1/127
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Types of Co-Ownership
Joint tenancy
tenancy by entirety
tenancy in common
Devisable
pass by will
Descendible
pass w/out will → intestacy
Joint Tenancy
w/ right of survivorship
when 1 JT dies, share auto passes to surviving JT
Alinable inter vinos → can transfer interest during lifetime
not Devisable (pass by will) or Descentible (pass by intestastcy)
How to create Joint Tenancy
4 Unities T-TIP→ JT’s must take interests
1) @ same Time
2) by same Title or instrument
3) getting Identical equal interest
4) w/ right to Possess the whole
+ must contain a clear expression of right of survivorship
How to Sever Joint Tenancy
“SAP” → Sale and Partition
Sale: JT can sell/transfer during life w/out notice to others → severs JT and B becomes Tenant in common with any others
Partition: (also for tenancy in common)
Voluntary, Amicable Agreement; or
Judicial Action: only if in best interst of all
Partition in Kind: (usually for big land)
physical division of property
Forced Sale: (usually for one building)
sell proceeds divided equal
Does a mortage/lien sever a JT?
Does a JT murdering another sever JT?
Majority view: Mortages/liens do not sever
minority does sever
Murder turns JT into tenancy in common
Tenancy by Entirety
martial estate w/ right of survivorship
can only be created b/w married partners → feircely protected
How to create Tenancy by Entirety
arises presumptively in any conveyance to married partners
unless grant clearly states otherwise
Protections of a Tenancy by Entirety
creditors, sales, liens
Creditor of 1 spouse can’t touch
1 spouse can’t transfer/sell w/out other
1 spouse can’t encumber w/out other
Ways to sever a Tenancy by the Entirety
death,
divorce (becomes tenancy in common),
mutual agreement,
creditor of both spouses can execute on property
Tenancy in Common
no right of survivorship
each co-tenany owns individual part and has right to possess whole of own itnerest
each interest devisable, descendible, alienable
Rights and Duties of Co-Tenants regarding Posession
Each co-tenant has right to possess whole/all portion of the property
right to use & enjoy whole but no right to exclusive possesion of any part
% of ownership share DOES NOT MATTER for possession rights
Ouster
wrongful exclusion of a co-owner from possession
Rights and Duties of Co-Tenants regarding Rent
rent of co-tenant to another
renting to 3rd Party
co-tenant in exclusive possession not liable for rent
unless ouster present
if rent out to 3rd party → Co-tenant must account his co-tenants based on ownership interest %
“account” = share profits gained
Rights and Duties of Co-Tenants regarding Adverse Possession
Co-tenant in exclusive possession can’t Adversely possess b/c never considered hostile
unless ouster then may be hostile
Rights and Duties of Co-Tenants regarding Carrying Costs
These are mortagage payments, tax payments etc.
each must pay based on % ownership
Rights and Duties of Co-Tenants regarding Repairs
Repairing co-tenant has right to contribution for reasonable, necessary repairs → based on % ownership
Must give notice to other co-owners of need for repairs (prior to repair)
Rights and Duties of Co-Tenants regarding Improvements
Co-tenant has no right to contribution for costs of improvements during co-tenancy
@ partition → improver gets value (or losses value) of any increase (or loss) that her unilateral change caused
Rights and Duties of Co-Tenants regarding Waste
Types of Waste
Co-tenant must not commit Waste
Voluntary Waste: willful destruction
Permissive Waste: neglect
Ameliorative Waste: changes that increased value but made w/out permission
think sentimental value
Rights and Duties of Co-Tenants regarding Encumberances
JT or tenant in common may encummber own interest in own share w/ mortage or lien BUT it won’t affect other co-owners interest
T in common: can only foreclose on mortaging co-tenants interest
JT:
mortage won’t sever JT but foreclosure sale will
if mortaging tenant dies → lien dies with him
What’s a leasehold
estate in land where tenant has present possessory interest and LL has future interests (reversion)
Types of Leasehold Estates
Tenancy for Years
Periodic Tenancy
Tenancy At Will
Tenancy at Sufferance
Tenancy for Years define
termination?
Writing?
