(12) Covenants

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/64

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:29 PM on 7/27/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

65 Terms

1
New cards

What is a covenant?

A promise contained in a deed or lease that requires a party either to perform an affirmative act or refrain from certain conduct.

2
New cards

What types of obligations may a covenant impose?

It may require an affirmative act or require a party to refrain from certain conduct.

3
New cards

What are the two types of covenants?

Affirmative covenants and negative covenants.

4
New cards

What is an affirmative covenant?

A covenant requiring a party to perform an affirmative act.

5
New cards

What is a negative covenant?

A covenant requiring a party to refrain from specified conduct.

6
New cards

Is a covenant considered an interest in land?

Yes. Fleming states that a covenant is a legal interest in land, although jurisdictions are split.

7
New cards

Why does a covenant generally have to satisfy the Statute of Frauds?

Because it is a legal interest in land.

8
New cards

What issue should you always consider when determining whether a covenant was properly created?

Whether the covenant satisfies the Statute of Frauds.

9
New cards

When should you analyze only creation of a covenant and not whether it runs with the land?

When the original promisee (B) sues the original promisor (A).

10
New cards

When B (the original covenantee) sues A (the original covenantor), what is the only issue?

Whether the covenant was properly created (generally, whether there is a sufficient writing).

11
New cards

When B (the original covenantee) sues C (the successor to the covenantor), what issue must be analyzed?

Whether the burden of the covenant runs.

12
New cards

When D (the successor to the covenantee) sues A (the original covenantor), what issue must be analyzed?

Whether the benefit of the covenant runs.

13
New cards

When D (the successor to the covenantee) sues C (the successor to the covenantor), what issues must be analyzed?

Whether both the burden and the benefit run with the land.

14
New cards

What four elements must be satisfied for the burden of a covenant to run with the land?

Intent, Notice, Touch and Concern, and Privity of Estate.

15
New cards

What is the mnemonic for determining whether the burden of a covenant runs?

Intent, Notice, Touch and Concern, and Privity of Estate.

16
New cards

What is the first element required for the burden of a covenant to run?

The parties must intend the covenant to run with the land.

17
New cards

How is intent to have a covenant run with the land expressly shown?

By language such as "heirs, assigns, and successors."

18
New cards

What language commonly demonstrates express intent that a covenant run with the land?

"And his heirs, assigns, and successors."

19
New cards

How may intent that a covenant run with the land be implied?

From the purpose of the covenant and the surrounding circumstances.

20
New cards

When should you be cautious of Spencer's Case when analyzing intent?

Whenever determining whether intent exists for a covenant to run with the land.

21
New cards

What is the second element required for the burden of a covenant to run?

Notice.

22
New cards

What forms of notice satisfy the notice requirement?

Actual notice and constructive notice.

23
New cards

What is actual notice?

Personal knowledge of the covenant.

24
New cards

What is constructive notice?

Notice imputed by law, generally through proper recordation.

25
New cards

What is the third element required for the burden of a covenant to run?

The covenant must touch and concern the land.

26
New cards

What does it mean for a covenant to touch and concern the land?

It must affect the legal relationship of the parties as owners of a particular tract of land rather than affect them personally.

27
New cards

Must both the burden and the benefit touch and concern the land?

Yes.

28
New cards

How does the burden of a covenant touch and concern the land?

It restricts the use of the land, making it less valuable.

29
New cards

How does the benefit of a covenant touch and concern the land?

It enhances or increases the value of the land.

30
New cards

What is the final element required for the burden of a covenant to run?

Privity of estate.

31
New cards

Why should privity of estate generally be analyzed last on an essay?

Because it naturally transitions into the discussion of equitable servitudes.

32
New cards

What are the two types of privity relevant to the burden running?

Vertical privity and horizontal privity.

33
New cards

What is vertical privity?

Privity between an original party and that party's successor in interest.

34
New cards

Which relationship illustrates vertical privity in Fleming's diagram?

The relationship between A and C.

35
New cards

How is vertical privity created?

Through a grantor-grantee relationship when the deed is conveyed.

36
New cards

What estate must generally pass to establish vertical privity for the burden to run?

The entire estate.

