1/21
Topic 1
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Why do we take risks?
For the possibility of being rewarded
What does risk entail?
uncertainty on the outcome
risk management manages how/what risks we take
risks can be losses for a firm or an individual
most risks are about money
Pure Risk
there’s either a 100% chance of losing, or a 100% of not losing
0% chance of loss means impossible loss
risk =/= loss
Probability of the Loss
how likely the event is to occur
ranges from 0-1 or 0%-100%
risk =/= probability of the loss
Types/Classifications of Risk
Pure vs. Speculative
Static vs. Dynamic
Diversifiable vs. Non-Diversifiable
Objective vs. Subjective
Pure vs. Speculative
both involve uncertainty
pure: loss or no loss
losses associated with pure risks are typically insurable
pure risk has 0 gain
speculative: loss, no loss, or gain
most common speculative risk is buying a house, gambling, stocks, paying for university
speculative risks is the basis for Enterprise Risk Management
most orgs face speculative over pure
many speculative risks aren’t insurable, ones that are are difficult and expensive, like if your alcohol business ends up having a major marijuana competitor, or if your junk food business lowers because of GLP-1s
Static vs. Dynamic
static: hasn’t changed much over time, fairly consistent
always present for orgs, societies, individuals, etc.
ex: risks of the Earth, human risk
dynamic: arises out of changing circumstance
ex: law change, tech change, AI change
Diversifiable vs. Non-Diversifiable
Diversifiable: when there’s true randomness and no correlation
ex: within 20mi of where I’m standing, there will be 10 car crashes
impacts only some individuals/groups
random, not dependent on one another
one event, a couple losses
ex: car accident involving 2 people/vehicles; rear-end chain reaction
Non-Diversifiable: one event, many losses
highly correlated
ex: natural disasters, stock crash, inflation, unemployed
hard to manage, but not impossible
Objective vs. Subjective
objective: measurable variation in uncertain outcomes based on facts and data
variation of actual data from expected outcomes
variation is key - more variation means more risk
let the numbers speak
flaw: numbers don’t tell us the future, the story can change
subjective: an individual’s view of uncertainty of the situation involving risk
airplanes are incredibly safe, but people will subjectively avoid them because they’re afraid
cars are very dangerous, yet people will drive them anyway
depends on the individual’s attitude toward the risk
how you feel about it doesn’t have to make sense
not easily measured
risk takers and risk averrers don’t easily get along
influences how a firm handles risks
ex: don’t bring up AI to someone who doesn’t trust technology
AI is great with objective risk, terrible with subjective risk
Factors Affecting Risk
Peril
Frequency of the Loss
Severity
Hazard
Peril
the “what”
immediate cost of the loss
phone stolen, you broke your leg, you died, you lost your job
Frequency of the Loss
how often does the risk occur
tendency to overestimate little risks & underestimate big risks
ex: avoiding ocean due to sharks but getting in cars
number of losses in a given time period (cannot be negative)
low frequency = low probability, high frequency = high probability
Severity
how bad is the loss ($$)
conditional upon frequency being positive
not an issue of the frequency is 0
Different Types of Hazards
Physical Hazard
Moral Hazard
Morale Hazard
Hazard
underlying condition behind a loss occurrence
either increases frequency of the loss, increases severity of the loss, or increases both
explains the peril
ex: texting while driving
Physical Hazard
location
House at Jersey shore. Peril is flood, shore is physical hazard (frequency)
construction
fire peril, wood structure physical hazard (freq. & severity)
use
peril fire, use of building as factory physical hazard (severity)
Moral Hazard
act/behave differently because of the existence of insurance
freq. & severity increases
insurance fraud, husband kills wife to get her life insurance
not all moral hazards are illegal
cash bar = you pay. open bar = free. drink more at open
2 ppl w/same health conditions. 1 w/insurance sees doctor more
behavior change =/= bad
costly, pay more for car insurance or more taxes bc of this
Morale Hazard
carelessness concerning losses
has nothing to do with insurance
texting while driving even if they know it’s dangerous because of addiction
Decision Making Process
Manage Pure Risk (TRM) and Speculative Risk (ERM)
goal in TRM is minimizing financial impact on the organization
goal in ERM is maximizing shareholder value
Risk Management Function in an Organization
RM originally was a specialized area of finance
continuously evolving, isn’t only insurance-buying now
finance dept. → risk manager → chief risk officer
Evolution of Risk Management
1950s: firms didn’t manage risks, only bought insurance
narrow and non-strategic
Mid-60s: professor Wayne Snider coins the term RM, beginning evolution into strategy
Present: important function in a firm, very broad scope
Steps In The Risk Management Process
Identify exposure to losses
Evaluate exposure to losses
Identify possible alternatives
Select among the alternatives
Implement chosen option
Periodically evaluate chosen strategy