1/4
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Introduction
Partially agree?
Outbreak of Korean War in 1950/China's intervention in support of North Korea caused United States to adopt a more aggressive containment policy
But recognize the pre-existing context of American foreign policy, characterized by the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan
Impact of Soviet actions in Eastern Europe and rise of global communism played equally significant roles in shaping US strategy
While China's actions helped accelerate an ideological confrontation and militaristic stance, they were part of a broader interaction of factors that collectively dictated US Cold War strategy
China played a crucial but not singular role in this shift, highlighting the complexity of international relations during this period
Agree
Awareness of communist power in Asia caused US focus on Japan - eventually develop Japan’s economic and political stability, military capability and consolidating Japan as us Cold War ally
US strategy: Truman Doctrine, Rolling Thunder (roll back communism in North Korea), Acheson speech (defensive perimeter strategy, built around Japan, Press Club speech), confusion he creates, tries to support nationalists in their civil war, go to Taiwan, US support Chang in Taiwan, stop Chinese invading TaiwanÂ
Recognition of containment not being enough to deal with communist threat - Chinese civil war showed this, US reviewed strategy, produced NSC68 - advocated increased tax to pay for military needs and rejected isolationism, fearing it would leave Europe and Asia vulnerable to soviet expansionism, build up of American conventional and nuclear weapons and rejected preventative war fearing to would lead to soviet retaliation and renewed war
Disagree
China not so important; US knew they were going communist/going South, couldn’t do anything, predictable
Focused on Japan Â
No surprise that the US would focus on Asia's containment without the influence of ChinaÂ
US not putting combat troops there anywayÂ
Korean War: 1950, 38th parallel, showed US how much military capability SU/China had, US setbacks, how to respond to communism, led move away from rollback with more emphasis on military buildup, more assertive stance (massive retaliation)
Other factors
Agree:
Europe’s main focus, pre-KoreaÂ
Truman not connected communist expansion in Europe to expansion in AsiaÂ
- nuclear technology? Soviet Union had successfully detonated their atom bomb by 1952
Disagree:
Defensive perimeter strategy
- Dean Acheson defined US defense strategy in which he identified the areas that the USA saw as critical for defense (Aleutian Islands, Philippines, Japan)
Conclusion
Provide balanced argumentÂ
Support your argumentÂ
Sum up each paragraphÂ