1/51
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Adaptation
respond to the impacts of climate change
ex: sea wall, beach nutrition, elevate buildings
Pros of Adapting
we can wait to act
future gen may be better equipped
adaptations help society bare weight of natural disaster
mitigation
policies to prevent the climate from changing
reduce global greenhouse emissions by 50-80% by 2050
near zero emissions by 2100
cons of only adapting
more expensive in future
moral issue
should be prepping for disaster anyway
not fair rich are the ones consuming massive amounts of energy and poor do not have funds to adapt
IPAT pop
fewer people consuming= lower emissions
unrealistic and unfair expectation on developing countries
religious and cultural traditions
IPAT Affluence
fewer goods and services= less energy to obtain/produce/transport
requires dramatic cuts
people think wealth= well being
some cannot consume less
Technology
less energy intensive goods and services and less carbon-intensive energy sources
more efficient= less wasted energy
saves money, better air
switch from fossil fuels
place to focus
solar power
photovoltaic or thermal
tons of it
but intermittent and requires a lot of space
wind
few hundred can replace conventional power plant
but intermittent and takes a lot of space
biomass
makes use of ag waste
takes lots of room and contributes to deforestation
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
keep producing carbon dioxide but don’t let into atmosphere
break down the fuel before burning it separate the CO2, burn or release the rest
current tech could capture 85-95%
store it in depleted oil and gas fields or deep salt formations
Geoengineering
manipulate the climate system
we don’t change our behavior
ex: cool the earth by increasing albedo via introduction of sulfur dioxide in the stratosphere, manipulate clouds
solar radiation management
temps react instantly
must continuously do it
could create political tension
change precipitation patterns
Would not counteract all impacts of climate change
carbon dioxide removal
plant trees works if no forest fires
add iron to ocean to stimulate phytoplankton all sinks to ocean burying it
direct air capture
Direct Air Capture
pull carbon right out of the air via chem or photosynthesis
may balance human emissions
would take years
may require more energy than offsets
Feb 2005
introduced three bills to boost development of clean energy technologies
two for corporate loans and tax credits the domestic development of clean tech, one focusing international tech exchange
doesn’t want gov intervention marketplace will go naturally
Why doesn’t the free market work
not enough on its own
costs of climate change are borne by everyone
costs and profits of energy efficient tech are only borne by manufacturers providing no incentive to make this move
tragedy of the commons
externality
when someone’s actions impose involuntary costs on another
b/c of them socially and economic preferred outcome does not occur
market failure
production: most affordable degrades envr
result: low prices and increased sales
response: clean up paid for by everyone, mostly invisible
ex: overfishing, logging, fracking
superfund site
taxpayer funded program to clean hazardous waste that threatens human life
market based regulations
biz as usual accept the cost of the damage you are doing
too expensive: consumers don’t buy products or services
all similar biz under same constraints
competition to achieve environmental goals by using economic incentives rather than direct regulation
may be less costly
conventional regulations
limit industries to specific technology
limit pollutants emitted
seen as unfair
removes incentive to go beyond this
carbon tax
taxpayer already have to pay for impacts of climate change
those responsible for climate change reimburse taxpayers
emitters have choice
reduce carbon emissions if that costs less than the tax you have to pay if you didn’t
cap and trade
issue permits to emit GGs
limit amount of permits
all industries with more permits than they need to sell them to other industries that want them
offsets
An activity taken by an emitter that removes some or all of the carbon produced
hard to tell if it is actually doing something
In 1820
the behavior of greenhouse gases was explained
In 1830…
geologists in Europe identify glacial deposits and come to the conclusion that climate must change over time
1859
John Tyndall identifies water vapor and carbon dioxide as two primary greenhouse gases
1896
Arrhenius: climate could change again, first climate sensitivity estimate, humans add carbon dioxide via coal, human induced warming theory
What did scientists think early on?
thought the carbon emitted by humans would be absorbed by ocean quickly
water vapor was so dominant it wouldn’t matter
nature was unlimited and humans cannot affect it
nature dangerous
1930s
warming was commented on, and blame was drawn to human emissions of carbon dioxide
not worried
1950s
people start believing human could impact environment with introduction of atomic bomb and severe air pollution
international geophysical year
A scientific research project in 1957-1958 that promoted global cooperation in Earth sciences, raising awareness of climate trends and fostering international data sharing.
tabacco strategy
scientific advocates appearing independent vigorous debate
invoke fairness= equal time creating illusion of debate
cherry pick
ignore support
make it attractive
create controversy
Clean Air Act
1970
creates EPA
Unanimous support
Nixon
Environmentalism in the 70s
halocarbons are banned due to experiments in lab demonstrate they destroy ozone
Coal burning emits sulfur dioxide destroying soil nutrients and acidifying lakes and rivers scientific ties were easy to make and restrictions set forth by UN
Regan Administration
decides not enough info to make changes about acid rain
Tabacco strategy
1990s Bush
cap and trade guy
sulfur emissions reduced
acid rain decreased
market solution
ozone layer depletion
in 1980s observations start and is more rapid than originally thought
destroys 90% of lower stratospheric ozone in month and build up for rest of year
Montreal Protocol 1987
international agreement to phase out CFCs
industrialized first and developing in ten yrs
this way allows for tech to be affordable for poorer countries
IPCC was formed to assess climate change science and impacts in
1988
1st IPCC
weak statement about the role of humans in cc
uncertanties
could not definitvely attribute warming to ghg
Framework Convention on Climate Change
1992
achieve stabilization of ghgs in atmo at a low level enough to prevent dangerous anthropogenetic interference with climate system
common but differentiated responsibilities among nations
Aim for industrialized countries to return emissions to 1990 levels by 2000
Kyoto
1997
followed second IPCC
required industrialized countries to reach emissions 5% below 1990 levels by 2008-2012
used market-based mechanisms
could reduce emissions in other countries and it counts
2009 Copenhagen Accord
made a temp goal of no more than 2 degrees Celsius preindustrial
deep cuts in emissions will necessary but delayed for poorer countries
rich set targets while developing countries mitigate w/o targets
industrialized countries agree to provide resources to poorer countries
100 billy fund
US-China Agreement
2014
The US committed to reducing emissions by 26-28% from 2005 levels by 2025, while China agreed to reach peak emissions around 2030.
Clean Power Act
required US states to set targets for emissions reductions from power plants, promoting cleaner energy sources and reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
Which fossil fuel emits the most CO2
Coal
Paris Agreement
2015
had to be accepted by at least 55 countries that together produce 55% of the world’s emissions.
limit avg temp increase to less than 2 degrees and net zero emissions by mid century
enhance resilience and adaptation to climate impacts
align financials
creates National Determined Contributions reported every 5 years
COP 26
fianance: reaffirmed duty to pledge of 100 billy
mitigation: work to reduce the persistent gap in emissions
adaptation: identify collective needs and solutions to the climate crisis
green new deal
outlines principles of a plan to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions across the economy by 2030
aims to guarantee high paying jobs in clean energy industries and marginalized communities’ benefit
would need to do serious work on infrastructure
got stuck in legislation process
inflation reduction act
designed to increase gov revenue, reduce emissions, extend subsides for health insurance, and lower prices on prescriptions