1/68
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Non-experimental
does not manipulate variables
can’t seek to identify causal relationships
seeks to discover, describe, explain, understand, or predict relationships
typically involves one group
sampling methods
either probability or non probability
excluding purposive, theoretical sampling
experiments
variables are manipulated by investigator
purpose to test the efficacy of a treatment or intervention
experiments: identify a cause-effect relationship
quasi: test the efficacy of intervention or treatments but can’t establish causality
must involve: control groups
sampling methods:
experiments: probability + random assignment
quasi: non probability sampling
Non experimental designs
developmental
cross-sectional
longitudinal
observational
cohort
retrospective
prospective
case control
correlational
survey
developmental designs
study characteristics or variables as they develop or change over time
most frequency used by developmental researchers (ex: child psychologist)
maturations
how people change over time
cross sectional design
longitudinal design
cross sectional design
developmental design
people from different age groups are sampled, data collected once and compared
How retired individuals in their 70s, 80s, and 90s spend leisure time = quota sampling
What is the nature of campus involvement in U1, U2, U3, U4 students
quota sampling: comparing data analysis across the buckets to see changes
longitudinal design
developmental
a single group is followed over time (months and/or years) many data collection points
ex: take the 70s individuals and collect data for 30 years
developmental: cross sectional design
stimulates people getting older through quota sampling
simultaneously gather info from individuals about their exposure and disease status
quick and economical approach
can get answer really quickly
useful approach for hypothesis generating and for health service planning
no control or comparison group
stimulates through quota sampling
associations may reflect various biases or confounding variables
what is the nature of campus involvement in U1, U2, U3, U4 students
difference might be linked to residential v commuter
makes sure to see differences
developmental: longitudinal design
expensive, requires a team of researchers, perhaps a grant
follow up is key on a specific time interval is essential in this research
attrition is a problem due to death, move, etc
long time before results are obtained
long time to get to answer
can’t get to the whole story until the end
can take up years depending on the study
can’t quickly test new hypothesis
cross sectional
takes a snapshot of stages of development from different groups at the same time
researcher collects data are time from different groups to simulate development over time
allows for quick, inexpensive data collection
low internal validity due to possibility of confounding variables
longitudinal
follows a group over a period of time to study development
allows for the researcher to set up multiple data collection points over the life of the study and look at multiple variables
often expensive and requires a team of researchers
high rate of attrition (loss to follow up)
observational research design
records/measures naturally occurring behavior to better understand:
what behavior is occurring
the frequency of a behavior
measures visual data
observational design
Can provide QUAN alternative to QUAL approaches
Prespecified focus to observations, underlying theoretical framework
Operational define what is being observed in order to count or evaluate observation
Data collection is divided into small segments of time
Codes are predetermined backed on theory (word alert)
Rating scale (data collection) is used to evaluate the observation
Often more than one independent raters
Involves in-depth training of team and raters to ensure consistency
Interrater reliability
observational vs. QUAL designs
all use observations, so how are they different?
data analysis
data collections = data collection/2 step process
QUAL
makes observations but do not predetermine what they will observe
Codes (data analysis)= reveal meaning units, when combined lead to themes
QUAN- observational research design
predetermine observations, predetermined code book (variables though rating scales) from theory and hypothesis
use numbers, rating, and statistical analysis
Cohort research design
used to determine if an exposure is linked to the development of a disease or outcome when the relationship between the two has not yet been determined
start with exposure
study if the exposure is through disease or conditions
Cohort Studies
no manipulating variable
sees association doesn’t approve it
cohort studies looks to determine if an exposure is linked to the progression of a condition
they can be either:
prospective: looking forward
retrospective: looking back into existing data
look at medical record
is there is cluster of disease higher rate than nationally
follow them for five years
if the exposure of the disease or condition have a higher rate than nationally
Prospective cohort study
Study begins with the identification of a population and exposure status (exposed/not exposed groups)
Population is followed over a period of time for the development of disease or condition
Retrospective cohort study
Previously collected data is reviewed to identify the population and the exposure status (exposed/not exposed groups)
Determines at present the (development) status of disease or condition
cohort study
advantages & disadvantages
Advantages
– Subjects in cohorts can be matched, which limits the influence of confounding variables
– Standardization of criteria/outcome is possible
Disadvantages
– Cohorts can be difficult to identify due to confounding variables
– No randomization, which means that imbalances in patient characteristics could exist
– Blinding/masking is difficult
case control research design
begins after the development of the outcome and look back in time to identify exposure (risk factor)
starts with disease and looks for exposure - why one group is ill and another group is welll
similar groups aren’t control group
case studies studies
Designed to estimate the odds of developing the studied disease/condition. Looks to determine if there is an associational relationship between condition and risk factor.
