1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Define aggression
All behaviour that is intended to inflict physical or psychological harm on another individual who does not want to be treated so
Describe role of limbic system in aggression
network of structures buried deep in the brain, composed of hypothalamus, amygdala, prefrontal cortex and parts of hippocampus
linked to emotional responses such as aggression
amygdala responds to environmental stress - its reactivity is an important indicator of aggressive behaviour
Role of limbic system AO3
Matthews et al (2006) - computer games - used fMRIs to measure brain function following playing violent/non-violent games - violent games showed increased activity in amygdala - scientific, controlled lab exp
Phineas Gage - case study - damaged left frontal lobe - link between amygdala and prefrontal cortex severed = lost rationality
Describe role of serotonin in aggression
Neurotransmitters that has inhibitory effect so is calming - slows down neural activity - those with reduced serotonin may have reduced self-control, leading to impulse + therefore aggressive behaviour
Evaluate role of serotonin in aggression
Virkkunen and Linnoila (1992) - cerebral spinal fluid - found products of serotonin breakdown to be significantly lower in impulsive offenders, suggesting they had lower serotonin levels
Man et al - weight loss drug - ppts given medication for WL which also happened to reduce serotonin levels + found that male participants became more aggressive
Describe the role of testosterone in aggression
Males generally more aggressive than females so attention has focused on hormone testosterone which is naturally higher in males
Testosterone promotes status-seeking/social dominance motives which is linked to assertive/violent behaviour
Evaluate role of testosterone in aggression
Wagner et al - mice - when chemically castrated mice, they became docile + when increased testosterone they became more aggressive BUT issues with generalising from animals to humans (as humans may be more aggressive due to environmental stimuli)
outline genetic factors in aggression
Assume aggressive behaviour is the result of inherited traits/characteristics that have adapted across generations because of their evolutionary advantage
Describe the role of MAOA gene in aggression
Produces an enzyme with role to ‘mop up’ neurotransmitters in synapse after nerve impulse transmitted - breaks down serotonin + helps with its reuptake
Low levels of MAOA enzyme = lows levels of serotonin as less is reabsorbed into neurone leading to aggressive behaviour
Evaluate role of MAOA gene
Bruner et al (1993) - Dutch family of abnormally violent criminals - had abnormally low levels of MAOA gene
Frazzetto eg al (2007) - MAOA must have trauma - argued that the MAOA gene is only active when significant trauma is experienced during the first 15 years of life
Outline how concordance rates can be used in investigating psychological traits
MZ twins share 100% of DNA + provide control sample for each other, but can also be compared to DZ twins
Adoption studies are used to investigate genetic factors in aggression as they may highlight differences between biological + adoptive parents and their children - can isolate environment child lives in as cause for behaviour
Give a study into concordance rates in aggression
Rhee + Waldman (2002) - meta analysis of adoption studies - found genetic influences accounted for 41% of variance in aggression
Evaluate the biological explanation of aggression
+ve - practical applications to benefit society - eg, give antidepressants (SSRIs) to prisoners may reduce aggression
+ve - benefit to economy - if can identify people before they commit a violent crime, means less people in prison so less money needed from taxpayers
-ve - strongly on nature side of nature vs nurture debate - reduces complex behaviour to its simplest (anatomical/biochemical) form so is reductionist, ignores gene-environment interaction + exhibits biological determinism
-ve - contrasting approaches with evidence - SLT (behavioural/environment/learning from others/experience)
What is ethology?
The study of animal + human behaviour in terms of traits, characteristics and rituals which have adapted to be useful for survival
What does the evolutionary explanation suggest about aggression?
It is an evolutionary process designed to minimise conflict and spread resources around the group - ritualistic behaviours are designed to deter competition
Why is no actual harm done to each animal in aggression in animals?
Because death is damaging to the species survival, so threat (eg, baring teeth growling) is only implied
Define an innate releasing mechanism
A build in physiological process or structure triggered by a specific environmental stimulus
Define a fixed action pattern
A specific sequence of behaviours released by an innate releasing mechanisms
Give 4 features of a fixed action pattern
Universal (in every individual of a species), unaffected by learning, ballistic (once triggered it runs its course), single purpose
AO3 ethological explanation - points
+ve - research into IRMa and FAPs by Tinbergen (1951) - red fish
-ve - cannot account for cultural differences in aggression
-ve - cannot be used to generalise to human aggression
Why can’t the ethological explanation account for cultural differences in aggression?
If aggression is innate, should account for aggression in all cultures
BUT research found white South Americans were more aggressive when insulted than white North Americans - further supported by differing homicide rates in these 2 regions
Shows that aggression differs from one culture to next - theory lacks internal validity
Why can’t the ethological explanation be used to generalise to humans?
Much research is carried out on non-primates (eg, fish) and results cannot be extrapolated to humans
Humans are more complex + their aggression may be a result of wide socio-economic triggers (eg, poverty) which is not replicated in animals
SLT would argue aggression is learnt (we don’t have FAPs)
What does evolutionary explanation suggest?
Aggression is the result of sexual competition, and is an inbuilt tendency for violence that is part of our basic nature
What has research suggested about gender differences in types of jealousy and why might this be the case?
Males are more prone to sexual jealousy than females but females more concerned about emotional infidelity
Can be explained by paternity uncertainty - sexual jealousy may be adaptive in that it may ensure a male is able to protect his genetic line
Give the evolutionary advantage for males and females
Males - spreading genes via more offspring
Females - secure a mate with the best resource potential
What are the evolutionary disadvantages of infidelity and how do males prevent this from occurring?
Cuckoldry and diverting resources from own offspring
Mate guarding strategies - controlling, domestic violence, lavishing with lots of resources
AO3 evolutionary explanation - points
+ve - sexual vs emotional jealousy evidence - accounts for gender differences
-ve - assumption that women are not aggressive is deterministic - results in disapproval of aggression ny females
Outline a study on the physical effects of computer games on aggression
assigned adolescents to play either violent or no violent computer game for 30 mins - fMRI immediately after showed increased activity in the amygdala + decreased activity in prefrontal lobe in those who played violent games
amygdala stimulates emotions, prefrontal regulates self control
Outline the effects of computer games on aggression
Desensitisation - playing lots over time means decreased emotional and physiological (FoF) response
Player in computer games take more active role compared to passive TV
Game playing more directly rewarded for player (operant conditioning)
Outline a study on the behavioural effects of computer games on aggression
Anderson + Bushman (2001)
Meta analysis, found that short term exposure to video game violence was significantly correlated with temporary increases in aggression in all participants
AO3 computer games - points
-ve - uncertainty on effects of long-term exposure (most research on short term)
-ve - difficulty distinguishing between ‘violent’ and ‘non-violent’ games - frustration vs excitement
-ve - ethical implications - social sensitivity
Why is there uncertainty on the effects of long-term exposure to computer games on aggression?
Lots of research suggests potential short term negative effects BUT less research into effects of long term exposure
Some research suggests potential benefits, so widespread concern around computer game use may be misplaced
Further longitudinal research required - with large, more randomly selected samples to investigate further
Why is there difficulty distinguishing between ‘violent’ and ‘non-violent’ games?
Many studies use games across conditions that aren’t particularly different - what constitutes violence is debatable and unclear in these studies
Frustration and excitement - violence may not be sole factor leading to aggression
Why is studying effects of computer games a socially sensitive toptic?
Researchers must be aware of how their findings will be interpreted in the media as the issue of computer game consumption and aggression has been popular topic for decades - results must be published in ways which are impartial, objective + fair