1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Van Gend en Loos (Issue + Rule)
Issue
- Direct effect of treaty provisions
Rule
- sufficiently clear + unconditional
Van Gend en Loos (independent or complementary)
Independent
Titanium Dioxide (Issue + Rule)
Issue
Art 114 TFEU Legal basis
Rule
Legal basis must be bacon on objective factors amenable to judicial review
Titanium Dioxide (independent or complementary)
Independent
Tobacco Advertising I (Issue + Rule)
Issue
Art. 1114 TFEU
Rule
Measure must genuinely have as its object of improvement the functioning of the internal market
Tobacco Advertising I (independent or complementary)
Complementary to Titanium Dioxide
Cassis de Dijon (Issue & Rule)
Issue
MEE & quantitative restrictions
Rule
Prohibition of non-discrimination n. Federal model of negative integration
Cassis de Dijon (Independent or complementary)
Independent
Costa v ENEL (Issue & Rule)
Issue
EU law supremacy
Rule
Cannot be overridden by domestic law whatsoever
Costa v ENEL (independent or complementary)
Independent
Simmenthal II (Issue & Rule)
Issue
EU law supremacy
Rule
national courts are allowed and obligated to ensure the full effect of EU law
Simmenthal II (independent or complementary)
Complementary to Costa
Van Duyn (Issue & Rule)
Issue
Treaty provision direct effect
Rule
Art. 45 TFEU is sufficiently clear and unconditional → vertical direct effect
Van Duyn (independent or complementary)
Complementary to Van Gend en Loos
Walrave (Issue & Rule)
Issue
horizontal direct effect of art 45+56 TFEU
Rule
Can also be invoked against private entities who are exercising legal autonomy
Walrave (independent or complementary)
Art. 45: used with Bosman
Art. 56: Used with Laval
Azienda Agricola Monte Arcosa (Issue & Rule)
Issue
Direct effect of regulations
Rule
Don’t always have direct horizontal effect, MS have some discretion to defining
zienda Agricola Monte Arcosa (independent or complementary)
Independent
Munoz (Issue & Rule)
Issue
direct effect of regulations
Rule
regulation shave direct horizontal effect
Munoz (independent or complementary)
Independent
Grad (Issue & Rule)
Issue
Direct effect of decisions
Rule
If its unconditional, sufficiently clear + precise
Grad (independent or complementary)
Independent
Marshall (Issue & Rule)
Issue
Direct effect of directives
Rule
Vertical direct effect:
After transposition deadline
provision sufficiently clear + unconditional
Marshall (independent or complementary)
Indepedent; used with Faccini Dori for ‘No horizontal direct effect of directives’
Kolpinghuis (Issue & Rule)
Issue
direct effect of directives
Rule
no inverse vertical direct effect
Kolpinghuis (independent or complementary)
Independent
Faccini Dori (Issue & Rule)
Issue
Direct effect of directives + indirect effect + State liability
Rule
duty to consistent interpretation arises only after the implementation deadline
Faccini Dori (independent or complementary)
Complementary; Marshall; Brasserie du Pecheur
Adeneler (Issue & Rule)
Issue
Indirect effect of Directives
Rule
Duty to consistent interpretation arises only after the implementation deadline
Adeneler (indepedent or complementary)
Independent
Dansk Industri (Issue & Rule)
Issue
Direct effect of fundamental rights
Rule
Art. 21 CFR has been codified - can be used both vertically and horizontally (try indirect then direct effect)
Dansk Industri (independent or complementary)
Independent
Brasserie de Pechuer (Issue & Rule)
Issue
State liability
Rule
3 cumulative criteria
Brasserie du Pecheur (independent or complementary)
Used with cases in week 6
Lecture 1 cases (Intro to EU law)
Van Gend en Loos
Titanium Dioxide
Tobacco Advertising I
Cassis de Dijon
Lecture 2 cases (Effects of EU law in the national legal orders)
Costa v ENEL
Simmenthal II
Van Duyn
Walrave
Azienda Agricola Monte Arcose
Munoz
Grad
Marshall
Kolpinghuis
Faccini Dori
Adeneler
Dansk Industri
Brasserie du Pecheur