231 Final - Ethics Module

5.0(1)
studied byStudied by 3 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/19

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Ten guidelines for the ethical treatment of human subjects in research
2
New cards
Guidlines from the Nuremberg Code
* Voluntary consent without coercion
* Good science, done by good scientists
* Benefits justify experiments
* Degree of risk less than potential benefit
* Harms minimized
3
New cards
Limitations to The Nuremberg Code
includes focus on medical research, no consideration of vulnerable participants
4
New cards
Declaration of Helsinki (1964)
Issued by World Medical association to expand on limitations of Nuremberg Code. Additions included:

* Peer review
* Attention to vulnerable groups
* Most recent was 2013
5
New cards
The Belmont Report (1978)
Important Code of ethics developed by the US National Commission for Protection of Human Subjects in Biomedical and Behavioral Research
6
New cards
Three primary ethical principles of Belmont Report
Beneficence, Respect for human dignity, Justice
7
New cards
Tri-Council Policy Statement
Canadian statements on the ethical conduct of research involving humans. Describes that research involving humans should be conducted in a manner consistent with three core principles
8
New cards
three core principles of Tri-Council Policy Statement
Respect for persons, concern for welfare, justice
9
New cards
Beneficence/Concern for Welfare
The right to freedom from harm and discomfort.

The right to protection from exploitation
10
New cards
Respect for human dignity/persons
The right to self-determination

The right to full disclosure
11
New cards
Justice
The right to fair treatment

The right to privacy
12
New cards
risk/benefit assessment
the potential benefits of the study to individual participants and to society are weighed against the costs to individuals
13
New cards
informed consent
an ethical principle that research participants be told enough to enable them to choose whether they wish to participate
14
New cards
confidentiality procedures
developed by researchers to ensure confidentiality of research subjects
15
New cards
Debriefing
the post-experimental explanation of a study, including its purpose and any deceptions, to its participants
16
New cards
Referrals
recommending that participants who may be showing negative health outcomes see a HCP
17
New cards
Treatment of vulnerable groups
Vulnerable subjects are study participants who require special protections.

May be incapable of giving fully informed consent (e.g., cognitively impaired people) or may be at high risk for unintended side effects (e.g., pregnant women)

Some (e.g., children) cannot make a truly informed decision about voluntary participation.
18
New cards
external reviews
review from an outside source that the study is ethical
19
New cards
Protection of Human Rights
Includes self-determination, privacy, anonymity and confidentiality, fair treatment, and protection from discomfort and harm
20
New cards
Mi'kmaq Ethics Watch
Committee established at Chapel island (1999)

developed principles and guidelines to protect Mi'kmaq peoples and guarantees right of ownership over the research/knowledge