Conservatism A level Politics

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/84

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:01 AM on 3/20/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

85 Terms

1
New cards

How do conservatives view human nature?

It is essentially imperfect, or has limited capacities (often related to the Biblical concept of 'original sin').

2
New cards

How do conservatives view society?

As organic i.e. an integrated whole that is more than the sum of its parts, whose value may supersede that of the individuals within it.

3
New cards

How does the New Right's view of society differ from that of more traditional conservatives?

They have embraced capitalist modernity and libertarianism, and arguably a more atomistic view of society.

4
New cards

What is pragmatism?

Essentially the idea that 'what's right is what works'.

5
New cards

What did Michael Oakeshott say that the aim of a conservative society is?

To 'stay afloat in uncertain waters' rather than sailing towards a specific destination which may prove illusory.

6
New cards

What kind of approach towards decision-making do conservatives take?

A flexible approach based on experience and empiricism i.e. identifying what has or hasn't worked well in the past.

7
New cards

What does the phrase 'changing to conserve' mean?

Making changes gradually and in an organic/piecemeal way, to acknowledge changing opinions and social conditions while preventing disruptive or radical social upheaval (e.g. revolutions).

This is an approach taken by conservatives.

8
New cards

Fill in the blank: the fear of ______ underpins much of conservative thinking.

revolution and violence

9
New cards

How has the fear of revolution and violence come through in conservative thinkers' writing?

Hobbes was writing in the aftermath of the English Civil War and Burke the French Revolution.

10
New cards

Why is tradition important in society for conservatives?

It stems from a respect for the accumulated wisdom and knowledge of our ancestors.

It also provides a connection between past, present and future generations.

11
New cards

What did G.K. Chesterton say about tradition?

"Tradition is the democracy of the dead. It means giving a vote to the most obscure of all classes: our ancestors."

12
New cards

What did Oakeshott say about tradition?

"Just as a plant's new leaves are connected to, dependent on and explained by the plant's roots and branches, so a society's present direction stems from its past development."

13
New cards

What do traditions provide?

- Informed guidance on how we should live our lives (based on past experience).

- A sense of stability/security that humans naturally crave.

- A way of building society together and furthering a sense of integration and belonging e.g. traditions associated with a school or nation.

14
New cards

What did Hobbes write about human life in the state of nature in his work 'Leviathon'?

Life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short".

15
New cards

How did Hobbes suggest that we prevent the state of nature from occurring?

With an all-powerful government.

16
New cards

What three human motives did Hobbes say would make life so bad in the state of nature?

- Competition

- Anticipation (diffidence)

- Glory

17
New cards

What did Hobbes mean by competition?

- People often desire the same things, and there is not enough for everyone.

- If there were obvious, significant differences in natural ability, the weak would surrender to the strong without a fight.

- But in practice, almost everyone has a reason to think they may 'win', hence people fight over the goods they want.

18
New cards

What did Hobbes mean by anticipation (diffidence)?

- Even if you have not faced competition, you might do so in the future.

- If you sit back, your adversaries are likely to grow stronger or have the element of surprise.

- So you're therefore better off making a pre-emptive strike before they do.

19
New cards

What did Hobbes mean by glory?

- Some people will attack because they overestimate their abilities, fear dishonour, or simply enjoy the experience of subduing others (desiring 'power after power').

- Even if you're not such a person yourself, the presence of such people reinforces your desire to 'anticipate' the attacks of others.

20
New cards

In what ways do conservatives believe human nature is flawed?

- Psychologically

- Intellectually

- Morally

21
New cards

How are humans flawed psychologically according to conservatives?

We are security-seeking, dependent beings who like to 'know our place' in social institutions.

Change and excessive liberty challenges this notion, causing a great degree of uncertainty which diminishes individual happiness.

22
New cards

How are humans intellectually flawed according to conservatives?

Even with education we are not capable of becoming perfectly 'rational' as liberals assume.

The vast majority lack wisdom and cannot comprehend the 'boundless and bottomless pit' of political life (Oakeshott).

Therefore, conservatives are suspicious of too much democracy, especially direct democracy.

23
New cards

How are humans morally flawed according to conservatives?

Our moral failings are often seen as rooted in the 'original sin' of Adam and Eve, of whom we are all descendants.

Humans are instinctively drawn to wrongdoing in pursuit of money, pleasure, power etc.

Those tendencies can only be controlled, never removed entirely.

24
New cards

How does Hobbes incorporate social contract theory into his views?

The state of nature is so bad that it's rational for everyone to agree to instill an absolute ruler and obey their laws.

In return, they are given protection of their lives, property etc.

25
New cards

How may Hobbes not be a true conservative?

He believes that the state is an artificial contract resulting from a rational decision to institute it (rather than a natural or organic entity).

26
New cards

Do all conservatives fully support Hobbes' view of human nature as inherently selfish and violent?

No.

