1/83
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
How did Lyndon B. Johnson's Great Society program both realize the promise of the New Deal and earlier forms of Progressivism (especially the call for "economic rights") but also simultaneously radicalize it?
It still focused on economic rights but stated that progressivism could no longer only be about economic rights. It was radical because it assumes that equality of opportunity was not enough anymore, we need equality of outcome.
Administrative state expansion under the federal government
What were some of the federal programs that he created to wage this war?
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Food Stamp Act of 1964, Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 , Medicare and Medicaid Act of 1965, Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965
The government must guarantee the happiness of its citizens
It permanently expanded the administrative state and welfare state
Contemporary liberalism strives for equality of outcome rather than opportunity.
First Wave Feminism
fought for women's voting rights and the right to be in the workplace while still valuing traditional gender roles to an extent.
Second Wave Feminism
saw pregnancy as a threat to social equality
Third Wave Feminism
radicalization of feminism. Fight against masculinity. Fighting for abortion and what exactly it even means to be a woman.
First wave feminists simply wanted women to have equal opportunity with men such as voting rights and visibility/presence in the workplace. Modern liberalism/feminism challenges that women should not have to fill any sort of gender role and that there should be equal outcome for all men and women. This includes issues such as abortion.
are institutions that seek to influence policy by electing candidates to office.
why are political parties linkage institutions that can be called the "indispensable organizers of democracy?"
they connect citizens to their government
They're very weak
This reflects the weakness of political parties because party leaders have no control over what candidates are elected and more polarizing candidates end up being representative of the parties which causes further division.
Direct primaries
America has a two-party system rather than a multiparty system. What feature of our electoral system causes the two-party system?
The winner take all system of electoral appointment
What kind of apportionment results in multiparty systems?
Proportional representation
Third party candidates almost always lose elections, but if you want your party to change, voting for a third party candidate can make an impact.
mark the end of one party system and the beginning of a new one.
What is one of the most important examples of a Critical Election in American political history?
FDRs election in 1932 (ushered in the 4th party system)
There is no power check for the "experts" in the administrative state and so the president has no power over them really and it weakens political parties
The framers viewed congress as the most important branch of government.
It is meant to improve the quality of legislation
An incumbent already holds the office they are campaigning for, they are going for reelection.
Who usually wins in elections between an incumbent and a challenger, and why?
Incumbent because More personal contact with voters; better name recognition; more money and resources; gerrymandering; and the rise of majority-minority districts.
Manipulating and changing the voting regions in order to win more votes.
Because there are less members, and their elections are every 6 years not every 2 years
The speaker of the house, he is a constitutional officer
Majority leader in house
speakers chief deputy and the second most powerful
Minority leader in house
elected by the party that is not in the majority to lead the opposition
Party whip in house
the assistant to the majority party leader
Standing, select, joint, and conference
What is the most powerful of all the Committees in the House, and why?
Standing committee because it is a permanent one
What are some of the most important differences between the House of Representatives and the Senate?
House members have a term limit of 2 years Senate have 6. Senate is much smaller than the house. House has more say on budget, senate is more powerful in foreign affairs.
It made the senators get elected by direct election by the people rather than appointment from the state governments.
Its smaller so individuals matter more. He thought it was a very bad idea that would weaken congress.
The vice president of the united states. Party officer.
President pro tempore in senate
is the oldest and most senior Senator from the majority party
Majority Leader in senate
is the real leader of the Senate.
Minority leader in senate
leader of the opposition party
Because the only power that they have over the senate is the tiebreak the majority leader has the most power
action designed to prolong debate and delay or prevent a vote on a bill, resolution, amendment, or other debatable question.
How does the filibuster rule reflect the Senate's original goal of checking majority faction and protecting the common good?
reflects the senate's emphasis on debate, dialogue, and deliberation. Gives senators from the minority party a voice.
finance committee, the appropriations committee, the judiciary committee, foreign affairs committee
the framers are attuned to the dangers of both executive weakness and excessive strength in the executive branch
carry out and enforce the law, protect the nation from foreign threats, and to mitigate the threat of faction. Deliberate sense of community.
the head of state is the head of all people and represents both parties, even conflicting ones. The head of government is the party leader.
What tensions emerge because of the fact that the President has to operate in both roles?
