Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Unrepresentative Sample
the sample relied upon in the premises is unrepresentative of the population in the conclusion
Overgeneralization
the conclusion is too broad for the premises used in support of it
Confuses a Sufficient and a Necessary Condition
Reversal without Negation or Negation without reversal of a principle (the argument fails to establish that a condition under which a phenomenon is said to occur is the only condition under which that phenomenon occurs)
Failure to Establish Sufficient Condition
A and B --> C. A exists, therefore C exists
Two Subabsolute Conditions Used to Draw Inference
Since some As are Bs and some Bs are Cs it follows that some As are Cs
Bad Analogy
Fails to take into account that two things that share a characteristic may have important differences between them
Rootless Analogy
when a comparative argument merely establishes a positive or negative comparison to a thing without also establishing that thing's objective relationship to the conclusion
Negative Analogy
Fails to take into account that just because two things are different doesn't mean they don't share important characteristics
Fails to Exclude Alternative Cause
assumes a causal relationship from a correlation when there is an explicit or implicit alternative cause
Mistakes Correlation for Causation
assumes a causal relationship from a positive or negative correlation (coincidence)
Common Cause
assumes a causal relationship from a positive or negative correlation when both the stated cause and stated effect might both be effects of a common cause
Causal Reversal
assumes a causal relationship from a correlation when it is just as likely that the stated effect caused the stated cause
Exclusive Causation
assumes that the establishment of a causal relationship means that there are no other causes for the effect and/or no other effects of the cause
Fails to Account for Degree of Effect
presumes that not all effects of a cause are equal in degree
Compound Effect
ignores the fact that effects are compound; what has happened in the past may not be possible today merely because it was possible before
Temporal Causal Flaw
presumes that just because one thing tends to occur after another that the first thing causes the second
Delayed Effect
assess the present of absence of causation without considering that the effect may be delayed / take longer to develop than the study allows
Inappropriate Authority
The authority relied upon does not have sufficient background in the subject in question
Biased Authority
relies upon an authority that has a vested interest in the outcome of the circumstance (they are self-reporting data that involves their performance; they are providing information about competitors or rivals)
Democracy Flaw
assumes that the opinion of the majority is sufficient authority in matters of fact
Missing the Point
arguing for a point that is not at issue or using irrelevant evidence
Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence
failure to prove a claim as true does not constitute proof of the denial of the claim
Ad Hominem
attacking the proponent of a claim (personal behavior, associations, past actions) so as to avoid addressing the merits of their claim)
Circular
uses the conclusion to support the conclusion; assumes what it attempts to prove
Contradictory Evidence
uses two premises that cannot at the same time be true
Contradictory Conclusion
when the conclusion is at odds with a premise used to support it
Strawman
misdescribing an opponent's position in order to make it easier to disprove
Ambiguous Word Usage
allowing a key term or concept to change meaning over the course of the argument
Relative is Mistaken for Absolute
healthier does not mean healthy
A Change in Proportion is not a Change in Number
if a total is unknown, a proportional change of a component of that total may be caused by an increase in number of that component or a decrease in number of other components.
Frequency Flaw
presumes that two categories have equal frequencies in a population (usually related to likelihood of occurrence yielding higher or lower amounts in reality)
Substitutes One Group for a Different Group in the Statement of a Percentage
when comparing percentages of the same thing, do not change the group identity
False Equivalence
treats two different concepts as if they are identical
False Dichotomy
fails to account for a middle ground; assumes there are only two possible options
Correlation within Categories is Assumed to Exist Across Categories
The older you are the wiser you are. Greg is older than Mary. Therefore Greg is wiser than Mary
Crowded Primary Flaw
the best of a selection of three or more does not necessarily mean a majority approve of it
Part to Whole
assumes that just because each member of a set shares a characteristic, the set as a whole also shares that characteristic
Whole to Part
assumes that just because a set has a characteristic, each member of the set must also share that characteristic.
Flaw of Averages
presumes that an average describing a set also accurately describes each member of the set
English Department Economics
assumes money is not fungible in a bureaucracy
Can Be is not Must Be
uses premises that involve could, may, might, or the presence of incentives/motives and concludes that something will or must happen or that the incentive/motive will be acted upon.
Weakening is not Proving False
providing contrary evidence is not tantamount to demonstrating that the conclusion cannot be true, just that it is not proven true
Temporal Continuity
just because something has happened in the past does not mean it will happen in the future; the flaw of predicting the future without qualification
Perfect is the Enemy of the Good
assumes that any departure from the ideal is fatal to a project
A Partial Solution is not a Complete Solution
if any part of the problem remains, a proposed solution is therefore only partial
Mistakes Generalizations for Principles
generalizations are consistent with non-conforming cases, but principles are disproven by non-conforming cases
Arbitrary Preference
chooses one option over another without giving a reason
Fails to Run a Controlled Study
does not isolate the tested variable, making it impossible to know if another thing or combination of things affected the outcome
Incomplete Cost Benefit Argument
chooses one thing over another by giving an incomplete assessment of costs and benefits