27
New cards

Does Edmund Burke believe that a perfect society can be conceived of?

Yes, the 'crooked timber of humanity' can conceive of this, but is too flawed to achieve it.

For Burke, there is a 'chasm between our desire and achievement'.

28
New cards

Does Burke believe that humans are capable of wisdom and kindness?

Sometimes, but this mostly stems from traditional social moves and the church's teachings.

29
New cards

What does Burke mean by 'little platoons'?

We are more likely to be altruistic to those immediately around us - our families and local communities.

30
New cards

Instead of 'nasty, brutish and short', what does Michael Oakeshott argue that life would be without law?

"Noisy, foolish and flawed."

31
New cards

How does Oakeshott believe that humans can be benevolent?

Humans are 'fragile' and irrational, but can be benevolent especially when their lives are guided by ethical customs and religious principles.

32
New cards

Who are two examples of New Right conservatives?

Ayn Rand and Robert Nozick.

33
New cards

How do New Right conservatives argue that human nature is - and in Rand's case should - be driven?

By self-interest, a yearning for individual freedom and enterprise/innovation.

34
New cards

What role does the state have for New Right conservatives?

The 'minarchist' (night-watchman) state has a role in conflict management and protecting property rights.

35
New cards

What is meant by the 'organic' state?

A theory which holds that society, or the state, is an organism - akin to a living being - which is potentially more important than its individual parts (citizens).

36
New cards

How does Shakespeare convey the idea of the organic state in his play 'Coriolanus'?

- He compares the role of the Senate in Rome to the role of the stomach in the human body.

- The stomach is a storehouse for all the nutrients which dispenses them throughout the rest of the body; the senators collect grain and disperse grain to the rest of the city - without which it wouldn't function.

37
New cards

What does Burke think is natural and desirable within an organic society/community?

Hierarchy/power structures

38
New cards

Who does Burke think is able to govern well within this society?

As ordinary citizens are fallible and ignorant, only those with suitable experience and background are able to govern well (which feeds into his trustee model of democracy).

39
New cards

What should the organic state ultimately maintain?

It should aim to maintain historical continuity

40
New cards

How does Aristotle define the state?

A collection of individuals and sub-communities which promotes the highest form of human wellbeing (following on from his claim that 'man is a political animal')

41
New cards

What is meant by the 'evolution of society'?

The organic theory suggests that, like other 'living' things, society/the state are in a constant process of evolution

42
New cards

How does Burke explain the evolution of society in terms of continuity between generations?

'Society is indeed a contract ... not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born'

43
New cards

How could the evolution of society theory be applied to the environment?

- 'Green' conservatives argue that each generation has a responsibility for stewarding of the natural world, keeping it in trust with the next

- This underpins initiatives such as Cameron's 'vote Blue, go Green'

44
New cards

How could the evolution of society theory be applied to public finances?

- It's wrong to saddle future generations with the need to pay back debts due to irresponsible spending, so a balanced budget is needed

- e.g. motivating the recent austerity programme

45
New cards

What does the evolutionary stance on society ultimately oppose?

A revolutionary stance (Burke was particularly critical of the 'zeal' of the French Revolution, where even the alendar was altered to remove all royalist and religious influences)

46
New cards

What is meant by paternalism?

- Power being exercised in a benign way to promote the interests of the people

- It Implies that individuals may not always be the best judge of their own interests (contrary to the views of liberals like Mill) so the state/social elite should make decisions on their behalf in the manner of a 'father figure'

47
New cards

What idea is paternalism linked to?

The 'noblesse oblige' idea, that people of higher status have a responsibility to those lower down the social hierarchy (with privilege comes responsibility)

48
New cards

What branch of conservatism is paternalism most closely linked to?

One-nation conservatism, and is very much in line with Burke's trustee model of representation (which sees MPs as more knowledgeable experts whose role is to make decisions on their constituents' behalf)

49
New cards

What is, in many ways, the opposite of paternalism>

Libertarianism

50
New cards

What element of 'New Right' conservatism is libertarianism associated with?

Its economic elements

51
New cards

Name two libertarian thinkers

- Ayn Rand

- Robert Nozick

52
New cards

What kind of capitalism do libertarians tend to support?

- Laissez-faire capitalism

- This involves 'rolling back the frontiers of the state' and policies such as tax cuts, public spending cuts and privatisation

53
New cards

Why do libertarians tend to support laissez-faire capitalism?

They believe that it encourages individual self-reliance and enterprise, as well as promoting economic efficiency

54
New cards

What is the state's main role, according to libertarians?

Ensuring 'law and order' and military defence to facilitate the operation of a capitalist economy

55
New cards

What kind of view of society does libertarianism appear to promote, at first glance?

- An atomistic view of society, as a loose collection of individuals pursuing their self-interest, rather than an 'organic' whole

- This is perhaps implied by Thatcher's famous claim that 'there is no such thing as society'

56
New cards

What is Ayn Rand's model of society called?