Case control studies
The goal is to determine how the exposure differs between the two groups of individuals: cases and controls.
case control studies
advantages and disadvantages
Advantages
– Good for studying rare conditions or diseases
– Less time needed to conduct the study because the condition or disease has already occurred
– Simultaneously looks at multiple risk factors
– Useful as initial studies to establish an association
Disadvantages
– Retrospective studies have more problems with data quality because they rely on memory and people with a condition will be more motivated to recall risk factors (also called recall bias).
Cohort vs. case control
Cohort studies
Begin with a group of people (a cohort) free of disease.
The people in the cohort are grouped by whether or not they are exposed to a potential risk
See if the development of new cases of the disease (or other outcomes) differs between the groups with and without exposure.
Case-control studies
Begin with the selection of cases (people with a disease) and controls (people without the disease).
The controls should represent people who would have been study cases if they had developed the disease (population at risk).
The exposure status to a potential exposure cause of disease is determined for both cases and controls.
Then the occurrence of the possible cause of the disease could be calculated for both the cases and controls.
statistical tests
cohort design
Data analysis = determining relative risk (RR) as long as the outcome is not rare.
Relative risk is defined as the probability of an outcome of interest developing as a result of the exposure being followed
Case-control design
Data analysis = odds ratio (OR) the measurement of association between an exposure and an outcome.
“The OR represents the odds that an outcome will occur given a particular exposure, compared to the odds of the outcome occurring in the absence of the exposure”
correlational research design
predicted association
Attempts to determine if the characteristics of one or more variables are associated with the characteristics of another variable.
Examines the extent (strength and direction, degree of association) of relationship between characteristics or variables within a group or between two or more groups
good common sense and look at literature reviews
correlational designd
Examines the extent (strength and direction, degree of association) of relationship between characteristics or variables within a group or between two or more groups
Correlation exists if:
One or more variables increase or decrease in relation (strength and direction)
The values of those variables are distributed in a consistent manner
Age is related to Reading level: typical as age increases so does reading
level
Discrete combination of variables combined can predict the
phenomena
Residential status, SAT scores, and Greek membership predict XX outcome
Pearson r (linear or product moment correlation)
Correlation coefficients can range from -1.00 to +1.00
– Value of -1.00 represents a perfect negative correlation
– Value of +1.00 represents a perfect positive correlation
– Value of 0.00 represents a lack of correlation
positive correlation
points lie close to a straight line, which has a positive gradient
one variable increase the other increases
negative correlation
points lie close to a straight line, which has a negative gradient
one variable increases the other decreases
no correlation
no pattern to the points
no connections between two variables
caution about correlational research
Interpret results with caution
For example:
Strong and positive correlation (r = .90) between ice cream sales and gun violence
Can I determine that ice cream sales is correlated with gun violence?
Can I determine that ice cream causes gun violence?
