Comparison with love through the ages

Structure

Intro - overall argument about factor in relation to TGG and 2 other poems. Engaging opening statement AO1. Intro. Include detailed relevant context. Writers intentions. Quotes but not analysis - embed to support a statement. AO4 - between all three - what similarities do they all share but is there any contrasts in how it’s presented between 3 . E.g both have x but in poem A it’s bc of Y and in poem B = Z. Marry me how are the poems? Similar or different? And how is this done? How far apart are the time periods between all poems and why is this important and is that message still the same or different? What could’ve influenced this? Talk about the title or symbolism if you can and a deeper meaning. What does it immediately suggest and make the reader want to get at?

Paragraph 1 = All about TGG in relation to question - do language and structure/form in this paragraph

Paragraph 2 = Compare to one poem - whichever links best next to what you previously just wrote about. AO4 where you can. The paragraphs must be linked to one another and not two separate. Language and structure of this poem.

Paragraph 3 = Compare to another love poem. Lang and structure.

Conclusion = Summarise overall argument linking back to question.

Historical context of women in 1920s America

• Women’s roles and changing gender norms : women began to embrace independence yet the novel critiques how these new freedoms coexist with privilege ,moral decay and societal expectations - Daisy embodies this duality by choosing security and tradition with Tom despite her feelings for Gatsby. Shows how women were offered new freedoms but ultimately still did not possess true freedom and equality . Unattainable due to economic inquality, low pay ,discrimination and limited political representation.

• boom in mass advertising and consumerism, in which women were both targeted and commodified. Beauty, youth, and femininity became consumer ideals - objects of male desire. Daisy is the ultimate symbol of this commodification—Gatsby constructs her as the embodiment of wealth and beauty, rather than a real person. Her voice is described as “full of money,” conflating female desirability with material possession.

• Despite the 19th Amendment (1920), many women remained politically marginalised. Social power was still distributed through marriage, inheritance, or association with men—women could appear powerful, but that power was often conditional and performative.

• The 1920s were a paradox for women: a decade of visibility but not full liberation. The “New Woman” (WW1/flapper) was a symbol of progress—confident, urban, sexually aware—but her freedom was often more aesthetic than structural. She could bob her hair and dance at jazz clubs, but still lacked legal, economic, and social parity with men.

Advertising Culture & the Birth of the “American Consumer Self”

(People become products)

• The 1920s saw a boom in advertising psychology (Edward Bernays, Freud’s nephew).

• Identity increasingly shaped by what you buy, not who you are.

• Desire is manufactured, not organic.

Application to Gatsby

• Gatsby markets himself:
  

  • His name

  • His car

  • His mansion

  • His parties

• Daisy is described in material terms (“gleaming”, “full of money”).

• Love becomes a commodity fantasy, not an emotional reality.

• Gatsby “sells” a lifestyle rather than forming genuine relationships.

Historical context of 1920s love/marriage

• In the 1920s, marriage was still heavily influenced by wealth and social status, particularly among the upper classes. While love was idealised in popular culture, many marriages—especially in elite circles—were arranged or maintained to preserve family reputation, financial security, or class position.

• Women had limited legal and economic independence. Even after gaining the vote in 1920, most middle- and upper-class women were expected to marry for financial protection. Marriage was often less about emotional fulfilment and more about survival or social stability, especially for women with no career opportunities.

• Divorce rates rose significantly during the 1920s (increasing by roughly 50% between 1910 and 1930), indicating growing dissatisfaction with traditional marriages. But divorce still carried strong social stigma, particularly for women, who risked being socially ostracised or financially ruined.

• Divorce rates rose significantly during the 1920s (increasing by roughly 50% between 1910 and 1930), indicating growing dissatisfaction with traditional marriages. But divorce still carried strong social stigma, particularly for women, who risked being socially ostracised or financially ruined.

• Infidelity was common and often socially tolerated for men, but judged harshly in women. The legal system, too, treated adulterous women more severely in custody and property disputes. This reinforced a gendered double standard in both love and marriage.

• The emotional aftermath of World War I affected personal relationships. Many young people, shaped by war trauma and instability, viewed love and marriage as temporary or unreliable, leading to more impulsive relationships and a culture of short-term pleasure.

  • Cross-class relationships were rare and socially discouraged. Marriage outside one’s class was viewed as a threat to social order and could lead to alienation or reputational damage. In this context, love was often conditioned by economic boundaries and social approval.

AO3 love

• The influence of jazz culture and nightlife encouraged freer expressions of love and sexuality. Dancing, drinking, and mingling in mixed-gender spaces became more common, reflecting a shift away from restrained, traditional courtship toward more experimental relationships.

• Love and ambition became increasingly linked. As social mobility and wealth became more central to identity, romantic relationships were often influenced by what a partner could offer materially. Emotional connection was sometimes secondary to financial or social advantage.

  • The rapid pace of modern life created a sense of emotional instability—love became more fragile, shaped by new technologies (telephones, cars), urban mobility, and fast-changing social norms. This contributed to relationships that felt exciting but lacked depth or permanence.

  • The emotional aftermath of World War I left many young people questioning long-term commitments. As a result, love was often viewed with cynicism or urgency, leading to relationships that were more impulsive or emotionally unstable.

AO3 A.D

• In the 1920s, the American Dream evolved from a vision of self-made prosperity grounded in hard work and moral integrity into a far more elusive ideal, increasingly tied to material wealth, social status, and outward performance.

• Post-war economic expansion and the rise of mass consumerism redefined success. The Dream became less about earning fulfilment and more about acquiring symbols of it—property, luxury, and reputation.

• While the mythology of America as a land of opportunity remained culturally dominant, it ignored the realities of class boundaries, inherited privilege, and social gatekeeping. Access to success was never equal; it was often determined by birth rather than merit.

- Gatsby’s relentless pursuit of Daisy is symbolic of this corruption. His wealth is his way of attempting to achieve the American dream through material success, but his failure illustrates the limitations of this ideal, particularly for those outside of old money.

AO3 new money vs old money/criminality

• The 1920s saw sharp tensions between “old money” families—those with inherited wealth and long-established social status—and “new money” individuals, who had accumulated riches rapidly through industry, speculation, or illicit means. This divide wasn’t simply about wealth, but about cultural legitimacy, lineage, and social exclusivity.

• Old money elites saw themselves as custodians of taste, tradition, and respectability. Their wealth was discreet, their identities rooted in history. In contrast, new money figures—often first-generation millionaires—were seen as vulgar, excessive, and socially inferior, regardless of their financial power.

• This period also overlapped with Prohibition (1920–1933), when the sale and distribution of alcohol was outlawed. Instead of curbing vice, Prohibition fostered a thriving black market, giving rise to organised crime and making bootlegging an immensely profitable route to wealth.

• Many new fortunes in the 1920s were either directly or indirectly tied to illegal activity—from smuggling liquor to manipulating stocks. Yet society often turned a blind eye to the origins of wealth if it was masked in luxury and style. This blurred the line between legitimacy and criminality, revealing a cultural obsession with wealth that outweighed moral integrity.

Crime as a Structural Necessity of the American Dream

• Early 20th-century America promoted limitless aspiration but maintained rigid class barriers.

• This creates a paradox: success is morally demanded but structurally restricted.

• Sociologists later describe this as “anomie” (normlessness): when goals are culturally enforced but legal means are blocked.

Application

• Gatsby is not deviant — he is obedient to the Dream.

• Crime becomes the only rational response to a system that demands success without providing access.

• Gatsby’s death is the system purging the symptom, not the cause.

High-level line

Gatsby’s criminality is not personal corruption but the logical outcome of an aspirational system that withholds legitimate pathways to fulfilment.

Law as Violence Without Blood

Context

• Law in the 1920s increasingly served economic elites.

• Enforcement targeted the visible and the marginal, not the powerful.

• Structural harm replaced physical violence.

Application

• Gatsby is killed, not arrested.

• Tom and Daisy are never judged.

• The law’s silence is itself an act of violence.

Conceptual line

Fitzgerald presents law not as moral authority but as an instrument that silently enacts class violence.

Gatsby as a Sacrificial Criminal

Context

• Societies preserve moral order by scapegoating outsiders.

• Crime is necessary to define respectability.

Application

• Gatsby absorbs blame: for Myrtle’s death, for corruption, for moral excess.

• His funeral’s emptiness reveals collective denial.

• His death cleanses society without changing it.

Deep line

Gatsby functions as a sacrificial figure whose destruction allows elite society to maintain the illusion of innocence.

Fitzgerald personal experiences

• Fitzgerald grew up socially adjacent to wealth but permanently excluded from it, creating lifelong class resentment; this informs Gatsby’s criminality as a necessary strategy for outsiders to access elite spaces that appear open but are structurally closed.

• His early romantic rejection by wealthy debutantes (especially Ginevra King) taught Fitzgerald that love and class were inseparable, shaping Gatsby’s illegal wealth as an attempt to retroactively legitimise desire in a society that treats class boundaries as moral laws.

• Fitzgerald lived through Prohibition as a cultural performance rather than a moral reality, witnessing widespread illegal drinking among the rich; this informs the novel’s presentation of criminality as socially tolerated when it preserves pleasure and power.

• His personal fascination and revulsion toward wealth produced a conflicted moral vision, reflected in Gatsby’s criminal success being simultaneously admirable and corrosive, suggesting crime is not deviation but participation in American capitalism.

• Fitzgerald’s sense that the American Dream demanded success without providing fair means underpins Gatsby’s criminality as systemic rather than individual — lawbreaking becomes a rational response to blocked legitimacy.

• He viewed modern America as morally hollow but emotionally demanding, meaning Gatsby’s true crime is not bootlegging but excessive belief in love, memory, and idealism within a culture that punishes sincerity.

• Fitzgerald associated wealth with emotional carelessness, drawn from his own experiences of elite indifference; this informs the novel’s inversion where legal elites commit the greatest harms without consequence, while the criminal outsider is destroyed.

• Fitzgerald’s exposure to real “gangster businessmen” blurred legality and respectability, shaping Wolfsheim and reinforcing the idea that crime in the novel is simply capitalism without social camouflage.

• Fitzgerald used Gatsby to externalise his own psychological conflict: the belief that America criminalises longing, sincerity, and aspiration when they come from the wrong class.

• Fitzgerald believed the world needed “big dreamers”, and Gatsby embodies this ideal; his ambition, optimism, and relentless pursuit of vision are both admirable and tragically vulnerable, reflecting Fitzgerald’s own hope that audacity could reshape a rigid society.

• Fitzgerald’s personal experience of betrayal in his marriage, with Zelda’s repeated infidelities and emotional distance, informs Gatsby’s obsession with idealised love and illustrates the fragility of desire when confronted with social and personal betrayal.

Post-War Moral Emptiness & “Lost Generation” Values

• After WWI, traditional moral structures (religion, patriotism, hierarchy) felt hollow.

• The Lost Generation didn’t replace old values with new ones — they drifted.

Application to Gatsby

• Characters act without consequence or accountability.

• Tom and Daisy retreat into wealth, not belief.