He has to prioritize his party while also appealing to the people. He has to do what is good for all of the people while also creating policies that support and further the cause of his own party.
Why does it strengthen the President's standing as the head of government if he is an effective head of state?
because more people want to vote for him and support him because he is appealing to everyone.
Natural born citizen, 35 year old minimum, resident for 14 years, swear oath of office to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution
What Constitutional Amendment limits the President to two four year terms?
22 amendment
Held by a single individual at any given time, fixed term in office excepting impeachment, draws strength from the consent of the people not from congress, received his power not from congress but from the constitution
officers that give advice to the president and run different parts of the office
What are some of the most important Cabinet offices?
Secretary of State, secretary of defense, secretary of the treasury, the attorney general
the chief of staff, he sets the presidents schedule and runs things like that for him
More powerful. The modern presidency has more formal and informal powers, agenda setting, more staff, heightened visibility
What Presidents were most important in establishing the Modern Presidency?
Teddy Roosevelt
The president has the duty to do whatever is necessary in national interest, unless prohibited by the constitution.
Does the duality of the president’s role tend to strengthen or to limit executive power, and why?
It strengthens the presidency because it suggests that the president has the ability to do anything that is not prohibited by the constitution
he argued for a more limited constitutional presidency
Formal powers are those outlined in the constitution and informal powers are those not outlined in the constitution.
Presidential national security powers
commander and Chief of the armed forces, negotiate treaties with other nations subject to approval of ⅔ senate, nominate ambassadors to foreign nations and receive ambassadors from other nations
Presidential legislative powers
info on the state of the union to congress and recommend legislation, convene both houses of congress on extraordinary occasions
presidential judicial powers
issue pardons for citizens accused of federal offenses (often very controversial), appoint federal judges, with the agreement of a majority of the senate.
bargaining and persuasion. Issuing executive orders, signing statements, negotiating executive agreements
The imperial presidency is much more powerful whereas the imperiled presidency believes the president does not have enough power to make change. In times of emergency a president has imperial powers for the good of the nation. His power increases greatly.
it strengthens the powers of the presidency, but with the weakening of political parties the executive power is weaker
. - Why did the Framers reject the election of the President by the Congress and how did their concern with this proposal connect to their understanding of the separation of powers?
The electoral was intended to check the possibility of government ruling by majority factions
The house elects the president with each state having one vote. This very rarely happens because the twelfth amendment prevents many deadlocks.
it gives the states all voices in electing the president and protects their opinions.
Election results can be challenged in individual states instead of dealing with the complications of popular vote
It makes the minority in certain states feel like their votes don't count at all because the state (california for example) is already spoken for.
So that they could make difficult decisions without fearing backlash from the people. This limits people/ voters being a motivation for corruption.
To bring stability, order, and permanence to the American political system. Because in the 20th century the supreme court has become very powerful more than intended.
A criminal case results in jail time. A civil case usually results in a fine of some sort.
They can limit the cases that the court has appellate jurisdiction over.
Original jurisdiction means the jurisdiction from the original court case. This means that the court heard the case first. Appellate jurisdiction is when the higher courts have the ability to overturn choices made by the lower courts.
The supreme court has the power to stop congress law if they deem it unconstitutional. He defends this as a necessary balance of power.
Judicial review is to review laws and such made by congress and determine if they are constitutional and only dispute them if they are unconstitutional even if they don't entirely agree with the law. Brennan's side of judicial supremacy believes that it is the court's duty to use the constitution for social justice and progress in ways that they deem fitting.
Judicial restraint does not see the court as lawmakers rather they must interpret and protect the original intent of the constitution. Judicial activism sees the constitution as a living document and that it must be interpreted in current situations in order for progress to be made.
He believes that the constitution is the document that demonstrates the consent of the governed so it is the supreme court's job to interpret it only as the founders intended.
William Brennan argues that Living Constitutionalism is more elitist than it is democratic, but he sees this as a good thing. What is Brennan's argument against trusting the people and their elected representatives to make decisions about human rights?
He thinks that only elites who are highly educated in the political world know what needs to be done for society.
How does Brennan's understanding of the Supreme Court build upon the Progressive philosophy of the administrative state?
It is an elitist view that gives more power to the federal government out of an elitist mindset that only experts know what is best for progress.