Strong and positive correlation (r = .90) between elephant population in Thailand and size of the Florida orange crop
Any two things that increase at the same time annually appear to be correlated but only faulty logic sees a relationship between two unrelated events
correlational vs experimental
Correlational research usually does not influence any variables
Looks for relations (correlations) between some set of variables
Data analysis looks at the strength and direction of the relationship
Cannot prove causality
Experimental research manipulates variables
Measure the effects of this manipulation on other variables
Data analysis also calculates "correlations" between variables, specifically, those manipulated and those affected by the manipulation
Has the power to prove causality
Do not get confused by data analysis techniques and research design
definition of words change based on the context
Correlation(al)
Statistical test (used during data analysis in any QUAN study)
Research design
Code
A step in QUAL analysis
QUAN data collection (code book – rating tool)
Observation(al)
QUAL data collection procedure
prolonged engagement/persistent observation
QUAN data collection procedure
rating scale or rating tool of behavior
Research design
The O in scientific notation
Research Design
Survey Research
Survey research is one of the most important areas of measurement in applied social research
Survey research: can seek to correlate variables BUT the main focus is on learning about a population
Correlational research: main focus is determining how the variables are related or how variables can predict outcomes
Surveys can collect data about: to understand the population…
– Knowledge
– Attitudes/Feelings
– Perceptions/Beliefs
– Behaviors
survey research
Surveys can be defined as any measurement procedures that involve asking questions of respondents.
Information may be collected directly (face to face interview, telephone interview) or indirectly (mail or private completion of a questionnaire)
A "survey" can have different formats
Short paper-and-pencil feedback form
Mailed surveys/questionnaires
Focus group
Intensive one-on-one in-depth interview
How is this different from QUAL?
Purpose of research is different
Automated telephone surveys that use random dialing methods
Computerized kiosks in public places that allow people to ask for input
On line surveys (i.e., survey monkey or Qualtrics).
Personal interviews
strengths and limitations
strengths:
generally has high response rate
allow the interviewer to elaborate on questions or ask for confusion
responses are usually easy to analyze
limitations
costly due to large number of interviewers needed
data colleciton is slow and overall study requires a lot of time
difficult to control for interviewer bias
telephone interview
strengths and limitations
strengths
less costly because no field work is required
random digital dialing (RDD) allows researcher to reach to large representative sample
data collection takes less time than in person interviews
allows interviewers to elaborate on questions or ask for clarification
better response rate than mailed surveys
limitations
only reach household that have telephones
higher non-response rate than inperson interviews
subject listens and responds without no visual data
hard to control for question confusion when asnswering
mail survey
strengths and limitations
strengths
cheaper than phones or inperson interviews
need for a smaller number of interviewers/staff contributes to lower cost
provides access to a large representative sample
respondents can participates when it is convenient.
limitations
easy for respondent to not participant or forget to participate
low response rate
incentives may increase participation but also increase cost
longer waiting periods for responses to be returned
increase response rate but also increase cost
online survey
strengths and limitations
strengths
lowest cost
provides assess to global population
timely
easy to collect only relevant data through online programs
provides access to an enormous representation sample
limitations
varying compute capabilities may not allow access to some households
easy for respondents to ignore or delete requests, within lead to very low response rates
may contain higher response rate from those interested in the topics, resulting in bias data
open or unstructured survey questions
allows respondent some sense of freedom to answer the question and give opportunity to elaborate on topics using their own words
less structure to the response than closed
answer to these questions usually involve some from of qual analysis
closed or structured survey questions
responses are easy to quanitfy and are turned into numerical form of analysis
all responses were turned into numbers for data analysis
Semi structured survey questions
respondents is asked predetermined questions with an occasional open-ended question when researcher is looking for clarification or elaboration on a response
Sampling
can the population be enumerated
for some populations, you have a complete listing of the units that will be sampled
for other populations, it will be difficult
if your study requires input from people who are unhoused, you will find a way to sample your population
may rule out mail survey or telephone interviews
will your sampling lead to unintentional subgroups which will bias your findings
sampling— response rates
low response rates are among the most difficult of problems in survey research
some members of your sample will simply refuse to respond
others have the best of intentions, but can’t seem to find the time to send in your questionnaire by due date
still others misplace the instrument or forget about the appointment for an interview
data collection
interviewer distortion
May ask a question in a way that distorts the meaning of a question.
May not ask questions that make the respondent uncomfortable (i.e., may only ask ‘safe’ questions).
May not listen carefully to respondents on topics for which they have strong opinions.