• Gatsby clings to a single ideal because nothing else holds meaning.

• Nick’s final judgement reflects moral exhaustion, not clarity.

The Rise of Pseudoscience & Social Darwinism

(Tom’s racism isn’t random — it’s historically specific)

• Early 20th century America saw widespread belief in eugenics and racial hierarchy.

• Books like The Rising Tide of Color (explicitly referenced in the novel) were taken seriously.

• These ideas justified class power and white supremacy.

Application to Gatsby

• Tom’s racism is a defensive ideology, not just prejudice.

His fear of social change mirrors anxiety about:

• New money

• Immigrants

• Racial mixing

• Gatsby’s rise threatens Tom’s belief that power is biologically deserved.

Exam line

Tom’s racial paranoia reflects elite anxiety in an era when pseudoscience was used to defend inherited power against social mobility.

The 1920s “Crisis of Masculinity” after WWI

• WWI destabilised traditional Victorian ideals of masculinity (honour, duty, inheritance).

• Millions of men returned traumatised, disillusioned, or economically displaced.

• The old markers of male success (land, lineage, military honour) were weakened.

Application to Gatsby

• Gatsby reinvents himself through wealth, spectacle, and romantic obsession.

• His masculinity is performative: pink suits, mansion, parties, car.

• Gatsby’s dream is not just Daisy, but a pre-war sense of certainty and worth.

• Tom represents old, brutal, inherited masculinity; Gatsby represents unstable, fabricated masculinity.

Fitzgerald’s Fear of Time - Modernity vs Memory

• Modern America celebrated speed, novelty, technology, and progress.

• Fitzgerald was deeply nostalgic and feared modernity destroyed meaning.

• The 1920s compressed time — the future arrived too fast.

Application to Gatsby

• Gatsby believes time can be reversed (“repeat the past? Of course you can!”).

• Nick frames the novel as a memory, not a celebration.

• The green light is not hope — it is distance and delay.

• The future always retreats, reinforcing loss rather than progress.

Exam line

Gatsby’s tragedy reflects Fitzgerald’s scepticism towards modernity’s promise that the future can replace the emotional depth of the past.

What happens in chapter 1 of The Great Gatsby and why is it significant?

In Chapter 1, Nick Carraway introduces himself and explains his background, establishing himself as a reflective but quietly judgmental narrator. He has recently moved to West Egg, a wealthy area of Long Island known for new money, and rents a modest house beside Gatsby’s mansion. Nick visits his cousin Daisy and her husband Tom in East Egg, where he meets the distant and cynical Jordan Baker. The dinner reveals Tom’s arrogance, racism, and hints at his affair. The chapter ends with Nick seeing Gatsby for the first time—standing alone, reaching out toward a distant green light across the bay.

This chapter immediately sets the tone for the novel’s world—a society of wealth, performance, and quiet instability. The divide between East Egg and West Egg introduces the tension between old money and new money, and the idea that wealth alone does not guarantee acceptance or respect. Gatsby’s silent reaching toward the green light introduces the central theme of longing and illusion—his dream is introduced before he is, making desire itself a central force in the novel. The chapter also begins Fitzgerald’s quiet critique of the American upper class: Tom and Daisy’s carelessness, Jordan’s detachment, and Nick’s unease all hint at the emotional emptiness behind the luxury. This chapter lays the foundation for key ideas around identity, class, the failure of the American Dream, and the difference between appearance and reality.

What happens in chapter 2 of The Great Gatsby and why is it significant?

Nick accompanies Tom to New York, passing through the bleak and lifeless Valley of Ashes, an industrial wasteland symbolising decay and abandonment. Overlooking it are the eyes of Doctor T. J. Eckleburg, a faded billboard that suggests silent observation. Tom collects his mistress, Myrtle Wilson, and they hold a party in a New York apartment. Myrtle tries to adopt the appearance of wealth and status, but the illusion collapses when Tom violently strikes her for mentioning Daisy.

Chapter 2 – Significance (Refined A* Analysis)

• Reveals the reality behind wealth: The chapter contrasts the glamour of East Egg with the moral emptiness and decay beneath the surface. The setting shifts from luxury to the Valley of Ashes—a space for the discarded, both socially and morally—making it a powerful symbol of what the pursuit of wealth leaves behind.

• Illusion vs reality is deepened: Myrtle attempts to escape her class through appearance and association, but her performance is never convincing. Her downfall in this chapter highlights how the dream of self-invention is fragile, especially for those without real power or privilege.

• Power dynamics are laid bare: Tom’s casual brutality exposes the violence embedded in class and gender inequality. He treats Myrtle as disposable—a temporary escape from his world, not someone who belongs to it. The scene warns that social boundaries, while sometimes blurred, are never easily crossed.

• The eyes of Eckleburg suggest spiritual emptiness: Introduced here as a godlike presence, they offer no comfort or justice—only observation. Their blank gaze symbolises a society that lacks moral direction and no longer believes in accountability, despite its wealth and progress.

• Builds the novel’s core critique: This chapter shows that the American Dream is not only flawed but actively destructive. Myrtle’s attempt to move upward ends in pain, not freedom. Fitzgerald begins to suggest that this dream doesn’t just fail—it consumes those who chase it.

What happens in chapter 3 of The Great Gatsby and why is it significant?

Nick is formally invited to one of Gatsby’s legendary parties, held at his mansion in West Egg. The event is lavish and chaotic, filled with music, alcohol, and crowds of people—many of whom don’t even know Gatsby and speculate wildly about his past. Nick eventually meets Gatsby, who is surprisingly polite and reserved, not the larger-than-life figure rumours have suggested. The chapter ends with Nick reflecting on the experience and beginning to distinguish himself from those around him.

Chapter 3 – Significance (A* Level Analysis)

• The glamour of the Jazz Age is fully displayed: Gatsby’s party showcases the era’s obsession with excess, pleasure, and spectacle. But despite the luxury, the atmosphere feels impersonal and hollow, suggesting that beneath the glitter, there’s a lack of true connection or meaning.

• Gatsby as a symbol of mystery and performance: Gatsby remains distant even at his own party. He is spoken about more than seen, showing how his identity is built on rumour, myth, and self-curation. His world is one of illusion, carefully constructed to impress.

• Fitzgerald critiques the emptiness of modern society: The guests come for the alcohol and status, not for Gatsby himself. Their shallow behaviour reflects a society where people consume experience for entertainment, not substance—mirroring the broader hollowness of the American Dream.

• Nick starts to reflect and observe more critically: By the end of the chapter, Nick begins to step back from the chaos around him. This moment signals the novel’s growing sense of moral questioning and Nick’s role as a narrator who is both inside and outside the world he describes.

• Surface vs substance becomes a key theme: The chapter dazzles with energy and colour, but what lingers is the sense that nothing is real—from Gatsby’s smile to the guests’ names, everything is temporary, performative, and unanchored.

What happens in chapter 4 of The Great Gatsby and why is it significant?

Gatsby invites Nick to lunch and, during their drive into the city, tells Nick a rehearsed and questionable story about his background—claiming he’s an Oxford man and a decorated war hero. Nick is sceptical. At lunch, they meet Gatsby’s associate, Meyer Wolfsheim, a shady character linked to organised crime. Later, Jordan Baker tells Nick the real story behind Gatsby’s obsession with Daisy: they were in love before the war, and Gatsby bought his mansion across the bay in hopes of rekindling that past.

Chapter 4 – Significance (A* Level Analysis)

• The cracks in Gatsby’s image begin to show: Gatsby’s carefully constructed identity starts to seem artificial. His awkwardly delivered backstory and vague connections with criminals like Wolfsheim suggest that his wealth and persona are based more on illusion than truth.

• Criminality and ambition are closely linked: Gatsby’s rise appears tied to illegal activity, hinting that in 1920s America, the pursuit of the American Dream often requires moral compromise. Success, Fitzgerald suggests, isn’t always earned honestly—it can be bought, staged, or stolen.

• The ideal of the past begins to take shape: Gatsby’s desire is revealed not to be for money itself, but for Daisy and the life they might have had. This introduces the novel’s central tragedy: Gatsby is not just chasing wealth, but trying to recreate a perfect, imagined past—something inherently impossible.

• Illusion vs reality deepens: Everything Gatsby presents is part of a performance aimed at impressing Daisy, not being himself. This reinforces the idea that identity in this world is shaped by performance, not authenticity.

• Moral boundaries are blurred: Wolfsheim, who openly boasts about fixing the 1919 World Series, shows that corruption is not hidden—it is woven into the success and glamour of Gatsby’s world. The line between respectable success and criminal activity is deliberately unclear.

What happens in chapter 4 of The Great Gatsby and why is it significant?

Gatsby invites Nick to lunch and, during their drive into the city, tells Nick a rehearsed and questionable story about his background—claiming he’s an Oxford man and a decorated war hero. Nick is sceptical. At lunch, they meet Gatsby’s associate, Meyer Wolfsheim, a shady character linked to organised crime. Later, Jordan Baker tells Nick the real story behind Gatsby’s obsession with Daisy: they were in love before the war, and Gatsby bought his mansion across the bay in hopes of rekindling that past.

Chapter 4 – Significance (A* Level Analysis)

• The cracks in Gatsby’s image begin to show: Gatsby’s carefully constructed identity starts to seem artificial. His awkwardly delivered backstory and vague connections with criminals like Wolfsheim suggest that his wealth and persona are based more on illusion than truth.

• Criminality and ambition are closely linked: Gatsby’s rise appears tied to illegal activity, hinting that in 1920s America, the pursuit of the American Dream often requires moral compromise. Success, Fitzgerald suggests, isn’t always earned honestly—it can be bought, staged, or stolen.

• The ideal of the past begins to take shape: Gatsby’s desire is revealed not to be for money itself, but for Daisy and the life they might have had. This introduces the novel’s central tragedy: Gatsby is not just chasing wealth, but trying to recreate a perfect, imagined past—something inherently impossible.

• Illusion vs reality deepens: Everything Gatsby presents is part of a performance aimed at impressing Daisy, not being himself. This reinforces the idea that identity in this world is shaped by performance, not authenticity.

• Moral boundaries are blurred: Wolfsheim, who openly boasts about fixing the 1919 World Series, shows that corruption is not hidden—it is woven into the success and glamour of Gatsby’s world. The line between respectable success and criminal activity is deliberately unclear.

What happens in chapter 5 of The Great Gatsby and why is it significant?

At Gatsby’s request, Nick arranges a meeting between Gatsby and Daisy at his cottage. Gatsby is nervous and awkward at first, but once they reconnect, the mood shifts into happiness and nostalgia. Gatsby then shows Daisy around his mansion, proudly displaying his wealth, especially his expensive shirts. Daisy is overwhelmed, and Gatsby appears almost intoxicated by her presence. For a brief moment, it seems like Gatsby has achieved what he longed for.

Chapter 5 – Significance (A* Level Analysis)

• The dream begins to materialise: This chapter marks the moment Gatsby’s long-held fantasy comes to life. After years of preparation, he is finally reunited with Daisy—but Fitzgerald makes it clear that reality can never match the dream.