(also knowns as: estate for years; term of years)
Lease for a fixed determined period of time
Termination:
a) Ends automatically @ termination date
no notice required
b) Termination upon Breach of Lease Covenant
c) Termination upon LL’s Acceptance of Tenant’s Surrender
Writing: Follow SoF → Lease over 1 year must be in writing
The Periodic Tenancy define
creation
“continuous until properly terminated”
lease that continues for successive intervals until either LL or tenant give proper notice of termination
ex. month to month lease
Creation
a) Express: “To T from month to month”
b) Implied: payment of rent @ set intervals no duration
Oral term of years violating SoF → implied based on how rent paid
“hold over”: LL keeps T who wronguflly stayed past OG lease
commercial → year to year
residential → month to month
Periodic Tenancy
termination
Termination: Notice
Give proper notice @ least equal to lenght of given interval (unless agreed otherwise)
week to week → 1 week notice
year to year → 1 month under Restatement ; 6 months under common law
Note: notice must be timed to terminte @ end of natural period
Tenancy at Will define
creation
lease w/ no fixed duration & terminable @ will of either party
Creation
Expressly agree to make terminatable @ will
if no explicit agreement, regular payments create periodic tenancy
Tenancy at Will
termination
a) theoretically @ any time by either party
b) most states require reasonable notice
Tenancy at Sufferance
creation & termination
lease created when T wrongfully holds over past expiration of lease
Creation: T holds over - give L a way to recover rent
Termination: short lived
evict T
hold T to new periodic tenancy based on old lease but not > year to year
Tenant’s Duties List
1) Duty to Repair
2) Duty to Pay Rent
3) Duty to not use premises for illegal purposes
Tenants Duty to Repair
when lease is silent → T must “maintain premises”
routine repairs other than ordinary wear and tear
duty expressly in lease (destruction) →
Common Law: T responsible for restoration of leased premises if force of nature
Majority View: T may end lease when premises destroyed w/out fault
more enforceable in nonresidential context
Duty to Pay Rent
L’s rights when T breach in possession vs out of possession
T breaches + still in possession →
evict through courts;
NO SELF HELP
continue relationship & sue for rent;
T breaches + out of possession → “S.I.R.”
Surrender : end lease
Ignore : (Minority) hold T responsible for rent
Relet: (Majority) hold T liable for deficiency after
Rent Deposit go where? how much?
usually restricted to 1 month rent
require L to put into interest bearing account → cannot be prevented through lease
What happens if gov takes a leased property?
If taking permanent → terminate lease
If taking partial/temporary → share $, keep lease
Landlord Duties
1) Duty to deliver (actual) possession (@ start of leasehold)
2) Implied Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment
3) Implied Warranty of Habitability
4) Anti- Discrimintation Legilation
no right to retaliate for reporting a violation
Implied Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment
in EVERY residential and commercial lease:
T has a right to quiet use and enjoyment of premises w/out interference from LL
Implied Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment:
Ways to Breach + T’s remedies
a) Wrongful Eviction: L excludes T from whole or part of premises
Actual Eviction: whole-terminate T’s obligation to pay rent
Partial: Terminates T’s duty to pay rent for entire premises
b) Constructive Eviction: L renders premises unsuitable for occupancy - “S.I.N.G.”
Subsantial Interference: chronic/permanent problem attributable to L’s actions/failure to act
Notice: T must give L notice of the problem & L must fail to meaningfully repond w/in reasonable time
Goodbye: Get out! T must vacate w/in reasonable time after L fails to fix the problem
Then → T may terminate lease & seek damages
Implied Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment: LL liability for other tenants acts?
Generally not liable but:
LL has duty to abate nuisance on site
LL must control common areas
Implied Warranty of Habilitability
Implied in every residential lease NOT commercial
Premises must be fit for basic human habitation (bare living requirements) ~ running water, heat, plumbing etc.
standard determined by case law + housing code
Implied Warranty of Habilitability: T options @ breach
“MR.3”
Move
Repair and Deduct
Reduce or Withhold Rent
Remain and Seek Damages
LL duty w/ Anti-Discrimination Legislation
a) Civil Rights Act: no racial/ethnic discrimination in sale/rent
b) Fair Housing Act: protects T and prospective T from discrimination based on: race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, familial status
Exceptions: THESE DON’T APPLY TO ADs THO
Owner-occupied buildings w/ 4 or less units
Single family homes sold/rented by O who owns 3 or less single family homes
Regarding Disability → LL must permit T to make reaonsbaly accomodations for disabilities
Transfers of Leaseholds- Allowed? Types?
