Lesson 2 General Rules of Thumb

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:46 PM on 8/13/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

21 Terms

1
New cards

What can “few” also be diagrammed as?

“Some.” Few can also be diagrammed as “most are not” X—→ most /Y

2
New cards

Can you ever put two somes together?

NO

3
New cards

What is the relationship between “many” and “some” in terms of how they imply each other?

“Many” can imply “some” but NEVER the other way around. In logical arguments, "many" suggests a quantity greater than one, thereby indicating that at least "some" are included.

4
New cards

What kind of arrow do “if and only if” statements have?

a double arrow. This implies that both variables will either exist or not exist at the same time

5
New cards

Can you ever put a “most” statement after an “all” when the sufficient is the bridge variable in common?

NO. A most following an all is a bad argument in this case

6
New cards

What requirements do you need for a good argument when dealing with conditional statements? Which argument template is the exception to this rule?

A good argument MUST have:

  1. A conditional statement (like X—→ Y)

  2. The Bridge variable in common must be the SUFFICIENT condition (X) in common


Argument template #12 is the exception to this rule (it has a double “most,” but since both “mosts” come off the same variable A it is OK):

P: A—(most)—> B

P: A—(most)—> C

C: BsomeC

7
New cards

When you put a “some” in front of an “all” statement, with the sufficient being the bridge variable in common, is this a good or a bad argument?

GOOD argument

8
New cards

When you put an “all” statement in front of a “some,” with the bridge variable being the sufficient, is this a GOOD or BAD argument?

BAD argument. You can never have a some statement following an absolute.

9
New cards

“Some…not” is the same thing as?

“Not all”

10
New cards

Can you turn a most into a some statement?

Yes! But never the other way around!

11
New cards

what is the logical opposite of must be true?

could be false/not necessarily true

12
New cards

what is the logical opposite of must be false?

could be true/not necessarily false

13
New cards

what is the logical opposite of could be true?

must be false/cannot be true

14
New cards

logical opposite of could be false

must be true/cannot be false

15
New cards

logical equivalent of must be true

cannot be false!

16
New cards

logical equivalent of must be false?

cannot be true!

17
New cards

logical equivalent of could be true?

not necessarily false

18
New cards

logical equivalent of could be false

not necessarily true

19
New cards

logical equivalent of not necessarily true?

could be false

20
New cards

logical equivalent of not necessarily false

could be true

21
New cards

are “some…not” statements reversible?

NO. Saying “Some fruits are not apples” does not equal the statement “some apples are not fruits”