• Idealism vs reality is central: Gatsby isn’t just trying to win Daisy back—he wants to recreate an idealised version of the past. His obsession isn’t with who Daisy is now, but with who she was to him then. This shows how memory and imagination distort reality, a key theme in the novel.

• Love is tied to wealth and performance: Gatsby stages the meeting, the house tour, and even the rain-soaked atmosphere like a performance. His display of riches isn’t just to impress Daisy—it’s to prove he is now worthy of her. This reflects how, in this world, love is inseparable from material success.

• Daisy’s emotional reaction is complex: She cries at Gatsby’s shirts, a moment often read as both emotional and ironic—it hints at a deep feeling, but also suggests that she is moved more by wealth and spectacle than love alone.

• The illusion begins to blur: For Gatsby, this chapter feels like a triumph. But Fitzgerald subtly shows that this is the high point before the decline. Once the dream seems fulfilled, it starts to lose its magic—because it was always based on something imagined, not real.

What happens in chapter 6 of The Great Gatsby and why is it significant?

This chapter reveals Gatsby’s true background: he was born James Gatz, the son of poor farmers in North Dakota, and reinvented himself at 17 when he met the wealthy Dan Cody. Gatsby built his identity around the dream of becoming someone greater. Later, Tom attends one of Gatsby’s parties with Daisy, who doesn’t enjoy herself. Afterward, Gatsby is disappointed and tells Nick he wants to recreate the past with Daisy exactly as it was. Nick warns him, “You can’t repeat the past,” but Gatsby insists, “Of course you can.”

Chapter 6 – Significance (A* Level Analysis)

• Gatsby’s reinvention is fully revealed: This is the moment where Gatsby’s myth is stripped away. His transformation from James Gatz to Jay Gatsby shows the extreme lengths he’s gone to in pursuit of the American Dream—not just for wealth, but for status and acceptance.

• The theme of illusion deepens: Gatsby’s entire life is shown to be a constructed fantasy, built to impress Daisy and escape his origins. His belief in self-invention is admirable, but Fitzgerald shows it to be deeply flawed when faced with social realities he can’t control.

• The limits of the American Dream are exposed: Gatsby has the wealth, the mansion, the parties—but not the social legitimacy that Tom and Daisy have. The cold reception Daisy gives his world reveals that money alone isn’t enough to cross class lines.

• Time becomes a key theme: Gatsby’s belief that he can “repeat the past” shows how deeply he is tied to nostalgia and fantasy. He doesn’t just want Daisy now—he wants the version of her from five years ago. This shows the destructive power of living in a dream, rather than reality.

• Tone shifts from hope to decline: This is a turning point—Gatsby’s dream, once within reach, now starts to slip. Daisy’s discomfort and Tom’s quiet threat show that Gatsby’s world is beginning to collapse, even if he refuses to see it.

What happens in chapter 7 of The Great Gatsby and why is it significant?

Gatsby stops his parties and dismisses his servants to protect Daisy’s reputation. On an unbearably hot day, Gatsby, Daisy, Tom, Nick, and Jordan gather at the Buchanans’ home. Tensions rise, and they all go into New York. At the Plaza Hotel, Tom confronts Gatsby about his past, exposing his criminal ties and mocking his claim that Daisy never loved Tom. Daisy breaks under pressure, saying she once loved both men. The dream Gatsby built begins to collapse. On the way home, Myrtle Wilson is hit and killed by Gatsby’s car—though Daisy was driving. Gatsby takes the blame and waits outside Daisy’s house, still hoping she will choose him.

Chapter 7 – Significance (A* Level Analysis)

• This is the novel’s emotional and thematic climax: Gatsby’s fantasy is directly challenged by reality. His belief that love can conquer time and class falls apart when Daisy refuses to fully let go of Tom.

• The limits of the American Dream are brutally exposed: Gatsby has the money, the house, and the image—but not the social background or legitimacy. Tom’s attack shows that old money will always protect itself and exclude outsiders, no matter how rich they become.

• Daisy’s true nature is revealed: Her inability to choose Gatsby—and her decision to let him take the blame for Myrtle’s death—shows that she is guided more by comfort and self-preservation than by love or loyalty.

• Class power and moral failure are central: Myrtle, who tries to rise above her position, is destroyed. Tom and Daisy, careless and privileged, escape any consequence. Gatsby, despite his devotion, is left vulnerable and isolated.

• The illusion collapses: Gatsby’s dream—to repeat the past, to win Daisy, to be accepted—is shown to be built on fantasy, not reality. This chapter marks the point where his hope begins to die, even if he refuses to see it.

What happens in chapter 8 of The Great Gatsby and why is it significant?

After the events of the previous night, Gatsby tells Nick the full truth about his past: his real name is James Gatz, and he fell in love with Daisy as a young soldier. He built his dream around her, and everything he achieved was to win her back. Gatsby continues to believe she will call him. Meanwhile, George Wilson, devastated by Myrtle’s death, becomes convinced that the driver was her lover. Guided by Tom’s hint, Wilson finds Gatsby at his mansion and shoots him dead, then kills himself. The chapter ends with Gatsby’s body in the pool and Nick reflecting on the loss.

Chapter 8 – Significance (A* Level Analysis)

• Gatsby’s dream is finally, irreversibly destroyed: His belief in the power of love and self-invention is left empty. Daisy does not call. The moment he has waited for never comes. His loyalty to the past ends in total abandonment.

• The American Dream reaches its tragic end: Gatsby’s story—rising from nothing to wealth, driven by idealism—is shown to be doomed from the start. His dream was based not on truth, but on illusion and memory.

• Romantic hope turns into fatal delusion: Gatsby refuses to give up, even when all signs point to the end. Fitzgerald uses this to show the destructive nature of clinging to a false ideal, especially when society refuses to let outsiders truly belong.

• Wilson and Gatsby are both victims of a careless world: Wilson is consumed by grief and misled by Tom. Gatsby is destroyed by his devotion to Daisy. Both are powerless men crushed by wealth, lies, and class divisions.

• The hollowness of the elite is now complete: Daisy and Tom have vanished into their protected world. They leave chaos behind, untouched by it. Fitzgerald exposes a society where the rich act without consequence, and the dreamers are the ones who pay.

What happens in chapter 9 of The Great Gatsby and why is it significant?

After Gatsby’s death, Nick tries to organise a funeral, but no one comes—not Daisy, not Meyer Wolfsheim, and not the hundreds who once crowded Gatsby’s parties. Only Gatsby’s father, Henry Gatz, attends, proud of his son’s ambition. Disgusted by the selfishness around him, Nick breaks off ties with the Buchanans and returns to the Midwest. The novel ends with Nick reflecting on Gatsby’s dream and the American Dream itself, concluding that we are all drawn forward by dreams that are always just out of reach.

Chapter 9 – Significance (A* Level Analysis)

• Gatsby’s complete isolation is exposed: In death, Gatsby is forgotten by the people who once used him. His empty funeral reflects how appearances mattered more than loyalty or connection in the world he tried to enter.

• Daisy and Tom’s cowardice is finalised: Their disappearance confirms Fitzgerald’s view of the wealthy elite as careless, selfish, and shielded by privilege. They cause destruction but escape responsibility, showing how money protects people from consequence.

• The American Dream is buried with Gatsby: Gatsby’s journey—from poor farm boy to wealthy man chasing love—was built on hope, illusion, and reinvention, but the dream ultimately collapses under the weight of reality and class division.

• Nick’s disillusionment becomes central: By returning to the Midwest, Nick rejects the East’s moral emptiness. His narration becomes a reflection on lost innocence, failed dreams, and the cost of idealism.

• The final lines reflect the novel’s core message: Gatsby believed in a dream that was always out of reach. The last sentence—“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past”—suggests that no matter how hard we try to move forward, we are always pulled back by memory, illusion, or history.

Who is Nick Carraway?

• Nick is the quiet, reflective, and subdued narrator of The Great Gatsby. He is Gatsby’s neighbour in West Egg and works in the bond business. He does not share the wealth or social status of the Buchanans, which positions him as an outsider observing the world of the elite. Nick is a flawed and somewhat unreliable narrator, openly reflecting on his own virtues and flaws, which encourages readers to trust his perspective while remaining aware of its subjectivity.

What is Nick Carraway’s narrative role?

• Nick is a reluctant participant: both inside the events and observing them from a distance. He describes this duality in Chapter 2: “I was within and without, simultaneously enchanted and repelled by the inexhaustible variety of life.” As an intradiegetic narrator, he blends first-person narration (his own perspective) with reflective third-person recounting (Gatsby’s story), allowing him to mediate between action and interpretation. He rarely drives events himself; instead, he documents the choices and actions of others, which can make him reliable in observation but limited in participation.

“I hope she’ll be a fool — that’s the best thing a girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool.” – Daisy Buchanan

• Context: Spoken by Daisy in The Great Gatsby when reflecting on the birth of her daughter. Set in the rigidly patriarchal society of 1920s America, the line reveals Daisy’s awareness of the limited roles available to women and the emotional cost of intelligence and awareness within that system.

• Method: The ironic juxtaposition of “hope” with “fool” exposes the bitterness beneath Daisy’s tone. The adjective “beautiful” aligns female value with appearance, while “little” infantilises and diminishes women. The dash creates a pause that mimics hesitation, suggesting an internal conflict between maternal love and social realism.

• Effect: Daisy’s statement is both cynical and self-protective. By wishing ignorance for her daughter, she implies that awareness brings pain rather than empowerment. The phrase “this world” broadens the comment beyond personal experience, framing misogyny as systemic rather than individual.

• Significance: Fitzgerald uses Daisy to expose how patriarchy operates not only through male dominance but through female resignation. Daisy’s insight does not lead to rebellion but to accommodation, contrasting sharply with later feminist ideals. The line highlights the tragedy of consciousness without agency: Daisy understands her oppression yet sees no viable escape.

• Themes: Gender inequality; female disillusionment; patriarchy and social constraint; appearance versus intellect; knowledge as burden.

“Can’t repeat the past?… Why of course you can!” – Jay Gatsby C6

• Context: Spoken by Gatsby in response to Nick’s scepticism about rekindling his relationship with Daisy. The line encapsulates Gatsby’s defining belief: that identity, love, and success can be reconstructed through willpower and wealth. It reflects the post-war American Dream’s emphasis on self-invention and optimism.

• Method: The rhetorical question followed by an emphatic exclamation reveals Gatsby’s absolute conviction. The ellipsis signals disbelief and momentary pause, as if Nick’s doubt is inconceivable. The adverb “of course” implies inevitability, dismissing reality in favour of idealism.

• Effect: Gatsby’s certainty is both inspiring and tragic. His refusal to acknowledge time’s irreversibility exposes his emotional naivety and deep longing. The abrupt shift from question to assertion mirrors his inability to tolerate contradiction, reinforcing the intensity of his obsession with the past.

• Significance: Fitzgerald uses this moment to critique the American Dream’s promise of limitless possibility. Gatsby’s faith in repetition denies social reality, moral consequence, and personal change. The line foreshadows his downfall, suggesting that clinging to an idealised past prevents genuine human connection in the present.