An 'objectivist' model

57
New cards

What does Rand's objectivist model state?

We are, and ought to be, guided by rational self-interest and the pursuit of self-fulfilment (i.e. a strongly individualist and egoist view)

58
New cards

What does Nozick believe about society, contrary to Rand?

- People might choose to act out of altruism and self-sufficient communities, each of which can practise its particular moral codes and values

- This arguably represents an updated version of Burke's model of society based on 'little platoons'

59
New cards

Which school of thought could libertarianism seem closer to than conservatism?

Classical liberalism

60
New cards

How is libertarianism similar to traditional conservatism?

- It assigns a high value to private property (as property ownership may lead people to make more responsible choices (with regard to the environment, housing etc.))

- It accepts a 'hierarchy' in terms of economic outcomes (e.g. inequality of income/wealth is an inevitable result of people making different choices, showing different levels of talent and industry)

- It may also be claimed that free market conditions promote moral virtues such as hard work and self-reliance, which the 'welfare state' undermines by promoting a culture of dependency + laziness

61
New cards

How do libertarians differ from 'New Right' thinkers such as Irving Kristol?

- 'New Right' thinkers are much less liberal with regard to social issues e.g. supporting traditional 'family values', police powers, immigration controls and nationalism

- 'New Right' conservatism is sometimes distinguished as 'neo-conservative' as opposed to 'neo-liberal'

62
New cards

How do traditional conservatives believe that the social order can be maintained?

Through strict adherence to traditional values and ways of life (including religious faith)

63
New cards

What did Joseph de Maistre (French counter-enlightenment and pro-monarchist thinker) call for in the years after the Revolution?

He called for a social model based on willing submission to 'throne and altar'

64
New cards

What (arguably) makes Thomas Hobbes a traditional conservative?

- His negative view of human nature

- His support for an absolute ruler as the only alternative to violence and chaos in the state of nature

65
New cards

Do one-nation conservatives view society as organic?

Yes

66
New cards

How do one-nation views on inequality differ from that of traditional conservatives?

- One-nation conservatives believe that high levels of inequality undermine stability and a shared sense of community

- Benjamin Disraeli wrote in his novel 'Sybil' that the wealthy and working class Britons were as "ignorant of each other's habits, thoughts and feeling as if they were ... inhabitants of different planets", which he thought should be rectified

67
New cards

How does the idea of 'noblesse oblige' help the elite as well as the 'less fortunate'?

It helps to preserve existing economic/social systems and prevent revolutionary change

68
New cards

What kind of conservatism is pragmatism (accepting small changes to reduce the likelihood of more radical ones taking place) most closely aligned with?

- One-nation conservatism

- As Michael Oakeshott argued, 'one has to reform in order to conserve'

69
New cards

What are some examples of Conservative politicians who have adopted one-nation conservatism to broaden the party's appeal to all sections of society?

Churchill, Heath, Macmillan, Major

70
New cards

When did the 'New Right' emerge?

- In the 1970s in the US and UK

- This was a period in which conservatives had joined in a consensus around Keynesian economics, state welfare and (relative) social liberalism

- The emergence of the 'New Right' aimed to fight against perceived economic stagnation in this period, excessive trade union power and increased welfare dependency

71
New cards

Why were the 'New Right' not happy with the political moves of the 1960's?

- The 60's were a time of great social progress (i.e. moving away from tradition)

- In the 60's there was use of drugs, sexual promiscuity, loss of respect for authority etc. and the 'New Right' referred to this as a 'permissive society'

72
New cards

What two strands does the New Right consist of?

Neo-liberalism (economic) and neo-conservatism (social/cultural)

73
New cards

What book do libertarians generally draw their support for measures aimed at increasing economic freedom from, and what are some examples of these measures?

Friedrich Hayek's 'The Road to Serfdom' (1944) - they get ideas from this such as:

- Major reduction in taxation and tighter control of government spending ('rolling back' of the state to a minimal 'night-watchman' function)

- Linked to the above, tackling a culture of welfare dependency

- Privatisation and deregulation of public services

- Weakening the power of trade unions and local government bodies

74
New cards

What does New Right neo-conservatism seek to restore?

Traditional sources of authority, Judeo-Christian morality and national identity/patriotism

75
New cards

What are some specific examples of what New Right neo-conservatism beliefs may entail?

- Tough stance on law and order: increased police powers and stricter sentences - more discipline in schools and the family

- Robust national defence, including willingness to intervene militarily overseas to promote national interests (e.g. Iraq invasion, Afghanistan etc.)

- Controls on immigration, based on the desire to maintain a single national identity/culture

- Emphasis on national sovereignty and hostility to supranational institutions like the EU

- 'Anti-permissiveness' in social policy e.g. war on drugs, promotion of the nuclear family, sceptical of homosexuality and abortion

76
New cards

How could it appear that neo-liberalism is not compatible with neo-conservatism?