T may freely transfer interest in whole (assignment) or in part (sublease)
but Lease can expressly and specifically prohibit OR may require prior written approval
But if LL consent to 1 type of transfer, waive right to object to a future transfer by T → unless LL explicitly reserves
Assignment of Leasehold
Transferring interest in whole
Assignee (T2) and LL now in “privity of estate”
LL and T1 remain in “privity of contract”
LL and T2 NOT in “privity of contract”
Thus, LL can go after who has priv of K IF priv of estate person doesn’t work out (insolvent/fled)
(LL-Tenant Law) “privity of estate” product of what? does what?
possession ← whoever has possession has this
makes each liable on all promises/covenants in OG lease that run w/ the land (“of and pertaining to” leasehold interest)
(LL-Tenant Law) “privity of contract” product of what? does what?
whoeever signed OG lease/K has this
makes them secondarily liable to each other → if T2 insolvent or fled, T1 liable through privity of K to LL
When do leasehold covenants “run w/ land” ?
if
OG parties enter lease and intent it to &
covenant “touches and concerns” the land
meaning → benefit one and burden the other
ex. rent duty runs w/ land
Sublease of Leasehold
Transferring interest in part
Typically → Subleasee is tenant of (OG) T1 → pays rent to them NOT to the LL
(unless subleasee expressly assumes covenant)
Privities
LL and Subleasee not in privity of anything
LL and T1 privity in-tact
Problem
Subleasee sue T1 → T1 sue LL
Exception: Residential Subleasee may enforce implied W of habitability against LL on own
LL may terminate main lease → which terminates sublease
Assignments by Landlord
LL may assign rents/reversion interest they own ← usually by deed
T consent not required
Attornment: T & L retain all benefits/burdens running w/ land
LL Tort Liabilities + Duties → Common Law
Generally, No Duty to make premises safe
EXCEPT “C.L.A.P.S.”
Common Areas: Reasonable care in maintaining
Latent Defects: Duty to warn T of hidden defects
Assumption of Repairs: if undertake → reasonable completion
Public use Rule: LL short-term lease public space→ liable for harm from significant defects
Short-term Lease of furnishes dwelling: liable for any defects proximately injuring T
LL Tort Liabilities + Duties → Modern Trend
There’s a general duty of reasonable care
LL owes general duty of reasonable care toward residential T → liable for tort injuries resulting from ordinary negligence if:
LL had notice + opportunity to repair
LL presumed to have notice for things beofre T took possession but not after unless reasonable should have known/knew
LL has statutory duty to repair → liable for failure/negligent repairs
LL must maintain advertized security features or comply w/ security related code
Servitudes
Easements
Covenants (+ Equitable Servitude)
Profits and Licenses
What is an easement and what types of easements exist
grant of a nonpossessory property interest that entitles its holder to a limtied form of use/enjoyment of another’s land
Affirmative vs Negative
Appurtenant vs In Gross
Affirmative vs Negative Easement
Affirmative: Right to go out and do something on another’s parcel
Negative: Right of holder to PREVENT servient landowner from doing something that’s otherwise permissible
4 categories of negative easements → “L.A.S.S.”
SVLASW
Light
Air
Support
Stream of Water from artificial flow
Some states → Scenic View
Sassy Vampires Love a Spooky Weekend
Appurtenant Easement
Benefits holder in use/enjoyment of own land (appurtenant to = “of benefit to”)
2 parcels of land must be involved
Dominant Tenement → derives benefit
Servient Tenenment → bears burden
Easement In Gross
Holder has personal or commercial advantage not linked to use/enjoyment of holder’s land
easement holder may not even own land
ONLY 1 Land invovled → servient/burdened land / no dominant tenement
ex. right to place billboard on another’s land; right to swim in neighbor’s pond; lay power lines
Transferability of Easements
Appurtenant
In Gross
App:
benefit passes automatically w/ dominant tenement regardless of mention in grant of transfer
burden passes automatically UNLESS owner is B.F.P. w/o notice
~ rules diff because usually only one pass at a time
In Gross: Not transferable UNLESS for commercial purposes
considered “personal” to its owner
Ways to Create Easements
P.I.N.G.
Perscription: need all 4 requirements (COAH)
Continuous: uninterrupted use for given statute’s period
Open and Notorious: must be visible
Actual:
Hostile: w/o servient owner’s permission
NO NEED TO BE EXCLUSIVE (unlike Ad. Poss.)