37
New cards

What is horizontal privity?

Privity between the original covenantor and the original covenantee.

38
New cards

Which relationship illustrates horizontal privity in Fleming's diagram?

The relationship between A and B.

39
New cards

How is horizontal privity created?

By the parties sharing an interest in the land independent of the covenant at the time the covenant is created.

40
New cards

What independent property relationships satisfy horizontal privity?

Concurrent owners, landlord-tenant, grantor-grantee, and mortgagor-mortgagee relationships.

41
New cards

Does merely being neighboring landowners establish horizontal privity?

No.

42
New cards

Example: O conveys Lot 1 to A while reserving an easement, and A promises to build a fence. Is horizontal privity satisfied?

Yes. O and A share an independent property interest through the grantor-grantee relationship and reserved easement.

43
New cards

Example: Neighbor A promises Neighbor B that A's land will remain residential. Is horizontal privity satisfied?

No. They share no independent interest in land.

44
New cards

Example: A owns Blackacre and Whiteacre, conveys Whiteacre to B, and promises not to use Blackacre commercially. Does the burden run to C when A later conveys Blackacre to C?

Yes. Horizontal privity exists because A and B were in a grantor-grantee relationship independent of the covenant.

45
New cards

What three elements are required for the benefit of a covenant to run with the land?

Intent, Touch and Concern, and Vertical Privity.

46
New cards

Is notice required for the benefit of a covenant to run?

No.

47
New cards

How may intent be established for the benefit to run?

Expressly or impliedly when the covenant touches and concerns the land.

48
New cards

Must the covenant touch and concern the land for the benefit to run?

Yes.

49
New cards

What type of privity is required for the benefit to run?

Vertical privity only.

50
New cards

Which relationship illustrates vertical privity for the benefit running?

The relationship between B and D.

51
New cards

How is vertical privity established for the benefit to run?

By succession between the original covenantee and the successor.

52
New cards

Must the original covenantee transfer the entire estate for the benefit to run?

No. The original covenantee may transfer a lesser estate.

53
New cards

What is a party wall?

A wall constructed along the common boundary line of adjoining properties pursuant to a covenant.

54
New cards

In the classic party wall problem, what does the covenantee reserve?

The right to receive one-half of the construction cost from future owners.

55
New cards

In the classic party wall problem, what does the covenantor promise?

To pay one-half of the construction cost upon completion of the wall.

56
New cards

What property interest results from a party wall agreement?

Cross-easements.

57
New cards

Why are party wall easements considered appurtenant?

Because they involve two separate parcels of land.

58
New cards

Testable Issue: What four elements are required for the burden of a covenant to run?

Intent, Notice, Touch and Concern, and Privity of Estate.

59
New cards

Testable Issue: What three elements are required for the benefit of a covenant to run?

Intent, Touch and Concern, and Vertical Privity.

60
New cards

Testable Issue: What is the difference between vertical and horizontal privity?

Vertical privity exists between an original party and a successor; horizontal privity exists between the original covenantor and covenantee through an independent property relationship.

61
New cards

Testable Issue: Which lawsuits require analysis of burden, benefit, or both?

B v. A: creation only; B v. C: burden; D v. A: benefit; D v. C: both burden and benefit.

62
New cards

Testable Issue: What independent relationships satisfy horizontal privity?

Concurrent ownership, landlord-tenant, grantor-grantee, and mortgagor-mortgagee.

63
New cards

Testable Issue: Why are party wall agreements treated as appurtenant easements?

Because they create reciprocal easement rights involving two parcels of land.

64
New cards

Essay Rule: How should you analyze whether a real covenant runs with the land?

First determine who is suing whom, then analyze creation if necessary, determine whether the burden runs using Intent, Notice, Touch and Concern, and Privity, determine whether the benefit runs using Intent, Touch and Concern, and Vertical Privity, and conclude whether the covenant binds the parties.

65
New cards

Master Synthesis: What is the framework for analyzing real covenants?

Identify the parties, determine whether only creation or running is at issue, analyze the burden and/or benefit using the required elements, carefully distinguish horizontal from vertical privity, and conclude whether the covenant is enforceable against successors.