1) Neo-liberals value individual (economic) liberty, whereas neo-conservatives want to restrict (social) liberty

2) Immigration is a major area of disagreement - neo-libs such as Rand embrace it as a feature of free markets and individual choice; neo-cons believes it 'swamps' traditional communities and national culture, so should be restricted

3) Neo-libs seek to reduce govt. spending while neo-cons call for more spending esp. on defence and policing

77
New cards

How can neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism work together and be compatible?

1) Traditional morality (neo-con) may be a way of ensuring people act responsibly as agents in a free market (neo-lib)

2) Strong law and order (neo-con) is a way of protecting the property rights on which free-market economics (neo-lib) is based

- Especially given that inequality may lead to social tensions which need to be firmly 'policed' (e.g. Thatcher's response to the miners' strike and inner-city riots)

3) The family (neo-con) provides an alternative source of support once state welfare is withdrawn (neo-lib)

4) Reductions in welfare spending and privatisation sell-offs (neo-lib) are a way of providing more funds for police and military (neo-con)

78
New cards

In what ways do conservatives agree on human nature?

1) All cons reject anarchist/socialist idea of human 'perfectibility' by social or economic institutions

2) All cons believe human nature is flawed: morally, psychologically and intellectually

3) Most cons believe individuals aren't self-sufficient and need social structures and a sense of belonging (though neo-liberals agree, advocating rugged individualism)

4) Most cons cite our tendency to form bonds with those similar or close to us - Burke's 'little platoons'

79
New cards

In what ways do conservatives disagree on human nature?

1) Hobbes (traditional) - strongly negative view that competition, diffidence and desire for glory lead to 'war of all against all' in state of nature

2) Burke and Oakeshott (one-nation) more positive: we are capable of wisdom and benevolence, even if prone to error (and esp. with help of religion/social mores)

3) New Right conservatives (esp. Rand) emphasise tendency to pursue self-interest esp. in economic contexts, though Nozick thinks altruism possible even in a free market e.g. through charitable or non-profit enterprises

80
New cards

In what ways do conservatives agree on society?

1) Respect for tradition - 'democracy of the dead'

2) Social (often religious) mores and authority figures help foster security and social harmony

81
New cards

In what ways do conservatives disagree on society?

1) Emphasis on family/localism (Burke's 'little platoons') vs. nationalist stance of neo-cons

2) Traditional cons hold an organic view of society giving individuals a sense of identity as part of something 'greater' than themselves vs. New Right atomistic view of society as a collection of individuals pursuing self-interest

82
New cards

In what ways do conservatives agree on the state?

1) Strong state needed to ensure internal order (policing, punishment) and external security (defence)

2) State seen as natural for human beings - reflects a natural hierarchy and desire for rule-based order (vs. liberal view of state as serving individuals' interests)

83
New cards

In what ways do conservatives disagree on the state?

1) Over how much authority the state should possess (e.g. Hobbes - absolute monarchy vs. Burke - trustee model of democracy)

2) Over extent and role of the state in the economy

- one-nation cons support welfare provision to reduce social divisions

- BUT New Right cons advocate a minimal night-watchman state which guarantees rights over person and property, but doesn't redistribute resources

84
New cards

In what ways do conservatives agree on the economy?

1) Support for property rights - rejects centrally planned economy or large scale nationalisation

2) Economic inequality, to some extent, is inevitable and perhaps desirable

85
New cards

In what ways do conservatives disagree on the economy?

1) Pragmatic intervention by govt. (trad. and one-nation cons.) vs. market fundamentalism of New Right

2) Concern over (extreme) inequality as socially divisive (one-nation) vs. acceptance of unequal outcomes as a result of different choices/efforts/talents (New Right)