Implication: from pre-existing use or w/out
From Pre-existing use
use prior to divison had to be apparent and continuous
parties must have reasoably expect prior use would endure
W/out any existing use
Subdivision plat → B gets implied easement to use street to access lot
Profit a Prende → impled E to pass over surface of servient land and use as reasonably necessary to extract mineral/resources as specified
Necessity: implied when owner conveys portion of her land w/ no way out except over some part of grantor’s remaining land
Grant: most common - “deed of easement”
In writing- signed by holder of servient tenenment
unless no SoF issue
writing must comply w/ requirements of deed
Scope of Easements determined how?
burden of repair?
by grant or conditions that created it
if not specified → reasonably imply sufficient scope
unilateral expansion not allowed
Sole easement holders have burden to repair
if both are users → split costs
Termination of Easements
“E.N.D. C.R.A.M.P.”
a) Estoppel: materially changing position on reasonable reliance on E holder’s assurances that easement no longer enforced
b) Necessity: easements created by necessity end when necessity ends UNLESS in writing
c) Destruction: of servient land UNLESS due to willful conduct of servient owner
d) Condemnation: of servient land by gov.
e) Release: in writing by E holder given to servient owner
f) Abandonment: E holder shows intent to never use again through physical action
non-use or mere oral reps NOT ENOUGH
g) Merger: when title in easement and title to servient land held by same entity
h) Prescription: meeting COAH by servient owner if servient owner is interfereing w/ easement holders right to use/enjoyment
Common/Shared Easements:
examples - called what?
owned by who?
rights to it?
creation?
running w/ land?
Wall erected partly on property of both adjoining land owners will be owned by each to the extent its in their land
implied a “mutual cross-easement of support”
Each party can use wall/driverway and neither can unilaterally destory it
Can be created by:
Written agreement in in SoF;
implied or prescription
Get irrevocable license from detrimental reliance
Burden and Benefits run w/ land if agree to mutually maintain it
Licenses defined
revocability
transferability
Servitude
Mere privilege to enter another’s land for narrow/delineated purpose
freely revocable @ will of licensor unless estoppel applies
license w/ interest irrevocable as long as interest lasts
personal and cannot be transferred ← attempt to do so will result in revocation by operation of law
Creation of License
information, no writing requirements (not subject to SoF)
an oral easement thats greater than a year auto creates license
Most commonly seen in:
Ticket cases (ex. tickets to sporting event)
Neighbors talking by the fence
What happens when licensee reasonable relies on license?
When licensee has invested substantial money or labor or both in reasonable reliance on licenses’s continuation → creates easement by estoppel until reimbursed
Profits
creation and termination
Type of Servitude
Non-possessory property interest that entitles holder to enter servient land and take its resources
Can be appurtenant or in gross.
Creation: Same as easements “PING”
Termination: Same as Easements ““E.N.D. C.R.A.M.P.”
Also can be extinguished through “surcharge” ← misuse that overly burdens servient estate
Restrictive Covenants defined
Type of servitude
written promise to do or not do something related to land
NOT property interest → just contractual limitation
Restrictive Covenants Types
Negative “Restrictive Covenants” → promises to refrain from doing something
Affirmative → "promise to do something related to land
Steps to determine whether Restrictive Covenants Run w/ Land
When a covenant runs w/ land it binds successors to the OG covenanting parties
Steps to determine Whether it runs w/ land:
1) Note benefitted side - note burdened side
2) Does burden bind to successor? → See “W.I.T.H.N.”
3) Does benefit bind to successor? → See “W.I.T.V.”
Restrictive Covenant: Requirements for a Burden to Run w/ land
1) Writing: OG Promise b/w OG parties (Burdened A1 & Benefitted B1) must have been in writing
2) Intent: A1 and B1 must have intended covenants would run (generally implied)
3) Touch & Concern: the promise must affect the parties in their use and enjoyment of their land
benefits one and burden the other
4) Horizontal & Vertical Privity: both needed
Horizontal → requires OG parties A1 and B1 have shared some interest in land independent of covenant @ time promise was made
ex. grantor-grantee, LL-tenant relationships
Vertical → OG burderened (A1) and successor in interest (A2) have a non-hostile nexus
really only absetn if A2 got through adverse possession
5) Notice: Burdened A2 (successor) needs notice (actual, inquiry or record) of covenant/promise when she took
Restrictive Covenant: Requirements for a Benefit to Run w/ land
easier analysis
1) Writing: OG Promise in writing
2) Intent: that covenant would run
3) Touch & Concern: same analysis
4) Vertical Privity: ONLY
Vertical → OG benefitted (B1) and successor in interest (B2) have a non-hostile nexus
Covenant vs Equitable Servitude
A single promise can create both a covenant and E.S → so comes down to the basis of relief sough
Covenant runnning w/ land anaylsis→ if you want $ dmgs
E.S analysis → if you want injunction
What is equitable servitude? What does it require for analysis?
