Negligence

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/44

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

45 Terms

1
New cards

Negligence

A tort where one party fails to provide a level of care to prevent loss or injury to another party, that a reasonable person would have exercised under the same circumstances.

2
New cards

Tort

A catch-all term for a 'wrong' that impacts a person's legally protected rights.

3
New cards

Rights protected by negligence law

Protect an individual's right to be safe from unjust harm, loss or damage.

4
New cards

Limitation of actions

The time limit in which a plaintiff must commence a civil action in court.

5
New cards

Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic)

Legislation that outlines the time limits for commencing civil actions.

6
New cards

Duty of care

A legal obligation to ensure the safety and wellbeing of others.

7
New cards

Reasonable foreseeability

The ability to predict that harm could occur as a result of one's actions.

8
New cards

Neighbour principle

A legal principle stating that one must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that could foreseeably harm others.

9
New cards

Breach of duty of care

Demonstrating that the defendant failed to uphold their duty of care.

10
New cards

Foreseeable risk of harm

The risk of harm that a reasonable person could predict based on the circumstances.

11
New cards

Insignificant risk

A risk that is not substantial enough to warrant concern or precaution.

12
New cards

Precautions

Actions taken to prevent harm or injury.

13
New cards

Possible defences to negligence

Legal arguments that a defendant can use to avoid liability for negligence.

14
New cards

Possible remedies for negligence

Compensations or actions that can be taken to restore the wronged party to their original position.

15
New cards

Impact of breach

The effects that a breach of duty of care has on plaintiffs and defendants.

16
New cards

Time limits for property damage/economic loss

3 years.

17
New cards

Time limits for personal injury

6 years.

18
New cards

Who owes duty of care?

Doctors to their patients, schools/teachers to their students, manufacturers to their consumers, employers to their employees.

19
New cards

Example of negligence

An electronics company rushes the production of its latest smartphone to meet a market deadline, overlooking critical quality control measures, resulting in defective batteries.

20
New cards

Causation

The direct link between the action and its resulting damage or loss to the plaintiff.

21
New cards

Scope of liability

Has there been a break in the chain of liability? Are there other factors that could make it impractical for the defendant to be liable?

22
New cards

Loss

Some sort of loss, injury or damage must occur in order for negligence to exist.

23
New cards

Breach of duty

An act or omission by the defendant that fails to meet the duty of care.

24
New cards

Contributory negligence

This is where the plaintiff has not taken sufficient steps to reasonably care for their own safety.

25
New cards

Voluntary assumption of risk

This may in turn add to the harm they suffer.

26
New cards

Elements of negligence

Duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and loss.

27
New cards

Major contributor

Were the defendant's actions a major contributor to the harm?

28
New cards

Break in the chain of liability

Has there been a break in the chain of liability?

29
New cards

Harm to the plaintiff

The harm suffered by the plaintiff that is the result of the defendant's act or omission.

30
New cards

Physical injury

David suffers loss in the form of a physical injury (ankle) and potentially medical expenses and pain and suffering.

31
New cards

Warning sign

Failing to place a warning sign about the wet floor could be considered a breach of duty.

32
New cards

Foreseeable harm

Taking reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harm.

33
New cards

Causation in negligence

It needs to be established that the lack of a warning sign directly caused David's fall and injury.

34
New cards

Other factors in causation

Other factors, like David's footwear or walking speed, could also be considered.

35
New cards

Negligence defences

Possible defences include contributory negligence and voluntary assumption of risk.

36
New cards

Defence to negligence

A legal argument that lessens the defendant's liability.

37
New cards

Aggravated damages

Damages awarded in cases where the defendant's behaviour is particularly harmful or reprehensible.

38
New cards

General damages

Damages that do not have a specific value and are less easily quantifiable.

39
New cards

Specific damages

Damages that are measurable and may have a precise value, such as medical bills or lost earnings.

40
New cards

Financial impact on plaintiff

Costs associated with negligence, such as medical fees, lost wages, or legal fees.

41
New cards

Physical injuries

Injuries such as sickness, broken bones, or illness resulting from negligence.

42
New cards

Psychological impact on plaintiff

A range of psychological challenges including fear of participating in events and stress-related issues.

43
New cards

Cultural changes for defendant

Changes prompted by negligence claims to avoid future negligence claims.

44
New cards

Reputational damage for defendant

Impact on the reputation of a defendant whether liable or not.

45
New cards

Financial impact on defendant

Negligence claims can be very expensive, including damages and legal fees.