Explore top notes

Imperialism Rise in Nationalism • During the French and Industrial Revolution, nationalism continued to inspire nations to increase their political and economic power. • Nationalism became the ideal force in the political, economic, and cultural life in the world, becoming the first universal ideology-organizing all people into a nation state. Nationalism Defined • The strong belief that the interest of a particular nation-state is of primary importance. o Nation-State – a state where the vast majority shares the same culture and is conscious of it. It is an ideal in which cultural boundaries match up with political ones. • As an ideology, it is based on the idea that the individual’s loyalty and devotion to the nation-state surpass other individual/group interests. • Exalting one nation’s belief above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests, excluding the interests of others. Changing the World through a Nationalistic Vision • The French Revolution significantly changed the political world and how countries govern. • The Industrial Revolution significantly changed the economic world. • The Age of Imperialism (1870-1914) dramatically changed the political, economic, and social world. What is Imperialism? • Imperialism- The policy of extending the rule of authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies. Power and influence are done through diplomacy or military force. Reasons for Imperialism • There are 5 main motives for empires to seek to expand their rule over other countries or territories: 1. Exploratory • Imperial nations wanted to explore territory unknown to them. • The main purpose for this exploration of new lands was for resource acquisition, medical or scientific research. o Charles Darwin • Other reasons: o Cartography (map making) o Adventure 2. Ethnocentric • Europeans acted on the concept of ethnocentrism o Ethnocentrism- the belief that one race or nation is superior to others. • Ethnocentrism developed out of Charles Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” theory. Philosophers used the theory to explain why there were superior races and inferior races. o This became known as Social Darwinism. • Most imperial nations believed that their cultural values or beliefs were superior to other nations or groups. • Believed imperial conquest would bring successful culture to inferior people. 3. Religious • Imperial expansion promoted a religious movement of people setting out to convert new members of conquered territories. • With the belief that Christianity was superior, missionaries believed it was their duty to spread Christianity to the world. • Christian missionaries established churches, and in doing so, they spread Western culture values as well. • Typically, missionaries spread the imperial nation's language through education and religious interactions. 4. Political • Patriotism and Nationalism helped spur our imperial growth, thus creating competition against other supremacies. • It was a matter of national pride, respect, and security. • Furthermore, European rivalry spurred nations for imperial conquest. Since land equaled power, the more land a country could acquire the more prestige they could wield across the globe. • Empires wanted strategic territory to ensure access for their navies and armies around the world. • The empire believed they must expand, thus they needed to be defended. 5. Economic • With the Industrial Revolution taking place during the same time, governments and private companies contributed to find ways to maximize profits. • Imperialized countries provided European factories and markets with natural resources (old and new) to manufacture products. • Trading posts were strategically placed around imperialized countries to maximize and increase profits. o Such places as the Suez Canal in Egypt which was controlled by the British provided strategic choke hold over many European powers. o Imperial powers competed over the best potential locations for resources, markets, and trade. History of Imperialism • Ancient Imperialism 600 BCE-500 CE o Roman Empire, Ancient China, Greek Empire, Persian Empire, Babylonian Empire. • Middle Age Imperialism (Age of Colonialism-1400-1800s) o Great Britain, Spain, Portugal, France, Netherlands (Dutch), Russia. • Age of Imperialism 1870-1914 o Great Britain, Spain, Portugal, France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Japan, United States, Ottoman Empire, Russia. • Current Imperialism...? o U.S. Military intervention (i.e. Middle East) o Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. Imperialism Colonialism • Refers to political or economic control, either legally or illegally. • Refers to where one nation assumes control over the other. • Creating an empire, expanding into neighboring regions and expanding the dominance far outside its borders. • Where a country conquers and rules over other regions for exploiting resources from the conquered country for the conqueror's benefit. • Foreign government controls/governs a territory without significant settlement. • Foreign government controls/governs the territory from within the land being colonized. • Little to no new settlement established on fresh territory. • Movement to settle to fresh territory. Age of Colonialism WHEN? • Started around the late 1400s and ended around the late 1700s/early 1800s. WHY? • Primary Reason: European countries, wished to find a direct trade route to Asia (China & India) and the East Indies. o Quicker and relatively more effective than land routes over Asia. • Secondary Reason: Empire expansion (land power) WHO? • Countries involved: Great Britain, France, Spain, the Dutch & Portugal. • Individuals’ knowns as Mercantilists believed that maintaining imperialized territory and colonizing the region could serve as a source of wealth, while personal motives by rulers, explorers, and missionaries could therefore promote their own agenda. o This agenda being “Glory, God and Gold”. Mercantilism • Mercantilism was a popular and main economic system for many European nations during the 16th to 18th centuries. • The main goal was to increase a nation’s wealth by promoting government rule of a nation’s economy for the purpose of enhancing state power at the expense of rival national power. • It was the economic counterpart of political absolutism. Why did mercantilists want colonies? • Mercantilists believed that a country must have an excess of exports over imports. • By colonizing