technically a covenant
promise that equity will enforce against successors regardles of whether it runs w/ land
Requirements for Granting Injunction (T.W.I.N.)
Writing; Intent; Touch & Concern; Notice
Writing has Common Scheme Exception
NO PRIVITY
Equitable Servitude Exception to Writing Requirement
Implied Equitable Servitude / General Common Scheme Doctrine → Applied when selling “lots” of land where some lots have covenant and others don’t AND there’s a common scheme
Non-restricted lots will get an “implied reciprocal negative servitude” to hold them to the terms of the restriction even not in writing in their deed IF:
i) when sales began → subdivider has general/common scheme of development which included D’s lot; and
ii) D had some form of notice (a,i,r) when D took
Equitable Defenses to Enforcement of Equitable Servitude
a) Changed Conditions → when there’s such significant to where entire character of neighborhood changed that enforcement would be inquitable
b) Unclean Hands → party seeking enforcement is violating same covenant on own parcel
c) Benefitted Party wrongfully acquired
d) Estoppel → Benefitted Party acted as reasonably person believing covenant abandoned or waived
e) Failure to bring suit w/in reasonable time (laches)
Ways to terminate:
Covenants?
Equitable Servitudes?
Both: “MR Cow”
a) written release from benefit holders
b) merger
c) condemnation of burdened party
Adverse possession + elements
Possession for a set statutory time can ripen into title if elements are met (“OCEAN” + H) → will auto get title after meeting elements, can abandon after statutory period and will retain title
Open and Notorious: visible, obvious enough to put owner on notice
Continuous: uninterrupted use of typical type- can use tacking
Actual: gain title only to as much as physicall occupy
unless “color of title”
Exclusive: not sharing w/ rightful owner or public
Hostile: “Claim of Right” w/o owner’s consent
When does Statute of limitation begin to run for adverse possession?
when true owner can 1st bring suit
“Color of Title”
Adverse Possession entered by invalid deed → deemed in constructive possession of all land deed described not just what was physically occupied
When is adverse possession put into chain of possession?
only if sue for quiet title for Adverse Possession
Tacking
adverse possessor may tack on to predecessor’s time as to meat statutory time requirment as long as there is privity b/w them
priv. satisfied by any non-hostile nexus b/w possessors
ouster defeats privity
Will Statue of Limitations for Adverse Possession run against a holder of a future estate?
not until it becomes possessory / until right is asserted by grantory
will a covenant run through adverse possession?
Yes, but only if the adverse possessor complied with it
What’s the process for the conveyance - purchase/sale of real estate?
