Why did countries in the Empire want independence in the 1950s?

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/12

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

13 Terms

1
New cards

colony

a territory that is controlled and governed by a foreign power, often established for economic exploitation and strategic advantage.

typically lacked self-governance and were subject to the political and economic systems of the colonizing country.

2
New cards

nationalism

A political ideology that promotes the interests of a particular nation, often leading to the desire for independence from colonial rule.

3
New cards

colonial nationalism

A form of nationalism that arises in colonized countries, emphasizing self-determination and independence from colonial powers.

4
New cards

crown dominions

countries in the commonwealth that recognise the Queen e.g. Australia

5
New cards

republican dominions

countries in the Commonwealth that do not recognise the Queen e.g. India and Pakistan

6
New cards

what impact did WW2 have on imperial policy

  1. Singapore, Hong Kong and Malaya were occupied by the Japanese in 1942 – Britain was worried about her Empire depleting.

  2. We know there is evidence of exploitation of colonies for resources and production to help with the war e.g. Bengali famine. Farmers in Kenya were forced to sell crops at a fixed, low price.

  3. UN was formed who was officially opposed to colonialism – pressure from the 2 world superpowers to decolonise.

  4. Mediterranean strategy during the war nearly cost the alliance!

  5. Commonwealth developed by post-war governments. The idea was that after decolonisation, countries would join the Commonwealth and continue to trade with Britain

7
New cards

reasons for colonial nationalist rising already

8
New cards

case study: India

  1. We are already aware of Churchill’s outspoken views on India in the 1930s.

  2. The Government of India Act 1935 had promised self government for India. Any foreign/defence policy was still controlled by a British administrator.

  3. India was vulnerable to Japanese attack by 1942. Britain declared war on Germany on India’s behalf – the Indian government was angry that they had not been consulted on this decision.

  4. The British government promised India post-war independence and self-governance. India became heavily reliant on American loans.

  5. British views were that India was too much hassle by 1947 and that parts of Africa were more flexible and adaptable.

  6. Lord Mountbatten visited in 1947 to confirm the independence of India and Pakistan as two states. Britain no longer could control foreign/defence policy in India

9
New cards

why does colonial nationalism rise

Reason

Summarise

Make a judgment – how important was this

Impact of WW2

WW2 exposed Britain's vulnerability. Japanese occupation of British colonies in Asia showed they could be defeated. Britain’s allies (USA & USSR) were anti-imperialist, and the creation of the UN in 1945 further pressured Britain to decolonise. Exploitation during the war (e.g. Bengal famine, fixed crop prices in Kenya) fuelled resentment. India used Britain’s weakened post-war position to push for independence.

Very important – Undermined British power both militarily and morally. Encouraged nationalist leaders, created resentment, and shifted international norms.

Economic weakness

Britain faced £2 billion a year in debt after the war. Reliant on US loans and Marshall Aid. Post-war Labour reforms (e.g. NHS) made empire maintenance too expensive. The Colonial Development Corporation (CDC) aimed to improve conditions but often created resentment due to corporate profits and impact on local livelihoods. Economic needs pushed Britain to seek cheaper ways of managing empire.

Important – Britain couldn’t afford to maintain control. Although development was attempted, economic strain led to retreat and fueled dissatisfaction.

Impact of Cold War

US initially wanted Britain to maintain order in colonies to prevent Soviet influence. However, global pressure — especially from the UN and other white European countries — criticised Britain’s imperialism. Britain struggled with increasing unrest (e.g. Egypt). The Cold War made anti-colonialism more prominent, especially as Britain failed to effectively manage nationalist resistance.

Moderately important – Cold War geopolitics influenced Britain’s decisions, but economic decline and post-war shifts were more decisive for nationalism’s rise.

10
New cards

if the UN didn’t exist, would Britain still have parts of her Empire intact?

Without the UN's influence, Britain might have retained some territories longer due to reduced international pressure for decolonization.

11
New cards

causes of India problem

Britain weakened by WW2

Rise of Indian nationalism

Religious tensions between Hindus & Muslims

Changing British politics

Global pressure & UN influence

12
New cards

events of India problem

Economic and military exhaustion made it harder to suppress demands for independence

Quit India Movement (1942) led by Gandhi and Nehru rejected cooperation with Britain

Muslim League demanded a separate state (Pakistan); growing communal violence

Attlee’s Labour government elected in 1945; appointed Mountbatten to manage independence

Britain came under criticism for its imperialism; US and UN favoured self-determination

13
New cards

consequences of India problem

Britain recognised it couldn’t maintain empire — opened door for negotiations with Indian leaders

British authority was undermined; mass arrests backfired and increased Indian unity against colonial rule

Britain feared civil war and saw Partition as the only way to avoid prolonged conflict

Political will shifted to decolonisation; rapid plans made for British withdrawal

Diplomatic pressure contributed to Britain’s decision to decolonise sooner rather than risk international backlash