territory, it provided the nation with indispensable wealth of precious raw materials. • Therefore, the claimed territory served as a market and supplier of raw materials for the mother country. Which, in time, provided an excess of exports for the nation and thus created wealth. o Development of Trading Companies to support this economic system. Hudson Bay Company – (1670). Controlled primarily North America. o Dutch East Indie Trading Company (1682) o East Indian Trading Company (1600) o Royal African Trade Company (1672) WHERE? • European nations begun to colonize the America, India and the East Indies to create a direct trade route. • Great Britain was the leading power in India, Australia and North America, South Africa. • Spain colonized central and South America. • French held Louisiana, coastal land of Africa and French Guinea. • The Dutch built an empire in the East Indies. • The Portuguese was able to take control of present-day Brazil and the southern tip of South America and Japan. Age of Colonialism • As countries started to imperialize these regions, eventually the concept of colonization took hold: • This is what makes the Age of Colonialism extremely different! End of Colonialism • By 1800, colonialism became less popular • Why? o Revolutions (Spain, France & American) o The Napoleonic Wars o Struggle for nationalism and democracy. o Exhausted all money and energy to supervise their colonies. Waiting to wake again • Imperialism would stay quiet for close to 50 years before Great Britain and France’s economies revitalized. • The outbreak of the Industrial Revolution only encouraged and revitalized European nations to begin their conquest for new territory and resources. Age of Imperialism THE SCRAMBLE FOR AFRICA 1870-1914 Conditions Prior to Imperialism of Africa  European interest in exploiting Africa was minimal.  Their economic interests & profit in Africa primarily came through coastal trade that took place during the 1500-1700s.  The slave trade became the main source of European profit.  Furthermore, disease, political instability, lack of transportation and unpredictable climate all discouraged Europeans from seeking territory. Slave Trade & the Trans-Atlantic Slave Voyages  Forced labor was not uncommon during the 13-17th Centuries. Africans and Europeans had been trading goods and people across the Mediteranea for centuries.  This all changed from 1526 to 1867, as a new system of slavery was introduced that became highly “commercialized, racialized and inherited”  By 1690, the America and West Indies saw approximately 30,000 African people shipped from Africa. A century later, that number grew to 85,000 people per year.  By 1867, approximately 12.5 million people (about twice the population of Arizona) left Africa in a slave ship. What Changed? 1. End of the Slave Trade- Left a need for trade between Europe and Africa. 2. Innovation in technology- The steam engine and iron hulled boats allowed Europe 3. Discovery of new raw materials- Explorers located vast raw materials and resources and this only spurred imperialism with Europe in the wake of the Industrial Revolution. 4. Politics- Unification of Germany and Italy left little room to expand in Europe. Germany and Italy both needed raw materials to “catch up” with Britain and France so they looked to Africa. The Scramble for Africa  The scramble started in 1870.  Although some coastal land had previously been acquired before 1870, the need for territory quickly accelerated as European countries looked t get deeper into Africa.  Within 20 years, nearly all continents were placed under imperialistic rule. Who was Involved?  Great Britain  France  Germany  Italy  Portugal  Belgium  Spain (kind) Violent Affairs  Violence broke out multiple times when European nations looked to claim the same territory.  Germ Chancellor. Otto van Bismarck. Attempted to avert the possibility of violence against the European powers.  In 1884, Bismarck organized a conference in Berlin for the European nations. The Berlin Conference (1884-85)  The conference looked to set ground rules for future annexation of African territory by European Nations.  Annexation is the forcible acquisition and assertion of legal title over one state’s territory by another state, usually following military occupation of the territory.  From a distant perspective, it looked like it would reduce tensions among European nations and avert war.  At the heart of the meeting, these European countries negotiated their claims to African territory, made it official and then mapped their regions.  Furthermore, the leaders agreed to allow free trade among imperialized territory and some homework for negotiating future European claims in Africa was established. Further Path  After the conference, european powers continued to expand their claims in Africa so that by 1900. 90% of the African territory had been claimed. A Turn towards Colonization?  Upon the imperialization of African territory, European nations and little interest in African land unless it produced economic wealth.  Therefore, European governments put little effort and expertise into these imperialized regions.  In most cases, this emat a form of indirect rule. Thus, governing the natin without sufficient settlement and government from within the mother country. Some Exceptions  There were some exemptions through in Africa as colonization was a necessary for some regions i n Africa.  Some regions where diamonds and gold were present. Government looked to protectorate the regions and establish rule and settlement in the regions.  Protectorates: A state controlled and protected by another state for defense against aggression and other law violations. Would  Some examples include South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe and Congo. Conclusion  Although it may appear that the Berlin Conference averted war amid the African Scramble, imperialism eventually brought the world into worldwide conflict.  With the continued desire to create an empire by European nations. World War 1 would break out which can be linked to this quest at imperialism.
Updated 490d ago
note Note