• Themes: Illusion versus reality; obsession with the past; the American Dream; self-invention; inevitability of loss.

“He had one of those rare smiles with a quality of eternal reassurance in it, that you may come across four or five times in life.” – Nick Carraway

• Context: Nick’s description of Gatsby early in the novel, before Gatsby’s illusions unravel. At this point, Gatsby is presented as magnetic and hopeful, distinct from the cynicism and moral emptiness of East Egg society. The line reflects Nick’s early admiration and emotional susceptibility to Gatsby’s charm.

• Method: The superlative “rare” elevates Gatsby above ordinary experience, while the abstract noun phrase “eternal reassurance” suggests timeless comfort and trust. Nick’s direct address (“you may come across”) universalises the moment, drawing the reader into complicity with his judgement.

• Effect: Gatsby is idealised as emotionally generous and validating, someone who makes others feel uniquely seen. The smile becomes symbolic rather than literal, suggesting a constructed persona designed to inspire belief. This description encourages readers, like Nick, to suspend scepticism and invest emotionally in Gatsby.

• Significance: Fitzgerald uses Nick’s romanticised language to foreground the novel’s central tension between appearance and reality. The smile foreshadows Gatsby’s role as an illusion — comforting but fragile. Nick’s admiration also raises questions about narrative reliability: Gatsby is filtered through longing as much as observation.

• Themes: Illusion and idealism; charisma and performance; appearance versus reality; narrative subjectivity; the power of belief.

Analyse the kiss scene and quote

“Then he kissed her. At his lips’ touch she blossomed for him like a flower and the incarnation was complete.”

A*-Level Analysis (Condensed for Revision)

• Religious Imagery – “the incarnation was complete”:
  Fitzgerald uses religious language to show how Gatsby sees this moment as sacred — Daisy becomes the physical embodiment of his dream. “Incarnation” (typically linked to Christ) suggests Gatsby has turned an idea into something real. But this is more about him completing his fantasy than loving Daisy for who she is.

• Metaphor – “she blossomed… like a flower”:
  Daisy is sexualised and idealised. The image of her “blossoming” presents her as passive, delicate, and fleeting — something that exists for Gatsby’s pleasure. Like a flower, the beauty is temporary, hinting that this moment can’t last.

• Sense of Fulfilment:
  Gatsby believes this kiss completes everything he’s worked for — his reinvention, his pursuit of wealth, his longing for Daisy. But the tone feels too perfect, too final, suggesting that the dream has peaked, and what follows will be disillusionment.

• Historical Context – The American Dream:
  This kiss is Gatsby’s personal version of achieving the American Dream: the idea that anyone can have success and happiness if they try hard enough. But Fitzgerald shows that reality can’t live up to the fantasy — Daisy is human, not an ideal. Like the Dream, she’s flawed and unattainable.

• Theme – Fantasy vs Reality:
  Gatsby doesn’t truly see Daisy — he sees what she represents. This kiss marks the moment where his illusion meets the physical world, but in doing so, it loses its magic. Fitzgerald warns against investing too much hope in dreams that reality can’t fulfil.

“Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgastic future that year by year recedes before us…So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

• Context: This is the novel’s closing reflection, delivered by Nick after Gatsby’s death. The green light, first seen at the end of Daisy’s dock, has evolved from a personal symbol of Gatsby’s desire into a universal metaphor for human aspiration. The moment broadens the narrative from individual tragedy to collective experience.

• Method: Fitzgerald fuses metaphor and collective voice. The green light symbolises hope and possibility, while the phrase “orgastic future” elevates desire into something transcendent and intoxicating. The shift from “Gatsby believed” to “we beat on” universalises Gatsby’s dream, transforming it into a shared human condition. The boating metaphor uses cyclical motion to contradict the idea of progress.

• Effect: The imagery creates a haunting sense of motion without arrival. The future appears vivid and attainable, yet perpetually retreats. The rhythm of the sentence mirrors this tension: forward momentum (“beat on”) is immediately undermined by regression (“borne back ceaselessly into the past”). Readers are left with both hope and futility entwined.

• Significance: Fitzgerald reframes the green light as the ultimate illusion of the American Dream — the belief that happiness lies just ahead and can be reached through persistence. Gatsby’s faith is no longer naive but tragic: it reflects a national ideology that promises renewal while denying escape from history, class, and time. The novel ends by suggesting that aspiration itself is noble, yet inherently doomed.

• Motif – The Green Light:
  The green light represents hope, desire, and the promise of self-reinvention. Initially specific (Daisy), it becomes abstract (the future), and finally symbolic of humanity’s endless pursuit of meaning. Its distance is crucial: the dream must remain unreachable to sustain belief. The green light thus exposes the paradox at the heart of the American Dream — it survives only because it is never fulfilled.

• Themes: The American Dream; time and memory; hope versus reality; inevitability of loss; illusion and aspiration; cyclical history.

Gatsby parties “glistening hors d’oeuvre, spiced baked hams crowded against salads of harlequin designs and pastry pigs and turkeys bewitched to a dark gold. In the main hall a bar with a real brass rail was set up, and stocked with gins and liquors and with cordials so long forgotten that most of his female guests were too young to know one from another.”

Fitzgerald’s description is carefully selective and intensely visual, transforming Gatsby’s food and drink into a mirror of his character and ambitions. The “turkeys bewitched to a dark gold” are not merely luxurious—they are magical, performative, and grotesque, signaling that Gatsby’s wealth is constructed spectacle rather than organic authority. Just as he has remade his identity, he remakes his party, using material abundance to simulate the sophistication and legitimacy of old money, yet the extravagance itself hints at its artificiality.

The bar and its “cordials so long forgotten that most of his female guests were too young to know one from another” deepen this critique. Fitzgerald shows that material wealth cannot substitute for social knowledge or cultural belonging: Gatsby can supply the symbols of status, but he cannot supply the lived history or inherited refinement that the East Egg elite possess. The guests’ ignorance makes the ostentation both impressive and hollow, reflecting the Jazz Age tension between surface glamour and underlying emptiness.

By focusing on food and drink as symbolic extensions of Gatsby himself, Fitzgerald critiques a society where appearance substitutes for authenticity, where desire and aspiration can be spectacularly displayed but never fully realized. The lavish detail, combined with subtle absurdity—the “harlequin designs,” the unfamiliar cordials—exposes the performative fragility of the American Dream: wealth and parties may dazzle, but they cannot genuinely transform social reality.

“She’s got an indiscreet voice,’ I remarked. ‘It’s full of—’ I hesitated. ‘Her voice is full of money,’ Gatsby said suddenly.” – Gatsby describing Daisy

• Context: Spoken in Chapter 7, during one of Gatsby’s reflections on Daisy. Gatsby’s description of Daisy’s voice reveals the materialism and social hierarchy that underpin his idealisation of her. To Gatsby, Daisy embodies not just love, but wealth, status, and the lifestyle he has longed for since his youth.

• Method: Fitzgerald uses hesitation (“I hesitated”) and interruption to build tension and highlight the significance of Gatsby’s interpretation. The metaphor “full of money” transforms a physical quality — her voice — into an abstract representation of privilege and class. Gatsby’s sudden declaration shows his obsession with the social dream he associates with Daisy.

• Effect: The description links desire and materialism, implying that Gatsby’s love is intertwined with his ambition. Daisy becomes a symbol of the social world he aspires to join, rather than a fully realised individual. The moment exposes the illusions that drive Gatsby: he projects meaning onto surface qualities, blending affection with aspiration.

• Significance: Fitzgerald critiques the American Dream by showing how wealth can distort love and perception. Daisy’s “voice full of money” captures the fusion of personal desire and social ambition central to the novel. It also foreshadows the tragedy: Gatsby’s infatuation is directed more toward an idealised social identity than a real person.

• Themes: Wealth and materialism; illusion versus reality; obsession and desire; the American Dream; social hierarchy; projection and idealisation.

“‘Oh, you want too much!’ she cried to Gatsby. ‘I love you now—isn’t that enough? I can’t help what’s past.’ Daisybegan to sob helplessly. ‘I did love him once—but I loved you too.’”

• Context: Spoken in Chapter 7, during the confrontation between Gatsby, Daisy, and Tom in the Plaza Hotel. This moment exposes the impossibility of Gatsby’s dream: he wants to erase the past and recreate an idealised love, but Daisy is tethered to her history with Tom and the social world he represents.

• Method: The exclamatory phrases (“Oh, you want too much!”) and interjections convey Daisy’s panic and emotional conflict. The dashes in “I did love him once—but I loved you too” create tension and hesitation, reflecting her inability to reconcile love with reality. Fitzgerald uses direct, fragmented dialogue to dramatise emotional complexity and moral ambiguity.

• Effect: The passage reveals Daisy’s dual loyalties and humanises her: she is neither villain nor pure victim. Gatsby’s idealism clashes with Daisy’s pragmatic awareness, highlighting the gap between fantasy and lived experience. Her sobbing underscores emotional helplessness, emphasising that love cannot undo social conventions, class, or the passage of time.

• Significance: This scene crystallises the central tragedy of the novel: the past cannot be repeated, and the American Dream — here embodied in Gatsby’s desire for total renewal — is ultimately unattainable. Daisy’s acknowledgment of past and present simultaneously exposes the constraints imposed by society and personal choice, reinforcing Fitzgerald’s critique of illusion, obsession, and social determinism.

• Themes: Love versus reality; the impossibility of recapturing the past; emotional conflict; the limits of the American Dream; social constraint; human frailty.

Chapter 1 - “Well, it’s a fine book, and everybody ought to read it. The idea is if we don’t look out the white race will be—will be utterly submerged. It’s all scientific stuff; it’s been proved.”

Tom’s praise of The Rise of the Colored Empires is not idle chatter — Fitzgerald deliberately anchors it in a real racial panic of the early 1920s. Tom’s fictional book is a stand‑in for The Rising Tide of Color Against White World‑Supremacy (1920) by Lothrop Stoddard, a widely read work of scientific racism and Nordicist ideology that warned that white dominance was threatened by demographic and geopolitical shifts.

But Tom’s insistence that the idea is “scientific stuff… proved” reveals more than casual prejudice; it exposes his desire to cloak racial anxiety in the authority of science. This mirrors how eugenics and racialist theories were marketed in the 1920s — not as crude bigotry, but as supposedly empirical truths supported by biology and ‘race science’. In doing so, Fitzgerald shows Tom not as a critical thinker but as someone who consumes ideology uncritically, using it to justify his own sense of superiority.

The panic about the “white race”—that it might be “utterly submerged”—also reflects a broader post‑World War I identity crisis among some segments of white American society, who feared loss of status amid immigration, global shifts, and social change. Tom’s fear functions as a class defence mechanism: his attachment to racial hierarchy parallels his attachment to traditional social hierarchies that privilege old money. In both cases, anything that threatens established privilege — whether it’s new wealth (Gatsby) or new peoples — is treated as existential danger.

