1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Corporate-Level Strategy: How does it create profit?
Corporate-Level Strategy: a strategy that focuses on gaining long-term revenue, profits, and market value through managing operations in multiple businesses
— synergies among the business of a firm ; the stronger the synergies, the more profit
(multi. Business strategies and ONE corporate strategies)
Within a conglomerate firm/company
Diversification
the process of firms expanding their operations by entering new businesses
Related Diversification
A firm entering a different business in which it can benefit from leveraging core competencies, sharing activities, or building market power
— products of the firms’ different businesses are somehow/partially related
Similar raw materials, suppliers, production/plant/manufacturing, etc.
Related Diversification
Economies of Scope
cost saving from leveraging core competencies or sharing activities among businesses in a corporation — leads to either leveraging core competencies or activities
Leveraging Core Competencies: a firm’s strategic resources that reflect the collective learning in the organization
developed knowledge in one business and transferring that knowledge into another business
Sharing Activities: having activities in two or more businesses’ value chains done by one of the businesses
having a central hub of a service/activity (i.e., HR, financing, etc.) for the firm to be used across all of their business
Pooled Negotiating Power
the improvement in bargaining position relative to suppliers and customers
have synergy between business of the firm increases the negotiating/barging power of the firm
Market Power
firms’ abilities to profit through restricting or controlling supply to a market or coordinating with other firms to reduce investments — ability to act like a olig/monopoly
Vertical Integration
an expansion of the firm by integrating preceding or successive production processes
LOW: not a large presence of the firm within the manuf. & distri. of their products
HIGH: LARGE presence of the firm within the manuf. & distri. of their products
HIGH V.I allows the firm to hold their cards close to their chest and leverage their power against their competitors that may be subject to their power and have to buy their components of their supply chain and/or won’t be able to to compete due to the firm w/ HIGH V.I having total competitive advantage
Lack of information access DECREASES the bargaining power of consumers, INCREASES the bargaining power of firm
Transaction Cost Perspective
vertical integration is better than market transactions when transaction costs are high
Transaction Costs: search, negotiating, contracting, monitoring, and enforcement costs
ALL the effort related in making a purchase/transaction
when transaction costs are low, stray away from vertical integration
FULL vertical integration Benefits and Risks
Benefits:
Secure source of raw material or distribution channels
Control of valuable assets
Able to have high turnaround of the production/manufacturing due to high vertical integration
Risks:
Higher overhead costs and capital expenditures
Loss of flexibility — MORE assets own, harder to channel all aspects of the firm
Unrelated Diversification
a firm entering a different business that has little horizontal interactions with other businesses in a firm — unrelated products/business of a firm
Horizontal Interactions: relationships among business units
create: core competencies, sharing activities, market power
Vertical Interactions: relationships between business units and corporate office
create: corporate parenting, restructuring, portfolio management
value lies in CORPORATE office
Corporate Parenting and Restructuring
Parenting Advantage: the positive contributions of the corporate office to a new business as a result of expertise and support provided and not as a result of substantial changes in assets, capital structure, or management
Restructuring: the intervention of a corporate office in a new business that substantially changes assets, capital structure and or management
Selling parts of business, changing management, downsizing, reducing costs, etc.
Portfolio Management
a method for (1) assessing the competitive position of a portfolio of businesses within a corporation, (2) suggesting strategic alternatives for each business, and (3) identifying priorities for the allocation of resources across the businesses
Portfolio Management – BCG Matrix
BCG Matrix
HIGH-HIGH / Stars: long term growth potential and should continue to receive
Doesn't make a profit, but a good investment due to the forecasted growth of the industry
If a company ONLY have stars, can go out of business
LOW-HIGH / Question Marks: resources should be invested in them to enhance their competitive positions
Either invest a lot to transform ? into a STAR, or divest and make it a DOG
HIGH-LOW / Cash Cow: limited long-run potential but a sources of cash flow to invest in stars and question marks
Makes MOST profit , but NO growth
Can go out of business if there's no industry growth or innovation
When CC starts to dip, DISCONTINUE — they don't become dogs
LOW-LOW / Dog: should be divested
BAD – divested, get rid of
Triangle of LOVE
Take money from CASH COW
Put that $$ into a ?
Hopes of that ? will become a STAR
And hopes of that STAR will be made into a CASH COW
The 3 Means to Achieve Diversification
1. Mergers and Acquisitions
2. Strategic Alliance and Joint Ventures
3. Internal Development
1. Mergers and Acquisitions
Merger: combining two or more firms into one new legal entity
Acquisition: the INcorporation of one firm into another through purchase
“ONLY” a larger company can acquire a smaller company through their purchase
PROS:
Obtain valuable resources
Attain economies of scope, market power, or leveraging core competencies
Consolidate the industry
Reducing the amount of competitors by buying them out
CONS:
Takeover premium for the acquisitions can be high
Cultural differences among companies can doom the benefits
2. Strategic Alliance and Joint Ventures
Strategic Alliance: a cooperative relationship between two or more firms
Joint Venture: new entities formed within a strategic alliance in which two or more firms (the parents) contribute equity to form the new legal entity
PROS:
Entering new markets
Reducing costs in the value chain
Developing and diffusing new technologies
CONS:
Lacking synergies
Lacking trust
3. Internal Development
Internal Development: entering a new business through investment in new facilities, often called corporate entrepreneurship and new venture development — in-house development and innovations
PROS:
Do not share wealth generated
No difficulties for combining activities
CONS:
It can be time-consuming
*price of the stock ISN’T the price of the of the ENTIRE company
Increased demand and purchases of stock = increase of stock price
Stand-alone/CURRENT standard value vs. Synergy Net Present Value (“future” value)
Synergy defines the ACTUAL value
How Managerial Motives can Erode Value Creation – DUE TO SELFISHNESS
Even if diversification can lead to increased performance, in a vast amount of cases it leads to performances losses — FAILS
Acquisitions in 60% of cases lead to value destruction instead of value creation — FAIL
50% of strategic alliances fail
Growth for Growth’s Sake
managers’ action to growth the size of the firms and not to increase long-term profitability to serve managerial self-interest
M&A done not for the company’s benefit/interest, but for their own benefit/interest
Egotism
managers’ actions to shape their firms’ strategies to serve their selfish interest rather than to maximize long-term shareholder value