Imperialism Rise in Nationalism • During the French and Industrial Revolution, nationalism continued to inspire nations to increase their political and economic power. • Nationalism became the ideal force in the political, economic, and cultural life in the world, becoming the first universal ideology-organizing all people into a nation state. Nationalism Defined • The strong belief that the interest of a particular nation-state is of primary importance. o Nation-State – a state where the vast majority shares the same culture and is conscious of it. It is an ideal in which cultural boundaries match up with political ones. • As an ideology, it is based on the idea that the individual’s loyalty and devotion to the nation-state surpass other individual/group interests. • Exalting one nation’s belief above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests, excluding the interests of others. Changing the World through a Nationalistic Vision • The French Revolution significantly changed the political world and how countries govern. • The Industrial Revolution significantly changed the economic world. • The Age of Imperialism (1870-1914) dramatically changed the political, economic, and social world. What is Imperialism? • Imperialism- The policy of extending the rule of authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies. Power and influence are done through diplomacy or military force. Reasons for Imperialism • There are 5 main motives for empires to seek to expand their rule over other countries or territories: 1. Exploratory • Imperial nations wanted to explore territory unknown to them. • The main purpose for this exploration of new lands was for resource acquisition, medical or scientific research. o Charles Darwin • Other reasons: o Cartography (map making) o Adventure 2. Ethnocentric • Europeans acted on the concept of ethnocentrism o Ethnocentrism- the belief that one race or nation is superior to others. • Ethnocentrism developed out of Charles Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” theory. Philosophers used the theory to explain why there were superior races and inferior races. o This became known as Social Darwinism. • Most imperial nations believed that their cultural values or beliefs were superior to other nations or groups. • Believed imperial conquest would bring successful culture to inferior people. 3. Religious • Imperial expansion promoted a religious movement of people setting out to convert new members of conquered territories. • With the belief that Christianity was superior, missionaries believed it was their duty to spread Christianity to the world. • Christian missionaries established churches, and in doing so, they spread Western culture values as well. • Typically, missionaries spread the imperial nation's language through education and religious interactions. 4. Political • Patriotism and Nationalism helped spur our imperial growth, thus creating competition against other supremacies. • It was a matter of national pride, respect, and security. • Furthermore, European rivalry spurred nations for imperial conquest. Since land equaled power, the more land a country could acquire the more prestige they could wield across the globe. • Empires wanted strategic territory to ensure access for their navies and armies around the world. • The empire believed they must expand, thus they needed to be defended. 5. Economic • With the Industrial Revolution taking place during the same time, governments and private companies contributed to find ways to maximize profits. • Imperialized countries provided European factories and markets with natural resources (old and new) to manufacture products. • Trading posts were strategically placed around imperialized countries to maximize and increase profits. o Such places as the Suez Canal in Egypt which was controlled by the British provided strategic choke hold over many European powers. o Imperial powers competed over the best potential locations for resources, markets, and trade. History of Imperialism • Ancient Imperialism 600 BCE-500 CE o Roman Empire, Ancient China, Greek Empire, Persian Empire, Babylonian Empire. • Middle Age Imperialism (Age of Colonialism-1400-1800s) o Great Britain, Spain, Portugal, France, Netherlands (Dutch), Russia. • Age of Imperialism 1870-1914 o Great Britain, Spain, Portugal, France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Japan, United States, Ottoman Empire, Russia. • Current Imperialism...? o U.S. Military intervention (i.e. Middle East) o Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. Imperialism Colonialism • Refers to political or economic control, either legally or illegally. • Refers to where one nation assumes control over the other. • Creating an empire, expanding into neighboring regions and expanding the dominance far outside its borders. • Where a country conquers and rules over other regions for exploiting resources from the conquered country for the conqueror's benefit. • Foreign government controls/governs a territory without significant settlement. • Foreign government controls/governs the territory from within the land being colonized. • Little to no new settlement established on fresh territory. • Movement to settle to fresh territory. Age of Colonialism WHEN? • Started around the late 1400s and ended around the late 1700s/early 1800s. WHY? • Primary Reason: European countries, wished to find a direct trade route to Asia (China & India) and the East Indies. o Quicker and relatively more effective than land routes over Asia. • Secondary Reason: Empire expansion (land power) WHO? • Countries involved: Great Britain, France, Spain, the Dutch & Portugal. • Individuals’ knowns as Mercantilists believed that maintaining imperialized territory and colonizing the region could serve as a source of wealth, while personal motives by rulers, explorers, and missionaries could therefore promote their own agenda. o This agenda being “Glory, God and Gold”. Mercantilism • Mercantilism was a popular and main economic system for many European nations during the 16th to 18th centuries. • The main goal was to increase a nation’s wealth by promoting government rule of a nation’s economy for the purpose of enhancing state power at the expense of rival national power. • It was the economic counterpart of political absolutism. Why did mercantilists want colonies? • Mercantilists believed that a country must have an excess of exports over imports. • By colonizing territory, it provided the nation with indispensable wealth of precious raw materials. • Therefore, the claimed territory served as a market and supplier of raw materials for the mother country. Which, in time, provided an excess of exports for the nation and thus created wealth. o Development of Trading Companies to support this economic system. Hudson Bay Company – (1670). Controlled primarily North America. o Dutch East Indie Trading Company (1682) o East Indian Trading Company (1600) o Royal African Trade Company (1672) WHERE? • European nations begun to colonize the America, India and the East Indies to create a direct trade route. • Great Britain was the leading power in India, Australia and North America, South Africa. • Spain colonized central and South America. • French held Louisiana, coastal land of Africa and French Guinea. • The Dutch built an empire in the East Indies. • The Portuguese was able to take control of present-day Brazil and the southern tip of South America and Japan. Age of Colonialism • As countries started to imperialize these regions, eventually the concept of colonization took hold: • This is what makes the Age of Colonialism extremely different! End of Colonialism • By 1800, colonialism became less popular • Why? o Revolutions (Spain, France & American) o The Napoleonic Wars o Struggle for nationalism and democracy. o Exhausted all money and energy to supervise their colonies. Waiting to wake again • Imperialism would stay quiet for close to 50 years before Great Britain and France’s economies revitalized. • The outbreak of the Industrial Revolution only encouraged and revitalized European nations to begin their conquest for new territory and resources. Age of Imperialism THE SCRAMBLE FOR AFRICA 1870-1914 Conditions Prior to Imperialism of Africa  European interest in exploiting Africa was minimal.  Their economic interests & profit in Africa primarily came through coastal trade that took place during the 1500-1700s.  The slave trade became the main source of European profit.  Furthermore, disease, political instability, lack of transportation and unpredictable climate all discouraged Europeans from seeking territory. Slave Trade & the Trans-Atlantic Slave Voyages  Forced labor was not uncommon during the 13-17th Centuries. Africans and Europeans had been trading goods and people across the Mediteranea for centuries.  This all changed from 1526 to 1867, as a new system of slavery was introduced that became highly “commercialized, racialized and inherited”  By 1690, the America and West Indies saw approximately 30,000 African people shipped from Africa. A century later, that number grew to 85,000 people per year.  By 1867, approximately 12.5 million people (about twice the population of Arizona) left Africa in a slave ship. What Changed? 1. End of the Slave Trade- Left a need for trade between Europe and Africa. 2. Innovation in technology- The steam engine and iron hulled boats allowed Europe 3. Discovery of new raw materials- Explorers located vast raw materials and resources and this only spurred imperialism with Europe in the wake of the Industrial Revolution. 4. Politics- Unification of Germany and Italy left little room to expand in Europe. Germany and Italy both needed raw materials to “catch up” with Britain and France so they looked to Africa. The Scramble for Africa  The scramble started in 1870.  Although some coastal land had previously been acquired before 1870, the need for territory quickly accelerated as European countries looked t get deeper into Africa.  Within 20 years, nearly all continents were placed under imperialistic rule. Who was Involved?  Great Britain  France  Germany  Italy  Portugal  Belgium  Spain (kind) Violent Affairs  Violence broke out multiple times when European nations looked to claim the same territory.  Germ Chancellor. Otto van Bismarck. Attempted to avert the possibility of violence against the European powers.  In 1884, Bismarck organized a conference in Berlin for the European nations. The Berlin Conference (1884-85)  The conference looked to set ground rules for future annexation of African territory by European Nations.  Annexation is the forcible acquisition and assertion of legal title over one state’s territory by another state, usually following military occupation of the territory.  From a distant perspective, it looked like it would reduce tensions among European nations and avert war.  At the heart of the meeting, these European countries negotiated their claims to African territory, made it official and then mapped their regions.  Furthermore, the leaders agreed to allow free trade among imperialized territory and some homework for negotiating future European claims in Africa was established. Further Path  After the conference, european powers continued to expand their claims in Africa so that by 1900. 90% of the African territory had been claimed. A Turn towards Colonization?  Upon the imperialization of African territory, European nations and little interest in African land unless it produced economic wealth.  Therefore, European governments put little effort and expertise into these imperialized regions.  In most cases, this emat a form of indirect rule. Thus, governing the natin without sufficient settlement and government from within the mother country. Some Exceptions  There were some exemptions through in Africa as colonization was a necessary for some regions i n Africa.  Some regions where diamonds and gold were present. Government looked to protectorate the regions and establish rule and settlement in the regions.  Protectorates: A state controlled and protected by another state for defense against aggression and other law violations. Would  Some examples include South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe and Congo. Conclusion  Although it may appear that the Berlin Conference averted war amid the African Scramble, imperialism eventually brought the world into worldwide conflict.  With the continued desire to create an empire by European nations. World War 1 would break out which can be linked to this quest at imperialism.
Updated 490d ago
note Note

Explore top flashcards

Unit 5: Genetics
Updated 375d ago
flashcards Flashcards (29)
La familia
Updated 784d ago
flashcards Flashcards (38)
CMS III Final: EM
Updated 255d ago
flashcards Flashcards (212)
2b: Cell structure
Updated 1171d ago
flashcards Flashcards (30)
deelsteppen
Updated 1065d ago
flashcards Flashcards (87)
PSYC 14
Updated 148d ago
flashcards Flashcards (64)
Unit 5: Genetics
Updated 375d ago
flashcards Flashcards (29)
La familia
Updated 784d ago
flashcards Flashcards (38)
CMS III Final: EM
Updated 255d ago
flashcards Flashcards (212)
2b: Cell structure
Updated 1171d ago
flashcards Flashcards (30)
deelsteppen
Updated 1065d ago
flashcards Flashcards (87)
PSYC 14
Updated 148d ago
flashcards Flashcards (64)