Moreover, Tom’s declaration is deeply ironic when contrasted with his moral and personal failures. He speaks about racial purity and dominance as if they were noble causes, yet he himself embodies the opposite: infidelity, exploitation, and brute aggression. His recourse to pseudo‑science reveals that his worldview is not grounded in genuine knowledge but in anxieties about maintaining power in a changing world.

Symbol: The Eyes of Doctor T. J. Eckleburg

• Context: The eyes appear in the “valley of ashes” (Chapter 2) — a desolate, industrial wasteland between West Egg and New York City. Originally part of a faded advertisement, the eyes stare out over the wasteland long after the oculist who placed them has gone. Later, in Chapter 8, George Wilson interprets them as the eyes of God, declaring “God sees everything,” despite his lack of formal religious belief.

• Method: Fitzgerald uses symbolism to transform a commercial billboard into a moral and spiritual presence. The adjectives “blue and gigantic” emphasise the unnerving scale and intensity of the gaze. The emptiness behind the eyes — they belong to a forgotten advertisement — creates irony: they watch but do not intervene. The imagery connects human observation to judgement without accountability.

• Effect: The eyes function as a silent moral witness, observing the decadence, infidelity, and violence of the Jazz Age. Their omnipresent gaze implies ethical scrutiny, yet the lack of a human or divine presence underscores the futility of judgement in a morally corrupt society. The forgotten nature of the advertisement mirrors the fleeting, superficial relationships and obligations of the novel’s wealthy characters, foreshadowing Gatsby’s abandonment and death. Their presence over the valley of ashes also mirrors the decay and neglect of the poor, showing that those without wealth or status are watched but ignored.

• Significance: Fitzgerald critiques the moral and spiritual emptiness of 1920s America. The Eyes of Doctor T. J. Eckleburg link themes of illusion, decay, and neglect, highlighting the hollowness behind the era’s glamour. They function as a symbolic warning that human actions — corruption, greed, and betrayal — are observed, yet consequences are neither guaranteed nor enforced, reinforcing the novel’s tragic tension.

• Themes: Moral decay; spiritual emptiness; judgement and observation; the hollowness of the American Dream; consequence and neglect; symbolism of vision versus insight.

Weather as Pathetic Fallacy – Chapter 5

• Context: In Chapter 5, Gatsby is nervously awaiting his long-anticipated meeting with Daisy at Nick’s house. The day is described as pouring rain, reflecting Gatsby’s anxiety and fear that the reunion may fail.

• Method: Fitzgerald uses pathetic fallacy, linking external weather to internal emotion. Gatsby is described as “pale as death,” and the persistent rain mirrors his tension and vulnerability. Later, when Daisy arrives and the meeting goes well, the rain stops, and there are “twinkle-bells of sunshine in the room,” symbolising the temporary joy and hope that their reunion brings.

• Effect: The shift from rain to sunshine externalises the emotional arc of the scene: initial dread gives way to exhilaration. Readers experience Gatsby’s relief and Daisy’s enchantment as if mirrored in the environment. The weather also subtly reinforces the fragility of the dream, suggesting that just as rain can return, so too can doubt and disappointment intrude.

• Significance: Fitzgerald shows that emotions and fate are intertwined with the natural world. The rain and subsequent sunshine highlight the delicacy of Gatsby’s hopes and foreshadow the impermanence of joy. Weather becomes a symbolic barometer of desire, tension, and the fleeting nature of happiness, reinforcing key themes of dreams versus reality.

• Themes: Anxiety and anticipation; hope and joy; fragility of dreams; emotional reflection in nature; tension and release.

Weather as Pathetic Fallacy – Chapter 7

• Context: In Chapter 7, the confrontation between Gatsby, Daisy, and Tom reaches its emotional and moral climax. The day is described as broiling hot, reflecting both the rising tension among the characters and the oppressive atmosphere of the narrative. Nick notes the “shimmering hush at noon” and observes that the “straw seats of the car hovered on the edge of combustion,” signalling the physical and emotional pressure of the moment.

• Method: Fitzgerald uses pathetic fallacy and hyperbole to link the weather to the characters’ inner states. The intense heat is described as draining energy, making the Buchanans restless and irritable, and amplifying their impatience and discomfort. Hyperbolic language (“hovered on the edge of combustion”) makes the environment feel almost combustible, reflecting the imminent emotional explosion. The heat is presented as entirely natural, which heightens its subtle influence over the characters’ behaviour.

• Effect: The oppressive weather externalises the novel’s rising tensions. The Buchanans’ drive into the city under such heat symbolises their inability to escape conflict or moral scrutiny. The oppressive conditions prompt irritability and force hidden conflicts to the surface — particularly Gatsby’s obsession, Tom’s jealousy, and Daisy’s divided loyalties. Readers feel the suffocating tension, almost as if it physically presses down on the scene, enhancing drama and anticipation.

• Significance: Fitzgerald uses the heat to enrich meaning and heighten dramatic effect, making it a narrative device that mirrors human emotion. The weather embodies the social and emotional pressure that drives characters to act, exposing cracks in relationships and revealing the fragility of dreams and appearances. Just as location (the Plaza Hotel) is symbolically significant, the oppressive heat magnifies the inevitability of confrontation, emphasising how environment, mood, and moral tension are intertwined in the narrative.

• Themes: Tension and conflict; emotional intensity; moral and social pressure; fragility of relationships and dreams; environment reflecting human psychology; weather as narrative device.

“Making a short deft movement, Tom Buchanan broke [Myrtle’s] nose with his open hand.”

This occurs in Chapter 2, when Myrtle asserts herself by saying Daisy’s name aloud in Tom’s presence. Her moment of agency — speaking the name of the woman Tom truly loves — triggers his violence. The phrasing “short deft movement” is striking: the violence is mechanical and precise, almost like a natural extension of his body, suggesting that Tom’s aggression is habitual, practiced, and unthinking. Fitzgerald’s economy of language here makes the act all the more chilling, showing brutality as effortless rather than dramatic.

The moment also reveals how power and self-image intersect psychologically. Tom is not only punishing Myrtle for insubordination; he is reasserting his dominion over the world he perceives as his, which includes Daisy and the social hierarchies he embodies. Myrtle’s transgression — naming Daisy — is symbolic: she invades the elite space through speech, and her punishment shows that the enforcement of privilege in Fitzgerald’s world is immediate, physical, and deeply internalized.

Furthermore, the clinical tone emphasizes the banality of cruelty in elite spaces. There is no moral reflection, no internal hesitation; Fitzgerald invites the reader to notice that violence is normalized and invisible within systems of privilege, making the act horrifying precisely because it is mundane. Myrtle’s pain becomes both literal and symbolic, embodying the cost of attempting to traverse social boundaries or assert selfhood against entrenched power.

Myrtle Wilson Chapter 2 - “thickish figure”

Immediately signals her physicality as tied to her working-class identity. The word is less polished and flattering than the language used for upper-class women like Daisy, suggesting her body—and by extension her status—is at odds with the elegance and refinement of the East Egg elite. In the 1920s, slimness was closely associated with wealth, sophistication, and social aspiration, so Myrtle’s “thickish” form marks her as visibly outside the world she tries to enter through her affair with Tom.

The description also functions symbolically: her body becomes a marker of desire and social transgression, highlighting the impossibility of bridging the class divide. The adjective carries a subtle tone of judgment, reflecting both the narrator’s and society’s condescending attitude toward those who attempt to rise socially. Myrtle’s unpolished physicality contrasts with Daisy’s delicate beauty, emphasizing the raw material reality of the working class in a world dominated by appearances and wealth. Ultimately, “thickish” anchors Myrtle firmly in her class while underscoring the social and moral hierarchies that define desire, aspiration, and power in the novel.

​

​

​

Fitzgerald’s choice of the names Daisy and Myrtle

Daisy — Symbolism of Innocence and Illusion

• Flower symbolism: “Daisy” evokes the white flower associated with innocence, purity, youth and beauty — qualities that appear to define Daisy Buchanan’s character and social image. This aligns with the novel’s repeated use of white in relation to her.

• Name meaning: Daisies are often tied to themes of innocence, transience and superficial charm, with meanings like “day’s eye” (opening at dawn and closing at dusk), suggesting something bright but fleeting — much like Daisy’s allure.

• Irony of purity: Although her name suggests purity, Daisy’s actions reveal moral emptiness and carelessness. The contrast between her name’s connotations and her behaviour deepens Fitzgerald’s critique of the elite as beautiful facades with hollow realities.

Key point: Fitzgerald’s choice of Daisy highlights the illusion of innocence — she looks pure and delicate, but this appearance masks selfishness and instability.

Myrtle — A Less Refined, Earthier Symbol

• Botanical roots: A myrtle is a hardy evergreen shrub, not an elegant flower like a daisy. It does have floral associations (linked to love and marriage in ancient symbolism), but it is far less ornamental and refined than a daisy.

• Working‑class connotations: Critics note that “Myrtle” sounds plain and unglamorous, reflecting her lower‑class status and her earthy, material desires. The name does not carry the delicate grace of “Daisy,” underscoring the social and aesthetic divide between them.

• Irony and contrast: In some symbolic systems, the myrtle plant is sacred to gods of love and fertility — an ironic twist since Fitzgerald’s Myrtle uses her affair not for genuine love but as a vehicle for social escape and sexual assertion.

• Shrub vs flower: The myrtle shrub is common and hardy, capable of growing in less ideal conditions — much like Myrtle Wilson herself, who is striving and struggling in the Valley of Ashes, not flourishing in the world of wealth she envies.

Key point: Myrtle suggests an earthier, more physical presence — she is robust, less refined, and rooted in the grim reality of her class, contrasting sharply with Daisy’s more ethereal and elite implications.

“They were careless people, Tom and Daisy – they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.”

This occurs in Chapter 9, at the novel’s conclusion, when Nick delivers his moral judgment on the Buchanans after Gatsby, Myrtle, and George have died. The phrasing “smashed up things and creatures” is deliberately violent and sweeping, collapsing human and material victims into the same category. By using the word “creatures,” Fitzgerald dehumanizes the victims while simultaneously magnifying the Buchanans’ moral detachment: their recklessness is all-encompassing and utterly destructive, yet it elicits no personal consequence.

The repetition of “retreated” and the reference to “their money or their vast carelessness” emphasizes that wealth acts as a protective shield, enabling both moral and physical escape from accountability. Nick’s ambiguity in “or whatever it was that kept them together” suggests that the bond between Tom and Daisy is as much social and psychological as emotional, sustained by privilege and ignorance rather than genuine connection. Their carelessness is not just moral laziness but systemic immunity, a commentary on the structural protection wealth affords the elite.

At a deeper level, the passage reflects Fitzgerald’s critique of the American Dream and moral decay: those with wealth and status can wield destructive power without repercussion, leaving the less privileged to bear the consequences. The stark contrast between the Buchanans’ impunity and the deaths of Myrtle, George, and Gatsby exposes the human cost of social inequality, while the phrasing’s rhythm — a slow accumulation of violent images followed by retreat — mirrors the elegance and ease with which the elite evade responsibility.

