1/4
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Summary
participant
Non-participant
Covert
Overt
Participant observation
✅- valid (groups are observed in natural settings)
✅- valid (data generated is richly detailed)
❌- unreliable (open ended and subjective to research)
❌- practical issues (get into the group, staying in the group)
Non-Participant observation
✅- valid (limited risk of the researchers ‘going native’
❌- not reliable (each observation will be subjective)
❌- not representative (involves a small-scale research sample)
Overt observations
the researcher explains their intentions to the group
✅- less ethical issues then covert
✅- higher level of reliability than covert
✅- allows researcher to use interview methods too
❌- practical (time consuming)
❌- lacks validity (Hawthorne effect)
❌- less reliable (difficult to repeat)
Covert Observations
the teacher keeps their real identity and purpose secret from research subjects
✅- more valid then overt because there’s a lack of Hawthorne effect
✅- research obtained is more valid due to first-hand insight
✅- find out more in depth detail about what, who, where, why, how
❌- ethical issues, immoral to deceit people
❌- researcher has to gain trust and acceptance