Kinematics - Philippine Sea Plate & Marginal Basins

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/31

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

32 Terms

1
New cards

4.0 km

Depth of South China Sea Basin

2
New cards

Pautot et al. (1986)

2 stages of SCS opening:

  1. 32 - 17 Ma along E-W axis

  2. 20 - 17 Ma along NE-SW axis

3
New cards

Holloway (1982) and Taylor & Hayes (1983)

Model 1 for SCS:

  • put the spreading, the prominent ridge being the Scarborough Ridge, in the basin on a roughly NE-SW direction starting around 32 Ma (Oligocene).

<p>Model 1 for SCS:</p><ul><li><p>put the spreading, the prominent ridge being the Scarborough Ridge, in the basin on a roughly NE-SW direction starting around 32 Ma (Oligocene).</p></li></ul><p></p>
4
New cards

Briais et al. (1993)

Model 2 for SCS:

  • showed a progressive change in the orientation of the spreading system: roughly ENE-WSW from 32-30 Ma (Oligocene) and E-W from 30-27 Ma. By 26-24 Ma, the ridge jumped to the South, and a second basin started forming to the Southwest.

  • suggested that the SCS spreading ceased around 15.5 Ma (Middle Miocene).

5
New cards

Barchausen & Rosser (2002)

Proposed the spreading of SCS ceased somewhat earlier, ~18 Ma.

6
New cards
  • NW sub-basin - ENE-WSW spreading during 32-30 Ma.

  • WE sub-basin - E-W spreading during 30-27 Ma.

  • SW sub-basin - NE-SW spreading 26-24 Ma.

Essentially three sub-basins for the South China Sea according to Briais et al. (1993)

7
New cards

Rangin et al., (1990)

Model 3 for SCS:

  • Trench pull.

  • Gravity-controlled trench-pull may be invoked to explain the rifting and spreading. The subduction along the Sunda Trench may be responsible for the opening of the proto-SCS (and even Celebes Sea) and the subduction of the proto-SCS south of Palawan may in turn explain the South China Sea opening.

<p>Model 3 for SCS:</p><ul><li><p>Trench pull.</p></li><li><p>Gravity-controlled trench-pull may be invoked to explain the rifting and spreading. The subduction along the Sunda Trench may be responsible for the opening of the proto-SCS (and even Celebes Sea) and the subduction of the proto-SCS south of Palawan may in turn explain the South China Sea opening.</p></li></ul><p></p>
8
New cards

Pubellier et al. (2003)

Model 3 for SCS:

  • Trench rollback (Back-arc basin model).

  • Rolls back due to getting longer as it subducts, and initiates spreading.

<p>Model 3 for SCS:</p><ul><li><p>Trench rollback (Back-arc basin model).</p></li><li><p>Rolls back due to getting longer as it subducts, and initiates spreading.</p></li></ul><p></p>
9
New cards

Tapponier et al. (1982; 1986)

Model 4 for SCS:

  • South China Sea opened as a side effect of the extrusion of Indochina

  • Contention: Timing of collision vs. opening of SCS & difficult to reconcile with a N-S spreading of the SCS.

10
New cards

Rangin & Silver (1991)

Characterized SSB:

  • Situated immediately to the southeast of Palawan, this small marginal basin composed of two sub-basins that are separated by an E-NE trending Cagayan de Sulu Ridge (CRS)

  • Formed starting at around ~20 Ma (Early Miocene)

11
New cards

Rangin & Silver (1991) - 2

Model 2 for SSB Formation:

  • The geochemcial signature of the oceanic basement, along with the basin’s position and age correlation with the arc volcanism along the CSR, suggests a back-arc spreading (starting ~20 Ma) origin for the Sulu basin.

  • Arc volcanism along the CSR ceased around 16 ma, following its collission with the rifted margin of China (Palawan Micro-continental block)

<p>Model 2 for SSB Formation:</p><ul><li><p>The geochemcial signature of the oceanic basement, along with the basin’s position and age correlation with the arc volcanism along the CSR, suggests a back-arc spreading (starting ~20 Ma) origin for the Sulu basin. </p></li><li><p>Arc volcanism along the CSR ceased around 16 ma, following its collission with the rifted margin of China (Palawan Micro-continental block)</p></li></ul><p></p>
12
New cards

Rangin & Silver (1991) - 1

Model 1 for SSB Formation:

  • Formed through spreading along the Cagayan de Sulu Ridge (CSR)

  • Discredited. Basins opposite of the Cagayan de Sulu Ridge have different geochemical signature.

  • NW sub-basin- Continental basement

  • SE sub-basin - Oceanic basement

13
New cards
<p>Celebes Sea Basin (CSB)</p>

Celebes Sea Basin (CSB)

Basin located southeast of the Sulu Basin & Sulu-Zamboanga Arc

14
New cards

Lee and McCabe (1986)

Model 1 for CSB formation:

  • a trapped basin mechanism for CSB; could have split off as a basin from a previously larger Molucca Sea Plate.