“I married [George] because I thought he was a gentleman,” she said finally. “I thought he knew something about breeding, but he wasn’t fit to lick my shoe.” – Myrtle Wilson

• Context: Myrtle speaks this line in Chapter 2, early in the novel, during a conversation with Tom Buchanan. She is explaining her dissatisfaction with her marriage to George Wilson, revealing her desire to escape her lower-class life and her attraction to wealth, status, and social superiority. This highlights the class divide that drives her infidelity with Tom.

• Method: Fitzgerald uses hyperbolic and colloquial language to convey Myrtle’s contempt for George. The metaphor “wasn’t fit to lick my shoe” exaggerates George’s perceived inferiority, emphasising her scorn and frustration. The contrast between her expectation of a “gentleman” and her actual disappointment reflects social aspiration versus reality.

• Effect: The quote exposes Myrtle’s materialism, class consciousness, and dissatisfaction, portraying her as trapped in a marriage that does not meet her social ambitions. It also underscores the broader theme of class division in the novel: Myrtle values status over emotional connection, and her contempt for George mirrors the social hierarchies of 1920s America. Readers see her moral compromise and yearning for a more glamorous life, setting up her eventual downfall.

• Significance: This line illustrates how Fitzgerald critiques social aspiration and the destructive effects of class obsession. Myrtle’s disappointment and disdain for George highlight the moral and emotional limitations imposed by social structures, showing how desire for wealth and status can override personal loyalty and lead to tragedy. It also contrasts with the Buchanans’ inherited wealth, emphasising the gap between “old money” and the struggling lower class.

• Themes: Class division; social aspiration; materialism; marital dissatisfaction; moral compromise; desire versus reality.

“Her left breast was swinging loose like a flap, and there was no need to listen for the heart beneath. The mouth was wide open and ripped at the corners.” – Myrtle Wilson (after her death)

• Context: This occurs in Chapter 7, immediately after Myrtle is struck and killed by Daisy driving Gatsby’s car. The description follows the climactic moment of tragedy and exposes the physical and symbolic consequences of reckless desire, social inequality, and moral carelessness.

• Method: Fitzgerald employs graphic imagery, simile, and stark realism to shock the reader and convey the full physicality of death. The simile “swinging loose like a flap” exposes her body in a sexualised and dehumanised way, even in death. The focus on her exposed breast and open mouth draws attention to sexuality, linking her life-long erotic desire and illicit attraction to Tom with her physicality in death.

• The focus on her “mouth… ripped at the corners” adds a grotesque element, symbolising voices silenced — her energy, ambition, and attempts to assert herself are violently terminated. The passage’s clinical, almost forensic tone enhances the horror and inevitability of her death.

• Effect: Myrtle’s body becomes a symbol of powerlessness under the social and moral hierarchy. Silencing of lower-class individuals in a world dominated by the wealthy. Readers are forced to confront the brutal consequences of privilege and carelessness, feeling both pity for Myrtle and anger at the society that allows such a death. The imagery transforms her from a lively, ambitious figure into a tragic symbol of desire cut short, making her death resonate thematically rather than just narratively.

• Significance / Deeper Meaning: Myrtle’s grotesque post-mortem description embodies the destruction wrought by class, desire, and moral negligence. Fitzgerald uses her body as a metaphor for the lower classes crushed under the excesses of the rich — her vitality is literally “ripped away” by those above her. The violence to her body mirrors the violence inherent in the social hierarchy and the corruption of the Jazz Age, where ambition and desire are frequently punished, particularly for those without wealth or status. Her death also contrasts with the Buchanans’ impunity, reinforcing the theme of reckless privilege versus powerless vulnerability.

“They’re such beautiful shirts,” she sobbed, her voice muffled in the thick folds. “It makes me sad because I’ve never seen such – such beautiful shirts before.”

This occurs in Chapter 5, when Gatsby invites Daisy to his mansion after their reunion. She is overwhelmed by the opulent display of his wealth, and Fitzgerald emphasizes this through lavish visual and tactile imagery. The “rich heap mounted higher” conveys almost impossible abundance, while the specific colors and monograms — coral, apple green, lavender, faint orange, Indian blue — give the scene a dreamlike vibrancy. Daisy’s voice being “muffled in the thick folds” suggests that she is physically engulfed by Gatsby’s wealth, highlighting how the spectacle of wealth overwhelms her and reminds her of the social and emotional distance between herself and Gatsby.

The shirts actively shape her emotions. They function as a material surrogate for Gatsby, embodying his achievements and the social world separating them, making her cry from wonder, longing, and the painful awareness of distance.

The crying can be interpreted in two ways:

1. Emotional overwhelm and longing: The shirts symbolize Gatsby’s achievements and the life they might have shared, evoking regret and nostalgia. Her tears capture the collision of desire and lost opportunity.

2. Realization of her limitations and fear of change: Alternatively, Daisy’s tears reflect self-consciousness and anxiety. Gatsby’s abundance illuminates her dependency on social norms and security, provoking admiration mixed with helplessness, foreshadowing her eventual retreat into safety with Tom.

Fitzgerald also conveys irony and foreshadowing: while Daisy admires the display, the moment subtly reveals her inability to choose Gatsby over security, showing how wealth can dazzle, overwhelm, and subtly trap emotion.

“I went to Gatsby’s house. I was one of the few guests who had actually been invited … after that they conducted themselves according to the rules of behaviour associated with amusement parks.” – Nick Carraway

• Context: In Chapter 3, Nick attends one of Gatsby’s extravagant parties. The scene highlights the superficiality of the Jazz Age elite, while also suggesting Gatsby’s isolation and the emptiness behind the spectacle.

• Method: Fitzgerald uses contrast (Nick as a genuine guest versus the careless, uninvited crowd) and simile (“rules of behaviour associated with amusement parks”) to convey chaos, spectacle, and artificiality. Irony is present: the glittering, lively atmosphere masks emotional emptiness and social detachment. The narrative perspective (Nick as moral observer) also functions as a lens for critique, giving readers insight into both the extravagance and the loneliness of the scene.

• Effect / Deeper Reading: These techniques highlight the performative and superficial nature of social life, where wealth and popularity create spectacle but not genuine connection. The party’s chaos contrasts with Gatsby’s isolation, hinting at the illusions and unfulfilled promises of the American Dream. Nick’s perspective encourages readers to see both the glamour and moral emptiness of the Jazz Age.

• Significance: Fitzgerald critiques the emptiness of wealth, performative social interactions, and the illusions of the American Dream. Gatsby’s parties are a microcosm of the 1920s elite: dazzling, chaotic, but emotionally hollow.

Valley of Ashes - “…a fantastic farm where ashes grow like wheat into ridges and hills and grotesque gardens.”

“…the men who work on the railroad there are themselves ‘ash-grey’.”

The Valley of Ashes, lying between Long Island and New York, is a desolate industrial wasteland where George and Myrtle Wilson live on its edge, trapped in poverty and social invisibility. Fitzgerald’s metaphor of a “fantastic farm where ashes grow like wheat” transforms industrial waste into a grotesque, unnatural landscape, emphasizing that this world is barren, lifeless, and morally decayed.

The inhabitants, described as “ash-grey,” are visibly shaped and drained by their environment. George’s quiet desperation and Myrtle’s restless ambition reflect how the valley saps vitality while fostering frustration and desire for escape. The setting enforces a sense of social and psychological entrapment: those who live here are literally and symbolically overshadowed by wealth and industrial decay, making their struggles and dreams appear muted or doomed.

Symbolically, the Valley represents the human cost of the American Dream. While the rich pursue pleasure in East and West Egg, people like George and Myrtle endure the fallout, their lives reduced to monotony, labor, and moral compromise. The “grotesque gardens” of ash suggest that even growth here is twisted and corrupted, turning effort into desolation and desire into frustration.

“Your wife doesn’t love you. She’s never loved you. She loves me.”

Tom replies: “You’re crazy.” He exploded. “Daisy loved me when she married me and she loves me now.”

This occurs in Chapter 7, at the climactic Plaza Hotel confrontation, when Gatsby directly challenges Tom’s claim to Daisy. Gatsby asserts that Daisy’s love belongs to him, reflecting his belief in the recoverability of the past and the perfection of a life remade through ambition and wealth. Tom responds with disbelief and explosive anger, defending not only Daisy but the social order and authority his wealth affords him.

Fitzgerald uses short, declarative sentences to heighten tension and mirror the emotional stakes. Gatsby’s repetition — “She loves me” — exposes his obsession and idealization, while Tom’s reaction — “He exploded” — reveals the fragility beneath his arrogance. The contrast between Gatsby’s calm certainty and Tom’s violent defensiveness dramatizes the clash between romantic idealism and entrenched social privilege.

Symbolically, the confrontation represents a struggle between two visions of America. Gatsby embodies the self-made dreamer, the possibility of remaking oneself and transcending social boundaries through ambition and desire. Tom represents old money, inherited privilege, and the rigidity of social hierarchy, asserting that wealth, status, and historical advantage ultimately dictate outcomes. For Daisy, this moment forces her into a moral and emotional stasis: she becomes a passive prize in the clash between these forces, unable to act decisively without risking social security or emotional safety, highlighting her entrapment between desire and duty.

Psychologically, the encounter exposes the characters’ core natures. Gatsby’s idealism and emotional intensity are fragile yet persistent, while Tom’s aggression masks insecurity and the dependence of his authority on status and entitlement rather than merit or moral right. Fitzgerald frames this as a microcosm of the Jazz Age, where desire, love, and ambition are overpowered by social structures, making Gatsby’s dream both poignant and doomed.

Brucolli critic - yearning

“ Gatsbys yearning for Daisy is a yearning for something far more significant than any human could ever provide”

TGG critic A.E Dyson

“He really believes in himself and his illusions”

AO3 Whoso - Wyatt

• Early English Petrarchan Influence:
  Wyatt helped introduce the Petrarchan sonnet to English poetry. His adaptation of Petrarch’s style includes courtly love tropes (unattainable women, love as suffering), but his tone is often more cynical and politically charged. Whoso List follows the Petrarchan model but subverts its idealism — the speaker is exhausted, frustrated, and defeated by the pursuit of the woman.

• Court Politics and Anne Boleyn:
  Many critics read this poem as an allegorical reflection of Wyatt’s relationship with Anne Boleyn, who later became Queen and the second wife of Henry VIII. It’s thought Wyatt was in love with her (perhaps even romantically involved) before Henry claimed her. The “hind” (a female deer) symbolises a woman pursued but ultimately owned by the king, making the poem a commentary on the danger of desire in a politically charged court.

• Tudor Court and Male Identity:
  Wyatt wrote in a time when courtly life was dominated by competition, ambition, and danger. Love was not just emotional—it was political. The poem’s weary speaker may reflect the masculine anxiety and powerlessness of men in court, especially when desire clashes with royal authority.

• The Role of Women and Possession:
  The hind bears a collar with the words “Noli me tangere, for Caesar’s I am” (“Do not touch me, for I belong to Caesar”). This reflects how women were treated as property of powerful men, especially monarchs. The Latin phrase also has biblical echoes (from the resurrected Christ to Mary Magdalene), suggesting the woman is elevated but untouchable—sacred, yet possessed.