May make the judgment that they already know what the respondent would say to a question based on their prior responses, even though that may not be true.
training the interviewers
Here are some of the major topics that should be included in interviewer training:
Explain interviewer bias
This is especially a problem when the content of the survey is highly charged and people have strongly held convictions
Skills in questioning
Don’t use cues, leading questions
Manage group dynamics in focus groups
focus group
Are a way to listen to people and see how interactions between people impact their answers
body language
Should not have more than 8-12 people
Props (video clips, products, public service announcements, etc.) can be used to generate discussions
Length varies between 90-120 minutes
Video or tape recorded
Transcribed
false respondents
With mail and phone surveys
Did the head of household complete the survey or someone else?
Did the CEO actually give the responses or pass the task off to an assistant?
Is the person you're speaking with on the phone actually who they say they are?
implications in using questionnaires
Require that your respondents can read!
What grade level will the questions be written at?
Questions need to developed without using medical or professional jargon
Can you produce multiple versions of your questionnaire effectively?
Culturally specific?
Will nuances get lost in the process of translating your questions?
IRB makes sure the survey or questionnaires is at a level that does not exceed 8th grade reading level
translators can be hired and that are qualified
survey as data collection tool
avoid pitfalls when constructing questions
wording - too many complex questions
How often have you visited a doctor during the past year?
How many times have you been treated as a patient in an emergency department during the past year?
During the past year, how many times were you admitted to the hospital?
simplify and combine questions
During the past year, how many times have you:
Visited a doctor?
None
1-2
3-4
More than 5
Been a patient in the emergency department?
None
1-2
3-4
More than 5
Been admitted to the hospital?
None
1-2
3-4
More than 5
dichotomous question format
When a question has two possible responses
Surveys often use dichotomous questions that ask the respondent to select one of two possible answers
Yes/No
True/False
Agree/Disagree response
closed questions that dictates exactly how respondents must answer with no room for variation in responses
structured, easy to quantify during data analysis
often used filter/screening questions when researcher is looking to remove a portion of respondents whom survey doesn’t relate
demographic question format
what is your occupation? (can be iv)
physician
doctor of osteopathy
nurse practitioner
physician assistance
nominal questions
are used to label, name, group responses
doesn’t assign a value to each response
not ranked
ex: my hair is
brown black blond gray
ordinal question
assign meaning to response by ranking them in order from lowest to highest or the other way around
ranked order
interval questions
rank order response like ordinal question
distance between the response is unknown, the distance between response is measured in standard increments
interval scales allow researcher to utilize a wider range of data analysis including inferentials statisitcs and averages
rank order question format
Make sure instructions are clear –
Rank the following exercises in order of preference from best to worst
____ running
____ walking
____ weight training
____ swimming
Do you want respondent to put a 1, 2, 3, etc. next to the exercise, where 1 is the respondent's first choice?
The prompt was not explicit
Respondent needs directions to figure out we want a rank order with 1 at highest rank and 4 at the lowest rank.
Otherwise respondent might check their favorite or check all their favorites
likert scale
strongly worded statement
Used to quantitatively assess abstract concepts (insubstantial phenomena) attitudes, self-reported behaviors, feelings, values, etc.
Ask an opinion question on a bipolar scale (it's called bipolar because there is a neutral point and the two ends of the scale are at opposite positions of the opinion).
ex: I think dealth penalty should be banned in the US
1 strongly disagree 2 disagree 3 neutral
4 agree 5 strongly agree
semantic differential scale (SDS)
measure attritudes, values, and opinions by having respondents rate their opinion or belief on a scale using bipolar adjective
ask a number of diff questions in short number of time and space making it a useful option for many researcher
utilizing a neutral point between bipolar adjective serves as a zero point
uses adjective or phrases that are completely opposite of each other to classify within a relatively short amount of time and space the respondents degree of feeling positivity and negativity.
guttman scale
Cumulative or Guttman Scale
Respondent checks each item with which they agree.
The items themselves are constructed so that they are cumulative, ranked ordered in difficulty from least to most extreme or most to least extreme.
Bogardus social distance scale is an example of a Guttman scale
__Are you willing to permit immigrants to live in your country?
__Are you willing to permit immigrants to live in your community?
__Are you willing to permit immigrants to live in your neighborhood?
__Are you willing to permit immigrants to live next door to you?
__Would you be comfortable if your child wanted to marry an immigrant?
Agreement with item 3 implies agreement with items 1 and 2
will filter questions be needed
filter questions
For instance, you wouldn't want to ask someone their opinions about a specific issue without first "screening" them to find out whether they have any experience.