15
New cards

Silver & Rangin (1991)

Model 2 for CSB formation:

  • a) Fragment of WPB

  • b) Back-arc basin

  • c) basin rifted from the SE continental margin

16
New cards

Hall (1996) and Nichols & Hall (1999)

Model 3 for CSB formation:

  • A fragment of the West Philippine Basin (WPB) of the Philippine Sea Plate.

  • argued that the CSB and WPB formed part of the same ocean basin with similarities in basement age, chemistry and stratigraphy.

17
New cards
<p>West Philippine Basin (WPB)</p>

West Philippine Basin (WPB)

Occupies 50% of the Philippine Sea Plate

18
New cards
<p>Central Basin Fault (Lineament)</p>

Central Basin Fault (Lineament)

Lineament where West Philippine Basin opened

19
New cards

Hilde and Lee (1984)

2 Stages of Opening of the WPB:

  1. 60 and 45 Ma at NE-SW - 4.4 cm/yr half spreading rate

  2. 45 and 35 Ma at NS orientation- 1.8 cm/yr half spreading rate

20
New cards

Trapped Oceanic Basin

by Uyeda and Ben-Avraham (1972), Hilde (1977), Lee (1984)

Model that suggests WPS as a trapped piece of the Pacific Plate during the 43 Ma kinematic reorganization of the Pacific Plate.

21
New cards
<p>Back-Arc Basin Model</p><p>by Karig (1975), Mrozoqki et al. (1982), Seno and Maruyama (1984)</p>

Back-Arc Basin Model

by Karig (1975), Mrozoqki et al. (1982), Seno and Maruyama (1984)

Model stating that WPB formed by back-arc spreading behind the Oki-Daito Ridge.

22
New cards
<p>N-S </p>

N-S

PVSB’s oceanic crust accelerates on a ______ spreading-axis.

23
New cards

Mrowzoski and Hayes (1979); Kobayashi and Nakada (1987):

Model for Opening of PVSB:

  • 1st stage: 30 Ma - Parece Vela

  • 2nd stage: 10 Ma - Shikoku

  • Oceanic accretion stopped at around 17 Ma

24
New cards
<p>Marianas Basin (MB)</p>

Marianas Basin (MB)

Philippine oceanic basin that opens around 6 Ma at a NS spreading axis and still presently active

25
New cards

Ayu Basin

Philippine oceanic basin that is a poorly known portion of the southern extremity of the plate.

26
New cards
<p>Palau-Kyushu Ridge</p>

Palau-Kyushu Ridge

  • Submarine ridge in the PH Sea Plate that divides the WPB and PVSB

  • 2,500 km long

27
New cards

Trapped Basin Model

Model for Palau-Kyushu Ridge:

  • Volcanic arc formed from the transformation of a transform fault to subduction zone at around 43 Ma.

  • Subduction retreated at 30 Ma and stopped, signifying the start of the opening of Parece Vela-Shikoku Basin

28
New cards
<p>Izu-Bonin Ridge</p>

Izu-Bonin Ridge

Submarine ridge in the PH Sea Plate:

  • Eastern limit of Shikoku Basin

  • Volcanic arc of the active Bonin Trench colliding with the Japanese margin - Izu Peninsula in Central Japan

  • West and East Marianas Ridge define limits of Marianas Basin

29
New cards
<p>West Marianas Ridge</p>

West Marianas Ridge

Ancient volcanic arc of the Izu-Bonin Ridge that was active between 20-9 Ma.

30
New cards
<p>East Marianas Ridge</p>

East Marianas Ridge

Volcanic arc of the active Marianas Trench (part of the Izu-Bonin Ridge)

31
New cards
<p>Old-Day Kinematics</p>

Old-Day Kinematics

4 Ma PLATE REORGANIZATION

  • Relative movement changed from NNW to WNW since 5 Ma based on Taiwan collision and lzu-Misira-Boso region of Japan.

  • In Taiwan, at 4 to 6 Ma, 40° CCW.

  • In Japan, at 2 to 3 Ma, 30° CCW.

32
New cards

Present-Day Kinematics

NW DISPLACEMENT DIRECTION

3 Main Kinematic Parameters with respect to Eurasia:

  • 1. Rotation pole located NE of Japan.

  • 2. Relative displacement rate varies from N to S along the western edge of the PSP:

    • 3 cm/yr - Latitude of the Nankai Trough.

    • 9 cm/yr - Southern end of the Philippine Trench.

  • 3. Relative displace direction whose azimuth is directed NS5W near Taiwan with a linear velocity around 7 cm/yr.

<p>NW DISPLACEMENT DIRECTION </p><p>3 Main Kinematic Parameters with respect to Eurasia:</p><ul><li><p>1. Rotation pole located NE of Japan.</p></li><li><p>2. Relative displacement rate varies from N to S along the western edge of the PSP:</p><ul><li><p>3 cm/yr - Latitude of the Nankai Trough.</p></li><li><p>9 cm/yr - Southern end of the Philippine Trench.</p></li></ul></li><li><p>3. Relative displace direction whose azimuth is directed NS5W near Taiwan with a linear velocity around 7 cm/yr.</p></li></ul><p></p>