2-step process
Step 1: Land K → conveys equitable title; K law applies; dies @ closing
Step 2: Closing → deed conveys legal title and becomes the operative document; Property law applies
Time b/w lank K and closing = escrow
Land Sale Contracts Requirements
USE K LAW SO:
Statute of Frauds applies:
K must be signed by party being sued
must ID parties, desribe property, include price or means to determine price
if size of land overstated → specific performance w/ pro rata reduction in price
Exception to SoF → allow oral K enforcement: Part Performance
oral K must be certain & clear; and
Acts of B’s Partial Performance clearly prove existince of K (at least 2 of these required)
took possession of property;
paid purchase price or significant portion of price;
made substantial improvements
Land Sale Contracts- what effect does it have on:
destruction/loss risk
death of a party in escrow
B = equitable owner of land | S has right to personal property (the proceeds of the sale)
Destruction/Loss if no fault of either party
B bears risk of loss UNLESS K says otherwise
S must credit any insurance proceeds
Death of Party
B dies → pass equitable title to estate
S dies → pass interest (right to purchase price) to estate, must still sell to B
specifically interest goes to the beneficiary of personal property
Implied Promises in Land Sale Ks (List)
1) S will provide Marketable Title @ closing date
2) S will not make false statements of material fact
Note: No implied W of fitness or habitability UNLESS it’s sale of a newly constructed home → then builder warrants these
Land Sale Ks → Marketable Title
Title is free from reasonable doubt (litigation/threat of lawsuit)
Considered unmarketable if:
Defect in chain of title (ex. adverse possession)
S must provide “Good Record Title”
Burdensome Encumberances - unless waived
covenants, liens, mortagages
Zoning Violation
mere present of zoning scheme not enough but if property violates a zoning ordinance then unmarketable
Land Sale Ks → False Statements of Material Fact
S liable for all material ommission of latent defects
~ can’t disclaim this
Liable for failure to disclose if:
S knew or had reason to of the defects
S realized B unlikely to discover defects; and
Defect must be serious enough for B to reconsider purchase
“Time of Essense” in Land Sales K
Generally time is NOT of essense in land sales K → closing date is not binding ~ just needs to be w/in reasonable time
BUT will be liable if:
K states it is;
circumstances indivate an intent for it; or
one party gives other notice it is
Can Seller of Land retain liquidated damages?
Yes, if reasonable
Closing → Deeds Requirements
“LEAD” → Deed passing legal title must be:
Lawfully executed; AND
in Writing - signed by Grantor
unambiguous description of land
can use parole evidence rule to clear
if insufficient grantor retains title
ID parties by name or description
may fill this in to make valid
Include words of intent to transfer (ex. grant)
Delivered
May be physical transfer → but not required
Ask: Did Grantor have present intent to be bound?
extrinsic evidence allowed to show
Acceptance presumed- but express rejection defeats delivery
any oral condition unproveable & unenforceable
Closing Deed Delivery through 3rd Party Rules
valid if instruction to deliver are included
conditions allowed → once met title passes
grantor bound by his own written instructions to 3rd P
Delivery to a donee → if condition is death, grantor can’t get deed back
Types of Deeds
1) Quitclaim Deeds
2) General Warranty Deeds
3) Special Warranty Deeds
“Covenants for Title” in Quit Claim Deeds
no covenants for titel - not even promising grantor has title to convey
worst deed
“Covenants for Title” in General Warranty Deeds
Best Deed → warrants against ALL defects in title, incuding those by grantor’s predecessors
Contrains all 6 covenants, present and future
Present:
Covenant of Seisin
Covenant of right to convey
Covenant against encumberances
Future:
Covenant of Quiet enjoyment
Covenant of Warranty
Covenants for further Assurances
All the “covenants for title” that can be found in deeds
Present: only can be breached @ time of deed delivery
Covenant of Seisin:
Grantor owns both title and possession of estate
Covenant of right to convey:
Grantor has power to make converyance
Covenant against encumberances:
no encroachments, servitudes, liens on land (even if visible to Buyer)
Future: run w/ land
Covenant of Quiet enjoyment:
No 3rd party lawful claims of title
Covenant of Warranty:
Grantor will defend against reasonable claims of superior title brough by 3rd Ps and compensate for any loss subtained by the claim
Covenants for further Assurances:
Grantor will do whatever to perfect title
“Covenants for Title” in Special Warranty Deeds
Same as general deed but warrants only on behalf of SELF → NOT predecessors
Contrains all 6 covenants, present and future
Present:
Covenant of Seisin
Covenant of right to convey
Covenant against encumberances
Future:
Covenant of Quiet enjoyment
Covenant of Warranty
Covenants for further Assurances
Defective Deeds - Types?
a) Void deeds → forged, never delivered, issued by nonexistent grantee
will be set aside by court even if BFP
b) Voidable Deeds → executed by minors, incapacited persons, duress, undue influecne, mistake
set aside UNLESS already passed to BFP
Conflict of Law for Property? what law applies to conveyance of land/
Real property → Law of state where property located
Will issues → Law of state of domicile @ death
When the same parcel is conveyed to multiple people → who wins?
Recording Acts determine → any interest in land can be recorded which gives notice to the world that title transferred
Types of Recording Acts and how to win in each
1) Race Juridction: whoever records 1st wins
2) Notice Jurisdiction: last B.F.P. to take wins
3) Race-Notice Jurisdiction: first B.F.P. to record wins