Logic and Critical Thinking Unit Seven: Argument in Logic (II)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/26

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

These flashcards cover the definitions and categories of deductive and inductive arguments, specific argumentative forms, and the criteria for evaluating arguments including validity, soundness, strength, and cogency.

Last updated 8:31 AM on 8/18/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

27 Terms

1
New cards

Conclusion

A claim—some statement of fact or opinion—that represents the point an argument is trying to make.

2
New cards

Premises

Supporting lines of reasoning that provide evidence or reasons related to a claim.

3
New cards

Deductive Argument

An argument whose conclusion is claimed to follow from its premises with absolute necessity or conclusive grounds.

4
New cards

Inductive Argument

An argument that claims its premises provide some degree of probability, but not certainty, to its conclusion.

5
New cards

Deductive Indicator Words

Words that suggest a deductive argument, such as "certainly," "necessarily," "absolutely," and "definitely."

6
New cards

Inductive Indicator Words

Words that suggest an inductive argument, such as "probable," "improbable," "plausible," "implausible," "likely," "unlikely," and "reasonable to conclude."

7
New cards

Argument based on Mathematics

A deductive argument in which the conclusion depends on some purely arithmetic or geometric computation or measurement.

8
New cards

Argument based on Definition

A deductive argument where the conclusion is claimed to depend merely on the definition of some word or phrase used in the premise or conclusion.

9
New cards

Syllogism

A deductive argument consisting of exactly two premises and one conclusion.

10
New cards

Modus Ponens

A deductive form also known as affirming the antecedent: If A then BIf\ A\ then\ B; AA; Therefore, BB.

11
New cards

Modus Tollens

A deductive form also known as denying the consequent: If A then BIf\ A\ then\ B; Not BNot\ B; Therefore, not Anot\ A.

12
New cards

Hypothetical Syllogism

A syllogism having a conditional statement for one or both of its premises, following the form: If A then BIf\ A\ then\ B; If B then CIf\ B\ then\ C; Therefore, if A then Cif\ A\ then\ C.

13
New cards

Disjunctive Syllogism

A syllogism containing a disjunctive statement (an "either… or" statement).

14
New cards

Prediction

An inductive argument that proceeds from knowledge of the past to a claim about the future.

15
New cards

Argument from Analogy

An inductive argument that depends on the existence of a similarity between two things or states of affairs to conclude that a condition affecting one also affects the other.

16
New cards

Inductive Generalization

An argument that proceeds from the knowledge of a selected sample to some claim about the whole group.

17
New cards

Argument from Authority

An inductive argument in which the conclusion rests upon a statement made by some presumed authority or witness.

18
New cards

Argument based on Signs

An inductive argument that proceeds from the knowledge of a certain sign to the knowledge of the thing or situation that the sign symbolizes.

19
New cards

Causal Inference

An inductive argument that proceeds from the knowledge of a cause to an effect, or conversely, from an effect to a cause.

20
New cards

Valid Deductive Argument

An argument in which it is necessary that, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true.

21
New cards

Invalid Deductive Argument

An argument where, even if the premises are assumed true, it is possible for the conclusion to be false.

22
New cards

Sound Argument

A deductive argument that is both valid and has all true premises (Sound Argument=A valid argument+All true premisesSound\ Argument = A\ valid\ argument + All\ true\ premises).

23
New cards

Unsound Argument

A deductive argument that is either invalid, or valid with one or more false premises.

24
New cards

Strong Inductive Argument

An inductive argument where the premises provide significant support, making it probable that the conclusion is true.

25
New cards

Weak Inductive Argument

An inductive argument where the premises do not provide enough support to make the conclusion probable.

26
New cards

Cogent Argument

An inductive argument that is strong and has all true premises (Cogent Argument=A strong argument+All true premisesCogent\ Argument = A\ strong\ argument + All\ true\ premises).

27
New cards

Uncogent Argument

An inductive argument that is either weak, or strong with one or more false premises.