• Love as Futile and Painful:
  In contrast to idealised love, Wyatt presents a speaker who is emotionally worn out, saying “Noli me tangere” is not just a command but a warning. His love becomes a hunt without reward, symbolising both sexual frustration and emotional despair—a stark departure from romanticised chivalry.

• Renaissance Masculinity:
  The extended metaphor of hunting mirrors Renaissance ideas of men as active pursuers and women as passive prizes. Yet Wyatt disrupts this by presenting a hunter who gives up—not out of choice, but because the woman is claimed by someone more powerful. This signals a tension between masculine ego, status, and submission.

• Stylistic Innovation:
  Though drawing from Italian form, Wyatt’s tone is notably colder and more personal. The blend of Petrarchan longing with English restraint and political caution creates a speaker who seems detached, strategic, and reflective, not swept up in passion.

AO3 - Sonnet 116 - Shakespeare

• Part of the Shakespearean Sonnet Tradition:
  Sonnet 116 is part of Shakespeare’s 154-sonnet sequence, written in the English (Shakespearean) sonnet form. While influenced by Petrarch, Shakespeare modifies the tradition — offering a more grounded but idealised view of love, focusing less on suffering and more on constancy and truth.

• The Ideal of Platonic or Spiritual Love:
  This sonnet defines “true love” as unchanging, eternal, and unaffected by time or circumstance. In the Renaissance, such love was seen as the highest form of love — not physical or courtly, but spiritual, grounded in mutual understanding and emotional permanence.

• Humanist and Neo-Platonic Ideas:
  Renaissance thinkers, influenced by Plato, saw love as a path to truth and moral perfection. Shakespeare draws on these ideals to portray love as a fixed star, guiding and eternal, elevating it to a near-divine, transcendent force — “an ever-fixed mark.”

• Time and Mortality in Renaissance Thought:
  The sonnet directly challenges time’s ability to destroy love: “Love’s not Time’s fool.” In an era when death and ageing were ever-present, this defiant stance reflects a yearning for emotional permanence in a fragile world. The poem resists change, even as human bodies and lives are subject to decay.

• Marriage and Religious Undertones:
  The opening line (“Let me not to the marriage of true minds / Admit impediments”) echoes the language of the Church of England’s marriage ceremony, which would have been familiar to Shakespeare’s audience. This links love to both spiritual and social covenant, elevating it beyond personal emotion to a kind of sacred truth.

• Masculine Voice and Poetic Authority:
  The speaker adopts an assertive, universal tone, declaring what love “is” and “is not” with certainty. This reflects the Renaissance poet’s role as both moral guide and philosophical thinker, using poetry to define abstract ideals. Yet the closing couplet subtly undercuts this by acknowledging the risk of being proven wrong, adding human humility.

• Possible Personal or Ambiguous Address:
  Although the poem defines love in universal terms, many of Shakespeare’s sonnets are addressed to a young man, suggesting that this vision of love may not be strictly heterosexual or conventional. This ambiguity invites discussion about non-traditional expressions of love, especially when comparing poems across time periods.

AO3 The Flea - John Donne

AO3: A*-Level Context for The Flea

• Metaphysical Tradition:
  John Donne is a central figure in the metaphysical movement — a poetic style marked by bold conceits, paradox, and intellectual playfulness. The Flea exemplifies this through its use of an unexpected symbol (a flea) to unite themes of sexual desire, religious language, and persuasion. His poetry often challenges conventional romantic ideals, turning love into an argument to be won.

• Sex, Honour, and Female Chastity in the 17th Century:
  In Donne’s time, a woman’s virginity was considered crucial to her value and marriageability. Premarital sex could damage a woman’s status irreparably. Donne mocks this cultural obsession by reducing the act of sex to no more significant than the mingling of blood inside a flea — a deliberate trivialisation of social and moral anxiety. This reflects a wider tension in the period between rising humanist thought and rigid Christian morality.

• The Flea as Erotic and Comic Symbol:
  The flea was a conventional image in Renaissance erotica, seen as humorous and faintly scandalous because it moved freely between bodies and sucked blood — a natural metaphor for intimacy. Donne transforms it into a seductive argument, blending body humour with philosophical reasoning, and positioning the flea as both physical proof and poetic conceit.

• Religious Imagery Used Subversively:
  Donne was raised Catholic in Protestant England, a background that may have sharpened his awareness of religious authority and hypocrisy. In The Flea, he borrows the language of sin, sacrifice, and sacred union to give weight to his argument — only to undermine it with comic absurdity. This reflects the metaphysical tendency to question the boundaries between the sacred and the profane.

• Gender, Power, and Consent:
  The speaker’s voice reflects a world where women had little agency in sexual or social matters. He dominates the exchange through wit, trying to persuade rather than coerce — but this still reveals how female resistance is dismissed as illogical. However, some critics argue Donne is not endorsing this view, but satirising male attempts to rationalise seduction.

• Performance and Audience:
  Donne’s poetry circulated among a small, elite readership, often within courtly or intellectual circles. The Flea may not reflect a real romantic situation, but rather a performance of cleverness, where Donne parodies traditional love poetry and challenges poetic decorum by making something as lowly as a flea the centre of a love poem.

TGG point of similarity to The Flea

1. The Defiance of Romantic Ideals

• Ultimately challenge traditional romantic ideals—Gatsby’s love is obsessive and futile, while Donne’s poem subverts courtly love conventions.

• • Gatsby’s love appears grand and devoted, yet Fitzgerald undermines the traditional literary notion of love as transformative and enduring. Gatsby’s fixation on recreating the past—“He had been full of the idea so long, dreamed it right through to the end”—reveals that his love is rooted in illusion rather than reality. Unlike conventional romantic heroes, Gatsby is not rewarded for his devotion; instead, he is punished, exposing the futility of idealized love.

• Similarly, The Flea subverts romantic idealism, stripping love of its emotional depth. The speaker trivializes seduction through the flea conceit—“This flea is you and I, and this / Our marriage bed and marriage temple is.” Donne’s speaker dismisses the spiritual and noble dimensions of love and sex, presenting it as nothing more than a biological transaction.

TGG - point of similarity to The Flea

1. Love as a Manipulative Force

• The Great Gatsby: Gatsby's love for Daisy isn't based on mutual understanding but on an obsessive and manipulative attempt to recreate a past fantasy. He goes to extreme lengths—accumulating wealth, throwing lavish parties, and trying to erase the years that separated them—just to win her back. His love for Daisy is a projection of his desire to reclaim the idealized version of her and the dream they shared, not an authentic connection with the real woman.

• The Flea: Donne’s speaker in The Flea similarly manipulates his lover, trying to convince her that their physical intimacy is not sinful or serious, using the flea as a metaphor for their union. The speaker’s argument reduces love and sex to a playful, almost transactional act, coaxing his lover into conceding by diminishing the significance of their actions. The manipulation is clear and overt—he’s trying to convince her that what he wants is not only permissible but trivial.

• Comparison: Both works depict love as a tool for manipulation. In Gatsby’s case, his love for Daisy leads him to craft an entire life built on illusions to win her, whereas in The Flea, the speaker manipulates his lover with rhetoric, using the flea as a tool to persuade her to yield. In both, love is not pure or mutual but is a strategic effort to control and influence the other person.

AO3 - To His Coy Mistress - Marvell

By Andrew Marvell (written c.1650s, published posthumously in 1681)

• Carpe Diem Tradition:
  The poem belongs to the carpe diem (seize the day) tradition of love poetry, common in 17th-century literature. It reflects a worldview shaped by mortality, urging immediate pleasure before time or death can interfere. This tradition often blends urgency, wit, and erotic persuasion, all of which Marvell uses to try and break down the mistress’s resistance.

• Metaphysical and Cavalier Influences:
  Marvell fuses the intellectual argument and conceit of metaphysical poets (like Donne) with the elegance and gallantry of Cavalier verse. His speaker is clever, playful, and persuasive, yet beneath the wit is a genuine existential anxiety about time and decay.

• Time and Death in 17th-Century Thought:
  The poem was written during a period of political instability, civil war, and plague in England. Death was an ever-present reality, which shaped the poem’s urgency. The speaker’s references to “Time’s wingèd chariot” and “worms shall try / That long-preserved virginity” reflect a blunt awareness that time destroys all things — love, beauty, and even the body.

• Gender and Persuasion:
  The poem reflects 17th-century male expectations of female modesty (“coyness”), but also reveals male impatience and pressure. The speaker reduces the woman’s hesitation to a waste of time, implying that virtue is meaningless in the face of mortality. This opens the poem to feminist critique, even while it’s often read as satirical or ironic.

• Erotic Imagery vs Ironic Tone:
  Marvell uses vivid sensual imagery (“vegetable love,” “deserts of vast eternity”) and blends it with mock-solemn tone. The exaggerated flattery followed by harsh reminders of death suggests the speaker is parodying idealised love poetry, making the poem both seductive and self-aware.

• Restoration Attitudes Toward Pleasure:
  Though written during the Puritan-influenced 1650s, the poem aligns more with Restoration values: wit, pleasure, and personal liberty. It anticipates a shift toward more secular, bodily expressions of love, especially compared to earlier, religiously influenced love poetry.

• Poetry as Argument:
  Like many metaphysical poems, To His Coy Mistress is structured as a logical argument: if we had time, I would praise you forever; but we don’t — so let’s act now. This creates a poem that is not just emotional, but rhetorical and strategic, blending passion with persuasion.

To his Coy Mistress - points of similarity to TGG

1.

The Urgency of Time and the Desperation of Desire

Marvell’s poem is driven by the pressure of time — love becomes urgent and desperate in the face of mortality. Phrases like “Time’s wingèd chariot hurrying near” and “then worms shall try / That long-preserved virginity” create a morbid countdown that turns seduction into panic. Similarly, in The Great Gatsby, Gatsby is acutely aware that time is running out. His obsession with recreating the past (“Can’t repeat the past? Why of course you can!”) is a refusal to accept temporal loss. Both texts show love becoming distorted under the weight of time: Marvell uses it to argue for physical consummation, while Gatsby uses it to fuel his illusion. In both, time exposes the fragility and futility of romantic ideals when reality and death loom large.

2.

Love Reduced to Physicality and Biological Urgency

In To His Coy Mistress, love is stripped of romanticism and reduced to bodily decay and sexual urgency — “into ashes all my lust,” “the grave’s a fine and private place.” The speaker’s focus on “embrace” and “vegetable love” (mocking spiritual or sacred ideals with the natural/biological) aligns with a more cynical view: love is merely a physical function threatened by time. This raw materialism echoes parts of The Great Gatsby, where love is also repeatedly shown as transactional or carnal. Tom’s relationship with Myrtle is based on lust and domination, not emotional connection, and even Gatsby’s fixation on Daisy is tied to her physical image and what she represents. In both texts, love is corrupted by or reduced to biology, desire, and decay, with little space for genuine emotional depth.

