1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
rule
made by organisations/groups, followed by people within organisation/group enforced by leaders
Laws
made by parliaments and courts, followed by people in society, enforced by police/courts
criminal law
regulates conduct in society to protect the community and provides sanctions against those who commit crimes.
Civil Law
Deals with disputes and rights and responsibilities between individuals or groups
Criminal Law difference
Deals with offences against state or society |
The prosecution takes the case to court |
Aims to punish the offender |
Standard of proof - beyond reasonable doubt |
Verdict is guilty or not-guilty |
civil law difference |
Deals with disputes between individuals or groups |
The plaintiff takes the case to court |
Aims to compensate the victim |
Standard of proof - on the balance of probabilities |
Verdict is who is liable and how much they owe |
What is a tort? How many areas of tort law are there and what are they called?
A tort is a civil wrong, 4 areas of tort: negligence, defamation, trespass, nuisance
detail the significance of the case of Donoghue V. Stevenson.
This landmark decision fundamentally shaped the concept of negligence
four elements must be proved in order for a plaintiff to be successful in a claim of negligence against another party?
Duty of care, causation, breach of duty, damages
What are the names of parties to criminal cases and civil cases?
Criminal: prosecution, accused
Civil: plaintiff, defendant
What are the standards of proof in criminal and civil cases?
Criminal: beyond a reasonable doubt
Civil: balance of probabilities
Who holds the burden of proof in criminal and civil cases?
prosecution plaintiff
Explain the facts of the case in Grant V. Australian Knitting Mills. Why was this a landmark case in Australia?
Significant case in Australian tort law
Grant purchased woolen underwear from a retailer, which was manufactured by Australian Knitting Mills. The underwear caused Grant rashes due to the garments which he sued the manufacturer, established the principle that manufacturers owe a duty of care to consumers to ensure no harm
marking the concept of duty of care