MGMT3140: Module 4 - Selection and Performance

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/63

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 12:54 AM on 8/4/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

64 Terms

1
New cards

Job Performance

Individual work behaviors that contribute positively or negatively to an organization's goals.

2
New cards

Three Components of Job Performance

Task Performance, Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, Counterproductive Work Behaviors.

3
New cards

Task Performance

Behaviors that contribute directly to the transformation of

organizational resources into goods and services.

4
New cards

Routine Performance

Responding to normal, routine work

demands.

5
New cards

Adaptive Performance

Responding to novel, unusual, or

unpredictable demands.

6
New cards

Creative Performance

Involves the creation of something new or

useful.

7
New cards

What task performance is a teacher who creates lesson plans?

Routine.

8
New cards

What task performance is a teacher who is revising lesson plans in

response to inclement weather (eg, shifting online)?

Adaptive.

9
New cards

What task performance is a teacher who is creating a new figure to help students understand a concept?

Creative.

10
New cards

Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCB)

Voluntary behaviors outside of one's job description that contribute to an organization's goals, typically by improving the work context.

11
New cards

Examples of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors

Civic Virtue, Sportsmanship, Altruism, Courtesy.

12
New cards

Counterproductive Work Behaviors (CWB)

Intentional behaviors that hinder organizational

goals.

13
New cards

Examples of Counterproductive Work Behaviors

Production deviance, Political deviance, Property deviance, Personal Agression.

14
New cards

Personnel Selection

Process of using instruments (tests) to select (hire) people for a work role based on the ability of those instruments to predict job performance.

15
New cards

Validity

The extent to which a selection tool accurately predicts an applicant's future job performance.

16
New cards

Reliability

The extent to which a selection tool produces consistent and dependable results over time.

17
New cards

Utility

The overall value of a selection tool is determined by whether its benefits outweigh its costs.

18
New cards

Fairness

The extent to which a selection tool is fair and does not discriminate based on characteristics like race, gender, or age.

19
New cards

Cognitive Ability Tests

Tests that measure general mental ability (intelligence) to predict job performance.

20
New cards

Integrity Tests

Tests that assess honesty and likelihood of counterproductive work behavior through overt or personality-based (covert) questions.

21
New cards

Interviews

Common selection method to evaluate applicants: structured interviews are more reliable than unstructured interviews.

22
New cards

Behavioral Interview Questions

Asks about past job-related behaviors to predict future performance.

<p>Asks about past job-related behaviors to predict future performance.</p>
23
New cards

Informational Interview Questions

Asks about an applicant's experience, knowledge, or qualifications.

<p>Asks about an applicant's experience, knowledge, or qualifications.</p>
24
New cards

Situational Interview Questions

Questions that present job-related scenarios and ask how the candidate would respond.

<p>Questions that present job-related scenarios and ask how the candidate would respond.</p>
25
New cards

Work Simulations

Assess applicants' performance at job-related tasks.

26
New cards

Work Samples

Evaluating performance on a sample of work.

27
New cards

Situational Judgment Test (SJT)

Test with items assessing applicants' judgment in job-related situations.

28
New cards

Assessment Center

A series of structured exercises evaluated by

human observers (eg, inbox exercise, role-play, presentations).

29
New cards

Reference Letters

Primarily used to verify information or avoid applicants with "red flags".

30
New cards

Physical Ability Tests

Measure physical abilities such as strength, stamina, flexibility, and coordination.

31
New cards

Selection Battery

A combined set of predictor methods (tests) used to select candidates for a job.

32
New cards

Complementary Validity

Using multiple selection methods together to improve the prediction of job performance because each measures different qualities.

33
New cards

Overall Battery Structure

Multiple Hurdle, Multiple Cutoff, Compensatory Approach.

34
New cards

Multiple Hurdle

Candidates must achieve a certain score to progress through each round of tests.

35
New cards

Multiple Cutoff

Must pass all selection tests by meeting the required score on each.

36
New cards

Compensatory Approach

High scores can offset low scores on other tests.

37
New cards

Job Analysis

Systematic process for determining the core elements of a work role, such as tasks, responsibilities, and necessary attributes (KSAO's).

38
New cards

Tasks

The basic elements of a job.

39
New cards

Knowledge

Information people can learn (eg, human anatomy).

40
New cards

Skills

Something people can learn how to do (e.g., presenting).

41
New cards

Ability

Something innate that people bring to the job (eg, physical

ability).

42
New cards

Other Characteristic

Something other than knowledge, skill, or ability (eg, personality traits).

43
New cards

Job Analysis Steps

1. Collect job info 2. Draft tasks 3. Identify KSAOs 4. Refine (SMEs) 5. Link tasks & KSAOs 6. Finalize job analysis

44
New cards

Performance Appraisal

Subjective evaluation of employee work performance based on pre-established criteria.

45
New cards

Targets of Appraisal

Abilities and traits, knowledge and skills, behaviors, and outcomes.

46
New cards

Abilities and Traits

Should be generally avoided.

47
New cards

Knowledge and Skills

Use with caution unless evaluating for

promotion, effects of training, etc.

48
New cards

Behaviors

Preferred because these are specific and observable (typically rated using a scale).

49
New cards

Outcomes

It can be acceptable if based on mutually agreed-upon goals vs. metrics alone.

50
New cards

Rater Bias

A personal preference or perception that unfairly influences an employee's rating.

51
New cards

Rater Error

A mistake in evaluating performance that leads to inaccurate ratings.

52
New cards

Leniency Error

Giving all workers high ratings.

53
New cards

Strictness (severity) Error

Giving all workers low ratings.

54
New cards

Central Tendency Error

Giving all workers "average" ratings.

55
New cards

Contrast Effect

When ratings are affected by comparing to others.

56
New cards

Halo/horn Effect

When overall impressions of a person affect their ratings on specific performance dimensions.

57
New cards

Similarity Effect

When workers who are more similar to the rater receive higher ratings.

58
New cards

Recency Error

When recent events have an outsized influence on performance ratings.

59
New cards

Minimize Rating Errors By

Use better rating tools, train raters, hold calibration meetings, keep performance records, hold raters accountable, and use multiple raters to improve accuracy and reduce bias.

60
New cards

What is Absolute Performance Appraisal?

A method that evaluates an employee against pre-established performance standards.

61
New cards

What tools are used in Absolute Performance Appraisal?

Graphical rating scales and behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS).

62
New cards

What is Relative Performance Appraisal?

Evaluates an employee by comparing their performance to other employees.

63
New cards

What tools are used in Relative Performance Appraisal?

Forced ranking and forced distribution.

64
New cards

360 Degree Feedback

Uses multiple raters (self, peers, and supervisor) to evaluate performance; most effective for employee development and often paired with job coaching

<p>Uses multiple raters (self, peers, and supervisor) to evaluate performance; most effective for employee development and often paired with job coaching</p>