AO3 - The Scrutiny - Lovelace

Richard Lovelace, c.1640s

• Cavalier Culture:
  Lovelace was a leading Cavalier poet — a group of Royalist writers loyal to King Charles I during the English Civil War. They celebrated aristocratic ideals, elegance, wit, and masculine freedom, often expressing a casual attitude toward love and a rejection of Puritan restraint.

• English Civil War and Royalist Identity:
  Written during a time of national instability (1642–1651), The Scrutiny reflects a Cavalier retreat into pleasure and individual liberty amid the political and religious chaos of war. The poem prioritises personal indulgence over loyalty — a value aligned with the Royalist elite, who resisted Parliamentarian moral control.

• 17th-Century Gender Roles:
  The poem reflects the patriarchal double standard of the time: men were socially permitted — even praised — for sexual freedom, while women were expected to be chaste and constant. Male infidelity was treated with amusement, female infidelity with shame.

• Marriage, Honour, and Reputation:
  In upper-class 17th-century society, marriage was often about property, alliance, and status. Romantic relationships outside of marriage, especially for men, were tolerated as long as public reputation was maintained. The speaker’s dismissal of monogamy reflects this culture of aristocratic male privilege.

• Libertinism and Classical Influence:
  The poem draws from the classical tradition of Epicureanism and libertine thought, which valued pleasure, beauty, and the pursuit of desire. These ideas were revived by Cavaliers as a contrast to Puritan austerity and religious moralism during the Civil War period.

• Courtly Love and Inconstancy:
  The idea of a man pursuing many lovers before settling down was rooted in Renaissance and courtly love traditions, where women were idealised, and men pursued romance as a game. However, The Scrutiny abandons idealisation in favour of frank hedonism — reflecting the evolving values of the 17th-century elite.

Scrutiny - points of similarity to TGG

1.

Love as Transactional and Rooted in Social Power

Both texts present love as intertwined with power, status, and gain, rather than emotional depth. In The Scrutiny, the speaker treats romantic encounters like a market — women are to be sampled for “variety,” echoing consumerist logic. Similarly, in The Great Gatsby, love is often shown as a social transaction. Tom’s relationship with Myrtle is based on dominance; she provides sexual excitement and he offers material luxury. Even Daisy’s marriage to Tom is partly a choice of security over passion. This reflects the same underlying structure as Lovelace’s poem — where love is not about mutual connection but about what the other person provides in terms of gratification or power. Characters in both texts love selfishly, choosing partners who reinforce their status or ego.

2.

Settings as Reflections of Corrupted Love

Lovelace’s speaker romanticises physical conquest, but the language is clinical and empty — love is reduced to “searching” and “spoils,” stripping it of warmth. This detachment is echoed in Fitzgerald’s use of setting to symbolise emotional sterility. The valley of ashes, where Tom and Myrtle conduct their affair, is a bleak, soulless landscape — it reflects the moral decay of love reduced to lust and ownership. Even Gatsby’s lavish mansion, constantly full of strangers, becomes a monument to unfulfilled desire, echoing the emptiness of the speaker’s “variety.” In both texts, the environment reinforces the idea that love has been hollowed out — commodified, transactional, and performative, rather than nourishing or intimate.

TGG - points of similarity to the flea

AO3 - A Song (Absent From Thee) - Earl Of Rochester

• Restoration Era Libertinism:
  Rochester was one of the most notorious libertines of the Restoration court under King Charles II, a period marked by the rejection of Puritan moral restraint after the English Civil War and Interregnum. Libertinism celebrated sexual freedom, wit, and anti-religious scepticism, especially among aristocratic men.

• Masculine Privilege and Sexual Freedom:
  In 17th-century aristocratic culture, male infidelity was not only common but often considered a mark of masculinity and status. Rochester’s speaker reflects this worldview, admitting to sexual wandering but expecting forgiveness and constancy from the woman he addresses.

• Religious Tension and Guilt:
  Though Rochester was known for blasphemy and irreverence, his poetry often reveals a tension between desire and conscience. This mirrors wider Restoration anxieties: the court embraced pleasure, but still lived with the residual weight of Christian morality and fear of damnation, especially after the strict Puritan regime.

• Satirical and Self-Critical Tone Common to Rochester:
  Rochester’s work often presents the libertine figure not as heroic, but as tragically flawed — aware of his moral failure and addicted to self-destructive pleasure. This tone reflects Restoration scepticism: a loss of faith in idealised love, stable morality, or lasting virtue in a cynical, pleasure-seeking society.

• Gender and Double Standards:
  The poem reflects the double standards of the time: while women were expected to remain sexually pure, men were permitted and even encouraged to pursue multiple sexual partners. Yet the speaker’s unease suggests a deeper dissatisfaction with this model, exposing the emotional cost of libertine values.

• Court Culture and the Role of Poetry:
  As a member of the king’s court, Rochester’s poetry was intended for an elite audience. His works often mocked courtly hypocrisy and the gap between public virtue and private vice, using love poetry as a vehicle for both seduction and social critique.

A song absent from thee - points of similarity/comparison to TGG

1.Love as a Conflict Between Physical Desire and Moral Guilt

In A Song (Absent from thee), the speaker is torn between sexual desire and the guilt of betraying a deeper emotional or spiritual connection. He speaks of returning “with shamefaced look” and losing his “everlasting rest” — an allusion to hell, symbolising internal torment. But the guilt doesn’t stop him from straying again. This creates a cycle of indulgence and regret. Similarly, in The Great Gatsby, characters like Tom engage in adultery without real remorse — yet society demands they maintain appearances of respectability. Gatsby, too, seeks a romantic ideal with Daisy while ignoring the moral chaos he contributes to. Both texts reveal a tension between lust and longing for something purer, but ultimately suggest that physical desire often wins — even when it leads to self-destruction.

2.Manipulation of Love to Justify Personal Desires

The speaker in Absent from thee manipulates the language of love to excuse his infidelity — he claims his soul is only at peace with the woman he betrays, even as he openly acknowledges “false” behaviour. Love becomes a rhetorical cover for selfish desire. The annotations around “manipulative tone,” “power in a patriarchal society,” and “threat of religion” point to how he uses emotion and even divine imagery to frame his lust as fate. In The Great Gatsby, Gatsby similarly distorts the idea of love to justify his obsession — he believes Daisy was meant for him and rewrites the past to suit this narrative. Both speakers attempt to elevate selfish desires through the language of destiny, love, or morality, showing how love can be weaponised to mask entitlement and control.

AO3 - The Garden Of Love - Blake

William Blake, from Songs of Experience (1794)

• Romantic Era Context:
  Blake was a key figure in the early Romantic movement, which rejected Enlightenment rationalism and instead emphasised emotion, imagination, nature, and individual freedom. The Garden of Love reflects Romantic concerns about how institutions suppress natural human desires, particularly love and sexuality.

• Critique of Organised Religion:
  Blake was deeply critical of the Church of England, which he saw as repressive and hypocritical. In The Garden of Love, the church becomes a symbol of how religious authority corrupts natural joy and imposes guilt, especially around physical love. This reflects Blake’s wider belief that institutional religion distorts spiritual truth.

• Control of Sexuality and Desire:
  In 18th-century Britain, the Church and wider society placed strong emphasis on sexual purity, marriage, and moral restraint. Blake opposes this view, presenting love and desire as natural, and arguing that religious control leads to psychological repression and emotional decay.

• Innocence vs Experience:
  The poem comes from Songs of Experience, which contrasts with his earlier Songs of Innocence. Blake explores how innocence — including free, unashamed love — is corrupted by the rules, fears, and restrictions imposed by adult society and religious institutions.

• Political and Revolutionary Climate:
  Written during the era of the French Revolution (1789), Blake’s poetry often channels a radical distrust of authority, whether political or religious. The poem’s tone of loss and anger reflects Romantic-era ideas that love and freedom are crushed by the structures of power.

• Blake’s Personal Beliefs:
  Blake was a deeply spiritual thinker but rejected conventional Christianity. He believed that true religion was found in human connection, creative freedom, and love, not dogma or obedience. His poetry often reclaims love as a sacred and liberating force — not something shameful or sinful.

The Garden Of Love - points of similarity to TGG

1.The Destruction of Natural Love by Social Institutions

Blake’s poem mourns how organised religion suppresses natural expressions of love and joy. The speaker returns to a once joyful “Garden of Love” only to find it replaced with a “Chapel,” guarded by a “Thou shalt not” — a clear symbol of institutional repression. The annotations note how “natural world ends in being ‘structured’” and how love is corrupted by control. This echoes The Great Gatsby, where love is often suffocated by societal expectations — especially through marriage. Daisy’s decision to stay with Tom, despite her feelings for Gatsby, reflects how love is constrained by wealth, tradition, and class. Just as Blake’s chapel replaces flowers with tombstones, Gatsby’s dream is buried under the weight of status and social codes. Both texts suggest that love, in its purest form, is destroyed by artificial moral and societal structures.

2.Innocence vs. Experience in Romantic Idealism

Blake presents a fall from innocence: the speaker “used to play” in the Garden of Love, suggesting childhood freedom and unrestrained emotion. But this innocence is lost to death, rules, and “binding with briars” — a painful awakening to the reality that love is policed and punished. In The Great Gatsby, this same disillusionment is mirrored in Gatsby’s tragic journey. His idealistic belief in a perfect reunion with Daisy collapses as he confronts her indecision and the reality of her embeddedness in elite society. Both texts critique idealised or romantic visions of love — Blake through religious imposition, Fitzgerald through social and emotional hypocrisy. The result is the same: love leads not to fulfilment, but to loss, death, or deep disenchantment.

Song (Ae fond kiss) - points of similarity/comparison to TGG

1.

Love as Bittersweet Acceptance vs. Obsessive Refusal to Let Go

In Ae Fond Kiss, the speaker expresses deep sorrow over a parting that feels both tragic and inevitable — “Ae fond kiss, and then we sever.” The poem’s tone is one of bittersweet acceptance: love has failed, but there’s dignity in letting go. The speaker doesn’t blame the woman (“I’ll ne’er blame my partial fancy”) and instead preserves the memory of love through idealisation. This emotional maturity contrasts sharply with Gatsby’s refusal to accept the end of love. He clings to Daisy obsessively, insisting she never loved Tom and that they can return to a perfect past. Where Burns offers grief shaped by realism, Gatsby lives in denial. Both men are heartbroken, but only one is capable of accepting loss — making Burns’s speaker emotionally richer, while Gatsby is tragically blind.

2.

The Elegy of Unfulfilled Love

Ae Fond Kiss is a lyrical lament — structured like a farewell, full of “sighs and groans,” with phrases like “deep in heart-wrung tears I’ll pledge thee.” Love here is presented as noble in its pain, something cherished even in separation. The speaker finds value in the emotional experience itself, even when it brings suffering. In The Great Gatsby, love is also rarely fulfilled — Gatsby’s dream ends in death, Myrtle’s ends in violence, and even Tom and Daisy’s union is hollow. The emotional core of both texts is built on yearning for something unattainable. But while Gatsby’s love is destructive and delusional, Burns presents love as something that can be mourned with grace, suggesting that emotional truth — even in failure — holds its own beauty.