1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Factors from NZ Fish and Game v AG that confer a lease
exclusive use and the owner must ask permission to come on to the property
purpose of the lease
obligations and responsiblities consitent with a lease
Fatac v IRD
exclusive possession is the corner stone of a lease rent is often an indicator
defined period
there MUST be a defined period for a lease but under s 12 of the PLA there can be leases for incosntitent period e.g. every saturday Smallwood v sheppards
Street v Mountford
Does not matter the labels party places on it a fork is a fork even if called a spoon
Sealink
this was a license as can be seen from the contract and the fact they had mere permission to use the morring poles they could not exclude the owners from them
what types of lease
registered lease under s 24 of the PLA
equitable lease which has been part preformed s 26 of the pla
short term lease which is less then one year and is part preformed per s 26
Cancellation of a lease
must follow s 12 in accordance with s 244 of the PLA.
If it is purley for failure to pay rent then the moment it is paid then there is the presumption that relief will be granted Mullholland v Waimarie
Strong v Hurunui, if the problem can be fixed quickly and the break down and communications is not to bad then likley not going to cancel there was also going to be large financial implications on the tenant.
Sidbrad v Kanters and Edwards, where the damage is so bad and the break down in communications can not be easily fixed then it may be cancelled
also consider the studio x factos
studio x factors
the financial position of the tenant
the conduct of the landlord
the number and severity of breaches
weather they were deliberate breaches