Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Winfield definition
an unlawful indirect interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of their land or rights over it
Step 1:
C must have a legal interest
in the land affected
cannot be a
family member of tenant or personal damage anymore
as in
Malone v Laskey
Step 2:
D must be responsible for the nuisance and
there must be an unreasonable use of land
a) can only claim against the creator of the nuisance
and not against third parties.
b) must be deemed that the use of the land is
unreasonable
the test for reasonableness is
objective and takes several factors into account (5)
Sensitivity of C
Robinson v Kilvert
C made brown paper bags and D’s heater ruined the paper
but failed since C was using the land in an abnormally sensitive way, not impacted by D’s actions
Duration of the nuisance
Halsey v Esso
smell of petrol station held to be actionable as it was
frequent and occurred during the night
Character of the area
St Helens Smelting Co. v Tipping
what is a nuisance in one area
may not be in another
but this will not stop a successful claim where
there is still physical property damage
Malice
Hollywood silver fox farm v Emmett
the intention is relevant
D can be liable if malicious
Social benefit
Miller v Jackson
action may be considered reasonable if D provides a benefit to the community
like the cricket club
Step 3:
Resulting damage
must be reasonably forseeable
Cambridge water Co v Eastern counties leather
chemicals polluting water is RF
DEFENCES:
Prescription
Bliss v Hall
if going on for 20 years
then cannot be liable
coming to a nuisance
is not grounds for a claim but courts will still analyse reasonableness Sturges v Bridgman
Statutory Authority
Hammersmith Railway v Brand
A o Parliment allowed to operate
so not a nuisance
Planning permission
Wheeler v JJ saunders Ltd
from the council but
does not guarantee immunity or authorise nuisance is based on judges decision
only if it changes the nature or locality of an area
Coventry v Lawrence