently unequal”- Plessy v Ferguson reversed and deemed unconstitutional
Impact- desegregation of public schools and Civil Rights Movement
Constitutional Basis- Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment
Engel v Vitale (1962)
Holding- States could not hold prayers in public schools— this violated the establishment clause
Impact- established the bounds of how religion could and could not be incorporated in schools
Constitutional Basis- 1st amendment- establishment clause
Baker v Carr (1962)
Holding- Due to the 14th amendment EPC issues this case addressed (redistricting), SCOTUS did have the ability to rule on cases of reapportionment
Impact- allowed for apportionment/reapportionment cases to be brought to SCOTUS
Constitutional Basis- 14th amendment EPC
Gideon v Wainwright (1963)
Holding- SCOTUS ruled this violated his 6th amendment right to counsel
Impact- applied the 6th amendment to the states
Constitutional Basis- 6th amendment right to counsel— 14th amendment applying to the states
Tinker v Des Moines Independent County School District (1969)
Holding- Students still have freedom of speech at school + symbolic speech is still a form of protected speech
Impact- substantial disruption test— symbolic speech
Constitutional Basis- 1st amendment freedom of speech
New York Times Co. v US (1971)
Holding- Freedom of the press is guaranteed by the 1st amendment
Impact- shot down prior restraint by presidents- unless in the case of absolute national security concerns
Constitutional Basis- 1st amendment freedom of the press
Wisconsin v Yoder (1972)
Holding- SCOTUS ruled that this violated the Amish people’s free exercise of religion
Impact- compulsory education? NO, free exercise of religion
Constitutional Basis- 1st amendment free exercise of religion
Shaw v Reno (1993)
Holding- Racial gerrymandering is considered unconstitutional under the 14th amendment
Impact- NO racial gerrymandering
Constitutional Basis- EPC of the 14th amendment
US v Lopez (1995)
Holding- The Gun Free School Zone Act was considered unconstitutional because it did not explicitly involve commerce— Congress exceeded its power
Impact- federalism tipping towards the states
Constitutional Basis- Commerce Clause (Article 1 Section 8)
McDonald v Chicago (2010)
Holding- The handgun law was unconstitutional because the 2nd amendment applied to states
Impact- applied the 2nd amendment right to bear arms to the states by the 14th amendment
Constitutional Basis- 2nd amendment right to bear arms
Citizens United v FEC (2010)
Holding- 1st amendment freedom of speech applied to corporations
Impact- completely reshaped campaign fundraising/money in terms of BCRA and political donations
Constitutional Basis- 1st amendment freedom of speech and political speech