Sometimes you have to screen on several variables (age, gender, experience).
The more complicated the screening, the less likely it is that you can rely on paper-and-pencil instruments without confusing the respondent.
Computer surveys make screening much easier.
if they answered no they are unfilter out
filter people out for those who have no exeprience
open ended question
Not uncommon to add a qualitative question at the end of the survey.
Is there any other information you would like to provide about how you think or feel about vaccines?
Does not make it a mixed method study but does require the research to do qualitative data analysis on the open ended responses
unstructured
allows respondents to write response in their own words
easier to write but hard to turn into quan data
can be misunderstood by respondent
difficult to quantify or group together
issues to be aware of when developing questions for your survey
content
question necessary/useful
double barrel
time frames
biased questions
neutrality in questions
wordings
sensitive questions
truthful in answer
issues to be aware of when developing questions for your survey
content issues
The content of your study can pose challenges.
Can the respondents be expected to know about the issue?
A study of family finances
you are talking to the spouse who doesn't pay the bills on a regular basis, they may not have the information to answer your questions.
inclusion criteria to help
issues to be aware of when developing questions for your survey
is the question necessary or useful
The question must be directly related to your research questions.
If you have a question about children, what do you need to know?
the age of each child, does the child live with you, or it is sufficient to know the number of children under a certain age?
If you have a question about income, do you need to know the exact amount or is a range sufficient?
issues to be aware of when developing questions for your survey
double barrel questions
you can often spot these kind of problems by looking for conjunction “and” in questions
asking question that have two concepts and therefore unable to answer
can support one concept but not other
unable to answer question with yes or no
conflict between the two
issues to be aware of when developing questions for your survey
time frames
Time frame must be specified in questions
“How much exercise do you usually get?”
You are leaving that up to the person answering question – some will answer the question with very different time frames (day, week, month)?
Resulting in worthless data
Better question:
“In a typical week, how many hours do you spend walking for exercise?
issues to be aware of when developing questions for your survey
biased questions
use likert scale
framing questions that doesn’t allows respondents to disagree it
or create an assumption of the respondents feelings or beliefs
ex:
What are the benefits of a tax cut?
What are the disadvantages of eliminating the WIC programs?
You're only asking about one side of the issue.
Already telling people how they should answer
tax cuts have benefits
Cutting WIC has disadvantages
issues to be aware of when developing questions for your survey
neutrality in questions
Avoid ‘loaded’ words or words that cue a certain response.
Also avoid vague words: what’s too much?
During the last month, how often did you drink too much alcohol?
vs
During the last month, how often did you drink 5 alcohol beverages in 2 hours or less?
You could change the # of drinks and time frame depending on what information you want to capture.
issues to be aware of when developing questions for your survey
will the respondent answer truthfully
Respondents generally want to "look good" in the eyes of others.
None of us likes to look like we don't know an answer.
We don't want to say anything that would be embarrassing.
May not tell you the truth, or may "spin" the response so that it makes them look better.
When writing survey questions, consider wording the question very neutrally – will help respondents to answer the question truthfully.
Some people are sensitive about answering questions about their exact age or income.
issues to be aware of when developing questions for your survey
sensitive questions
Set the tone by using an introduction that allows someone to admit to an undesirable behavior.
People sometimes forget to take the medication their doctor prescribes.
How many times in a typical [insert time frame] did you forget to take your medication?
Time frame [day – week – month] will be based on medication/disease studied or on what specific behavior you are researching.
In much of our health based research, we have to ask respondents about challenging, private, or uncomfortable subjects.
Before asking such questions, you should attempt to develop some trust or rapport (close relationship/bond) with the respondent.
Often, preceding the sensitive questions with some easier warm-up ones will help.
But, you have to make sure that the sensitive material does not come up abruptly or appear unconnected with the rest of the survey.
It is often helpful to have a transition sentence between sections:
In this next section of the survey, we'd like to ask you about your personal relationships. Please do not answer any questions if you feel uncomfortable doing so.