1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Aim
investigate whether children imitate aggression of a model in the absence of the model
investigate whether children are more likely to imitate the behavior of a same-sex model
Methodology
experiment
72 children: aggressive model (female- 6 boys, 6 girls; male- 6 boys, 6 girls) , non-aggressive model (female- 6 boys, 6 girls; male- 6 boys, 6 girls) , 24 saw no model
Procedure
initially taken to a room with attractive toys, told they could play, then when engaged told they toys were being reserved and they couldn’t play (inducing aggression arousal)
taken to room w/ table, chair, tinker toys, mallet, and Bobo doll
in the non-aggressive condition the model played with tinker toys and ignored doll
in aggressive condition model focused on doll for 9 min, punched, hit with mallet, threw, kicked, verbally aggressive
child then taken to game room and observed for 20 minutes
game room contained same toys incl. doll, plus dart guns and non-aggressive toys
behavioral checklist was used
Results
participants were very likely to model aggression
boys were more likely to imitate aggression esp. if model was male; girls more likely to imitate verbal aggression esp. if model was female
non-aggressive group showed twice as much non-aggressive play
Strengths
standardisation, inter-observer reliability- inter-rater reliability
matched aggression level
quantitative data
Weaknesses
psychological distress (ethical)
only 2 models, doesn’t guarantee children imitated solely because of sex
main observer was also a model (subjective)
not generalisable, not a mundane context and small sample